💬 Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What compels a doctor to risk their license and potentially throw their whole career away to juice up little girls with testosterone?
It's the sort of behaviour commonly associated with people who have joined a cult.
They question nothing, they blindly follow the ridiculous and they are a danger to themselves and anyone in their orbit.
 
One of the things that supposedly never happens has happened again.

"A mass shooting-obsessed trans teen has admitted to plotting a Valentine’s Day massacre at her Indiana high school. Trinity Shockley, 18, is set to plead guilty to felony conspiracy to commit murder in return for a maximum of 12.5 years behind bars plus five years of probation, according to the Morgan County Prosecutor’s office.Shockley — who authorities said identifies as male and goes by the name Jamie, but also uses she/her pronouns, according to 13News — was arrested in February after police received a tip that she had access to an AR-15, had purchased a bullet proof vest, and was obsessed with mass shooters."


Trans teen Trinity Shockley admits to plotting Valentine’s Day mass shooting at Indiana high school
 
One of the things that supposedly never happens has happened again.

"A mass shooting-obsessed trans teen has admitted to plotting a Valentine’s Day massacre at her Indiana high school. Trinity Shockley, 18, is set to plead guilty to felony conspiracy to commit murder in return for a maximum of 12.5 years behind bars plus five years of probation, according to the Morgan County Prosecutor’s office.Shockley — who authorities said identifies as male and goes by the name Jamie, but also uses she/her pronouns, according to 13News — was arrested in February after police received a tip that she had access to an AR-15, had purchased a bullet proof vest, and was obsessed with mass shooters."


Trans teen Trinity Shockley admits to plotting Valentine’s Day mass shooting at Indiana high school
Interesting how she is accurately described as she in the article and they don't use her preferred\fake name.
An article that actually makes sense - wouldn't have seen that a year ago.
 
In addition to jail time and probation, Shockley is also barred from researching school shooters for life – and will be required to download monitoring software on all electronic devices to be kept accountable.
The worst punishment of all, she isn't allowed to post here now.
 
Interesting how she is accurately described as she in the article and they don't use her preferred\fake name.
An article that actually makes sense - wouldn't have seen that a year ago.
Eh, she's a pooner. They misgendered correctly gendered and deadnamed named Audrey Hale like a motherfucker and that was more than 2 years ago.

I get your point though. Once we start getting consistent he-ing for rapist nonce males then we'll know for sure we're back in sanity territory.
 
Federal judge vacates Biden-era rule protecting transgender patients from discrimination

"A federal judge has vacated a Biden administration rule that extended anti-discrimination protections to gay, lesbian and transgender patients in federal healthcare programs.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti this week claimed victory in the case, saying the rule “force(d) radical gender ideology into every corner of American health care.” Skrmetti noted in a news release that the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Missouri not only eliminates the current protections but “makes it more difficult for future administrations to revive them.”

Skrmetti and Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch led a 15 Republican state coalition challenging the rule to protect patients from gender-identity discrimination in programs such as Medicaid, Medicare. the Affordable Care Act plans and other programs receiving federal funding.

The rule was adopted by the Obama Administration, set aside under Trump’s first administration then reinstated by President Joe Biden. It was intended to protect LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination in doctors’ offices and preserve access to gender affirming care for transgender patients based on Title IX, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex for recipients of federal dollars.

The appeals court, however, concluded that when Congress enacted Title IX in 1972, it “only contemplated biological sex.” The decision was issued Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., a George W. Bush-appointee.
 
Pentagon policy change lets commanders override decisions on transgender troops' status
WASHINGTON (TNND) — A new Pentagon policy just made it harder for transgender troops to challenge their dismissal from the military, marking another step in enforcing the Trump administration’s ban.

That's according to a memo The Associated Press obtained on Friday. Citing the memo, which was sent to all military branches on October 8, the AP reported that "if military separation boards decide to allow transgender service members to remain in uniform, commanders can override that decision."

The memo, which advocates said was made available to troops last week, also sets up an additional hurdle of requiring that trans service members appear before separation boards in uniforms that match the gender assigned to them at birth. If they fail to do so, their absence can be used against them.

President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have moved away from diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts as a way to make the military the "world’s most lethal and effective fighting force."
 
"Bash Back", a UK-based radical trans group already behind the attack on the FILIA conference in Brighton recently has now vandalised the HQ of the Equality and Human Rights Commission in London.


1761988668866.jpeg

1761988915049.png

The action has been described by legal experts from the University of Trustmedude as a devastating move that will almost certainly checkmate TERFs and the shadowy born-again cabal that bankrolls them.

EDIT: needless to say these imbeciles have vandalised the window of whoever occupies the ground floor of the building where the EHRC is. And put some stickers in the street. In other words they have not inconvenienced the EHRC in any way - just reminded them how insane and clueless they are. Anyone familiar with activists from any cranky cause will have witnessed similar behaviour - people who do this as a hobby absolutely don't care who they target, it's all about the communal feeling.

1761989716328.jpeg 1761989734197.jpeg
 
Last edited:
More Maine school districts align with Trump’s transgender policy, defying state law

The town of Richmond was trying to decide if it should amend a school policy to prohibit transgender girls from competing in girls sports. Among public commenters, debate was just about evenly split: should they follow a state law that allows them to compete, or an executive order signed by President Donald Trump that doesn’t?
The school board in this small Sagadahoc County town ultimately voted 3-2 in mid-October to align its policies with the executive order, becoming at least the eighth Maine district to do so. They’ve gone against the advice of the law firm that provides counsel to most of the state’s districts. Some, including those in Augusta and Kennebunk, have discussed, but ultimately declined, to adopt those changes.

Ever since Trump signed the order shortly after retaking office, his administration has threatened to pull funding from schools that allow students assigned male at birth to compete on girls sports teams in an interpretation of Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. Maine’s governor challenged Trump on the issue and pledged to see him in court, which led to the the Justice Department filing a lawsuit against the state. That case is set to go to trial next April.

But districts like Richmond aren’t waiting for legal clarity, and the conservative Maine Policy Institute and the Maine Chapter of Parents’ Rights in Education are working directly with others that want to make that same leap. Their calculation is that state officials won’t challenge them.
That may not be true.
The state agency responsible for enforcing the Human Rights Act could already be doing so, its director acknowledged, although all complaints are confidential until their investigations are complete.

Daniel Farbman, an associate professor at Boston College Law School, said executive orders like this one are not laws themselves, just proposed interpretations of existing statute. A change to Title IX could be decided by the courts, but in the meantime, he said, state law still applies. In the meantime, a group of Maine Republicans are asking voters to sign a ballot initiative that would change state law to align with the Trump administration’s order. Petitioners need to gather 68,000 signatures from registered voters to put the initiative on next year’s ballot and were out at polling locations on Tuesday to kick off that process.
 
The only thing "ground breaking" about this is how totally frivolous it is.

See if you can follow:

Troon in Maryland

Flies a lolsuit in New Jersey

To enforce a New York Law

Against a defendant in Colorado.

Silliest of all, the Olympics are not regulated by state law.

Tony Reed still thinks executive orders are not enforceable.

Troon Civil Complaint

View attachment 8047020

View attachment 8047021
View attachment 8047023
View attachment 8047025
"Any athletes disqualified from competition were assigned suicide prevention resources"

LMAO, I've heard of troons threatening to 41% to get their parents to buy them titty skittles, but threatening to do it so they can beat up on women in the women's division is a new one. Or maybe USA Fencing is just stopping it before anyone can start it.
 
New rules for the game.

Pro troon = first amendment free speech.

Anti troon = not free speech.

At circuit court, NH parents argue for the right to protest transgender athletes

"At the heart of the arguments Wednesday is a disagreement over what counts as viewpoint discrimination. Attorneys for the parents argued the school discriminated against parents on the basis of viewpoint by singling out their position against transgender sports participation as a violation, when the same school would not prohibit a pro-transgender message. In effect, the district decided to allow inclusionary viewpoints around LGBTQ+ students but disallow exclusionary viewpoints, plaintiffs said. That kind of selectiveness is prohibited by the First Amendment, argued Endel Kolde of the Institute for Free Speech, which is bringing the lawsuit."
 
Last edited:
Let the sperg out begin!

As I pointed out in the USPG2 thread, this is great, but it is merely an order (not a ruling) granting a stay of the injunction while the case continues to be litigated. It's not over yet.

PDF with Jackson's moronic dissent attached. She is deeeeeeeeply fucking stupid you guys.
 

Attachments

Tony and Geidner are both full of shit.

] Screenshot 2025-11-06 203903.png

Tony’s claim that the Sixth Circuit “carved out a right to bully transgender kids” is false. The court held the opposite. It prohibited schools from punishing students for the ordinary, non-abusive use of biologically accurate pronouns, while reaffirming that schools may still punish harassment, threats, bullying, and abuse just as they do in every other context. The injunction bars the district only from punishing students for the commonplace use of biological pronouns and makes clear that nothing prevents the district from enforcing its anti-harassment policies against abuse of transgender students in the same way it enforces them for everyone else.

The district’s policy forced students to use preferred pronouns or face discipline. The court found that this amounts to compelled speech and viewpoint discrimination. Under long-standing First Amendment rules, a school cannot restrict protected speech unless it can show that the speech would materially disrupt school operations or violate the legal rights of others. The district offered no evidence that ordinary sex-based pronoun use caused disruption, harm, or harassment. Discomfort or ideological disagreement is not “bullying,” and public schools cannot force students to affirm a belief they reject. The result is straightforward: respectful speech is protected, harassment remains punishable, and schools may still enforce anti-harassment rules against actual mistreatment of transgender students. Reed’s framing is contradicted by the text of the ruling.
 
Screenshot 2025-11-06 180859.png
I read this line of the ruling while I was in line at the store and almost laughed.

Just like in Skrmetti, the insistence on expanding the definition of trans until it is useless is coming back to bite them in the ass. If sex and gender are different then why do you care about having your sex defined on legal documents.
 
View attachment 8138150
I read this line of the ruling while I was in line at the store and almost laughed.

Just like in Skrmetti, the insistence on expanding the definition of trans until it is useless is coming back to bite them in the ass. If sex and gender are different then why do you care about having your sex defined on legal documents.

I'm offended by that excerpt because "at birth" is not only not needed, it implies that sex can change.
 
Back
Top Bottom