Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Colorblind people are jumping on the same ideals the deaf community has been preaching about. Mostly because of those new Chroma glasses that make seeing colors more saturated.

You would think they would be glad about something that reduces the risk of dying when trying to figure out whether a wire that needs to be cut on a bomb is green or red. But seriously from video games to other things in life being colorblind is annoying for those that have it, so you would think that something that removes that annoyance would be accepted.
 
Last edited:
ALso, watch a few of those reaction vids of people trying the glasses for the first time. More than a few end in tears.... the good kind.

You would deny someone that because it makes you less special? Somehow?

To these people, the answer is a puzzling "yes".
 
Yeah these people think that curing genetic disorders is genocide. Deafness is not a race. Blindness is not a race. They are ailments, diseases, defects. Even Helen Keller was in favor of Eugenics if it meant no deaf people were to born.

Are there those among the dwarf community with similar nuttiness? Or does the dwarf community by and large think that curing the genetic conditions responsible for dwarfism is a good thing even though this will mean no more dwarfs will be born?
Humanity has solved so many of its problems they have to genetically engineer new races and communities to keep the oppression olympics going.
 
You would think they would be glad about something that reduces the risk of dying when trying to figure out whether a wire that needs to be cut on a bomb is green or red. But seriously from video games to other things in life being colorblind is annoying for those that have it, so you would think that something that removes that annoyance would be accepted.
We live in a time where weakness is strength and being a victim means being a hero. Self improvement and medication are never a good thing when your privilege points are on the line.
 
I'm surprised we haven't seen a deaf/trans crossover where a bunch of trans people want to manipulate prenatal genetics to make more people feel like they're born in the wrong body.

But I suppose that might create a huge shitstorm with the "gender and sex are illusory social constructs" crowd.
 
I saw that...

And how selfish do you have to be to want to deny a cure for a disability/disease in the name of keeping the community of sufferers together.

That's like saying without wars, the VFW has no reason to exist. I doubt any of the vets would have a problem with a world without wars, seeing as their fallen died in the hopes that would eventually come about.....

People who praise deaf culture/community often talk about how wonderful and supportive it is, which is true. Domestic violence survivors have a strong community as well and go to lengths to not think of themselves as victims either, but I'd never wish it to happen to anyone in the first place.

Hearing is our most important sense after sight. Imagine going through life being unable to listen to music or hear the voice of someone you love or easily interact with the vast majority of society. Doctors want to cure deafness not because they want to destroy deaf culture, but because they believe every person is entitled to enjoy the gift of hearing.
 
May be a stretch, but I think that's probably the reason a lot of these deaf people are such assholes.

I can imagine frustration plays a big part in day to day activities, regular life is annoying enough without having to deal with the problems which go with being unable to hear the alarm/car/etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNvfrBu6xKQ

I want to tell you a story about a group of small children. They came from homes where they could not communicate with their parents and families. Many of them did not know their names. They were alone, in a world that didn’t understand what they needed. In classes, they would be forced to measure up to arbitrary and unreasonable standards – to lip-read and talk – when they could not even hear the language. Day in and day out. If they were caught moving their hands, they would be put in the corner, scolded, have their hands slapped with a ruler, and be ostracized by the authority figures.

But do you know what those children did? They rebelled. In the far corners of the playground, the dorms at night, and when the teachers weren’t watching, they moved their hands. They created masterpieces – beautiful stories that sang of victory, sadness and strength. There was always one child that stood out – their hands moved through the air with ease, fluency and beauty. When they were caught, the teacher would yank them by their arm and drag them across the playground to detention while the other children watched. Later on, the troublemaker would emerge triumphant, proud, and a hero. Those children took their strength, courage, resilience, intelligence and created something that came from their souls, their minds, and their bodies. That was American Sign Language.

Nice story sadly it's
asl-profanities-cut-video-bullshit.png

rior to the birth of ASL, sign language had been used by various communities in the United States.[7]:5 In the United States, as elsewhere in the world, hearing families with deaf children have historically employed ad-hoc home sign, which often reaches much higher levels of sophistication than gestures used by hearing people in spoken conversation.[7]:5 As early as 1541 at first contact by Francisco Vásquez de Coronado, there were reports that the Plains Indians had developed a sign language to communicate between tribes of different languages.[14]

In the 19th century, a "triangle" of village sign languages developed in New England: one in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts; one in Henniker, New Hampshire, and one in Sandy River Valley, Maine.[15] Martha's Vineyard Sign Language (MVSL), which was particularly important for the history of ASL, was used mainly in Chilmark, Massachusetts.[7]:5–6 Due to intermarriage in the original community of English settlers of the 1690s, and the recessive nature of genetic deafness, Chilmark had a high 4% rate of genetic deafness.[7]:5–6 MVSL was used even by hearing residents whenever a deaf person was present.[7]:5–6

ASL is thought to have originated in the American School for the Deaf (ASD), founded in Hartford, Connecticut in 1817.[7]:4 Originally known as The American Asylum, At Hartford, For The Education And Instruction Of The Deaf And Dumb, the school was founded by the Yale graduate and divinity student Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet.[16][17] Gallaudet, inspired by his success in demonstrating the learning abilities of a young deaf girl Alice Cogswell, traveled to Europe in order to learn deaf pedagogy from European institutions.[16] Ultimately, Gallaudet chose to adopt the methods of the French Institut National de Jeunes Sourds de Paris, and convinced Laurent Clerc, an assistant to the school's founder Charles-Michel de l'Épée, to accompany him back to the United States.[16][nb 2] Upon his return, Gallaudet founded the ASD on April 15, 1817.[16]

The largest group of students during the first seven decades of the school were from Martha's Vineyard, and they brought MVSL with them.[8]:10 There were also 44 students from around Henniker, New Hampshire, and 27 from the Sandy River valley in Maine, each of which had their own village sign language.[8]:11[nb 3] Other students brought knowledge of their own home signs.[8]:11 Laurent Clerc, the first teacher at ASD, taught using French Sign Language (LSF), which itself had developed in the Parisian school for the deaf established in 1755.[7]:7 From this situation of language contact, a new language emerged, now known as ASL.[7]:7



American Sign Language Convention of March 2008 in Austin, Texas
More schools for the deaf were founded after ASD, and knowledge of ASL spread to these schools.[7]:7 In addition, the rise of Deaf community organizations bolstered the continued use of ASL.[7]:8 Societies such as the National Association of the Deaf and the National Fraternal Society of the Deaf held national conventions that attracted signers from across the country.[8]:13 This all contributed to ASL's wide use over a large geographical area, atypical of a sign language.[8]:14[8]:12

Up to the 1950s, the predominant method in deaf education was oralism – acquiring oral language comprehension and production.[18] Linguists did not consider sign language to be true "language", but rather something inferior.[18] Recognition of the legitimacy of ASL was achieved by William Stokoe, a linguist who arrived at Gallaudet University in 1955 when this was still the dominant assumption.[18] Aided by the civil rights movement of the 1960s, Stokoe argued for manualism, the use of sign language in deaf education.[18][19] Stokoe noted that sign language shares the important features that oral languages have as a means of communication, and even devised a transcription system for ASL.[18] In doing so, Stokoe revolutionized both deaf education and linguistics.[18] In the 1960s, ASL was sometimes referred to as "Ameslan", but this term is now considered obsolete.[20]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Sign_Language

Not everything in life has to be a shitty daytime movie.
 
Last edited:
Isn't deafness one of the most accepted disabilities in the US, up there with blindness? They have a shitton of resources, everyone is at the very least aware of sign language, and it's not like they're motor-impaired so they can perform most if not all jobs.
 
Actually, I've noticed that more than a few deaf people have an odd superiority complex that just isn't seen in other disability groups.
The neurodiversity community is pretty crazy themselves. Go to a :autism:-related forum and say you support a cure for autism and Aspergers.
 
Slight powerlevel here. My Uncle was at one point married to a deaf woman. The marriage fell apart because she became one of those capital D Deaf people. Her deafness was genetic and she felt it made her special and even superior to hearing people. They were on the verge of starting a family and when he mentioned getting their child cochlear implants if they were born deaf she went batshit. He wisely realized that this was not a woman he wanted to breed with and got out. It wasn't that he had anything against people with disabilities (he learned sign language for her, etc.) he just didn't see why a kid should have to deal with one if it could be fixed. I have to agree with him. I don't understand why you would want to make life harder on someone if you don't have to.
 
The ASL teacher I had in school thought like this, the weirdest part was that she wasn't deaf herself and wanted to be. A lot of classtime was spent talking about how cochlear implants are bad and should be banned. I really don't get communities like this, there's nothing wrong with having a disability (obviously) but if there was a cure, wouldn't you take it?
 
Domestic violence survivors have a strong community as well and go to lengths to not think of themselves as victims either, but I'd never wish it to happen to anyone in the first place.
This is a great point. I've never heard any member of the community that is domestic abuse survivors get offended at attempts to prevent other people from getting raped.
 
Colorblind people are jumping on the same ideals the deaf community has been preaching about. Mostly because of those new Chroma glasses that make seeing colors more saturated.
I don't want my kids to be colorblind. I also don't want Chroma glasses. I do however get a kick out of occasionally telling people I'm "disabled" and that white males are an oppressed group due to having the highest occurrence of color blindness (though I think the ratio is pretty similar with other minority males).

ALso, watch a few of those reaction vids of people trying the glasses for the first time. More than a few end in tears.... the good kind.

You would deny someone that because it makes you less special? Somehow?

To these people, the answer is a puzzling "yes".
Ive never tried the glasses, but I can't help but think those vids are bullshit. I just can't see (no pun intended) seeing proper purple for the first time as being on par with hearing for the first time. I imagine for me it would be more along the lines of "huh... neat."
 
Last edited:
Isn't deafness one of the most accepted disabilities in the US, up there with blindness? They have a shitton of resources, everyone is at the very least aware of sign language, and it's not like they're motor-impaired so they can perform most if not all jobs.

Yeah, I don't want to diminish the struggles of deaf people, but from my understanding they have a lot of support and understanding from society at large. In every school I've gone to, ASL interpreters are available for deaf/hard-of-hearing students, and ASL courses are offered in my high school and college. It seems like most problems deaf people run into with hearing people is the result of ignorance, not malice. Anyone who is shitty to deaf people is (rightfully) seen as a total asshole.

This is a great point. I've never heard any member of the community that is domestic abuse survivors get offended at attempts to prevent other people from getting raped.

Again, that's what's so bizarre about the capital-D Deaf community. PTSD support groups don't condemn therapy for PTSD. Support groups for amputees don't condemn prosthetics. Support groups for people with depression don't condemn medication and therapy. So why do some deaf people condemn technology that will improve hearing?

Damn, I really want to make a Deaf community thread now. I just don't know where to start.
 
I watched a documentary about the Deaf Community butthurt about cochlear implants once, and the deaf dad that was upset about Muh Culture was probably one of the worst people ever. I wanted to just reach through the screen and knock some goddamned sense into him.


Isn't deafness one of the most accepted disabilities in the US, up there with blindness? They have a shitton of resources, everyone is at the very least aware of sign language, and it's not like they're motor-impaired so they can perform most if not all jobs.

Deaf people I have personally talked to say it's very isolating, actually. It's not like your average asshole in line at the store can speak sign language. The average deaf person also only reads at a 4th grade level, so that is a whole other aspect of communication that they're sort of left out of.
 
Last edited:
The ASL teacher I had in school thought like this, the weirdest part was that she wasn't deaf herself and wanted to be. A lot of classtime was spent talking about how cochlear implants are bad and should be banned. I really don't get communities like this, there's nothing wrong with having a disability (obviously) but if there was a cure, wouldn't you take it?
Fuck knows I would. Getting government checks every so often is kinda nice but I'd dump all that cash in a heartbeat to have a normal body.

I don't even understand how you could possibly think being disabled makes you a better person, unless you're such a shallow person that there's nothing to you but a disability. In that case, you might want to introduce a noose to your shitty life.
 
Damn, I really want to make a Deaf community thread now. I just don't know where to start.

The place to start is probably with the faculty at Gallaudet University, who are fucking insane. That place is ground zero for the deaf equivalent of Salafists. I've previously mentioned their awful complaint against UCB that denied the world access to 20,000 hours of educational video for free. The two crazed assholes responsible for that mess are Stacy Nowak and Glenn Lockhart, though I am sure there are plenty of other faculty, administrators, and students there who are just as terrible. I would likewise assume that authors published by Gallaudet University Press are exceptional.

Names of other people/orgs to look into for anybody willing to expend the energy starting a deaf thread (I'm not ready for the burden):
- Kathleen M. Wood (formerly? of Gallaudet)
- Ruthie Jordan/Audism Free America
- Jeff DuPree
- Tom Humphries
- Nancy Rourke (artist)
- Nyle DiMarco

You may also want to look for people critical of any of the following sensible deaf-related entities: The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Oberkotter Foundation, Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech, Memphis Oral School for the Deaf, and Cleary School for the Deaf.
 
I don't even understand how you could possibly think being disabled makes you a better person, unless you're such a shallow person that there's nothing to you but a disability. In that case, you might want to introduce a noose to your shitty life.
I think that might be why the captital D-Deaf community acts the way they do. Their idenity makes them different and special that they put all their eggs in that basket.
 
It's also worth noting that the deaf and proud community was around well before SJWism took off.

If Law and Order is any barometer of society, they had an episode in the early 90's where a deaf woman was killed by a fellow deaf activist for getting cochlear implants, and thus "Betraying" the movement.

But like some perverted Midas touch, the current progressive obsession has definitely made it worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom