- Joined
- Jul 8, 2022
Soyteens successfully phonebooked Pragmata pedophile Slumbrrr (Alex Ruiz) into hiding.
I have looking into his works and have been archiving them. It's a bit of a challenge due to him "orphaning" his account.I don't really come here often but I had seen some of this drama on Twitter, and also again now that he's DFE'd. I had decided to briefly look at his AO3 the other day. I wish I had posted this before he DFE'd, but I believe this is an incredibly important part of this situation, which I had found on his very front page as a latest work. It now shows orphan_account, but the comments refer to the author as Slumbrrr explicitly.
https://archiveofourown.org/works/75360711 | https://archive.transformativeworks.org/works/75360711?view_adult=true
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Search Archive / Archive
Archive
This guy wrote so much smut, there is probably far more of his gross stuff out there. But I think I archived most of his shit.
It's funny seeing the pro-lolicon cope with reveal of Slumbrrr stating that one of his stories was "based on true events."
>"Stalker child, it's quite simply a joke! It's irony, he was only pretending that his writing was inspired by true events of child sexual abuse! So funny!"

>"Who cares? It's not an accurate and literal retelling of the true events! Therefore it's fine, it's still muh fiction!"

>"I'm dismissing your entire point because the origin of it is AO3! Genetic fallacy, what's that?"

They love to pull the "It's a joke!" card whenever they or their pals get pushback for their statements. But they won't apply the same standard for their opponents. First off, Slumbrrr didn't clearly clarify if it was an edgy joke or a genuine admission, even when people hinted for clarification in the comments. Even if it was a "joke" it's a very retarded and tasteless thing to put it in a detailed smut story involving a child character, and never clarify that it was a joke. That is still shitty behavior and utter stupidity; it being a "joke" doesn't suddenly protect it from all criticism. Jokes are meant to be funny, the punchline for this so-called joke fails spectacularly. Regardless if it was a joke or not, it still greatly downplays and glorifies real-world sexual abuse against children because it blurs the line between fiction and reality.
You know what? As a counterexample, all the death threats that Slumbrrr got were merely jokes! Why were Slumbrrr and his supporters getting upset over jokes?!

Somebody is going to think I was making a sincere statement above.