Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[RodgerDodger]

This would prove Greeee's entire move was something he chose to do, not something he was required to do, and thus would be discretionary spending, which would not qualify him to file IFP, correct?

In a sane rational world.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Oddly, Greer's sworn statement does not seem to include him swearing he didn't make the alleged payments, bizarrely.

 

[Unknown God]

I feel like we are overlooking the fact he mentioned another prostitute who is totally real and willing to be a witness for him and trash Natalie on the record. Doesn't that mean Hardin now gets to demand he discloses who she is and, when he inevitably refuses because he is obviously lying (either she doesn't exist or she hates him because there is no prostitute who doesn't hate him), hit him with yet another motion for sanctions?

 

[BoomerPrime]

The reply to the response to the motion to reply to respond to move to strike Russell Greer out a window.

This filing was not checked for porn.

Motion to Defenestrate GRANTED. Plantiff will be tossed out the nearest, highest window.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Do the Germans have a word for something that is both side-splittingly hilarious and rage-inducing at the same time?

Slurpenfraude

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

the judges can let this go on forever until they retire or jewsh has no money.

I don't believe that is how it works. It's my understanding that once Hardin files a logjam motion, and if they don't respond to that in a timely fashion, a writ of mandamus can be filed with the 10th circuit appeals court. If it can be proven that there has been an unacceptable length of time since the magistrate or district judge have acted in a substantive way to move the case along they will be told to get their asses in gear and do their damn jobs.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I feel like we are overlooking the fact he mentioned another prostitute who is totally real and willing to be a witness for him and trash Natalie on the record. Doesn't that mean Hardin now gets to demand he discloses who she is and, when he inevitably refuses because he is obviously lying (either she doesn't exist or she hates him because there is no prostitute who doesn't hate him), hit him with yet another motion for sanctions?

If Greee is claiming she's a witness than she almost certainly already has a restraining order against him, and is dead.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

If Greee is claiming she's a witness than she almost certainly already has a restraining order against him, and is dead.

Then Null can write a book "I Got Sued For Copyright Infringement, And Bizarrely It Ended With Two Dead Bodies!" with the dead people being poor Steve Taylor and said whore. If a second body suddenly appears and is directly related to Rusty's as him intending to call them as a witness, the police really need to look into this. I have said before that poor Steve's death may not have been so natural. You never know when Greee is involved.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Jumping waaaaaay back to ECF 415, Greer says

Allowing Defendants’ disclosure would therefore devolve discovery into an endless loop of finger-pointing

That's quite the claim, one might almost say threat. "Defendants know that I'll sperg out endlessly about Banks, therefore they are creating an endless cycle of sperging!" Who was it that recently claimed it was "coercive" and "harassing" to threaten a legal maneuver if the other side did something they were legally entitled to do?

Spoiler: unqualified rules speculation

Even with the sperging, I don't think it actually can turn into an endless cycle of character witnesses. Hardin calls Banks to provide relevant fair use defenses or IFP attacks, Greer can call a witness to rebut and smear her, then the judge/jury decides who is credible. End of side diversion. I don't think Hardin can call a character witness against Greer's alleged friendly sex worker, it's a one and done. But admittedly I haven't researched any relevant rules.

Also:

The Federal Rules do not permit discovery to devolve into reciprocal accusations untethered from any claim or defense.

POT
KETTLE
NIGGER

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

paying for hookers is a basic need. wonder how the judge(s) will rule.

this is honestly a better defense than whatever he came up with, as it would at LEAST pretend to introduce an unruled question as I doubt a court would ding an IFP litigant for paying to support his wife, so why not his whores?

Are you saying that I am dangerous? Then I think you are dangerous, stalker child!

He has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he only knows how to mimic.

You don't have to be living in a van down by the river and it doesn't mean you can have absolutely no money for recreational activities, but if you have money for hookers you have money for filing fees.

The funniest thing about this is the fee is like $500 or something, petty shit even for greer, he's just a fucking retard

This case is going super-critical, filings are being filed faster than the Judge can read them

Once a month is too fast for our judges

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Also:

POT
KETTLE
NIGGER

His complete and utter lack of self-awareness is just astounding. My cat and dog are more self-aware than Gree is. Hell, the mouse my cat killed was likely more self-aware than Crusty, even several seconds after being mauled by a vicious house beast.

 

[Sexy Potoo]

You know, after ECF 400 dropped, people were joking that we would hit ECF 500 before the end of the year.

I actually expect to hit ECF 500 before the end of January, but hitting 500 before New Year's is real possibility, with ChatG(reer)PT firing on all cylinders.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Plaintiff's got another hooker who told him (certainly on the clock) that she'll be his witness!

Tricia Christy will TOTALLY actually come to court this time!

 

[HackerX]

I wonder what caused Russ to go from limiting his AI motions to churning multiple of them out a day? He went from about a 75% plightsperg/25% AI split, to a 99% AI/1% plight sperg split, and increasing his throughout a million percent. Did Hardin bringing up Natalie Banks and Waylon Huber break his brain this bad? I bet he forgot everything about the sanctions and show cause shenanigans that were happening before.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 417

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Maybe this flurry of worthless garbage and AI slop will convince the judge not only to admonish Greeee for using AI and screwing it up, but revoked his e-filing privileges (finally!)

 

[BoomerPrime]

I wonder what caused Russ to go from limiting his AI motions to churning multiple of them out a day? He went from about a 75% plightsperg/25% AI split, to a 99% AI/1% plight sperg split, and increasing his throughout a million percent. Did Hardin bringing up Natalie Banks and Waylon Huber break his brain this bad? I bet he forgot everything about the sanctions and show cause shenanigans that were happening before.

My guess is Hardin is over target, and it's causing Shitlips to short-circuit.

ETA: LOL ECF 417 Hardin actually asked for it. Well done you magnificent bastard.

 

[ScatteredJaws]

Once again, Mr. Greer grabs his shovel and starts digging, and it's only getting ever more desperate.

 

[obsdj]

So often in this case, it really is the little things.

Not just opposition (even though you already filed a response in opposition). No no no, my declaration is in DIRECT opposition to your declaration. Not ambiguous opposition; not thinly-veiled opposition; certainly not indirect opposition. My declaration is in DIRECT opposition, which courts have recognizes as carrying greater weight in opposing mean declarations.

a writ of mandamus can be filed with the 10th circuit appeals court.

Can, but that's considered an extraordinary remedy, and it would also be fucking costly for our side with no guarantee of a positive response. It could be argued that their refusal to rule on more than a dozen open motions in the case has drastically affected the trajectory of the case, but at the same time Hardin did suggest they hold off on the motion to dismiss until Cox is disposed of. The judges here could just shrug and say look, we took counsel's suggestion under advisement (even though a lot of the other motions could and should still be ruled on, like Greer and his idiotic motions for protective orders).

So will we be seeing Hardin assert this, not only for the book but for all this past year's worth of Greer's documented selective editing of emails?

ECF 417 OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT I WAS KIDDING

 

[Greasy Goblin]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/doctrine_of_completeness

doctrine of completeness
...
This additional evidence is called explanatory evidence, and its purpose is to qualify, explain or put the original piece of introduced evidence in context.

Ah, finally, a defense motion for Greer to explain! It must be everything he ever wanted.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Once again Greer steps on a rake. If his book gets published in this case I assume people still couldn't reproduce it freely but could just link to courtlistener. Will Greee sue the 10th circuit for Contributory Copyright Infringement if the judge allows his book to be added to the record?