Nick will probably never do this, but if he does the streams will quickly devolve into seethe sessions about people that have “wronged” him and he’ll chase off the few people that tune in.
I'm inclined to agree this goes past what the First allowed, mainly because you're not allowed to slap people in the face with gloves and say "Pistols at Dawn." In our gay current year, hecklers, retards, and assholes feel safe hiding behind "free speech," because we're not allowed to put their conviction to the test.
Indeed, he took it a little too far with the man who threatened to butcher his girlfriend's dogs, threatened to murder children, and had been convicted of beating the fuck out of women. Faggot.
Surprisingly Nick had 6k live viewers at the start of the Read trial. The problem was he did no research and most of his streams turned into cope and seethe sessions and pandering to dabbletards for super tips.
Anyone who's raised children (i.e. not Nick, his children's mummy and daddy are known as "iPad" and "the church") knows that they are generally dumb (in that they have a poor overall understanding of the world), yet particularly smart about things that interest them. There's nothing like a child's ability to learn something on the fly, especially when they're told they can't do it (e.g. "don't go in this safe that I'm constantly parading around!"). On the balance of probabilities, I find it hard to believe that out of a five-child household, at least one of them WOULDN'T try to access his drugs, and given his rapidly diminishing mental state, wasn't afforded the chance to. His confusion about this fact is part of what's so aggravating about his attempts at apologetics, he will never quite understand just how poor of a parent he is. The drugs aren't even the main thing here, it's his complete lack of a paternal instinct. I'd be a thousand times more forgiving of him if he exclusively did coke outside of the family home, that would at least show a shred of awareness of others' safety.
Shitty parents are extremely invested in never understanding how much harm they have done and continue to do to their children. If Nick were capable of honest enquiry and self-reflection, he would never have destroyed his life like this.
I genuinely believe in theory Nick could rebuild a good chunk of his streaming career
Without a law license, Nick is just basically an appendage of Kurt, dangling from his nutsack squealing for attention he never gets.
I don't think Nick ever did any research on the trials he covered. Only time you got some legal analysis or proper commentary was when guests came on and gave their 2 cents. The start of his streams was just people waiting, and hoping, for guests to come on.
The "secret sauce" to Nick's trial stream success was the panel format. That is to say, he had panelists on that knew considerably more about the law than he did. In some cases, actual practicing attorneys. They did the heavy lifting. He reaped the financial rewards.
When was Ron "convicted of beating the fuck out of women"? I must have missed that one. It's not in his thread. In fact, the exact opposite is pointed out.
Imagine all the hairy balls that have slammed into that gay cuck beard while the cock went down his throat.
I don't think I will do that, but thank you for offering.
It's pot kettle.
He can just say it was a mess and honestly he didn't know how the drugs got into her instead of coming up with increasingly ludicrous cope scenarios in scientifically uncharted (Balldo) territory.
All of that leads to the inevitable hindsight-informed question: Was he projecting about that at the time?
Nick’s nonstop lying about Rumble was one of my favorite charades. All of his idiot fans believed him and he had to keep pretending they’d totally renewed his lucrative deal.