Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Corpun said:
Black people are weak to psychic type pokemon?
Click to expand...
1772401702053.png
Yes? Been so since gen 1
 
Waffle Iron said:
The seethe is sweet.
Click to expand...
It's embarrassing. This fake "encyclopedia" routinely lies in the face of reality, much like Young Earth Creationists. It's absolutely incapable of telling the truth. It is a LIEpedia.
 
funwithshemales69 said:
I'm simply amazed as to how the Arabs took over the civilized world and their greatest invention (the Internet) while not even having functional electrical grids. It really is the crusades of the modern day, as Constantinople became istanbul, so will Britain become Anglistan.
Click to expand...
Never a word on Lent and its traditional customs. The West puts other cultures before its own.
 
Wikipedia is nothing but a vile, disgusting, one-sided view of things, a propaganda mouth-piece. Irony in a nutshell, from the mouth of the beast, explained here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact .

Their take on the concepts of "Compound facts", "Fact–value distinction", and "Factual–counterfactual distinction", and their approach to them, undermines any credibility claims they present.
 
"Originally, there were four Bratz dolls [only 1 citation for the first three and only for the latina, and it's also a jewish source???], and one of them is Black[1][2][3][4]."
Screenshot_2026-03-03-09-54-00-244_com.brave.browser-edit.jpg
 
Last edited:
Darwin Watterson said:
"Is or was" isn't that bad. "Could be" is fucking retarded and makes him sound like a cryptid.
Click to expand...
Schrodinger's Iranian Revolutionary Politician. He is both dead and alive at the same time, so that's why we need to bomb Tehran into the stone age.
 
Katy Yolfo said:
Click to expand...
Discussed upthread:
WhiteNight

Post in thread 'Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General'

Someone created a Category:Mass shootings by transgender individuals two days ago. It currently has 4 articles:
1771090481378.png


Needless to say, it was immediately nominated for deletion.
1771090562160.png


The conversation is ongoing and long:

There are a few keep votes in there, so not all hope is lost.
Reactions:Informative x 4 Like x 4 Winner x 1 Horrifying x 12 Optimistic x 1

It's been relisted so the discussion continues though it's already gone on for weeks.
 
Last edited:
Vriljami said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Republicans (https://ghostarchive.org/archive/iwwVv)

Compare the two. I know it requires the effort of clicking the link but just do it.
Click to expand...
The Young democrats of America article is a totally neutral summary of the history of the group, a list of leaders and a timeline of how it's changed under different presidencies. Zero controversies are mentioned. There isn't even a section for it. The Young Republicans has a very brief opening 6 sentences describing what it is then nearly the entire rest of the article is controversies. It is literally "here is what the young Republicans are now let me tell you about the Nazi telegram leaks". This is bad even by Wikipedia standards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom