📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Found this on xitter. Someone made a video talking about troon music (i haven't nor do i want to watch the video) and low and behold a troon got offended because a "cis man" was grouping music and thought he understood troony music.
A normal man would never make a video titled "trans music and the desire to exist". He's gonna come out as a troon in the near future and I wonder how those commenters will retcon their current hatred towards him.
 
Includes a video but found a post about infighting between the pooner's and non-men.
I don't support the lgbt community but I do find it funny how screwed over the lesbians get compared to the fags.

Yea it doesn't really affect my life or yours and guaranteed you can't tell the diffrence between a trans masc lesbian and a trans man lesbian without having to ask them their identity.
Note: It has a video

And many in the comments are very telling in why they support what they do:

FecalAlgebraTrans Lesbian | HRT 3/19/24 50 points 2 months ago
Exactly how I feel about this topic. I don't really get it and it isn't my business. I wouldn't date a trans man, but I'm sure there are plenty of lesbians that wouldn't date me either because I'm a trans woman. It's all valid, and it doesn't make any of us less of a lesbian.


Ender_Dragneel 21 points 2 months ago
I am a transfem lesbian. I don't fully understand the usage of the lesbian label for transmasc folks, and I know the lesbian label is supposed to mean something. But nonbinary lesbians exist, so who am I to dictate where someone else draws the line for themself? I'm confused, but I'm allowed to be confused; like this guy said, it doesn't personally affect me.

[–][deleted] 2 months ago
[removed]
[–]RevolutionaryCap5744 6 points 2 months ago
I’ve heard people define lesbianism as closer to “people who aren’t men who are attracted to non-men” which seems closer to a definition that would include non-binary people and any trans men who feel somewhat fluid or complicated in their gender identity. At the end of the day, isn’t being queer about being accepting and inclusive since we are excluded by so many people? We don’t need to have rigid labels within our own spaces; let trans and non-binary people identify how they want.

[–][deleted] 2 months ago
[removed]
[–]Dizzy_Substance_2480 5 points 2 months ago
All words are made up and language is in a constant state of change and development to keep up with new discoveries and ideas. This has been the case since forever.

[–]OwlMiserable8090 5 points 2 months ago
They told you the meaning of the word, just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it suddenly “doesn’t have meaning” lmao

[–][deleted] -1 points 2 months ago
The meaning of lesbianism is women attracted to women. If you aren’t a woman then you can’t be a lesbian.

[–]OwlMiserable8090 3 points 2 months ago
You’re allowed to have a different definition dawg. But just because you’re using a different definition doesn’t mean any new ones which accommodate the ways the word is actually being used indicate that words suddenly lack meaning. Language is a fluid thing, especially as it refers to identity, which is an ever evolving understanding of the human condition. It’s messy and intangible. You can keep trying to put gender and sexual identity in boxes, but all you’re gonna do is make yourself frustrated. Culture changes. People change. Rigid definitions help no one 🤷‍♂️

[–][deleted] 0 points 2 months ago
Sure thing. I can still maintain the definition of lesbian is women who are attracted to women, much like others can maintain it has a different meaning.

[–]Sezoxeufu[🍰] 3 points 2 months ago
There are some non-binary people who still identify as a woman in some way, either by being gender fluid or things like demi-girl (partially woman partially agender) and stuff like that. Language is an imperfect thing.


]JamozMyNamoz 3 points 2 months ago
The more (not completely) accurate definition would be non-men loving non-men, which includes non-binary people if they feel their attraction to women is similar to how women would feel it, or sapphic in some way (me for instance, although I prefer bi/pan).
I don't fully get why transmascs or trans men may use the label, but my best guess would be they feel gay towards women rather than straight, probably influenced by their experience with gender. But I'm not transmasc so I do not speak for them, and I don't really need to, because unless a label is appropriating or harming someone in some way, there's no reason to gatekeep.

[–][deleted] -2 points 2 months ago
Lesbianism is women who are attracted to women.
permalinkembedsaveparentreportreply
[–]JamozMyNamoz 3 points 2 months ago
I just told you why that isn't a true statement. I don't think this sub is for you considering most of us here are connected to being lesbian in a way that isn't strictly WLW

[–][deleted] 0 points 2 months ago
I thought you didn’t like gatekeeping?
permalinkembedsaveparentreportreply
[–]JamozMyNamoz 3 points 2 months ago
I don't, you are more than welcome here if you can be respectful of other's identities when they aren't harming or appropriating anyone, but otherwise the tolerance paradox holds true

[–][deleted] -2 points 2 months ago
Who gets to decide what is harm? There is heaps of lesbians who don’t want the term to be used for anything outside of women being attracted to women

[–]Ender_Dragneel 5 points 2 months ago
And there are tons of TERFs who think trans women can't be lesbians. Does that mean we should listen to them?
You're trying to ascribe a binary to something which fundamentally isn't binary - an absolutist definition where there are no absolutes. It'd be like saying I'm not allowed to call myself a woman just because I fluctuate between feminine areas of the gender spectrum.

[–][deleted] -2 points 2 months ago
Yes we should listen to women, even if you don’t like what they are saying. Ignoring women’s voices is called misogyny.

[–][deleted] -2 points 2 months ago
Your trying to imply that having rigid definitions of things is bigoted

[–]JamozMyNamoz 3 points 2 months ago
When they purposefully exclude others that aren't harming anyone, yes, that is bigoted.


attledogCross 4 points 2 months ago
I'm trans masc not a trans man but I get it I think?
Like, the experiance of being a trans masc person Wether binary trans man or not is inharently different to the experiance of being a cis man and part of that experiance for some portion of us, myself included, involved at some point in time identifying as a lesbian before having our eggs crack. Lesbian relationships have a whole other vibe, and that vibe dosnt nessiserily have to change into the vibe of being straight just because we've discovered more of ourselves, and some of us are attached to the lable that we've lived for so long. shrug I don't think it's that deep really.
I'm not straight now. I'm just not. Any relationship I'm in is gonna be inharently a little queer. Man, woman or another enbie, it wouldent matter. The relationship isn't going to be straight because that implies a certain level of conformation to the binary I'm just not interested in. I dunno what I call myself right now, other then ace, but I doubt I'm ever gonna be like "lol I'm straight now" when I have legit never had that experiance before in my life lol

[–]3nderslime 3 points 2 months ago
« Can trans men be lesbians? » I don’t know, do I look like the gender police to you?

[–]LilithScarlet 4 points 2 months ago
To me it sounds weird, like you're misgendering yourself, but like they said call yourself what you want. I've also seen a lot of trans men lament about the losing their connection to the lesbian community after transitioning, so I get still wanting to keep that identity. You should do whatever makes you feel most comfortable and what expresses you the best. And we should never hate people for expressing their true self.

Also found this image which sums up the community perfectly

Screenshot_20251124-060912.Reddit.png

If they reject our social standards it's no surprise if they accept any sexual predator.


Reddit Post
 
Found this on xitter. Someone made a video talking about troon music (i haven't nor do i want to watch the video) and low and behold a troon got offended because a "cis man" was grouping music and thought he understood troony music
Troon music is only some "core" slop with a pretentious title and that just sounds like a fucking printer and static.
 
Found this on xitter. Someone made a video talking about troon music (i haven't nor do i want to watch the video) and low and behold a troon got offended because a "cis man" was grouping music and thought he understood troony music.
View attachment 8208562
I saw this in my reccomended and I just assumed the algo was feeding me tranny nonsense. Genuinely shocked this wasnt made by some troon defending his shitty hyperpop breakcore. If this (allegedly) cisgender guy frames trans music as "The Desire To Exist", he's obviously sympathetic. I dont know why fags are upset other than them being misanthropic and foul MANnered more often than not.
 
Found this on xitter. Someone made a video talking about troon music (i haven't nor do i want to watch the video) and low and behold a troon got offended because a "cis man" was grouping music and thought he understood troony music.
View attachment 8208562
Here's some of the comments (most are from troons or lesbo's)
View attachment 8208563View attachment 8208564View attachment 8208569View attachment 8208566
Xploshi joined in, he's famous for his crappy animations that get transferred to vhs to look "spooky"

View attachment 8208565
View attachment 8208572
Some porn artist also chimed in, her art's just nothing but symbiote shit. Its ugly and it gives off the vibes of that "evil autism" retard.
View attachment 8208577View attachment 8208576
Some dumb faggot making fun of Charlie kirk also commented on that tweet.

Edit: found another tweet on the same topic
View attachment 8208584
it was posted in the Patricia/eric taxxon thread in Sept and troon reception on it has been mixed. some loved the attention some said its shite (like troonslop music is.) but bottom line is the mong shouldn't have made it because you cant please trannies
 
A troon wants his terms defined? Is that OK? 8)

1764009562705.png
Reddit -- Archive
i see so much misuse of this word across trans subreddits, and people use them for 2 completely opposing things.

stealth is when you pass well enough as cis that no one (or very few people) in your life know that you’re trans. for example, a trans woman has FFS that makes her pass as cis, she moves to a new city and doesn’t tell anyone she’s trans. everyone sees her and treats her as a cis woman. she’s stealth.

stealth is NOT when you’re transitioning and not telling people about it. that’s boymoding or whatever word you want to use for it, but it’s not stealth.

i’ve made multiple posts mentioning that i’m stealth and people have thought i’m early in transition or even pre transition because of this.

Apparently it's OK, because it affords an opportunity to boast. :christine:
I’m a dozen plus years into transition.

In the area where I live, the only people who know I’m trans are my doctors as they have a legitimate need to know that. And even then, I still get asked when my last period was and if there’s a possibility I’m pregnant.

In my day to day life, transness isn’t on the minds of my neighbours and the folks in town when we meet for a coffee or when I go to the butcher’s for a kilo of sausage or whatever.

They just see me as just another woman.

That’s stealth.

I think I misused the word stealth in my year of discovery. I had thought to use it as a term meaning “I’m getting away with wearing feminine things, no one is noticing.”

I started to wear women’s slacks and jeans, camis, bralettes (with tiny breast forms), women’s underwear, women’s shoes, light makeup, clear fingernail polish. All this I did under the cover of ‘boymoding’. I was not ready for people to see the real me. I still had my own excessive beard (now knowing it is often referred to as ‘the trans beard’).

But now I understand the term stealth as the ability to live as your full self, amongst the crowds seemingly like the cis versions of your gender.
 
A troon wants his terms defined? Is that OK? 8)
So "stealth" = people are aware you're a man in a dress and are avoiding confrontation by pretending not to notice your giant man head and man feet; "boymoding" = people are aware you're a degen but are avoiding confrontation by not asking why the fuck a 6 foot bearded guy is wearing lip gloss. Am I getting that right?
 
I thought stealth = "I wear women's clothing and bullied everyone around me into keeping quiet about it" and boymoding = "I'm too afraid to go out in public yet but as we speak I am gooning myself into a psychosis for which the only cure is chopping my dick off"
I think "stealth" just means "not wearing giant tranny pride flag buttons and a shirt that says I♥️Girlcock"
 
A troon moves from bumfuck, nowhere to Seattle or Portland where misgendering is a deadly sin, and they think no one can tell he’s trans, and he thinks he is stealthy.

They never realise why only chasers or other troons are interested in them.
 
The Bridge has taken another tranny!View attachment 8211082

Feels like sympathy bait, honestly. Very “I’m going to Los Copa.”

Edit: there’s a pretty funny video of him saying he’s gonna rope, though. Comments aren’t having it. And the username does seem to be gone from a few sites. Hmmm…
 
Last edited:
I don't even know but I feel as if this thread would be the best place for this. Guy crashes truck into power pole wearing a pink dress and a diaper.

I don't think this is as funny as that guy who showed up to Alex Rosen's pedo sting operation wearing a filled diaper to talk to minors but this is up there.

From Xitter
https://x.com/RealBlackRebel_/status/1992586331890090251?t=DuRBSwA2kGpz4xU0NsMJIw&s=19
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom