Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I am sorry
You are not excused. You are a kikenigger, and good thing you earned your ban - why the fuck did you think saying you are a lolitroon would earn good boy points?
It's time to stop pretending "freedom of speech extremism" is a good thing.
>Their gatekeeping you.
View attachment 8292610

Which SEAmoneky shithole do you guys think he's from? My money's on the Phillipines.
Brazil. I don't know why, I am hoping my country will be stained for once.
 
It’s amazing how much discourse with lolicons is just them pretending not to understand genuine anti-lolicon arguments, thus making discourse impossible.

Also, here is a funny tweet from H1-Beez Nuts / H1BeesNuts. (Archive)
>Gaijin, remember this, Japan is your greatest ally!
1765897356986.png
 
It’s amazing how much discourse with lolicons is just them pretending not to understand genuine anti-lolicon arguments, thus making discourse impossible.
I was thinking about this after reading this earlier:
Because they think they're on the right side of history and that you should be their allies. No different from any other delusional culture war faction
Lolicon arguments are a dead ringer for lefty Critical Race Theory "right side of history" arguments, just with a different coat of paint.
  • ackchually the heckin science agrees with me! presents conclusions in my favor- The only reason you don't talk about these is your preconceived biases!
  • I'm actually on the right side of free speech history! Lolicon / CRT curriculum is the canary in the coal mine, and if you bully me about it and call me a pedo / remove these government-sponsored classes you hate free speech!
  • It's just a joke bro! I said "I want to fuck a child"/"I want white people to die" as a simple joke and you cannot read any further into it for any reason because it's just a joke.
  • You're just a dumb racist / can't separate fiction from reality, don't believe your lying eyes.
I'm seeing the horseshoe form in front of me: one end CRT and the other cunny groypers.
 
Last edited:
It’s amazing how much discourse with lolicons is just them pretending not to understand genuine anti-lolicon arguments, thus making discourse impossible.

Also, here is a funny tweet from H1-Beez Nuts / H1BeesNuts. (Archive)
>Gaijin, remember this, Japan is your greatest ally!
View attachment 8292881
No one is our greatest ally, we do our own national policy; we have trading partners. The cold hard truth is that every country wants to exploit each other. Even if we take the principle of the White Nationalist view of "White people are inherently good", well, too bad - just take a look at the process of Balkanization and see maybe even before that - try to think of Ireland and England relationships to see if one country likes the other to the point of "greatest ally". They may look forward to a "good neighbour" policy, but not the the point of blindly following the other into doom.

This is especially true when speaking into other races. The nips may not be as noxious as the kikes; yet if you truly think they are angels or something... oh boy, get ready:
1765901482045.png
I was thinking about this after reading this earlier:

Lolicon arguments are a dead ringer for lefty Critical Race Theory "right side of history" arguments, just with a different coat of paint.
  • ackchually the heckin science agrees with me! presents conclusions in my favor- The only reason you don't talk about these is your preconceived biases!
  • I'm actually on the right side of free speech history! Lolicon / CRT curriculum is the canary in the coal mine, and if you bully me about it and call me a pedo / remove these government-sponsored classes you hate free speech!
  • It's just a joke bro! I said "I want to fuck a child"/"I want white people to die" as a simple joke and you cannot read any further into it for any reason because it's just a joke.
  • You're just a dumb racist / can't separate fiction from reality, don't believe your lying eyes.
I'm seeing the horseshoe form in front of me: one end CRT and the other cunny groypers.
It's the same thing, there is no such thing as "inverted signal". It's CRT the same way and they present their arguments, only they are too low IQ to be taken seriously (thank fuck).
 
This has flown over the head of this threads creator, otherwise he wouldn't have mentioned the artist wholesome orenji. Yes, he used the term "child GF" in his meme . But you got offended over it and that's the point. There is a reason why Blue Archive fans spam the n-word, and shout uuuuuuuoohh cunny, cunny, cunny and type the crying emoji. Their gatekeeping you.
this is gatekeeping the same way as selling crack and shooting people to keep the rent low
Which why the evolution of the term primarily led to it being used in the context of fiction.
I think you're missing a part, that it is used not just for fiction, but is used for fictional children. This is how it differs from your normal autist who lusts over anime girls. You leaving this out is disingenuous in of itself; The Lolita Complex being about real-life children means lolicon is about fictional children, and no form of reinterpretation changes that. If lolicon wasn't about children, lolicon artists wouldn't write the characters to act like, look like, and straight up be written as children, unless you're arguing that everyone in that community is doing some retarded gatekeeping thing even before the internet existed.
Otaku have a very strong sense for what is real and what is not real.
nigga says he has otaku-sense
Galbraith shows quotes from many of these publications and they basically admit the photographs were unpopular with their readers
If we take the quote that is shown in the thread:
“‘I don’t feel anything for the photographs in the opening pages. For that reason, I’d like you to stop with the pictures and run only manga’ (Manga Burikko, August 1983: 201). Manga Burikko’s editors respond that on orders from the top “there is no way we're taking the photographs out.” Complaints about the photographs as well as pornographic content continued, including a letter from Suzuki Yōko, a female reader from Miyazaki Prefecture, who praises the artists featured in Manga Burikko, but explains, “I feel nothing for manga that is simply about penetration or girls being raped. I psychologically can’t accept it”(Manga Burikko, October 1983: 193). It seems that the editors finally yielded to reader demands in November 1983, symbolized by the issue’s subtitle: “Totally bishōjo comic magazine” (marumaru bishōjo komikkushi). Gravure idol photography is entirely absent, and remained so for the rest of the magazine’s existence.”
-Lolicon: The Reality of ‘Virtual Child Pornography’ in Japan
This reads to me less as "lolicons aren't pedophiles" it reads to me more as "lolicons don't like when they can actually see real-life children being harmed, even when the art they view is most likely based on real-life children." This doesn't prove that lolicon isn't pedophilia, it just says that maybe not all lolicons go out and molest children.

TLDR: You are a waste of human life.
 
Soyteens successfully phonebooked Pragmata pedophile Slumbrrr (Alex Ruiz) into hiding.
An update to this, as Alex has made an announcement of an apology on Twitter. He claims that was all a "joke" and the "cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking. Furthermore, he plays the victim because of all the pushback he got. But he does acknowledges what he did was dumb.
Here is the best part: he straight up admits and confirms that his phonebook is authentic. Not only that, but he confirms the pizza delivery happened as well. :story:
1765903284826.png 1765903300720.png
Nitter / Archive / Archive of the offending Tweet
 
Galbraith argued that concepts are reinterpreted through different cultural lenses. The Japanese molded Lolita Complex to better fit their cultural sensibilities. Which why the evolution of the term primarily led to it being used in the context of fiction.
Bruh. Even if we bought this it’s incumbent on anthropologists to be non-judgmental observers only.
 
An update to this, as Alex has made an announcement of an apology on Twitter. He claims that was all a "joke" and the "cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking. Furthermore, he plays the victim because of all the pushback he got. But he does acknowledges what he did was dumb.
Here is the best part: he straight up admits and confirms that his phonebook is authentic. Not only that, but he confirms the pizza delivery happened as well. :story:
View attachment 8293132View attachment 8293133
Nitter / Archive / Archive of the offending Tweet
People should stop playing things as "joke". Everything people say "is a joke" nowadays I interpret as "I am being 100% serious".
 
Good point. Just like murder is already a term for unjustified killing, fetishism is a term for perverse sexual expression.
Look man I’m not trying to come off like I’m defending pedophilia here but there’s a world of difference between liking it when adult women hit you and being attracted to children
 
It's just a joke bro! I said "I want to fuck a child"/"I want white people to die" as a simple joke and you cannot read any further into it for any reason because it's just a joke.
People should stop playing things as "joke". Everything people say "is a joke" nowadays I interpret as "I am being 100% serious".
I will never trust someone who consistently jokes about being pedophile, possessing child porn, or anything related. Used to know a guy who would make jokes like that. I called it out and so did others. Other personal issues caused me to separate from him. He disappeared. Out of curiosity I searched up his name a few months later. He used to make jokes about liking CSAM, now he has been criminally charged for Possession of Child Porn. I have never met a normal, healthy person who likes making jokes about being a pedophile, mainly because they do not exist. The people who joke about raping kids, enjoying CSAM, etc are always pedophiles.
 
An update to this, as Alex has made an announcement of an apology on Twitter. He claims that was all a "joke" and the "cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking. Furthermore, he plays the victim because of all the pushback he got. But he does acknowledges what he did was dumb.
Here is the best part: he straight up admits and confirms that his phonebook is authentic. Not only that, but he confirms the pizza delivery happened as well. :story:
View attachment 8293132View attachment 8293133
Nitter / Archive / Archive of the offending Tweet
I am critical of Slumbrrr's statement. I believe he is crying crocodile tears in order to play the victim. Painting everyone who was critical of his actions as "doxxers" or harassers. Which is most likely intended to overshadow any good-faith criticism of his behavior.

I don't believe him when he said that the joke was a "double entendre." I believe he meant it as a sexual comment; why else would he use the lolicon dog whistle emotes?
>"on everyone's soul we WILL be cracking Diana"
The video game isn't called "Diana" which makes zero sense if we were to interpret this as him referring to video game cracking. Not only that, he's fairly positive about the game. Why would he want to pirate a game that he wants to support? If he used the term "Diana's game" or "Pragmata" it would have strengthened his claim of it being a "double entendre." But he never did that, which validates my assumption that he originally meant for it to be sexual.

Why hasn't he provided any evidence for his claims?
Where is this video footage of these cars he mentioned?


His life is NOT in danger, nor was his family; it never was. He is exaggerating the annoyance of allegedly receiving pizza deliveries into a life-threatening issue. It's extremely unlikely that someone would make a life-changing effort to kill a person because of this Internet drama. The vast majority of death threats on the Internet are shallow and not followed through with.

He is SOLELY responsible for his OPSEC. It was his own MASSIVE failures in safeguarding it that led to him getting unmasked and allegedly receiving pizzas. It was HIS FAULT for having his REAL LIFE NAME attached to his book, it was HIS FAULT for being so careless on the Internet, it was HIS FAULT for being provocative, and it was HIS FAULT for not knowing how to cover up his Internet footprint.

At least he acknowledges that his tweet was a mistake and a stupid decision. But had it not gone as viral as it did, would he still have regretted it? Or is the regret only there due to the consequences of his own actions?

So overall, Slumbrrr is not a victim; he was responsible for his own actions. Slumbrr playing the victim is pathetic and is meant as a deflection from genuine criticisms of his behavior. His original tweet was most likely sexual in nature. He should have owned up and accepted the consequences of his actions.
 
An update to this, as Alex has made an announcement of an apology on Twitter. He claims that was all a "joke" and the "cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking. Furthermore, he plays the victim because of all the pushback he got. But he does acknowledges what he did was dumb.
Here is the best part: he straight up admits and confirms that his phonebook is authentic. Not only that, but he confirms the pizza delivery happened as well. :story:
View attachment 8293132View attachment 8293133
Nitter / Archive / Archive of the offending Tweet
Who is this, the dev behind the game? I must have missed some drama, I'm actually looking forward to playing this one once it leaves Early Access.
 
I am sorry to say but whoever created this thread is disingenuous.
The only one being disingenuous here is you bringing up only shit that you think defends your position while ignoring all the evidence to the contrary. The movement started based off a bok about how great it was to fuck kids. The people who spun a movement off it were pedophiles that wanted to fuck kids. In Japan if someone calls themselves a lolicon they are saying they want to fuck little girls, & the general public would call someone who wants to fuck little girls a lolicon.
Its the same with lolicons. We are constantly being called pedophiles.
Yes we. I am not ashamed of being a lolicon because I know its a part of being an anime fan
Fuck off & write essay's about why morality doesn't matter & it's okay to jerk off to this because it's not real somewhere else. I hope you get your fucking head caved in.
1765912854300.png
 
He claims that was all a "joke" and the "cracking" term was meant to be interpreted as the video game piracy type of cracking.
If he used the term "Diana's game" or "Pragmata" it would have strengthened his claim of it being a "double entendre." But he never did that, which validates my assumption that he originally meant for it to be sexual.
You're being retarded here. A double-entendre is a statement with a double meaning, both meanings are intentional. The guy explicitly said he was making a sexual reference about a child, and his actual defense is that, in the words of Billy Mitchell, it was just "dark humor", he didn't really have any sexual affection towards the character.
I want to also emphasize that my dumb jokes are just that: jokes. They IN NO WAY reflect my true thoughts, feelings, or dispositions. In case it has to be said: I do not like kids.
Anyway this is the most hilarious defense possible, imagine if Joe Biden in 2019 had said "I'm going to KILL Donald Trump," and when he was arrested for threatening to kill the president he said "it was a double meaning, I meant that I was going to kill Trump and beat him at the polls."
 
You're being retarded here. A double-entendre is a statement with a double meaning, both meanings are intentional. The guy explicitly said he was making a sexual reference about a child, and his actual defense is that, in the words of Billy Mitchell, it was just "dark humor", he didn't really have any sexual affection towards the character.
Let me clarify this. What I meant is that I believe his original statement was NOT meant to be a double entendre, and he was only saying that it was afterward as a convenient defense. I believe his original comment and intention were meant to be purely sexual with no other intended meaning. Afterward he claimed that it was, but it was him saving face.
 
>i am in internet personality, detached from my fleshy operator
Funny how the guys overemphasising fiction vs reality come off as being schizophrenic.
slim_gator.png
I get being retarded online, catching yourself midway and then gathering perspective. I don't know if it's the coomer chair or social media in general, but I don't think that shit comes with brakes.
 
Look man I’m not trying to come off like I’m defending pedophilia here but there’s a world of difference between liking it when adult women hit you and being attracted to children
I didn’t say they were equivalent. It’s just that I wouldn't listen to “moral” rationales for either one.
 
Back
Top Bottom