Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The ones on far left youtubers are worse. You can't use. Non reliable sources, but their own opinions for some reason and their own videos matter now. Except when? Being accused of being pedophiles in their own words.
Also, my favorite one is how the Bumpy Johnson article is tiny compared to the Trump article. Yeah, just one of the most prolific gangsters. Of the 1940s to the 1960s, yeah. Not that important.
 
Idiot Asshole said:
I was browsing some of the afrocentrist/black supremacist/nigger content and came across this on the page for Wallace Fard Muhammad (aka the found of the Nation of Islam).
View attachment 8555168
Archive. This is hysterical, retarded trash, so naturally I was curious about the source:

View attachment 8555181
A unarchived Youtube video! Very scholarly. Let's check in on this illuminating content.

View attachment 8555194

It's a random livestream by a nigger with bad greenscreen that's accrued less than 6000 views in a year featuring this as the PhD "expert":
View attachment 8555212
Click to expand...
"Lynching's were a daily occurrence" per the NAACP between 1882 and 1968 4,743 people were lynched with 3,446 of them being black people. I have no doubt in my mind these numbers are inflated too. But yeah, "daily" lynching.
1771011081934.png
 
WhiteNight said:
Someone created a Category:Mass shootings by transgender individuals two days ago. It currently has 4 articles:
View attachment 8560701

Needless to say, it was immediately nominated for deletion.
View attachment 8560703

The conversation is ongoing and long:

There are a few keep votes in there, so not all hope is lost.
Click to expand...
Note that a ton of the Keep votes are robotically agreeing with Wikipedo "Blueraspberry",; whose whole rationale is that such an article would be bad for trans people. This is one thing I hate about Wikipedia: It's clearly being used to put a thumb on the scale of public discourse.
 
Tranny is not a gender, it's a mental illness. The argument doesn't even work. I am betting the fucker was in such a rush they just chose the first thing that popped into their head as a excuse.
 

Another case of why use a 70+ year old photo for a political figure who was active well into the modern day. I would get it if Sihanouk was a relatively irrelevant monarch from Southeast Asia, but he is arguably one of the most interesting historical figures from that region of the world in the late 20th-century. A far more suitable photo to use would be any number of existing ones from the Vietnam War where he was serving as Prime Minister and de facto king ruling through his mother he abdicated to. But no, we get some photo from the 40s when Cambodia was a French Protectorate.
 
Sicko Hunter said:
The forum is barely working right now so please excuse me if this image is unreadable. This is one of the most bizarre pages I have found on Wikipedia. It's an article about a ridiculous anime sculpture of a woman shooting milk out of her titties that's supposed to be social commentary on Japanese consumerism and Otaku culture? But it's literally just some hentai girl shooting milk out of her titties.
View attachment 8543478
Oh also someone paid over 420k for a cast of it. Not money laundering btw! Serious art!
View attachment 8543496
Link to sculpture very much NSFW https://www.christies.com/img/LotImages/2002/NYR/2002_NYR_01081_0316_000(043231).jpg
CNN article on it and the artist behind it https://www.cnn.com/2013/01/13/world/asia/talk-asia-murakami/index.html

I found this while researching the post war meth epidemic in Japan. The main brand name for meth was "Hiropon" (translates to "lover of work") which is also the name of the sculpture.
Click to expand...
Takashi Murakami (the artist who did the college dropout cover) is goated.
You faggot ass nigga
Sargon's wife's son said:
Oh, that guy's actually a well known. Japanese artists. And a bit of a low cow. He keeps insisting his art is extremely deep and not just glorified. Pornography. That's actually part of a series he did. Weirdly, he was on Toy in America and I saw it.
Because it's funny, he doesn't have normal art. But for some reason he makes a lot of this weird kumar OT. You also wanna know that statue, one of the copies of the cast's sold for like half a 1,000,000 dollars.
Click to expand...

Most of his art has nothing sexual in it
Examples
1000003178.png
1000003177.webp
 
Last edited:
Corpun said:

Another case of why use a 70+ year old photo for a political figure who was active well into the modern day. I would get it if Sihanouk was a relatively irrelevant monarch from Southeast Asia, but he is arguably one of the most interesting historical figures from that region of the world in the late 20th-century. A far more suitable photo to use would be any number of existing ones from the Vietnam War where he was serving as Prime Minister and de facto king ruling through his mother he abdicated to. But no, we get some photo from the 40s when Cambodia was a French Protectorate.
Click to expand...
My best guess is that they’re trying to capture how those (dead) figures appeared in their prime, so to speak. When Queen Elizabeth died, they managed to dig up one of her official portraits from 1959 and replace the more contemporary photo at the top of her article with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom