From what I remember, there's something that most people have that if you stop breathing at night to an extent it could kill you, you'll wake up and adjust yourself. The SIDS babies don't have that thing though, I think it's some kind of gene? I found this on tumblr a million years ago, I wish I could find the original article.
I want you all to look into infant mortality and the body fat percentage of the mother + incidences of co-sleeping like @Cherry Eyed Hamster said.
That's a lot of words to say, "It's niggers".
I decided to read the paper the AI summary was referencing. The graphs presented are very confusing and the paper never clarifies if it compared a lack of the BChE enzyme in SIDS deaths and non-SIDS deaths, one of the graphs even shows overlapping distributions of BChE enzyme in both cases. I feel like it was making a better argument for BChE being a potential marker for infant death but not necessarily for SIDS deaths, if that makes any sense.
See my comment above.
"some" babies, it says. So, how many?
Now that is actually really interesting, but an immediate nuking probably wouldn't have been the USSR's first choice, they had a habit of threatening nuclear war and IIRC did it during Yom Kippur which did scare the Americans. Israel was a nuclear power at that time, however, and SA wasn't. A more likely outcome was the Soviets getting directly involved using their navy and airforce and gaping South Africa while the West stood by.
I believe Stephen Paddock has a similar psychology to the pilot of MH370.
I don't believe the official story on that one at all. Not only did the witnesses say there were multiple shooters (and I don't buy the "They were just confused" shit either), but people have jokingly tried to recreate smuggling in all that equipment into the hotel and it can't be done.
Every mass shooting has people reporting multiple shooters because it's chaotic and 99% of people have never been on the receiving end of gunfire. Eyewitness testimony from people under than much stress is wildly unreliable. Moving that many firearms and ammo isn't that uncommon in Las Vegas, it is home to Shot Show and a number of large shooting ranges. Paddock could easily have had help moving everything from bellhops, especially since he had booked a very expensive suite and its not like any of the bellhops would be asking questions about what's in his luggage. The arms deal gone sour theory also doesn't make any sense because he had nothing but a bunch of mid- to high-tier AR-15s and all his mags were loaded with Hornaday V-Max which is way too expensive for a cartel or foreign military/rebel group. And why would he be selling them bumpstocks when those same groups could easily acquire full-auto receivers or modify them?
State gun laws are being tightened to fix this by banning the sale, manufacture, assembly, or transport of: threaded barrels (that screw onto the receiver), barrels with threads for silencers. foldable and collapsible stocks, partially complete uppers and lowers for banned parts, some types of rails, bump stocks, and a long list of specific rifles and pistols. The Communists in these states are already working on expanding this. (F.e. HB 1504 in Washington State).
At the time I remember thinking
All of the "free AI" tools I've dinked around with are abysmal, but maybe that's on purpose so you sign up for the $80 to $250 a year package. Gemini and ChatGPT can't even explain simple things without hallucinating incorrect info.
IIRC The Tasmanian Tiger went extinct in the mid 30s, well before the advent of trail cams, camcorders and any way for anyone to get footage of it without hours of setup. A couple dozen could easily be kicking around, but I don't blame the government for keeping them under wraps. Some people will poach anything they can or try and capture it for the exotic pet trade.
Do you know a lot about direct nuclear threats? I have a pet theory that they're much more common than we've been led to believe, but most of the official threats have to do with communicating troop movements to a potential adversary. Like pieces on the devil's chessboard, the enemy can see your nuclear capabilities and react accordingly, without the need for explicit verbal threats. Which obviously isn't exactly the same thing as what you're describing.
Feel free to PM me. I have a fair amount of experience with DMT, and don't want to shit the thread up with drug trip stories.
It is a conspiracy I hope is happening.
one year late but i cant sleep and found your post. let me calm you down regarding fossil frauds.
this is not true. paleontologists don't have money for this
if you're studying famous or rare fossils you already have tenure. it's not that hard to get.
it's not convincing at all . it's only convincing because private collections have no obligation to give anyone access to the fossil to analyse it. meanwhile in academia there's fossil numbers and you can request to see any fossil that was mentioned in any article.
stratum dating (aka vibe checking the fossils age based on the rocks near it) isn't to check if it's real or not
Wasn't there some dubai prince in the area at the time? Prince A and B back in dubai hate one another, Prince A goes to Vegas to party, so Prince B orders a hit on Prince A and uses his super rich royal connections to stage it as a mass shooting so it doesn't get traced back to him? Maybe that did happen, but Prince B was going a step further and going full dubai, paying ungodly amounts of money to BE the "mass shooter" to try and kill his rival?
