💬 Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Troon Meet Noose said:
I'm offended by that excerpt because "at birth" is not only not needed, it implies that sex can change.
Click to expand...
It illustrates that even if we accept the claims of those who believe in trans stuff there has not been sufficient evidence of undue harm.
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
Jackson packed in a lot of troon pseudoscience such as "assigned at birth" which is pure nonsense.
Click to expand...
It's the "assigned at birth" that gets me. "Assigned". They had to make themselves the object, having an act done to them. It couldn't be that the doctor saw the newborn baby and passively observed that the baby had a penis. No, that doctor actively "assigned" a sex to that child like the fucking Hogwarts sorting hat.
 
The Morning Visitor said:
It's the "assigned at birth" that gets me. "Assigned". They had to make themselves the object, having an act done to them. It couldn't be that the doctor saw the newborn baby and passively observed that the baby had a penis. No, that doctor actively "assigned" a sex to that child like the fucking Hogwarts sorting hat.
Click to expand...

They also assigned it being human which when it comes to troons isn't true since they're subhuman parasites.
 
The thing that supposedly never happens just happened again.

First openly trans lawmaker admits to sickening child sex charges involving kids as young as 3

"The first openly trans lawmaker in the US — who was hailed as a trail-blazer — has admitted to sickening child sex charges involving young kids in a daycare. Former Democratic New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie-Marie Laughton, 41, a biological male who identifies as female, pleaded guilty to charges including sexual exploitation of children last week in a Boston federal court, WMUR reported. Laughton now faces up to 30 years in federal prison. Four pictures of children believed to be 3 to 5 years old were sent to Laughton by former partner, Lindsay Groves, who took the horrific images in the bathroom of the daycare where she worked in Tyngsborough, Mass., federal prosecutors said."
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
Former Democratic New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie-Marie Laughton, 41, a biological male who identifies as female, pleaded guilty to charges including sexual exploitation of children last week in a Boston federal court,
Click to expand...
I wonder how many TRA's will talk about this on BlueSky.
It'll be Trumps fault you wait and see...
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
The thing that supposedly never happens just happened again.

First openly trans lawmaker admits to sickening child sex charges involving kids as young as 3

"The first openly trans lawmaker in the US — who was hailed as a trail-blazer — has admitted to sickening child sex charges involving young kids in a daycare. Former Democratic New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie-Marie Laughton, 41, a biological male who identifies as female, pleaded guilty to charges including sexual exploitation of children last week in a Boston federal court, WMUR reported. Laughton now faces up to 30 years in federal prison. Four pictures of children believed to be 3 to 5 years old were sent to Laughton by former partner, Lindsay Groves, who took the horrific images in the bathroom of the daycare where she worked in Tyngsborough, Mass., federal prosecutors said."
Click to expand...

Wow, this “woman” sure is a trail-blazer! Elected to the NH Legislature three whole times! Too bad he couldn’t be seated in 2012 because of a 2008 felony fraud conviction. Managed to win in 2020 after the suspended sentence was completed in 2018, but then missed out on the third swearing-in in 2022 Because he was in jail for stalking …and all of this before being caught exploiting small children. Trail-blazer indeed.
 
Lentil Soup said:
The Supreme Court declined to hear Kim Davis's appeal

It is going to be funny to see the trans people who can't blame their losses on the judges being anti-LGBT. They will have to use real arguments or lose.
Click to expand...
This is very good news. Trannies hide behind historical gay discrimination and use the threat of Obergefell being overturned to keep vanilla gays toeing the party line. This demonstrates that basically nobody gives a shit about gay marriage anymore, that this backlash to troons is completely separate from religious piety/bigotry being snuck into law.
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
ROFLMAO at the "real world harms" nonsense.

Screenshot 2025-11-06 133104.jpg

Screenshot 2025-11-06 133351.jpg

Screenshot 2025-11-06 133126.jpg
Click to expand...
"Real world harms" because the government won't recognize your made-up gender? Nobody is stopping you from saying you are a fairygender or whatever stupidity you identify as, it's just not going on your passport.

Of course, Big Fat Gay Al just has to weigh in despite the fact that nobody cares about what he thinks. So does Tony Reed. Their mental gymnastics are going insane enough that they think that ackchyually Republicans are losing bigly because of supporting a view that over 4/5 of the country holds.
obsdj said:
PDF with Jackson's moronic dissent attached. She is deeeeeeeeply fucking stupid you guys.
Click to expand...
While most of the disasters of Biden's puppet presidency can be and are being undone, we are going to have to deal with this moronic DEI hire staining the Court with her sheboon gibberish for a long time. Every time she tries to use "legal framing" to justify naked partisanship, I feel brain cells die. Honestly, I don't even think the other liberal justices can stand her. And if Democrats win the next election and pack the courts, instead of one of her, there will be six, which is a horrifying thought.

Could be worse. We could be Brazil. Alexandre de Moraes is an unelected dictator and a literal lizard person, but he's not stupid. Imagine this idiot sheboon having ruling authority over the country.
 
Questions are a Burden said:
How does he explain the dicks?
Click to expand...
I think we just need to stop asking these questions, stop engaging with the bullshit as if it's worth engaging with on a polite level, because it's not. We all know the answer to that question is that "some women have penises, you silly billy," and it's just an invitation to be drawn further down into the bullshit. They'll have a cutesy answer for everything and will not be logicked out of the bullshit because they didn't logic themselves into it. Instead of asking "What about dicks?" we need to be saying, "No, trannies are not biological women, you are enabling mental illness and medical mutilation, you are a bad person and you should feel bad and nobody should listen to you, ever."
 
Not Dr. Evil said:
California State Senator Scott Weiner says troons are actual biological women.


sssx.io_1762887116733.mp4
Click to expand...
It makes me feel warm and cozy seeing Scott Wiener demoralized face to face with his own community/constituency.

I respect that she tried kissing his ass to make him listen, but if she's going to catch AIDS flies with honey, she needs to work on her disguise game. Blurting out "they are men" will turn the crowd against her and wearing a shirt advertising biological reality on the back will cement her as a TERF in everyone's minds. I don't buy for a second that she "likes most of his bills" because he is the king of terrible trans/pedo legislation.

So, she could be herself and say "even lesbians like me think you're a degenerate faggot" thus disregarding audience sympathy, or she could have pretended to be a meek and supportive handmaiden that is having doubts because of her recent assault and throwing really tough questions at Wiener, garnering audience sympathy by doing so. The mixture of both tactics just seems a little sloppy.
 
Nero Fiddled said:
I still find it hard to believe that normal people would ever actually vote for these mentally deficient politicians.
Click to expand...
California's 11th senatorial district is anything but normal.

osm-intl,10,37.77,-122.45,300x300@2x.png

He literally just represents San Francisco, the modern Sodom. The more sensible parts of the state can't kick him out.
 
She’s right of course but the problem is that she’s a woman. A black lesbian sure, which gets her initial token respect in that crowd, but still a woman.

Scott Weiner loathes women. You could’ve had Hilary Clinton putting the screws to him and he would’ve reacted the same— he inherently has no use or respect for females and our experiences in this world. Notice he automatically deflected to fixating on the (male) trans experience. He can’t even conceive of how women and girls live and feel. Our lives are utterly alien to him.
 
LaughJoke2.0 said:
Nothing pisses off a white liberal more than when a black gets uppity.

Edit: For POCs and Women the Trans issue really is a mask off movement when it comes to white liberals.
Click to expand...
I really want to believe, but black people leaned into woke too hard. A lot of their politically active minds lean into borderline, us-versus-them, zero-sum, black-and-white thinking (pardon the pun on that last one) and you end up with literal niggercattle praising "decolonization" and openly loving the fact that the brown chevron was painted over the rainbow flag.

Marcus Dimitrous King'Josiah LaQuandrius Jones from the hood on the other side of the freeway is mad about it (if he pays attention to it), because it insinuates brown people are part of the faggot coalition, but most of their women and intellectuals have supported the pandering because it's short term feelgood asspats to earn their loyalty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom