🦊 Furry Furry Fandom and Drama General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Unless their fursona dates back to 1998 or something, most people using rodents and possums as their online avatar are gross People of Gender who gravitate toward those animals because they are generally seen as unclean and have decided to "ironically" embrace that themselves.
 
Barry Williams said:
Unless their fursona dates back to 1998 or something, most people using rodents and possums as their online avatar are gross People of Gender who gravitate toward those animals because they are generally seen as unclean and have decided to "ironically" embrace that themselves.
Click to expand...
It's not the animals that are unclean, it's the deluded humans pretending to be them that are disgustingly filthy. Reports from Hotel Staff as to the state Furries left the Hotel rooms, bathrooms, public bathrooms are enough to justify this. Don't blame a hungry "Pizza rat" for scampering off with a discarded piece of pizza when you saw or heard what Furries did to a pizza at BLFC. Humans can be very disgusting animals!

If animals could talk I wonder what they'd have to say about these humans dressed as Furries pretending to be like them? I can imagine such words would not be of a positive persuasion.
 
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
If animals could talk I wonder what they'd have to say about these humans dressed as Furries pretending to be like them? I can imagine such words would not be of a positive persuasion.
Click to expand...

Oy vey Hooman, thats anti-rodentic!

images (1).jpeg
 
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
This is the prime example of someone who pretends to be a follower of Christ but sins like Satan.
Click to expand...

Barry Williams said:
simply saying "I'm Christian now" isn't really good enough, it's making a commitment and following through.
Click to expand...

A follower of Christ can and will make mistakes, though the main difference is that pattern of behavior of willful violation without repentance, and earnest without attempts to remedy thru accountability to another.

"Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye." - Matthew 7:3-5 (ESV)

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits." - Matthew 7:15-16 (ESV)


Minion Facebook Memes said:
things like bestiality, defiling ones body/harming others, and dishonest business practices are all quite thoroughly and explicitly condemned in the bible, whether by name or by principle!
Click to expand...
Exodus 20:1-17. There's several shorthand mentions elsewhere of these:

"But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For the people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen of conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people." - 2 Timothy 3:1-5 (ESV)

Mind you, none of this is meant to be legalistic, a sound mind with moral clarity knows what is right and what is wrong.
 
The best way to "date" a furry is to stumble into it on accident because you're both behaving like normal people in a social environment outside of the furry fandom, meaning you're both well adjusted people and had no idea you had that in commons until much later.

If you are in the fandom and looking for love inside that same fandom, "you're gonna have a bad time".
 
dontwantagoudatime24 said:
So thread what would your opinion on it. As for me i wouldn't mind dating a furry.

As long as she isn't a far-left nutjob or a depraved gooner. I rather Ack myself than have her shove a 20 inch horse cock dildo into my anus no thank you.
Click to expand...

The chance of finding a furry who is simultaniously:

A. An actual legit female
B. Not a left wing nutjob
C. Not a gooner sex pest

Is zero. You have a better chance of finding an actual hot submissive Christian girl with big non-fake tits who willl play vidya ganes with you before they cook a nice meal and raise beautiful aryan christian babies. That is literally less delusional.
 
Last edited:
The Mass Shooter Ron Soye said:
These are the changes between the policy captured in November 2025 (updated February 5, 2024), and the new policy. I added some line breaks around headings and paragraphs to make it more readable, and used Text Compare like Ana Valens did:
Click to expand...
SubscribeStar has updated its policy again, under 15 hours later, to remove the sections about "Feral Animal Sexual Content" and "Anthropomorphic Characters". "Bestiality" is still prohibited by this one line: "Any depiction of sexual activity between a human and an animal is prohibited".

https://subscribestar.adult/prohibited_content
Yesterday's archives: (archive) (ghost) (mega) (wayback)
Today's archives: (archive) (ghost) (mega) (wayback)

I found out from reading this Niche Gamer article:
SubscribeStar quietly amends content policies to comply with payment processor censorship (archive) (ghost) (mega) (wayback)

They also fixed the embarrassing "tabaco" typo they had for years.
 
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...
If you ask me, it's definitely something along the lines of the artstyle being far too "bitmoji" and somewhere on the rising curve of the uncanny valley, and generally tard-repellent in it's being so. All of the shows, movies, etc. that are adored by furfags are often built on the framework of having a cutesy, low-realism artstyle that's far easier to fetishise

Also, there are some furries who are into Bojack Horseman, it's sort of inevitable with anything that has anthro characters, no matter how they're drawn or animated. It's just nowhere near as prolific as the normie audience that likes the show. So it goes.
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...

E621 autofill search says there are 1.8k posts with the tag Bojack_Horseman and like 600 for the character. I assume the art style isn't goonable enough for whatever reason. Also the show is boring from what I remember and furries probably see Bojack as an unflattering mirror of themselves.
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...
Bojak is also a groomer. So you think most furries would relate to him.
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...

The character design is pretty bland, but its mostly the uninspiring art style and the fact that most of the show is written by TDS obsessed weirdos that make it as depressing and unsexy as possible because they hate men, sexuality, and happiness. The whole show is just a boner killer, furry or no. Zootopia, Robin Hood and Lion King at least have some decent designs, some romance or sexual tension, and in the case of the Lion King fuck me eyes so blatant it spawned a meme.

1773241207320.png
This is the first example I found.
 
I remember seeing a video of a women going to a anime convention holding a sign saying "lolicon is pedophilia and promoting child sex abuse" and Pedotroons got butthurt over the fact people don't like it when you fap to drawn CSAM. I feel like furries need to get a similar message except it's "feral porn is zoophilia and normalizes animal sexual abuse/harkness test is the same as the lolicon excuse kill yourself dog fuckers". I bet lots will out them selves as zoofags.
 
Law said:
I have a question. Why is Bojack Horseman not embraced by the furry fandom the way Zootopia, Robin Hood, and Lion King are? It's got anthropomorphic animals and is generally considered a well-written show, it's also rated R and has human characters dating animal characters. Is it just the ugly, cheap-looking, bitmoji-esque art? Is there something about the character designs that repels fetishists? Was it secretly a hit with furries and I'm just unaware of it?
Click to expand...
You'd think that Furries would fall head over heels for Mr. Peanutbutter? The character is such a typical furry stereotype within the Fandom.
Screenshot_11-3-2026_111121_www.indiewire.com.jpeg
 
Noebel said:
I am a bit confused. Is it so over, or are they so back?
Click to expand...
Mostly so back, if you mean the furries being permitted to collect dough on SubscribeStar. Although there is a line left about "any depiction" of human-animal sex in the latest version of the policy that could mean it bans fictional bestiality.

SS can rewrite their policies all they want, next up is wielding or not wielding the banhammer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom