🦊 Furry Furry Fandom and Drama General

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
dontwantagoudatime24 said:
I remember seeing a video of a women going to a anime convention holding a sign saying "lolicon is pedophilia and promoting child sex abuse" and Pedotroons got butthurt over the fact people don't like it when you fap to drawn CSAM. I feel like furries need to get a similar message except it's "feral porn is zoophilia and normalizes animal sexual abuse/harkness test is the same as the lolicon excuse kill yourself dog fuckers". I bet lots will out them selves as zoofags.
Click to expand...

Where are our heroes when we need them?

WBC_20051202_sacco-topeka5.jpg
 
John.Doe said:
The whole show is just a boner killer, furry or no. Zootopia, Robin Hood and Lion King at least have some decent designs, some romance or sexual tension, and in the case of the Lion King fuck me eyes so blatant it spawned a meme.
Click to expand...
It's interesting to me that g-rated family cartoons are considered sexier than an edgy comedy where characters talk about romance and sex all the time. It even had some Tumblerisms with the "asexual" character having to "come out" about not wanting to bone anyone.
I know being a furry is sometimes associated with arrested development. So furries will sexually imprint on the Disney films they watched 200 times at daycare, while an "adult" show like Bojack won't get seen by kids and was instead consumed primarily by 32-year-olds who read The Guardian and followed Popehat on Twitter.
Still, the things that furries glom onto and the things they reject always surprise me, but there always seems to be a consistent internal logic to it. I guess a lot of it is just the way the characters look.
 
It just has to be art style, then, right?
Screenshot_20260311_114626_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20260311_114717_Chrome.jpg
The horse man is literally fucking a human woman, in lingerie. Furries: meh.
The goofy fox is having a great day. Furries: omg hottest thing ever.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that if it were just about anthropomorphic animals, I'd expect Bojack to be more popular.
 
dontwantagoudatime24 said:
I remember seeing a video of a women going to a anime convention holding a sign saying "lolicon is pedophilia and promoting child sex abuse" and Pedotroons got butthurt over the fact people don't like it when you fap to drawn CSAM. I feel like furries need to get a similar message except it's "feral porn is zoophilia and normalizes animal sexual abuse/harkness test is the same as the lolicon excuse kill yourself dog fuckers". I bet lots will out them selves as zoofags.
Click to expand...
 
Law said:
It just has to be art style, then, right?
Click to expand...
It's probably a mix of that plus how these characters are written and portrayed. Robin Hood and Nala from Lion King are written with very "human" characteristics, they have real (for lack of a better term) personalities? I feel like maybe they are easier to imprint on as a friend, lover, mother, sibling whatever because of their portrayal.

Bojack Horseman is raunchy but also just follows the same beat of being shocking for the sake of laughs or whatever. One dimensional. The MLP horses are drawn like shit just like Bojack (just in a totally different but equally unappealing, IMO, style) but look at the fandom around them and compare the writing.
 
I had been working on this post quite a while, especially since Archive.ph is having problems with X and Nitter.
The archived videos with their chats are in .zip files.


A few years ago, there was this upcoming indie furry music label called 'Aural Alliance'.
We're a fresh Music Label built on socialist ideas distributing a diverse roster of artists across all major platforms. Our releases will be free for creators, and our revenue goes towards our artists.

Known to some through our previous work as Fuzznet Music, we learned there’s a big need for a better supportive infrastructure for Musicians in our community, as well as a good hub to find all kinds of artists across the fandom. While we will mainly work with a signed-on roster of artists, many of our funds and efforts will go towards building a cohesive Furry Musician Database and similar endeavours aimed at helping our peers.

60% of all label revenue is meant specifically for our artists. All of this portion will be paid out to artists only.

The remaining 40% don’t just go into the label’s pockets. This portion of the split firstly covers our overall operations & anything left over still goes towards artists through various means.

Aural Alliance openly embraces inclusivity.

Our label will consist of and welcomes individuals from the LGBTQIA+, BIPOC and Furry communities.
Click to expand...

They even licensed their music with a Creative Commons Attribution license.

Of course, they ruin this with 'anti-fascism'.
When it comes to politically charged content, if it does bash the fash, we heavily encourage it.
Click to expand...


However, one day, someone deleted everything. Finn, the founder, was caught in some lost controversy:
https://nitter.poast.org/M1ssD1X13F0xx/status/1833608543301173386 (https://archive.ph/Tcw6Z)
https://nitter.poast.org/Ry_koa/status/1833629897857941845 (https://archive.ph/x0uHb)
https://nitter.poast.org/deerBonkers/status/1833696376997159116 (https://archive.ph/YOXUR)

Sean Chiplock was involved, too.
https://nitter.poast.org/vaperroreon/status/1834926771340226604 (https://archive.ph/Gbxv0)

A takeover ensued.
https://nitter.poast.org/ELSEIFedm/status/1858292190574698979 (https://archive.ph/TmcMH)
https://nitter.poast.org/caseJackal/status/1833941469289488703 (https://archive.ph/QkV49)

The result was a rebrand to Awoominati Records.
(https://archive.ph/dPc9L)

Notice tha the Creative Commons license is gone.

A Reddit hread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/furry/comments/1oiuvb5/what_happened_to_this_aural_alliance/ (https://archive.ph/benoR)

Here are some stray Posts:
https://nitter.poast.org/russelbuck/status/1888460026899017741 (https://archive.ph/IdcFN)
https://nitter.poast.org/vaperroreon/status/1833670046696001849 (https://archive.ph/hYp7J)
https://nitter.poast.org/Erisworx/status/1833670899486093665 (https://archive.ph/PEjyh)
https://nitter.poast.org/rebane2001/status/1878581637459616208 (https://archive.ph/2afGB)


Cassidy compiles everything in one video:

Cassidy made another video that roasted Finn Raccoon:

This was a pattern:
https://nitter.poast.org/CassidyTheCivet/status/1875657341821186176 (https://archive.ph/QKwEJ)
https://nitter.poast.org/CassidyTheCivet/status/1830734653558530439 (https://archive.ph/OuXmC)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
dontwantagoudatime24 said:
Furries run the internet, almost everything in the entertainment and luxury industries and now their dipping their paws into Handling politics.

View attachment 8686077
"You can kill the man but you can't kill the idea"
Click to expand...

Jeets run the internet and jews run everything else. There isn't a single politician or notable celebrity furry that isn't a complete joke and openly mocked. Probably the most famous celebrity "furry" is that Insane Clown Possie guy who does furry shit because his daughter is into the fandom and ICP is already considered retarded by normies.
 
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
You'd think that Furries would fall head over heels for Mr. Peanutbutter? The character is such a typical furry stereotype within the Fandom.
View attachment 8685586
Click to expand...
Nah it's all got to be the art style. Not even style, just blatant incompetence? Everything but the faces look drawn by a 12 year old, like a slightly cleaned up Chris Chan drawing. Look at his tiny disproportionate hand randomly attached to his noodle arm. The other arm with no elbow, and the forearm drawn like "well I know an arm is two mostly straight curves, bam, done."

I think the problem is that it's not cartoony enough to be expressive like Adventure Time or Stephen Universe, they are realistically proportioned, but also drawn without any thought to underlying anatomy. It just looks amateurish.
 
Law said:
It just has to be art style, then, right?
.......
I guess what I'm trying to say is that if it were just about anthropomorphic animals, I'd expect Bojack to be more popular.
Click to expand...

Barry Williams said:
It's probably a mix of that plus how these characters are written and portrayed. Robin Hood and Nala from Lion King are written with very "human" characteristics, they have real (for lack of a better term) personalities? I feel like maybe they are easier to imprint on as a friend, lover, mother, sibling whatever because of their portrayal.
Click to expand...

I think a combination is correct. After all, it can't be the art style because an unhealthy amount of people thirst over Bandit Heeler from Bluey and that design is a no-neck rectangle with limbs attached. So I think we have two factors:

1. Character Design/Animation: This is all about the characters design and how they are animated. The better they look, the better they are animated, the highest they rate.
2. Fuckable Personality: Different people like different things, but depressing, stupid, or obnoxiously annoying personalities are a turn off so this score is based on how tolerable the character would be, combined with possible attractive personality traits.

When you combine these two scores, they have to go over some kind of threshold that makes the character be attractive in a way that encompasses both emotional and physical attraction. A really high score in one or the other can get you over the finish line, or mediocre scores in both probably. Really ugly characters or personalities deep six the chances, though.

So for example:
  • Robin Hood - His design is classic Disney, easy on the eyes and fluidly animated - moderate to high attractiveness. His personality is very romantic, affectionate, heroic, caring, and fun - just a cool guy to be around and won't piss you off the morning after. Easily passes the threshold.
  • Chief Bogo - He has a big brawny design that radiates masculine force, very attractive for people into manly muscles or bara look - high attractive levels. Bogo has a real gruff domineering attitude that appeals to submissive, but also a softer side for that classic 'grumpy guy with a heart of gold' - for people looking for a 'daddy' type he's very appealing. Easily passes the threshold.
  • Tiger Dangers - They have a muscular, lithe design, are almost always shirtless and dancing like pro strippers at all times - classic levels of physical attraction, hunky and graceful. Their personalities besides being loyal to Gazelle are pretty much a blank slate that lets people project onto them - weak personalities, but with potential. Overall their lack of personality doesn't help much, but their sheer visual appeal easily pushed them over the threshold.
  • Bandit Heeler - His design isn't unpleasant or ugly, but he's a rectangle with a muzzle and he's animated smoothly but not sexily - very low levels of physical attraction. Bandit's personality is the ur-example of a supportive, loving father figure that so many brain broken furries lack, goofy, doting, supportive, etc - for every fucked up person with daddy issues who have a desperate need for a caring masculine figure because they were from a single mother home Bandit's personality is catnip. He is pushed over the threshold from the personal tragedy of fatherless furries combining their need for a father figure and a fuckbuddy.
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
You'd think that Furries would fall head over heels for Mr. Peanutbutter? The character is such a typical furry stereotype within the Fandom.
Click to expand...

Well, if you grade him on the two factors as above, he scores so-so on the aesthetic front. His design is very generic and the animation lackluster. The larger issue is that, from a 30 second clip, you might think he's a stereotype of a 'himbo' that could be very sexy but in the full course of the show he's portrayed as much more depressingly neurotic. Since the writers hate fun, happiness, and positive vibes in all forms its revealed that his himboesque personality is all a front and he's actually a passively suicidal depressed bundle of neurotic ticks that couldn't maintain a relationship to save his life.
 
Last edited:
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...
Because it's a cynical ugly show. It looks like a shitty rick and morty/regular show cartoon, but without likeable characters. Hard to care about when it's so relentlessly unlikable.
 
Fenrir Ratatoskr said:
Because it's a cynical ugly show. It looks like a shitty rick and morty/regular show cartoon, but without likeable characters. Hard to care about when it's so relentlessly unlikable.
Click to expand...
Food for thought: Despite the fact that furries are no stranger to miserable slop, even Izzyizz's pilot was soundly rejected.
 
Noebel said:
I am a bit confused. Is it so over, or are they so back?
Click to expand...
They are SO BACK:

SubscribeStar updated again. Time to hit the diff checker.
https://subscribestar.adult/prohibited_content (archive) (ghost) (mega)

ss-facial-features.webp

Old said:
Characters portrayed with body proportions, facial features, clothing, or contextual cues commonly associated with minors
Click to expand...
New said:
Characters portrayed with body proportions and features commonly associated with minors
Click to expand...
They appear to have softened the language on prohibited characters considered to be minors. This probably saves gothic lolita from being banned ("clothing"), perhaps ABDL ("contextual cues").

Old said:
Any depiction of sexual activity between a human and an animal is prohibited
Click to expand...
New said:
Any depiction of sexual activity between a human and a real animal is prohibited
Click to expand...
With this change, drawn bestiality is no longer banned.
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...
I saw a lot of those Bojack Horseman styled avatars all over FA once. I even saw furry accounts post clips and other messages from the series. I feel tha they have been actually enjoying the series, even if not s obvious at first.
 
Furry fads come and go with the tides. Without looking, I'd guess the reason Bojack didn't catch on is either there just wasn't enough tide to overtake whatever was popular just before it or something more interesting came out just after/at the same time.

People are quick to come up with all kinds of philosophical reason as to why something did or didn't happen, but you'll find more often than not it's related to the timing.
 
Law said:
It just has to be art style, then, right?
View attachment 8685725View attachment 8685726
The horse man is literally fucking a human woman, in lingerie. Furries: meh.
The goofy fox is having a great day. Furries: omg hottest thing ever.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that if it were just about anthropomorphic animals, I'd expect Bojack to be more popular.
Click to expand...
Watch this and it'll tell you everything you need to know. Even normal people can develop crushes on such characters and still turn out completely normal. I don't know what these people internet search histories look like but they're likely normal.
 
Gog & Magog said:
Watch this and it'll tell you everything you need to know. Even normal people can develop crushes on such characters and still turn out completely normal. I don't know what these people internet search histories look like but they're likely normal.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=btUx3gb0-FE
Click to expand...
One of my weirder crushes when I was younger was Sally from cars and I did not grow up to stick my wee wee in or lick a cars exhaust pipe.

Furtards will always care more for others political opinions rather than their degenerative behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom