💼 Careercow Donald J Trump - 45th/47th President of the USA, convicted felon, Epstein bro, Putin/Netanyahu simp, serial liar, sore loser, cheat and the Chris-Chan of Presidents. THIS IS NOT USPG2.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
View attachment 8680916

40% are good goys pulling Netanyahu in their rickshaw.

Matt Walsh will never not be funny to me because he looks like some craft beer-loving lib.

His whole gimmick is men should not enjoy anything ever. He's not representative of Republicans in general.
And Libya, not much more, also below 40% (and rightly so), as the near future has already shown, and it's still a huge mess there because of it. It has completely set the region on fire and destabilized it. It was a very, very stupid and tragic war, also absolutely hopeless. The current war with Iran is even more stupid and tragic in its consequences. And Iran has even less support than Libya but both are at the very end and rightly so. Well, that is perfectly logical and doesn't surprise me and makes sense. Well, I'm surprised why Iraq and Kosovo had such high support. Those were also very stupid wars.
 
Last edited:
Pete Hegseth spent $15 million on ribeye steak in September. And $225 million on furniture:

Some of the frivolous September purchases made under Secretary Pete Hegseth’s stewardship include a $98,329 Steinway & Sons grand piano for the Air Force chief of staff’s home, $5.3 million for Apple devices such as the new iPad, and an astronomical amount of shellfish, including $2 million for Alaskan king crab and $6.9 million worth of lobster tail. (Lobster tail is apparently a favorite of Hegseth’s Pentagon—the department spent more than $7.4 million total on the luxury item in March, May, June, and October.)

In other pricey food purchases, the government decided to drop $15.1 million for ribeye steak (again, just in September), $124,000 for ice cream machines, and $139,224 on 272 orders of doughnuts.
One of the largest bulk expenditures was just for furniture, for which the Pentagon decided to shell out $225 million. That included $12,000 for fruit basket stands, and checks totaling more than $60,000 for Herman Miller recliners. All in all, the agency spent more on furniture in 2025 than it had in over a decade.

Where is DOGE at?
 
The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump's advisors are recommending he withdraw from the war with Iran. Gasoline prices in the US have risen 17% in a week. According to these reports, Trump is surprised by Iran's refusal to compromise or negotiate. Trump wants to end the conflict this week but is unsure how to present it.
Yeah, unfortunately nobody in this administration seems to have read classic fairy tales. Distracting someone with offers to negotiate and then sneak attacking them while their guard is down is really, really effective. Makes you wonder why people don't do it all the time. It's almost like the second or third time you pull that trick, people will just refuse to negotiate with you from then on out, giving any conflict no offramps. This applies to both sides of the aisle, the Europeans did the same shit with the Minsk accords. Every retard thinks he's come up with a revolutionary idea when he's pulling golden egg after golden egg out of his butchered goose, or watching the townsfolk fall for that old 'crying wolf' trick yet again.
 
Well, I'm surprised why Iraq and Kosovo had such high support. Those were also very stupid wars.
No one really gave a fuck about the Bosnians because their lifestyle wasn't like those nice Europeans living in Belgrade... We tolerated the shit out of Milosovic, even calling him a "guarantor of peace", before bombing his house in '99.
 
Yeah, unfortunately nobody in this administration seems to have read classic fairy tales. Distracting someone with offers to negotiate and then sneak attacking them while their guard is down is really, really effective. Makes you wonder why people don't do it all the time. It's almost like the second or third time you pull that trick, people will just refuse to negotiate with you from then on out, giving any conflict no offramps. This applies to both sides of the aisle, the Europeans did the same shit with the Minsk accords. Every retard thinks he's come up with a revolutionary idea when he's pulling golden egg after golden egg out of his butchered goose, or watching the townsfolk fall for that old 'crying wolf' trick yet again.
Alternatively, Iran has free license to do the same to the US. America decided to destroy its diplomacy.
 
Then he should go and sign up to fight for Israel in this war. He can lead the Ladybugs Brigades. Iran is homophobic don't you know? Surely a band of sodomites will bring them to their demise.
They might even crash the Grindr servers there, if there is one.

Imagine if a member of China's People's Assembly said this. Maybe something along the lines of "I'm not with you (Xi or the Chinese people), I'm with Kim Jong Un to my dying day".
What would happen?
"Cool, that day is today."

Treasonous scum.

Pete Hegseth spent $15 million on ribeye steak in September. And $225 million on furniture:




Where is DOGE at?
They don't want you to get universal healthcare, cheap petrol, good roads to drive on, safe parks and livable cities, but they must stuff their faces like literal North Korean dynasty emperor.
All of those things re communist, don't you know? Because it's not like literally every other advanced western nation has them all.

Unreal.

By the way, remember when this orange nonce banned Chinese drone parts and gave a multi million dollar government contract to one of his family members specifically focusing on drone manufacturing? Does anyone remember that?
Just look at who stands to benefit from this stupid fruitless war. It's not just who with an echo, look within your own government.
 
Last edited:
We’ve suffered much worse than Trump before and come out on top.
I want to agree with your sentiment, we have indeed been through, strictly speaking, much worse CONDITIONS. We have had administrations wielding the same level of power, a government trifecta with a stacked supreme court. We have been through depressions, we have been through wars, we have been through close calls that have nearly leveled the Western world. We have survived coup d'etat plans, insurrectionists, domestic and foreign terrorism. Strictly speaking of conditions, we have been through times that were a million times worse than what we are going through today.

But these things mentioned above, for one, almost none of the wars we have fought have been threats to our homeland. The last time something like that happened were the Indian Wars, and even then we had the Indians cowed from the very beginning, they were only a real threat out West, and even then not an existential one. For two, for the wars that could have posed serious threats to the homeland or to our ability to conduct ourselves abroad, we had some of the best leadership we could ask for. Washington, Lincoln, say what you want about Roosevelt, I'll probably agree with you, but he was an excellent wartime leader, MacArthur, Eisenhower, Grant, Sherman, Patton, you could write up a list with about 30-50 names if you wanted to. And for our minor and proxy wars, the worst blunders we've had were not existential threats, and could be managed by men of lesser skill.

As far as depressions, terrorism, insurrections go, we have had excellent or at the very least middling leadership that have, either quickly or with time, pulled us out and we escaped mostly unscathed. But these are all problems that are easy to rally people on. You can rally people for or against wars easily, you can rally people against terrorists and insurrectionists, you can rally people around fixing a depression or a recession. The great issue of our day is not this war, or terrorists, or the economic hellscape that we live in, these are all problems that make sense, rather it is the crisis of corruption in the nation, and this is something that is difficult to rally people against. It is easy to say our leaders are corrupt, it is nearly impossible to get people to agree to a solution. All solutions are bound up in other political affairs, meaning every reform we attempt to pass has knock-on effects that will upset SOMEONE. The consequence is that we achieve nothing, while those in power fleece us.

Trump is a president who possesses power that past presidents have dreamt of, and few have had. The man has the House and Senate under his thumb, the Executive branch is purged and packed with loyalists, he has a Supreme Court full of people who he appointed, or have consciously allied with him. They have ruled that he has immunity against all punishment for anything done in office. The only thing he could ask for really is a supermajority in the Senate so he could avoid the filibuster, but then he's quite keen on executive orders to sidestep Congressional approval on issues. Admittedly, many of these executive orders have been challenged, and some have even been thrown out by his packed Court, so take my statement with a pinch of salt there. But my overarching point is: A President with an exceptional control over the government and law, and look at what he does with it.

He starts pointless wars, he engages in market manipulation, he enriches his friends, family and allies, he threatens American allies except for the one, he spends government money litigating and challenging his enemies, he uses his influence to censor negative coverage of him, he makes a fool of our nation abroad with big puffed up threats, he institutes ridiculous economic policies that backpedal on 80 years of free trade policy WITHOUT fixing the problems that people have with it. Look at what he doesn't do, he does not challenge monopolies, mergers, or market manipulation, he does not make any attempt to reform the housing market, or to regulate corrupt business practices, he does not attempt to reform healthcare, he does not challenge lobbyists or dark money. This is to say nothing about the man making vague statements about third terms, or about interfering with elections, or about being a dictator. Call them jokes, maybe, but I would expect that the man who is apparently victim of rigged elections, and ballot stuffing would want our elections to be free of interference.

Our great problem of the day is not the conditions themselves, which are certainly bad, but not catastrophic, it is the fact that the people in power have no interest in fixing it, no interest in meaningful change, they are payed off, they are in bed with one another. In fact they are often aligned with the people who cause economic and societal problems for the average person, because they stand to gain in power, money or influence. They have no respect for our institutions, and only see the government as a vessel to enact their will and the will of their backers upon the country, and the world. Nothing will improve until we improve the quality of our leadership, and the strength of our institutions against corrupt men. This is what will destroy our country, not a recession, not a war, not a terrorist attack or a coup, but powerful men, corporations, and organizations devouring the nation alive, destroying the systems of power that have kept us afloat in our worst days, with only the approval of a plurality of the population.

long rambly post, sorry!
 
Last edited:
I feel like Hegseth is gonna get thrown under the bus if the war gets any worse. Every time he talks it’s about how victory is assured .
That prancing faggot should be thrown under a bus literally. Sadly, it feels optimistic to think that it will even happen figurtively. No other individual has been such an effective detriment to US military interests since the days of the Kido Butai.
 
Trump's man warns several countries: "Otherwise, you will suffer the consequences."

Influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham appealed to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council allies to join the US strikes against Iran, threatening them with dire consequences if they didn't. He quickly received a response from a Dubai billionaire.

In a post published on Monday, Graham criticized the lack of engagement by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in light of Iran's retaliatory attacks on those countries, which resulted in, among other things, the evacuation of US embassies.

Question: Why would America enter into a defense agreement with a country like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that refuses to join the fight in the common interest?

Graham wrote.

Americans are dying, and the US is spending billions to overthrow the terrorist Iranian regime that threatens the region. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is issuing statements and acting in a marginally supportive manner, but refuses to participate in military operations aimed at ending Iranian terror," he added.

Trump's circle is panicking after the attack on Iran. "It could be a political disaster."'

He noted that he hopes both the Saudis and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries will become more involved, "because this fight is taking place in their backyard."

If you're not ready to use your military now, when are you going to do so? I hope that changes soon. Otherwise, you will suffer the consequences,

the senator threatened.

Trump's man appeals for support. It concerns US attacks on Iran. Senator threatens consequences.

Khalaf al-Habtur, a prominent Emirati billionaire close to the Dubai government, responded to Graham's post, accusing the US of dragging the Gulf states into war without consulting its allies.

If President Donald Trump and Senator Graham are willing to risk their country and American lives for Israel's interests, that's their choice. We will not do the same,

the businessman wrote.

He added that although Graham is a US senator, he could be mistaken for a member of the Israeli Knesset.

Iranian attacks on infrastructure and civilian targets in neighboring countries have caused significant economic losses, crippling the oil sector. So far, these countries have largely confined themselves to defensive actions.

Donald Trump's Blunder: Sharp Reaction from the US President's Niece

Saudi Arabia does not have a formal, binding mutual defense treaty with the United States, although Donald Trump granted it Major Non-NATO Ally status last year. This provides privileged access to US arms sales but does not provide any specific or enforceable security guarantees and is not a binding treaty. The conclusion of such a treaty was reportedly a demand put forward by Riyadh as part of negotiations on normalizing relations between the monarchy and Israel.

The US is threatening its allies and calling for an attack. "You will suffer the consequences."

Influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham warned Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council allies on Monday that they will face consequences if they do not join in attacks on Iran, criticizing their lack of involvement in Iran's retaliatory attacks on American diplomatic missions.

Senator Graham warns Gulf countries of consequences
The right-wing politician stated in a tweet posted on Monday that, in light of Iranian attacks on American targets, which resulted in, among other things, the evacuation of US embassies, Gulf states have demonstrated a lack of loyalty.

"The question is: why would America enter into a defense agreement with a country like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is unwilling to join the fight in the common interest?" Graham wrote. "Americans are dying, and the US is spending billions to topple the terrorist Iranian regime that threatens the region. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is issuing statements and acting in a marginally supportive manner behind the scenes, but is unwilling to participate in military operations aimed at ending Iranian terror," the Republican added.

Republican senator threatens Persian Gulf countries: "You will suffer the consequences."
The Trump advisor expressed hope that both the Saudis and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries will soon demonstrate greater engagement, "because this fight is taking place in their backyard."

If there is no change in the attitude of American allies in the region, Graham threatened them with consequences.

Explosions in the Persian Gulf countries. Iran attacks despite promises

"If you are not ready to use your military now, when will you do so? I hope this changes soon. Otherwise, you will suffer the consequences," the senator thundered.

The US seeks support in the Middle East. "It's their choice"
Emirate billionaire Khalaf al-Habtur, who is closely linked to the Dubai government, responded to the Republican senator's tweet. He accused the United States of dragging Gulf states into war without consulting allies.

"If President Donald Trump and Senator Graham are willing to risk their country and the lives of Americans for Israel's interests, that's their choice. We will not do the same," the businessman wrote. He added that although Graham is a US senator, he could be confused with a member of the Israeli Knesset.

Explosions in the Persian Gulf countries. Iran attacks despite promises

"If you are not ready to use your military now, when will you do so? I hope this changes soon. Otherwise, you will suffer the consequences," the senator thundered.

The US seeks support in the Middle East. "It's their choice"
Emirate billionaire Khalaf al-Habtur, who is closely linked to the Dubai government, responded to the Republican senator's tweet. He accused the United States of dragging Gulf states into war without consulting allies.

"If President Donald Trump and Senator Graham are willing to risk their country and the lives of Americans for Israel's interests, that's their choice. We will not do the same," the businessman wrote. He added that although Graham is a US senator, he could be confused with a member of the Israeli Knesset.

Trump called Putin, details revealed. "A Few Proposals"

Saudi Arabia does not have a formal, binding mutual defense treaty with the United States, although Donald Trump granted it the status of Major Non-NATO Ally last year. This provides privileged access to American arms sales but does not provide any specific or enforceable security guarantees, nor is it a binding treaty.

Such an agreement was reportedly proposed by Riyadh as part of negotiations on the normalization of relations between the monarchy and Israel.

Trump and MAGA and "America First" suddenly turned out to be neoconservatives, neoconservatives at their worst, closely aligned with and collaborating with someone like Lindsey Graham and MIGA and "Israel First." Who would have thought? Who would have guessed.
 
The sad fact of the matter is that be it Trump or Kamala, this shit would have gone down no matter what. Trump completely sold our conservatism when his masters told him to do so, no hesitation whatsoever.

But one must be smarter to see the wider picture and be reminded that it doesnt matter the puppets are in conflict, the arms controlling them come from the same body.

Any MAGA worth their salt knows Trump aint it if he is willing to sell us out this much this quick.

For MAGA to survive, it needs to ditch Trump, he is a liability now.

Tho if there is a "bright side" to this is the fact that "The Noticing" has never been higher and Israel's reach is being laid bare for even notices to fucking notice if they actually WANT to.

Preschoolers lie more convincingly.

Dead ones cant
 
Was he not a potential liability as far back as 2016? Most everyone knew that he was a rancid piece of shit even before 2016, but for some reason, everyone across the entire political spectrum turned their brains off during the 2010s.

Trump's advantage is his boldness and knowing to appeal to the right groups in the right way. You really need to put yourself in the 2016 mindset as people were, and still are really, tired of the wonders of democrats and the fact they hated Trump so much really made it seem like he was "that guy", the one that the establishment hated it so of course he must actually get something meaningful done, right?

But honestly, it really is becoming a case of "shit" except if one is blue or red.
 
The sad fact of the matter is that be it Trump or Kamala, this shit would have gone down no matter what. Trump completely sold our conservatism when his masters told him to do so, no hesitation whatsoever.
I mean I do not doubt that Kamala would've still funded Israel, but she would not have done war with Iran because even Joe Biden for all his faults didn't take the bait.

Trump is uniquely stupid to poke the bear that is Iran especially when you remember that he thought it would work out like Venezuela.
 
Back
Top Bottom