💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lach said:
Who do we have that's prominent in the right-wing sphere that's actually well composed, not a manchild, principled, isn't a homosexual, white, not a ragebait grifting breadtuber, serious political force that will exist after Trump croaks and all the republicans slink back to their warhawk corporatist faux-christian stances?
Click to expand...
Charlie Ki... oh.

Seth Dillon argued in a recent Piers Morgan interview that there should be more gatekeeping against Nick Fuentes and this comment made me laugh.

gatekeeper.png
 
Cyberpunk Meta said:
Fuentes spent years ankle biting Tucker Carlson and calling him a CIA asset, even as recently as last year if I’m not mistaken (correct me if I’m wrong, he probably even anklebit Tucker this year as well).

One thing that makes me skeptical about the Fuentes rehabilitation arc (which is what his series of events are, an attempt at mainstreaming him, especially with Charlie out of the picture now). What possible use does Fuentes have to the feds? Why the sudden softening of him and his movement which has a verifiable list of controversies ranging from school shooters to pedophiles?
Click to expand...
To try to further tether him to the Right? AFAIK, nobody on the Right likes him. I feel like they tried to do this with Richard Spencer back in 2016 and it didn't really stick. If they soften his image they could maybe Trojan Horse his way into the mainstream Right for 2026, or maybe play the long game for 2028? People in politics have a short attention span, so people might forget that Fuentes is a gay furry neo-Nazi, and anything he said in the past was just him being an edge lord in his wayward youth. As for the Feds, I assume they work like the mafia. They may not need you today, or tomorrow, but some day they will come calling in a favor.
 
AnOminous said:
What is the supposed endgame of whitewashing (literally) this spic pederast? There's no way this ends well, right?
Click to expand...
Pushing NETTR and the ideas you want to push without actually saying the words yourself. There's a reason Tucker was pushing a lot of other crazies and Nick is simply the most recent one.
Then again, I'm highly doubtful Tucker wants the sorta weird spic "white nationalism" that Fuentes wants. Instead, he wants the groypers to think he's "based" and "one of them" and all that, so that they accept the shit he pushes, because "it's only for the white people."

As for whether or not it ends well....Tucker is one of the most dishonest fags online who doesn't have mental illness. I imagine if things go his way, it'll only ever go good for him; everyone else can go fuck themselves.
 
didn't see anyone mention it yet, sorry if I missed it
"Nick Fuentes is someone I've been paying attention to for a couple of years now." - Bret Weinstein, Oct 2025
I timestamped just to avoid obnoxious opening ads
Honestly, found this weird, in how (((Bret Weinstein))) seems to have a higher opinion of Nick Fuentes than I do
 
Enoch Emery said:
As to why the others have him on, I think it is at least somewhat organic. His clips have blown up on places like Instagram reels where all the normie racist zoomers are.
Click to expand...
He is being obviously allowed to operate on Instagram. With modern AI, recognizing whether a video is of Nick Fuentes or not is trivial. If they wanted him off the platform, they would shadowban the clip accounts. Same thing with X.
 
AnOminous said:
What is the supposed endgame of whitewashing (literally) this spic pederast? There's no way this ends well, right?
Click to expand...
The guy draws massive numbers on piddly platforms that shouldn't even make a blip, while their big budget propaganda gets 30k views in primetime. There are guys talking about movies in their basement who get better numbers.

Personally, I think Fuentes is being discussed in the mainstream now because the mainstream is no longer the mainstream. They're not plaforming him, they're trying to re-platform themselves. As for Carlson, I think he got the message after he tried to deflate Fuentes. He's got to realize his audience is mostly dying Boomers and, like it or not, the right is drifting in Fuentes' direction. That's certainly why Charlie Kirk was softening on his support for Israel. It was either that or watch your audience dry up as you become irrelevant.

Fatpacks said:
And just like that, the populist right will be no more, and the Democratic party, now infested with communists, have free reign to take over America and complete their gay race communism fantasy once and for all. I'm not fucking kidding. In a decade from now most if not all of us will have been executed by President Mamdani for wrongthink (i.e. not wanting delusional pornsick men in dresses to use the women's bathroom). Nick will likely still be kept alive for as long as possible to give non-communists the illusion of hope that their side still has people willing to support them.
Click to expand...
All Mamdani wants to do is loot New York for his co-ethnics. That's all any of the left's precious shitskins want to do-- from Ilhan Omar to that Indian who looks like a ventriloquist dummy. The Democrats ran with that moronic "coalition of the ascendant" thing for decades, assuming their brown goblins would just be new niggers-- blindly loyal forever in exchange for crumbs and flattery. But the very instant their imported ethnic enclaves had the numbers to simply elect one of their own, they give the party the finger, do so, and start looting Rome bureaucratically.
 
Last edited:
DeeDee Megadoodoo said:
The guy draws massive numbers on piddly platforms that shouldn't even make a blip, while their big budget propaganda gets 30k views in primetime. There are guys talking about movies in their basement who get better numbers.

Personally, I think Fuentes is being discussed in the mainstream now because the mainstream is no longer the mainstream. They're not plaforming him, they're trying to re-platform themselves. As for Carlson, I think he got the message after he tried to deflate Fuentes. He's got to realize his audience is mostly dying Boomers and, like it or not, the right is drifting in Fuentes' direction. That's certainly why Charlie Kirk was softening on his support for Israel. It was either that or watch your audience dry up as you become irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Tucker lost a lot of influence the second his show got cancelled. It's pretty amazing how many boomers have zero clue how to use the internet.
 
Part of the problem with frequent talk shows like Tucker's, is that they are always scouring the political landscape for new guests. So for better or for worse, an interview with Nicholas was inevitable. May as well get it out of the way now.

It is amusing to think about where this goes from here... Could an interview with Joshua Moon happen? Given a long enough timeline for Tucker's show, I would say it's a near certainty.
 
For people mad that Tucker did a softball interview, consider that this was strategic and not because Tucker actually agrees with Nick:

Candace type interview —> anything Candace now says is considered hostile to their purposes
Dave Smith interview —> doesn’t deny reality by admitting the Israel problem and not just kiking him like how Ben Shapiro and every other moneyed Jew has dealt with problematic goys. Now his followers have a good example of a Jew who is cool
Tucker Carlson interview —> by being non-combative, Tucker has a chance of seeding non-extremist views onto fertile ground. Instead of just shutting down what Nick is saying for being hateful but engaging them with nuance, this allows Tucker to soften and deepen the views Nick’s followers have.

Because both of these people have treated Nick with respect they actually have a chance to have what they say considered by the groyper movement. You CANNOT win against Fuentes by challenging him directly because he is extremely thin-skinned and will crash out on someone over anything.

It seems obvious that Tucker doesn’t like the guy and wanted to avoid ever engaging with him but he knows he lost and is now adopting Dave’s strategy of being the black guy who talks to the KKK as the best way to move forward. Plus, there also seems to be a “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” thing going on here - seeing Zionists cope and seethe over this on Twitter is a silver lining to all this at least.
 
BIG DADDY said:
It seems obvious that Tucker doesn’t like the guy and wanted to avoid ever engaging with him but he knows he lost and is now adopting Dave’s strategy of being the black guy who talks to the KKK as the best way to move forward. Plus, there also seems to be a “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” thing going on here - seeing Zionists cope and seethe over this on Twitter is a silver lining to all this at least.
Click to expand...
Fag.
 
1761927453081.png
https://x.com/ZoomerHistorian/status/1984198616798425458
https://archive.is/fB42n
Does anybody else think that Fuentes is softening his rhetoric and probably even changing his beliefs as hes gaining mainstream prominence? I dont quite agree 100% with ZoomerHistorian and I dont like him but this is sort of accurate. I presume hes trying to go for the Pat Buchanan route as he gains more exposure but after the Tucker Interview, Im sure hes going to become a lot more soft. Its a perfect arc for a grifter like Fuentes and he probably might end up like Sneako if he makes a wrong move somewhere.

EDIT: Its spreading
1761928767494.png
https://x.com/Black_Pilled/status/1984152203410731451
https://archive.is/xdfr2
1761928992339.png
https://x.com/Blondes_tweets/status/1984298084680286443
https://archive.is/vHB6g
1761929061282.png
https://x.com/Steve_Laws_/status/1984150619838673177
https://archive.is/Xf1gh
I see a lot of the groypers defending this using "we must be spiritually racist, not completely biologically racist", unironically the classical liberal civnat position lmao. The William F Buckley position, and we all know what that fucker did. At least they could go the Evola route with this spiritual racism shit but they wont.
 
Last edited:
funwithshemales69 said:
Does anybody else think that Fuentes is softening his rhetoric and probably even changing his beliefs as hes gaining mainstream prominence?
Click to expand...
That's just the way he is. He will criticize conservatives that bend over backwards for brown people and then he himself will get on his fucking knees in support of diversity.

Also, if he said that America First is white only, he'd lose 90% of his audience.
 
Last edited:
funwithshemales69 said:
View attachment 8105441
https://x.com/ZoomerHistorian/status/1984198616798425458
https://archive.is/fB42n
Does anybody else think that Fuentes is softening his rhetoric and probably even changing his beliefs as hes gaining mainstream prominence? I dont quite agree 100% with ZoomerHistorian and I dont like him but this is sort of accurate. I presume hes trying to go for the Pat Buchanan route as he gains more exposure but after the Tucker Interview, Im sure hes going to become a lot more soft. Its a perfect arc for a grifter like Fuentes and he probably might end up like Sneako if he makes a wrong move somewhere.
Click to expand...
I'm going to give Nick the benefit of the doubt and assume he's softening himself publicly mainly because he's seeing how many normalfags are becoming enlightened to the JQ and Israel. As much as it may seem like a win to have more followers pick up your views, it's also equally annoying because normalfags are such slow learners in informing and educating themselves on a particular subject. While normies are now taking their first redpills, you've spent the better part of your life doing the research and finding that while the tribe has numerous crimes to answers for, whinging about "all jews all day all the time 1488 race war now", gets nothing done and makes you look like a rabid child suffering from redpill stress.

And that's annoying. It's annoying to do so much research for years only to have Joe Six Pack be all "he maaaaan do you about AIPAC?? Did you that despite 12 percent of the population, black people...." Nigger, yes I know all of that, shut the fuck up and back to doing more research or go back to work. You aren't enlightened for chancing upon ideas autists on /pol/ knew 12 years ago. Twelve years ago, if I said these things to you, you would've called me a racist/Nazi/misogynist/incel. Normalfags can get redpilled all they want, but they need to know their place as slow learners.

That's what Nick is probably trying to curtail, or put a lid. Yes, I know this sounds autistic. Nick could also be trying to bury the stupid shit he's done, ie China simping and hiring a pedophile.
 
funwithshemales69 said:
View attachment 8105441
https://x.com/ZoomerHistorian/status/1984198616798425458
https://archive.is/fB42n
Does anybody else think that Fuentes is softening his rhetoric and probably even changing his beliefs as hes gaining mainstream prominence? I dont quite agree 100% with ZoomerHistorian and I dont like him but this is sort of accurate. I presume hes trying to go for the Pat Buchanan route as he gains more exposure but after the Tucker Interview, Im sure hes going to become a lot more soft. Its a perfect arc for a grifter like Fuentes and he probably might end up like Sneako if he makes a wrong move somewhere.
Click to expand...
It's not exactly shocking. He started out as the not-wignat right-wing guy but when the Republican establishment spurned him, he embraced the substance and optics of the white nationalism he rejected... until some rich bipolar black gave him attention. Then it's "Aww shucks, black people have it hard in America." Now back to whatever this is. Fuentes First has no substance. It's whatever gets him attention in the moment, zero memory.

In the clip, Fuentes endorses birthright citizenship and naturalized citizenship. No mention of the fraud associated with either (anchor babies and Ilhan Omar style fake marriages).

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom