Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 58 3.7%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,579
starborn427614 said:
The people running Disney are far too egotistical to ever admit fault and this would damage the brand more than simply moving on to new stories.
Click to expand...
yeah normal humans will never be able to understand "those stories sucked so we don't count them"
just move a few hundred years forward, occasionally drop obtuse references to the long-long ago and just move on
 
De-canonizing the sequels would be hilarious, but what would that even mean or look like?

Do they delete them off of Disney+? Come out with a statement that says outright that they are no longer canon?

To any normal (non-tranny) they already don't exist. Even turbo-normies only have a vague memory of some kind of sequel movie they watched, didn't really enjoy, and subsequently forgot about.

Disney already doesn't advertise them - if you go into the SW section of Disney+, other than a single Kylo Ren picture, you wouldn't even know they existed. Same for Galaxy's Edge at Disney World - there's virtually no sequel merchandise to be found, and all of the wandering photo op characters are OG or prequel (lol) (although of course the rides are still sequel focused and Kylo has a perma-meet place).

Other than the hilarity and goodwill from actual fans, I don't know what Disney would gain from this. I mean if they wanted to shit on Kennedy's legacy, they could've just fired her.

And on top of that, the fact remains that they are incapable of making anything good anymore anyway. You think given a clean slate, the cowboy hat faggot and his Kennedy-clone jew boss are going to make anything good?

Anyway, I hope it happens, but I don't see how or why it would, or what difference it would make to anyone but us at this point.
 
Your Starter for 10 said:
De-canonizing the sequels would be hilarious, but what would that even mean or look like?

Do they delete them off of Disney+? Come out with a statement that says outright that they are no longer canon?

To any normal (non-tranny) they already don't exist. Even turbo-normies only have a vague memory of some kind of sequel movie they watched, didn't really enjoy, and subsequently forgot about.

Disney already doesn't advertise them - if you go into the SW section of Disney+, other than a single Kylo Ren picture, you wouldn't even know they existed. Same for Galaxy's Edge at Disney World - there's virtually no sequel merchandise to be found, and all of the wandering photo op characters are OG or prequel (lol) (although of course the rides are still sequel focused and Kylo has a perma-meet place).

Other than the hilarity and goodwill from actual fans, I don't know what Disney would gain from this. I mean if they wanted to shit on Kennedy's legacy, they could've just fired her.

And on top of that, the fact remains that they are incapable of making anything good anymore anyway. You think given a clean slate, the cowboy hat faggot and his Kennedy-clone jew boss are going to make anything good?

Anyway, I hope it happens, but I don't see how or why it would, or what difference it would make to anyone but us at this point.
Click to expand...
yeah if this was like, back when Fisher and whoever else had died was still alive there might be a reason to go "NEVER MIND THAT SHIT, THE GANG'S BACK ON THE FALCON" but yeah it's not going to have any real payoff
 
We wuz puppi skinners n shetz.
Screenshot 2026-05-05 175558.png
 
The original Snow Queen was very much a weird character. You can both write her as a kidnapper (if she had no reason to do it beyond because she could), a sympathetic villain (in some versions she just wants someone to love her), a woman trying to create the circumstances of healing Kai (if she decided to do something about the shard) or someone trying to take him away from his pain (if she doesn't know how to cure him and he seems to find little joy in life). You wouldn't even need to change the story at all for any interpretation.

It is fascinating in how many different stories you can tell with just the original Snow Queen.
 
Incecticyder said:
The original Snow Queen was very much a weird character. You can both write her as a kidnapper (if she had no reason to do it beyond because she could), a sympathetic villain (in some versions she just wants someone to love her), a woman trying to create the circumstances of healing Kai (if she decided to do something about the shard) or someone trying to take him away from his pain (if she doesn't know how to cure him and he seems to find little joy in life). You wouldn't even need to change the story at all for any interpretation.

It is fascinating in how many different stories you can tell with just the original Snow Queen.
Click to expand...
I vaguely recall some concept shit on display for Unproduced Snow Queen Project at the MGM Animation Studio Tour back in the day
 
Your Starter for 10 said:
De-canonizing the sequels would be hilarious, but what would that even mean or look like?
Click to expand...

I assume they would just low key rebrand the sequel trilogy on Disney+ and else where something like, "Star Wars: The Rey Trilogy." Separate it out from the originals.

They can no longer do live action with the originals, so it is animated or recast. I don't think it's practical to do anything AI powered deep fake, CGI motion capture (Avatar style) for anything besides small roles.

I don't think they'll decannonise the Madoverse stuff. I also don't think they'll want to risk something completely new. Which leaves them with two main options. Adapt George's sequel trilogy treatment. Or adapt the Expanded Universe which they had previously decannonised.

I don't think they'll go down the route of doing a new Episode 7. I would expect something like they just adapt the Thrawn Trilogy and be damned with where it doesn't fit with the version of Thrawn in Ashoka. Just work on adapting and building out all the EU stuff that exists. There's a huge amount of material there, they don't need strict adaptations and they can just throw Kathleen Kennedy under the bus for her claims there's no source material.
 
Betonhaus said:
Reading the plot summary, it sounds to be very specific to the WWII era and a more modern adaptation would've seemed strange up until recently where it would now come off as woke garbage
Click to expand...
Still, but then again it would've also been strange given the original movie never had any magical or sci-fi elements. Then again, I hadn't read the original book that the film is based on.
 
Disney aren't going to redo the sequels or any of that bullshit, they just won't revisit them with shit like the Rey spin-off. To redo the sequels would be such a shit show, it would piss off everyone who worked on them, and what would be marketing for them? "This time we won't fuck them up"?. Makes no sense to even try.

If they want a whole new trilogy, the smart move would be to do one set far in the past or far in the future, with no returning cast. Desperate move would be to make movies set between OG and sequels with cgi deaged Luke, but no numbering.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom