So as I told a few people I would do, I went through a majority of Mimi's Pixiv likes.
A few random things off rip:
- A majority of their likes are just Blue Archive, Pokemon, or Saba/Gura, including aged up girls and big breasted BA and Pokemon girls. I saw almost no fully original works.
- There was nothing real or "realistic" looking in the entire thing. It was all clearly generic anime style.
- A big thing they said repeatedly in the thread was "depictions of rape" and I guess they mean it in the sense that the drawing "can't consent" but for the actual fetish of rape, I found I think 2 images in the entire thing that fit the bill and I'm still not really sure they do.
- I noticed that some of the "younger" character looking drawings were actually tagged with FF14. They were Lalafells.
With that said I went through 43 with 48 images per page. Thats 2043 images (last page was missing a few)
I was looking for 3 things that were claimed in the KF thread
1. Illicit writing alluding to the creator being a MAP or supporting MAP ideals
2. Beasty content of any kind
3. What is referred to as "todcon" among some groups
-1-
One of the huge claims in the KF thread was the constant use of writing, particularly writing about...illicit topics or characters saying things that would imply the creator was a predator themselves.
What was shockingly lacking from those 2043 images was any writing at all. I found about 81 with any sort of genuine writing on them (I am excluding onomatopoeias, account advertising and character's names.) Of those 81 images, 42 were exclusively in Japanese. I think this is important because I do not believe you can fault someone for the content of a text they likely could not read.
Exactly two had what could be considered illicit text and it was hentai of HatKid from A Hat In Time and one of Gura+Saba and it was just referring to them as "child" as opposed to loli.
Other then that a majority of the text was jokes or basic mesugaki dialog. Nothing particularly strange or that would catch the average weeb off guard.
-2-
The second was the claim of constant bestiality. I found 18 images of it and 8 of them were of Pokemon, 1 of them was SFW but I'm counting it anyways cause the implication was there.
-3-
For the final part, I could find maybe a handful of images I might personally classify as "todcon" adjacent but basically none of them actually fit the bill. The "youngest" a character looked was some art of Nahida from Genshin Impact, Becky from SpyXFamily, a 1 piece of HatKid from A Hat In Time.
There was literally none of this "babies" stuff they were claiming in the thread. This is also ignoring the fact that I would still stand by the fact that these works are FICTIONAL and I genuinely don't care.
---
By the end of the looking through every single one of these, my position HAS STILL NOT CHANGED. It is all fully fictional work and the "mass amount of suspect images" simply do not exist. I found, in total by my personal metric, 4 images that made me double take, thats it.
Also about 2 dozen images were deleted by the original artist. Most of these are at the end and were very old pieces so there could be any number of reasons they're gone.
The most shocking part of looking through this was actually the fact that half of it just wasn't lolisho art, it was big boobed girls.
Below are just some random examples of the average stuff that was on the page that I talked about above.
x 17 
