An update to this, as Alex has made an announcement of an apology on Twitter. He claims that was all a "
joke" and the "
cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking. Furthermore, he plays the victim because of all the pushback he got. But he does acknowledges what he did was dumb.
Here is the best part: he straight up admits and confirms that his phonebook is authentic. Not only that, but he confirms the pizza delivery happened as well.
View attachment 8293132View attachment 8293133
Nitter /
Archive /
Archive of the offending Tweet
I am critical of Slumbrrr's statement. I believe he is crying crocodile tears in order to play the victim. Painting everyone who was critical of his actions as "doxxers" or harassers. Which is most likely intended to overshadow any good-faith criticism of his behavior.
I don't believe him when he said that the joke was a "
double entendre." I believe he meant it as a sexual comment; why else would he use the lolicon dog whistle emotes?
>"on everyone's soul we WILL be cracking Diana"
The video game isn't called "
Diana" which makes zero sense if we were to interpret this as him referring to video game cracking. Not only that, he's fairly positive about the game. Why would he want to pirate a game that he wants to support? If he used the term "
Diana's game" or "
Pragmata" it would have strengthened his claim of it being a "
double entendre." But he never did that, which validates my assumption that
he originally meant for it to be sexual.
Why hasn't he provided any evidence for his claims? Where is this video footage of these cars he mentioned?
His life is
NOT in danger, nor was his family; it never was. He is exaggerating the annoyance of allegedly receiving pizza deliveries into a life-threatening issue. It's extremely unlikely that someone would make a life-changing effort to kill a person because of this Internet drama. The vast majority of death threats on the Internet are shallow and not followed through with.
He is
SOLELY responsible for
his OPSEC. It was his own
MASSIVE failures in safeguarding it that led to him getting unmasked and allegedly receiving pizzas. It was
HIS FAULT for having his
REAL LIFE NAME attached to his book, it was
HIS FAULT for being so careless on the Internet, it was
HIS FAULT for being provocative, and it was
HIS FAULT for not knowing how to cover up his Internet footprint.
At least he acknowledges that his tweet was a mistake and a stupid decision. But had it not gone as viral as it did, would he still have regretted it? Or is the regret only there due to the consequences of his own actions?
So overall,
Slumbrrr is not a victim; he was responsible for his own actions. Slumbrr playing the victim is pathetic and is meant as a deflection from genuine criticisms of his behavior. His original tweet was most likely sexual in nature. He should have owned up and accepted the consequences of his actions.