- Joined
- Oct 25, 2024
I wonder why he wouldn't want you to see her, Nick
And he's still as gullible as ever. "I'd love to still see you but my new bf won't let me"
Nick - she's over your weird ass, she'll say anything that will make you leave her alone and not spam her with a million shower calls.
he wonders why her husband gives him the access DENIED
It's even more pathetic: that DM is not actually an expression of bewilderment as if he thinks the boyfriend should A) trust Nick to keep any contact with April strictly platonic or B) get with the times and accept a poly relationship allowing Nick to cuck him. Instead, that DM is actually intended as a flex whereby Nick considers himself such a suave, debonair casanova for having "stolen" April from the likes of Aaron that he can surely "steal" her from the boyfriend as well, and he further believes that the boyfriend would somehow know this, which would make him so possessive about April because he is (or at least should be) afraid of Nick "stealing" her all over again whenever he pleases. He already suggested as much back in May, so the same flex ending up in the above June DM would be very much in character:
[L]
He really should keep it up, doing all he can to
Nick Rekieta is still seething at Momma K, deciding to dox her first name.
Nick still has nasty incel fans who admire him and are going hard after Mama K on Twitter — exactly as he hoped they would when he targeted her.
No mercy for this faggot anyway, but man does he make me want to fedpost.
There's one silver lining at least - preserving her anonymity was presumably the first and foremost reason she'd never have considered taking him to court for anything, but if he shoots himself in the foot by doxxing her further or by inducing fans or Meltonites to do it for him, what would be left to stop her from a crowdfunded defamation suit regarding his repeated public statements that she's a delusional drug addict who flat-out lied about the content of the bodycam footage that she viewed? The need to prove that his calling her a liar was a false statement, and/or the need to disprove a defense of truth put forth by him, would make the footage itself squarely relevant and discoverable regardless of whether Hardin loses, would it not?
Last edited: