❄️ Snowflake Nethilia / Tasha Campbell - Doll-sperg with a social-justice twist

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Screen Shot 2017-09-03 at 1.26.45 PM.png

Liking TV shows is an indication of homosexuality. (On her main blog she describes herself as a lesbian with a husband, which makes a whole lot of sense.)

What is it with social justice types and the word 'queer'. It's a slur and it kinda irritates me to see it everywhere.
 
To be fair, the offensiveness of queer varies with the person or community. In my college's LGBT community queer was used everywhere. I wouldn't use it for other people though.

I'm amused by her tags like Black Doll Magic and Black Dolls Matter. Because dolls are people too, apparently.
 
Screen Shot 2017-10-12 at 10.45.12 AM.png

Hawt.

She's using the new Addy as a representation of one of her relatives, which isn't creepy at all!
Screen Shot 2017-10-12 at 10.45.43 AM.png

I wonder how she even tells all these Addys apart.
 
New tantrum incoming, more boy dolls are being made:
View attachment 309714
View attachment 309715
View attachment 309716

In other news, one of her pals doxed someone for saying he didn't want to talk about race, and she had this to say:
View attachment 309718
Because doxing some dude is definite safety.

I don't understand why she is so against boy dolls. When I was a kid it was damn near impossible to find one that wasn't Ken or that creepy Chucky looking My Buddy.

Why is she so concerned about diversity? I remember getting the AG catalog every year when I was a kid. And after awhile they started selling generic non-story dolls with various skin colors and hair textures. Why not get those and make your own back story instead of waiting around for AG to make your autistic dreams come true?

Are you suggesting that children playing in ways she dislikes isn't a serious, life threatening issue?
View attachment 317525
(this was about putting a white doll in moccasins btw.)

Is she claiming Native heritage too or is she just being offended for other groups like a good little SJW?

I found these on that AG forum from a user named Thyme:
http://w11.zetaboards.com/agcollectors/topic/11741090/1

28162166684_4c25129e5f_z.jpg


28674436522_62c36032f3_z.jpg


The mobility aids aren't from AG but this site here: https://www.lakeshorelearning.com/product/productDet.jsp?productItemID=1,689,949,371,896,411&ASSORTMENT<>ast_id=1408474395181113&bmUID=1470407893197

They even have a helmet for your little tard doll.
These are probably useful for children with disabilities. But I imagine they get a lot of sales from doll autists trying to make the perfect plastic snowflake.

Thyme appears to be white (at least by her hands) yet is obsessed with dolls of color.

In this thread she butchers an off brand doll to make it into a disabled little sister.

The results are absolutely horrifying and the doll's head keeps popping off. The solution was to retie the ribbon around the head. Only now it's visible like that fairy tale about the lady who's head will come off if you remove her neck ribbon.
32541805314_28c5b5dc85_z.jpg


The whole photo set is horrifying. actually.

Editing to add this. Board rules about cultural appropriation. I think this whole community might be a collective lolcow.
http://w11.zetaboards.com/agcollectors/single/?p=10044113&t=10563329

Why Culturally Appropriative/Non-Native Craft Is Not Allowed
(and why it will probably be risking your account to even do it)
What's that? Some blogger recently released a free pattern to make Hopi style moccasins? Or you have some super-"cute" fringe "Indian" mini dress you purchased off etsy? Were you looking through a copy of Sew the International Wardrobe for 18-Inch Dolls by Joan Hinds and there was a pattern for the most perfect jingle dress? Or you read Josefina's book and decided to make Mariana's outfit? And you want to show this off to us?

Yeah. Nah. Nope. Don't.

In fact, you should probably read this entire post and then listen to Native Voices in our Fandom explaining why this is a shit thing to do.

First of all, the The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 states:

Quote:
It is illegal to offer or display for sale, or sell any art or craft product in a manner that falsely suggests it is Indian produced, an Indian product, or the product of a particular Indian or Indian Tribe or Indian arts and crafts organization, resident within the United States. For a first time violation of the Act, an individual can face civil or criminal penalties up to a $250,000 fine or a 5-year prison term, or both. If a business violates the Act, it can face civil penalties or can be prosecuted and fined up to $1,000,000.
and:
Quote:
It is illegal to market an art or craft item using the name of a tribe if a member, or certified Indian artisan, of that tribe did not actually create the art or craft item.

What does that mean? It means that even labeling a doll clothes pattern as, say, a "Cherokee dress" or "Navajo earrings" is a violation. Yes, a bunch of people do that on Etsy. They're doing wrong. Don't do wrong with them.

On this board and in this fandom, a violation of Native Craft includes but is not limited to:

* Doll-sized Native-simulating footwear not made by a Native person.
* Doll-sized Native pow-wow style wear not made by a Native person.
* Doll-sized Native-simulating tribal clothing not made by a Native person.
* Crafts, outfits, patterns, and/or designs that are often called "woo," "Pretendian," or "Generokee." We're talking your knitfug dresses, your tragic suede fringed minidresses, your rainbow chicken "war" bonnets, the "costume" patterns in the back of Simplicity pattern books, and/or that Tiger Lily costume you spent four months making for your all-doll production of Peter Pan.

Unless you are Native displaying your own tribal work and/or can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that a Native person designed and made the outfit or accessories, you are not allowed to post it here. We don't want to hear about your appropriation.

The main exception are things made by American Girl for Kaya's collection. (We know AG is not a Native-run company, but since the items are made for her collection, we will allow it since she is a character of the line.) We will also consider, appropriately done, Singing Bird dolls/other Native characters as long as she and they are given her full respect.

But? Don't make Mariana's anything. No dolls. No costumes. No shoes. Nothing. Zip-pah. It has been articulated at least twice in this fandom (that Mod Neth has seen, and Mod Neth done seen some shit) that the Hopi and Pueblo people do not appreciate any attempts at all to reproduce their personal cultural clothing. Not even to make Mariana. Don't do it. Go make Clara if your Josefina needs a bestie.

* If you make a fake native outfit or anything for your dolls or you, we are probably going to request that you to take it down and explain to you how Culture is not a Costume. Also, it won't be a request. You will take the post down. Or we will take it down for you.

* Do not link to patterns of Native-implied costumes done by non-Native people once you have been informed they are offensive.

* If you post Kaya's cultural clothes of any form on anyone other than Kaya, prepare to get a long lecture about Why You Best Not Do That Shit.

Furthermore, the rule on displaying culturally insensitive crafts and patterns will not just apply to Native-"themed" craft. It applies to all Cultures of Color. The next re-statement's so important that it's getting a whole line, increase, and center to itself.

Culture Is Not A Costume.
See that? We hella mean it. If you post Roma insulting/mimicking costume, African Diaspora insulting items (just let Mod Neth see a doll with a doobie and a dreadlocked wig; you will regret your whole life from your conception until that very moment), a sorry-ass sari, a coconut bra and tissue paper skirt, or some Jade Pearl Chicken Hat mismash of Asian cultures, we will come down on you with the fury of the Valkyries. (Mods will consider Disney Princess costumes on a case-by-case basis. Even so, you should still probably avoid anything Pocahontas- or Esmeralda-related. They're kinda icky.)

"What about white culture?"
Well when white Western culture has had to fight for hundred of years to avoid being stomped out and there is a history of making it illegal to practice, dress, or even have "white" culture things in public, and white people are systematically decimated under world-wide Native destruction, then we'll think about how mean it is to have Addy in a pair of Uggs and tight yoga pants holding a pumpkin spice latte. Til then, life ain't fair and racism doesn't go both ways.

If we find that any member has made culturally insensitive outfits--and it is found anywhere--then we will seriously reconsider your continued membership on this board.

We respect our Native and Roma members more than your "need" to make doll shoes or a "fortune teller" costume.

Test us not.

You apparently have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are Native or Roma in order to show off your doll clothes.

Admin has pronouns too under the name: We/Our/They/Their/Them. Looks like there's a field for any user to add them. So no one gets triggered by misgendering.

:lol:
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why she is so against boy dolls. When I was a kid it was damn near impossible to find one that wasn't Ken or that creepy Chucky looking My Buddy.

Why is she so concerned about diversity? I remember getting the AG catalog every year when I was a kid. And after awhile they started selling generic non-story dolls with various skin colors and hair textures. Why not get those and make your own back story instead of waiting around for AG to make your autistic dreams come true?



Is she claiming Native heritage too or is she just being offended for other groups like a good little SJW?

I found these on that AG forum from a user named Thyme:
http://w11.zetaboards.com/agcollectors/topic/11741090/1

28162166684_4c25129e5f_z.jpg


28674436522_62c36032f3_z.jpg


The mobility aids aren't from AG but this site here: https://www.lakeshorelearning.com/product/productDet.jsp?productItemID=1,689,949,371,896,411&ASSORTMENT<>ast_id=1408474395181113&bmUID=1470407893197

They even have a helmet for your little tard doll.
These are probably useful for children with disabilities. But I imagine they get a lot of sales from doll autists trying to make the perfect plastic snowflake.

Thyme appears to be white (at least by her hands) yet is obsessed with dolls of color.

In this thread she butchers an off brand doll to make it into a disabled little sister.

The results are absolutely horrifying and the doll's head keeps popping off. The solution was to retie the ribbon around the head. Only now it's visible like that fairy tale about the lady who's head will come off if you remove her neck ribbon.
32541805314_28c5b5dc85_z.jpg


The whole photo set is horrifying. actually.

Editing to add this. Board rules about cultural appropriation. I think this whole community might be a collective lolcow.
http://w11.zetaboards.com/agcollectors/single/?p=10044113&t=10563329



You apparently have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are Native or Roma in order to show off your doll clothes.

Admin has pronouns too under the name: We/Our/They/Their/Them. Looks like there's a field for any user to add them. So no one gets triggered by misgendering.

:lol:
So making a fringed leather dress or something inspired by a certain character is a sin worthy of death, but actively promoting 9 year old girls tribbing each other and having sex is one hundred percent okay. What the fuck?
 
So making a fringed leather dress or something inspired by a certain character is a sin worthy of death, but actively promoting 9 year old girls tribbing each other and having sex is one hundred percent okay. What the fuck?
Being a pedo: you are progressive and wholesome.
Putting a doll in a dress: you need the electric chair.

Speaking of her sexualization of children, she retweeted this:

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 1.53.23 PM.png

I think she needs to look in the mirror before posting something like that tbh.


Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 1.50.40 PM.png

"Negroligraphy"
Most progressive and not-racist term ever.
 
She really gives me the impression that she was raised in a middle-upper class home and pretty far removed from stereotypical black culture, and is now trying to compensate by forcing this hardcore ghetto thug/proudest black to ever black persona. It really doesn't feel genuine.
 
I think this whole community might be a collective lolcow.
Alright, so I went looking through the forum for drama. (Basically I just searched for the word 'banned') and I've found something amazing.

Some chick came onto the thread about the boy doll and said she liked him:
Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.05.37 PM.png

Everyone proceeded to lose their shit, somehow thinking the girl was accusing them of wanting genocide:
Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.15.30 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.18.09 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.16.55 PM.png

Soon enough, Neth turned up to lose her mind:
Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.19.04 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.19.47 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.20.27 PM.png

Immediately after getting upset and accusing someone of saying they want to kill men... They proceed to talk about how they want to kill men:
Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.22.49 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.22.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 8.23.02 PM.png


agcollectors: Where a comment about liking a doll leads to talk of tranny cum.
 
More sperging over the moccasins thing. It was all over some poor seamstress named Wren Feathers. Originally she was trusted to respect precious POC cultures. But she made some incorrect moccasin wraps for a pattern that was supposed to benefit a charity. Additionally she used some type of print that a Native AG Collectors forum member got triggered over. So they tried to say that Wren Feathers was breaking the Indian Arts and Craftsmenship laws. According to Wren Feathers the AGC spergs are bending the meaning of that law since she isn't falsely claiming that the doll clothes were made by real Natives and are authentic crafts.

https://jenwrenne.wordpress.com/2017/11/15/your-comments/

My apologies if last week’s post was offensive, I responded via email to the originator of those comments, as I do sometimes when a reply to a comment would get too long to fit. There are many insensitive representations of not just Pueblo, but all Native tribes online and it’s hard to understand why this blog is being singled out for attack when misinformation is being corrected, for example that this is a Pueblo outfit. It is sad to know non-authentic Pueblo and other misrepresentations labeled as “Native” doll patterns are currently available all over etsy and also see here here , as well as pixiefaire and here’s another from pixiefaire . McCall, Vogue, Simplicity have manufactured patterns labeled as “Native American” for quite some time, including this one labeled as “American Indian”.

Is that OK? No, but according to the law.

The final rulings in the IACB Protection of Products of Indian Art
and Craftsmanship https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/03-14827.pdf

§ 309.9 When can non-Indians make and
sell products in the style of Indian arts and
crafts?
A non-Indian can make and sell
products in the style of Indian art or
craft products only if the non-Indian or
other seller does not falsely suggest to
consumers that the products have been
made by an Indian.

As for the term “costume”:

noun: costume; plural noun: costumes

  • a set of clothes in a style typical of a particular country or historical period.
synonyms: outfit, garments, (set of) clothes, ensemble

  • a set of clothes worn by an actor or other performer for a particular role or by someone attending a masquerade.
  • a set of clothes, especially a woman’s ensemble, for a particular occasion or purpose; an outfit.
It means “complete ensemble of clothing” and on this blog, as in literature regarding costume, it is used for all cultures, for example, on this blog you can find it used in:

this Polish “costume” https://jenwrenne.wordpress.com/2012/07/17/polish-folk-costume/ or French “costume” https://jenwrenne.wordpress.com/2016/07/21/marseille-costume-part-2/ and lots of others: https://jenwrenne.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/hooray-new-dolls-and-new-patterns/

Native artists have been representing their culture in doll form for quite a while, including selling those dolls in traditional outfits to non-natives. It takes a lot of research to find authentic examples among all the inauthentic stuff on the internet. Learning about, honoring, and appreciating ALL other cultures is something I love. Sharing that love by disseminating information and helping people learn more about sewing, history, dolls, and other cultures is what is great about this blog. Correcting misinformation, such as that those incorrectly labeled modern doll outfits I linked at the beginning are authentic, is an educational service that I really take to heart.

It’s sad when someone gets upset without knowing the whole story. I created this as part of an awesome collection of patterns from various regions that was going to be free for a donation as a fundraiser for http://collegefund.org/. Whether that will happen with the other patterns now remains to be seen.

When Wren Feathers fans and friends defended her against the bullying she received the board members denied being bitches about it. But the entire thread is Nethilia and her friends acting like it's the most tragic thing in the world and making a new rule to avoid any triggering.

http://w11.zetaboards.com/agcollectors/topic/30397266/3/
triggeredmocs.png


Rock your mocs week RUINED by doll shoes.

If this green chile supergirl is a 98% white Cherokee princess I wouldn't even be remotely surprised.

Editing because I can't view the forums anymore. I think they are on to us.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom