You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
💪 Tough GuysDalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.
I have a troll account on normiebook and every black nigger was defending him because "dat white man broke a bottle on his head!" Ignoring the fact that he fake crushed a can (not a bottle) on Rajas head because he thought he was a fellow wrestler and then profusely apologized when he realized he was just a bystander. Niggers believe these justifies you trying to murder someone and possibly give them permanent brain damage.
Anyone who sides with these literal demons over their own kind should not be allowed to call themselves white anymore.
You ever heard the phrase "both things can be true"? I can call her a cunt while acknowledging that little shit should have his ass kicked for stealing, and I can call mustache boy a dumb fuck while still acknowledging the ape that attacked him also got what was coming to him.
I'm here to laugh at stupidity, not wince and whinge about white powah or plans to do genocide on entire races.
Multiple people also donate to DSP and Lily Orchard. People are stupid with money, News at 11.
it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that this whole "he was just defending himself!" thing was/is being used constantly by Karmelo Anthony defenders as if who initiated physical contact first is some sort of detail that fully exonerates someone as if the totality of circumstances don't apply, both Chud and Karmelo defenders operate on similar arguments but then also arrive at completely polar opposite outcomes because they've designated themselves to either Team White or Team Black.
Brah, someone shoving you and someone sucker punching you and continuing to attack you while you are on the ground are two very different things.
It is not reasonable to fear for your life because someone shoved you.
It is reasonable to fear for your life because someone sucker punched you and is currently punching and fighting with you.
Calling someone a nigger is legal and should always be legal.
Posting: "I bet I will be put in a self defense situation for calling someone a nigger one day,"
is a simple recognition of the reality of what Chud was doing and doesn't invalidate his right to defend himself.
Hearing someone say a noun is never a good enough reason to attack someone.
If someone physically attacks someone else for using a word, then the one getting attacked has the right to defend himself with deadly force.
The black who attacked Chud sucker punched him and was punching him while thy both were on the ground.
Chud had no reason to believe this black would not try to kill him. He didn't know if the black might end up pulling a knife or if a bunch of other blacks come out and start stomping on his head.
It was completely reasonable, justified and morally righteous for Chud to shoot the attacker.
Being rude doesn't invalidate your right to defend your life.
He has a right to defend himself, but he provoked the incident as he routinely does (pattern of behavior), which (As I have already posted about in this thread) disqualifies the use of deadly force under the statutes of Tennessee no-retreat laws.
Have you ever considered sucking fewer cocks? Being slightly less of a homo? These are just helpful suggestions. They could improve your life. I'm just trying to offer helpful advice.
Calling someone a nigger is legal and should always be legal.
Posting: "I bet I will be put in a self defense situation for calling someone a nigger one day,"
is a simple recognition of the reality of what Chud was doing and doesn't invalidate his right to defend himself.
Hearing someone say a noun is never a good enough reason to attack someone.
If someone physically attacks someone else for using a word, then the one getting attacked has the right to defend himself with deadly force.
The black who attacked Chud sucker punched him and was punching him while thy both were on the ground.
Chud had no reason to believe this black would not try to kill him. He didn't know if the black might end up pulling a knife or if a bunch of other blacks come out and start stomping on his head.
It was completely reasonable, justified and morally righteous for Chud to shoot the attacker.
Being rude doesn't invalidate your right to defend your life.
He has a right to defend himself, but he provoked the incident as he routinely does (pattern of behavior), which (As I have already posted about in this thread) disqualifies the use of deadly force under the statutes of Tennessee no-retreat laws.
"Hey fellow members of the international race of white patriots and nigger haterz! I propose we create a law that would allow blacks to indiscriminately murder whites and then get off with it on the basis of self defence. I am so based and definitely not brown."
Does it ever occur to you, isn't it awesome that I'm white? I am so white. It is so awesome.
Suppose there were a signup every year, and you got this choice. Check this and you get to be white for another year. I'd be checking that every goddamn year. Wanna be white for another year? I'm definitely signing up for that. Way better than signing up to be a fucking NIGGER.
If I got bit by a snake, people would probably have a few questions.
"What happened? Did you not see it? Where you somewhere you shouldn't be? Were you fucking with it?!"
But when Chud gets attacked by a black person, he was a good boy who dinnu nuffin.
He has a right to defend himself, but he provoked the incident as he routinely does (pattern of behavior), which (As I have already posted about in this thread) disqualifies the use of deadly force under the statutes of Tennessee no-retreat laws.
Totally the same case, same bond, same sentence and the victims are also totally the same upstanding citizens of society. That poor blackie Chud shot was gonna cure cancer and revive George Floyd n' shiet.
both cases are going to touch upon provocation and whether someone was justified in their self-defense, and both Karmelo and Chud are similar in that they've both done things that aren't going to reflect well in court and might put their self-defense claims in jeopardy, criminal history and shit like that is 100% irrelevant (just like it was with George Floyd).
nobody is arguing against this, but if you put yourself in the dangerous situation where you find yourself getting punched in your fucking face because you jumped into the proverbial lion enclosure you're still going to go on the book for killing said lion in self-defense no matter how reasonable your fear of life was, what did you expect inserting yourself in such a scenario? we all know what Chud was expecting, he said so himself.
for instance even if Karmelo was getting jumped and got punched in the face he'd still be culpable for murder because he went there with the intent to cause trouble, and when trouble found him it can't be used as a pre-text to then go and kill somebody in the scenario he himself engineered.
Does it ever occur to you, isn't it awesome that I'm white? I am so white. It is so awesome.
Suppose there were a signup every year, and you got this choice. Check this and you get to be white for another year. I'd be checking that every goddamn year. Wanna be white for another year? I'm definitely signing up for that. Way better than signing up to be a fucking NIGGER.
both cases are going to touch upon provocation and whether someone was justified in their self-defense, and both Karmelo and Chud are similar in that they've both done things that aren't going to reflect well in court and might put their self-defense claims in jeopardy, criminal history and shit like that is 100% irrelevant (just like it was with George Floyd).
You are an actual retard. The Jury always considers the quality of character of the person in trial. Why do you think single mothers or women in general get lighter sentences than men? Hell, why do you think the Jury was created in the first place? It was to be judged by your own peers. Intention and the type of person you are the most important things judges look at before sentencing.
I don't think they've learned yet that any good movement throws those under the bus who give them a bad name. Look how well it worked for BLM who thought guntguarding George Floyd of all people was a good idea. Wypipo, be smarter than this. We wouldn't defend Chris Chan either for being a hhwhite man.
You are allowed to shoot a lion if it jumps at you on the street.
The problem is there is a human subspecies roaming the streets that is aggressive and ready to kill you if you say the wrong word.
If I make it known that if you say the word cumskin I will try to kill you, then the problem can't ever lie with the person saying cumskin and defending themselves from my attack.
Looking for a fight and a reason to kill someone is not the same as expecting to eventually having to defend yourself for a completely lawful and benign action. Chud being aware that blacks will probably try to kill him for saying a word should not infringe on his right to say that word.
PS I do enjoy that everyone keep comparing blacks to wild dangerous animals.
Chud has the right to defend himself from someone attacking him, nobody said he should let himself get beaten up. Nobody also said that the nigger who sucker punched him is blameless.
It's more that provoking random people until they get angry is:
1) hard to defend under the banner of freedom of speech because it's speech that is deliberately, directly, and immediately meant to cause a violent reaction. It's not just calling someone nigger and leaving it at that.
Unless you're some masochist who gets off on people following you around and insulting you, it's in your interest that Chud's behavior isn't encouraged (I didn't mention anything about legality)
2) not actually a productive way to "save the white race". A lot of you say that being an annoying prick is always justified if it's done to the outgroup/minorities/etc, because whites must vanquish these violent subhumans who have been enabled and coddled for too long. etc etc. Ok, I get it, but I'm not seeing how the former (annoying black people) leads to the latter (saving white people)
"Chud is opening the eyes of people to how violent niggers are!" is gonna be a real hard sell to normies once they find out he deliberately provoked the violent reaction
Yeah, because the ADL is very smart to copy from. It's a good thing I never said they were a good movement. White people, take notes and purge the bad actors or never be taken seriously I guess.
2) not actually a productive way to "save the white race". A lot of you say that being an annoying prick is always justified if it's done to the outgroup/minorities/etc, because whites must vanquish these violent subhumans who have been enabled and coddled for too long. etc etc. Ok, I get it, but I'm not seeing how the former (annoying black people) leads to the latter (saving white people)
This is the main issue with the white nationalist movement, and I have to bring it up because I have no clue how none of them have realized this. Going around provoking people gives them ammo, and the more and more people are provoked the more and more they'll just become angry. This will ONLY increase violence against white people. Not only that, but no one will want to associate with them because they will be like a venomous spider, not worth touching at all. But by instead engaging in dialogue and bringing up the black crime rates, sticking to the facts, and offering solutions, progress can actually be made. And if they DO get attacked for doing this, then they have all the right to say they're the victim because in this scenario they would be. But this movement will never get to that point, because only the lowest IQ individuals are attracted to it in the first place. That's made obvious by all the leaders of white nationalism, who ironically are generally not white themselves or they are mixed.
It's pretty simple, hate and violence towards the outgroup has been what is lacking among Whites for a long time.
In general White people are either more or equally as accommodating towards the outgroup than the ingroup.
This is very bad because no other group does this, which leads to the erosion of White countries.
Demographics determine how countries are and if White people are this nice to brown people why wouldn't they come and parasitize from them?
If White people aren't even willing to be rude, then their countries will become third world countries and they will become a hated minority in their own homelands.
