Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Have any of these retards read the actual file documents? There is no Rowling Epstein connection at all.

View attachment 8510525

What you have is Epstein getting tickets for a Harry Potter stage production in New York. Rowling played no role.

View attachment 8510536

For these types, the mere mention of Harry Potter is enough to make them see red. Any mention of Harry Potter can easily be interchanged with JKR. It's all the same to them.

They’re just going to run with this Epstein thing until everyone believes it, just like they told everyone her mild ass “my thoughts on gender” letter was some manifesto about killing troons until they all believed it.

I’ve seen them using that graphic invitation to the play with “JK Rowling invites you to” on it as proof they were totally best friends but I’ve seen other theatre/film premiere invites and it’s standard for them to say “(producers name) invites you to” regardless of who it’s for. it’s a nothingburger.

Daniel Lismore's latest anti-JKR rant involved just that. Comments were mostly "dude, that's not what it says" or other people believing it merely because Daniel said it, to the point of thanking him for being the whistleblower (I shit you not).

IMG_8377.jpeg
IMG_8378.jpeg IMG_8379.jpeg
IMG_8380.jpeg IMG_8381.jpeg

So to answer Evil's first question: no, they don't. Many of them play a game of telephone with tweets, skeets, TikToks, etc and will get upset or confused if you ask them if they actually read her actual tweets. They're willingly ignorant because it helps the narrative.

In their rush to gloat over Rowling they're forgetting that Epstein's entire MO was being a socialite who tried to get as many people in power implicated. I would imagine any rich and/or politically powerful person is likely to have some kind of oblique mention in these documents.

It's kind of like equating Diddy's white parties (industry events that lots of musical artists attended) with his infamous sex abuse parties.

If Rowling (or anyone else) did have direct communication or visited the island then yeah, it's worth some side eye and also probably socially responsible to make fun of her on the internet, but this "proof" is completely not it.

I had to google what Epstein was doing again because with all the conspiracy theories and other bullshit, I forgot that he was technically a financier and socialite larper. I could not remember the basic facts to help with context since the fallout has fallen into Derangement Syndrome. With how prolific and well tied he was, this would be like unraveling everyone that Bernie Madoff entwined into his Ponzi scheme, both victim and accomplice.

My opinion is the same. The fact they are going that nuts over mere mentions is the real telling part. Releasing the files is not a desire for the truth, it's a witch hunting ground. JKR was proven to be neither a client nor on the island, yet mere mentions of people wanting to meet her or get Harry Potter themed tickets might as well be her trafficking kids to them.
 
At least make an effort. For example, put all your complaints about billionaires and transphobes in a two-hour video essay that's ostensibly about a nineties video game but turns into a rant about JK Rowling ten minutes in and only ends when you get so mad you need to take a nap. You know, like a civilized person.
That sounds exhausting!

What on earth do people do besides make videos about how they aren't doing the things people claim they do. Phew!
 
If they had literally any counter to her actual arguments they wouldn’t need to grasp at straws like ‘Evil man’s assistant asks for tickets to mega hit Broadway show she didn’t even write’ or ‘her wallpaper has a weird pattern in that one photo.’
It just shows they have nothing.
There’s an answer that perhaps you’ll one day stumble upon, John: there’s no contradiction here because she’s both right and still perfectly consistent with her own worldview
Lithgow is bewildered because a) he hasn’t read anything she actually said so he has to stay vague, and b) agreeing with her views means you care more about women and children than the right of perverts to get boners from crossdressing.

As a side note, it’s awkward when two good KF posters fight. Let’s turn the radio up and sit in the car at least.
 
So let me get this straight; Epstein's assistant/publicist/whatever asked for a ticket to a Harry Potter play from the assistant of one of the producers of Cursed Child, a Broadway play in NYC that Joanne had zero involvement with, therefore JK is a pedophile that was friends with Jeffery Epstein?

Oh forgive me, there's also someone in the files that is A) a woman and B) signs off as "Jx" SO IT MUST BE HER!!!!!!!!!

(ignoring that the "jx" in the files spells airplane as airplane (the american spelling) when Joanne has only ever spelled it aeroplane (brit spelling))
 
I find it hilarious how libtards with no background themselves in any of these things first pretend that they won't take a critic seriously unless they hold degrees and have written papers in these fields, but the second you produce a neuroscientist or any other researcher who says these idiots are full of it, they disregard it and go on a mission to strawman or ad hominem attack the expert to discredit them. We're talking about a group of people who have no ability to look at the entire breadth of evidence and come to a conclusion, only people who cherry-pick and condemn anyone who doesn't tow the line.
 
Rowling: "Women continue to require sex based protections and misleading people into believing it's possible to change sexes is socially harmful and cruel to the individual."
Epstein: "Castrating little boys and turning them into estrogenized little fuck puppets sounds like a neat trick! But don't give girls medication that makes their cunts even stinkier, euh!"
Trannies on Twitter:
16bbbb07ddd98fdea3616960e83f4306-858358718.jpg
 
Trannies are mentally ill and will stop at nothing to try to "get" JK. And they fail over and over and over....

Just like they fail in their attempts to be women. Because they're men.
 
Trannies are mentally ill and will stop at nothing to try to "get" JK. And they fail over and over and over....

Just like they fail in their attempts to be women. Because they're men.
Every outlandish accusation of Holocaust denial, pedophilia, etc. is just a tacit admission that the original accusations of transphobia didn't stick. They have to make shit up because nobody except trannies and orbiters gives a shit that she said she doesn't think men are women.
 
R/TransgenderUK reacts:
1000011790.png
You see the classic progressive scope creep here, there is a tiny crumb of connection between Rowling and Epstein and they jump to call her a racist misogynist transphobe Nazi.
1000011793.png
1000011798.png
Thanks to that same scope creep we also have Helen Joyce catching a stray for reading cringey fanfiction. They don't mention that she writes about the yaoi to pooner pipeline.
1000011791.png
If you scroll down enough, you can see some users point out that the evidence is incredibly flimsy with some calling it misinformation. You can also see a transfemme enby poly plural engiqueer comb through their histories to evaluate their purity to the cause.
1000011796.png
1000011795.png
1000011797.png
Unsurprisingly, the engiqueer encourages minors to DIY their HRT.
1000011799.png
 
Back
Top Bottom