🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Apteryx Owenii said:
So if you're going to have a clause like this, you have to at least spell out the consequences (like penalties for a broken lease, etc) instead of just saying "you can't undo the thing that was just done."
Click to expand...
The "no takesies-backsies" clause has another fatal flaw - it can be repealed under 'countervailing emergency circumstances':
1773613086652.png
And that term is never defined. The board could declare one for any or no reason, include the 'emergency' designation in the ballot measure, and that would constitute (admittedly malicious) compliance with the law.

If I understood Hollingsworth correctly SCOTUS has held that sponsors of a ballot measure, or individuals who agree with the measure's premise, lack standing to defend it in court even if local officials decline to do so. This would presumably gut Russ' ability to fight the repeal measure, I've never heard of clients of a business having standing to oppose a measure which would outlaw that business. Not that it will stop him from trying.

ETA: I misread the section about the board, according to subsection 10.1 the city/county board would pull double duty as the prostitution oversight board and therefore could be staffed, incorrect text below is left in for posterity.

On the subject of this board its powers are defined but how members are appointed/removed is not:
1773613589744.png
So the board with the sole authority to approve brothels would be permanently vacant and unfillable even if the measure passed.

Great job Rusty!
 
Last edited:
Belgians in the Congo said:
Also I just want to point out that this very specific case was a significant part in me finally taking the decision to go into law school.
Click to expand...
Don't want to clutter the GvM lawsuit thread but I want to gloat about passing both my entry exams and being formally admitted to lawschool, thank you Greer you've helped ushered more evil (another law student) onto this world.
 
Belgians in the Congo said:
Don't want to clutter the GvM lawsuit thread but I want to gloat about passing both my entry exams and being formally admitted to lawschool, thank you Greer you've helped ushered more evil (another law student) onto this world.
Click to expand...
Congratulations! In 50+ years, you'll be sitting on the Supreme Court when Greer v Moon finally appears before them.

You can recuse yourself with the statement "nigger"
 
Belgians in the Congo said:
Don't want to clutter the GvM lawsuit thread but I want to gloat about passing both my entry exams and being formally admitted to lawschool, thank you Greer you've helped ushered more evil (another law student) onto this world.
Click to expand...
Ya did good, son. Ya did good. Enter your career with your head held high, knowing you will be infinitely more successful than Mr. Greee.
And seriously, well done.
 
Belgians in the Congo said:
Don't want to clutter the GvM lawsuit thread but I want to gloat about passing both my entry exams and being formally admitted to lawschool, thank you Greer you've helped ushered more evil (another law student) onto this world.
Click to expand...
Congratulations!
I look forward to you qualifying, becoming Belgians in the Congo Esquire and joining the defense team on Greer v Moon as part of Hardin and Partners. Hell, at the rate this case is progressing, you could end up as a judge on it.

When you are asked what inspired you to study law, how do you answer? Do you say 'Sir, I did it for truth, justice and the American way' or 'a lying, cheating whore mongering ex Mormon vexatious litigant made me do it'?

Whoda thunk it, Russell's claim to want to inspire others has actually come true in the most delightfully ironic way. God is good.
 
I don't know all that much about Eagle Scouts, but a tard can do almost anything while their parents are still in the driver's seat.
Belgians in the Congo said:
Don't want to clutter the GvM lawsuit thread but I want to gloat about passing both my entry exams and being formally admitted to lawschool, thank you Greer you've helped ushered more evil (another law student) onto this world.
Click to expand...
Congratulations. I'm assuming you're not in Canada/US so I know nothing about law in your jurisdiction. But generally law is a pretty good hustle.
 
UncleTusky said:
As long as we're talking about pro se retards would it be advisable for Schaefer to hire a lawyer for the appeal?

The first hearing amounted to "he didn't pay his rent, he admits it, that's sufficient to evict, the objections don't change that". If Russ tries turning the appeal into a debate over affirmative defenses and procedural objections Schaefer may be out of his depth.

This says more about Schaefer's incompetence than anything to do with Russ.
Click to expand...
Given that Schaefer is a disbarred lawyer IIRC, he should be at least evenly matched with our plucky pro se tard.

Edit: apparently this was disproven last time it was brought up. My bad!

UncleTusky said:
This was my mistake: We established that they are different people and while father/son or something similar is most likely there is not hard proof of that.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet) said:
I don't know all that much about Eagle Scouts, but a tard can do almost anything while their parents are still in the driver's seat.
Click to expand...

I would say one of those exceptions is Eagle Scouts. The entire Eagle Scout process is about organization, planning, and time management, anticipating and handling difficulties as well as adapting to them as necessary, focusing on achieving your stated goals, and to do so independently as someone becoming an adult. Heavy adult involvement outside of the scouts wouldn't be appropriate or likely tolerated (this was at least true back when I was a scout many years ago).
 
Throwing Romans said:
Given that Schaefer is a disbarred lawyer IIRC, he should be at least evenly matched with our plucky pro se tard.
Click to expand...
There is a disbarred attorney named J. Michael Schaefer according to the Nevada Bar's website:
1773764356305.png
Apparently he was disbarred in 2001 for legal disputes with neighbors in a condo development where he owned multiple units.

This has to be our guy, there could be multiple people named Michael Schaefer in Vegas but multiple people with the same name and involvement with condos in Vegas is too much of a coincidence to be true.

Independent of his interactions with Russ/being a slumlord he has apparently stalked a comedian and filed serial unsuccessful requests to rejoin the bar. He and Russ deserve each other.

ETA: Wow, Schaefer really is the parallel-universe version of Russ. From the article describing his disbarment:
"I still think I was right -- I have no apology for what I did," said Schaefer
Click to expand...
Justices said Schaefer, among other things, tried to influence the testimony of a witness in a pending case; got a "self-serving award of costs" in a case without a court order; and submitted a false affidavit to a judge.
Click to expand...
Nevada [Supreme Court] Justices said the disputes involving Schaefer became so pervasive that real estate agents trying to sell other condo units "were compelled to disclose to potential buyers that a litigious lawyer lived there."
Click to expand...
From the article on his attempted reinstatement

Schaefer used to represent himself in these efforts
Click to expand...
Now 76, he wrote in 2006 that because he was disbarred he has become a “pariah” with ladies he would like to date.
Click to expand...
Yet in 2012, a restraining order keeping him 100 feet from [comic Brad] Garrett was granted.
Click to expand...
Garrett and others asked whether they could testify by telephone at the hearing because they were afraid to be in the same room as Schaefer
Click to expand...
Schaefer, who has been dubbed a vexatious litigant
Click to expand...
the [Nevada] Supreme Court “expressed reservations concerning Mr. Schaefer’s litigation activities
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
UncleTusky said:
Apparently he was disbarred in 2001 for legal disputes with neighbors in a condo development where he owned multiple units.

This has to be our guy, there could be multiple people named Michael Schaefer in Vegas but multiple people with the same name and involvement with condos in Vegas is too much of a coincidence to be true.

Independent of his interactions with Russ/being a slumlord he has apparently stalked a comedian and filed serial unsuccessful requests to rejoin the bar. He and Russ deserve each other.

ETA: Wow, Schaefer really is the parallel-universe version of Russ. From the article describing his disbarment:
Click to expand...
This is gold, Jerry, GOLD!!

For real, they should just kiss and get married.
 
RodgerDodger said:
So what are the odds the Judge orders both parties executed for the betterment of society?
Click to expand...
Forcing them to live with each other forever is funnier and limits their ability to harm innocents, which is why I hope the appeals judge drags this out even worse than the Greer v. Moon clowns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom