💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Astroturf Bonanza: Double-Talking Kook Nick Fuentes Continues Flooding Internet with Lies and Gibberish

Screenshot-2025-10-17-at-10.19.17-AM-618x471-600x457.png

It looks like Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer has completely U-turned on Nick Fuentes and is launching a full assault, with expansion to podcast-style subscription media imminent. A takedown of Feuntes seems to be his priority. Anyways, here's the article. It was reposted on Unz with some comments.

On Anglin's private forum, he explained the length of the article was due to not wanting to be accused of cherrypicking.

I'll post a few paragraphs from Anglin's article. But check the links below.



Starting article cut here.
...

Standing on Charlie’s Corpse, Nick Fuentes has Been Astroturfed as the Most Important Right-Wing Voice on the Internet

Something that is personally very surreal to me is the fact that Nick Fuentes is clearly being positioned by very powerful people to be a new “voice for the youth.” For those who don’t know, and for the sake of full disclosure, Fuentes spent years as my Padawan, basing his show on my materials. Two years ago, I disavowed him due to his decision to associate with and promote Richard Spencer, and then to openly tie himself to documented FBI informant Chuck Johnson. I am a really cool guy, I’m totally super edgy and doesn’t afraid of anything. But I have a hard rule that I do not associate with anyone who associates with FBI informants.

informant.jpeg

Nick Fuentes pictured with federal informant Charles Johnson. I don’t know if Fuentes has ever explained why he decided to establish this relationship, but according to his followers, Fuentes is not a fed, he is just friends with them and cooperates with them to make content. Notably, court documents show that Johnson not only worked as an informant himself, but was also tasked with recruiting other informants. But hey. Who knows, right? It doesn’t really even matter at this point.

Before I denounced him, Fuentes spent years citing me as his biggest influence, and would use my articles as the basis of virtually every show he did. Now that he has become this alleged superstar, it’s worth analyzing in some detail just what the hell is going on here.

For basic context: he supported Trump until some point before the election. Then he became anti-Trump. However, his current “anti-Trump” stance is that Trump is not doing enough censorship, not doing the police state hard enough, and so on. It’s actually hard to follow, which is sort of the underlying point I want to try to highlight today: it’s all very garbled.

For unclear reasons, Charlie Kirk dying meant that Nick Fuentes became very important, and was all of a sudden everywhere. No one has explained why, and I think I am the only person asking why. But it is clearly astroturf.

When Charlie died, Fuentes said he was too distraught to do a show. Then the next day, he did this really emotional show where the ideas being communicated were confusing to say the least. He started campaigning for mass censorship, and for some kind of domestic terrorism operation or something. (I covered his early post-assassination campaign here.)


...
Ending article cut here.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? Are we still playing this game?
Yes🙄

For those out the Loop, Quence is a Groyper who constantly comes in here to sweep for and defend Nick.
Good Lord, why all of the hate directed at Nick Fuentes?
Do we know for a fact that Fuentes is a homosexual or is that simply part of a smear campaign against him employed by RINOs and Leftists?
Anyone who doesn’t want a nation full of disgusting looking half-breed mongrels cares
(This one is especially ironic because it describes Nick)
As to the allegation that Fuentes is gay, does anyone have explicit and undeniable proof that it’s true? I’m not referring to circumstantial evidence cobbled together from various sources of questionable provenance or quotes and clips that can be assessed with a wide range of interpretation.
Report, then ignore anything else.
 
Once controlled opposition, always controlled opposition, if you have any serious aspiration, or intention of helping your country you have to destroy or ignore all controlled opps.

You cannot face a vampire and say, when he attempts to drink my blood, I will bite him back and drink his!

They have no blood, that is why they want yours, no matter how many "Based" Statements they spout, at the end of the day everything they do or say is to try to gain enough credibility to sabotage the movement they are currently leeching off
 
But are we absolutely 100% sure about that? IOW, is there undeniable proof that Nick is a pillow biter or is the claim based simply on random guesses and poorly supported hunches?
He watches tranny porn, frequented femboy servers before he exploded in popularity, and spent days staring lustfully into the eyes of a femboy who deepthroats dildos on camera.

The more I hear this guy speak (granted, it’s just in clips), the more I like him.

Can anyone honestly disagree with this common sense opinion?

https://youtube.com/shorts/MJwe2AlsS3o
Is the America We Grew Up With Disappearing?.publer.com.mp4
Note how he doesn't actually describe his upbringing. But the things he lists being worried about losing, presumably what he grew up with and wants to raise his kids and grandkids around, are white, Christian, English-speaking, safe.

Nick Fuentes is not white. He is a mutt and given how quick he was to fall back on "I'm not a Nazi, I'm Mexican!" when questioned by police after he pepper sprayed that lady, he was raised in a mixed/Mexican-identifying household. He's also a huge fan of black people and Muslims so he can't be too worried about browns.

Nick is not a Christian. Given how weak his religious takes are, he was probably raised in a "culturally Christian" home which is worse than a non-Christian home. (Revelation 3:15-16)

English is the global language. To say people won't be speaking English in America in two generations is unfathomably retarded.

Crime rates in America have been trending steadily downhill for the past 30+ years. But Nick takes glee in assaulting old women who knock on his door, likes throwing things at people whose backs are turned, and chooses to stay in shithole Chicago instead of moving elsewhere so I don't think he's in a place to be wringing his hands about America being unsafe.
 
It looks like Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer has completely U-turned on Nick Fuentes and is launching a full assault
I don't even remember why Anglin (midget, pedophile, objective failure at life) broke up with Nick a few years ago, but any continued assault from him nowadays is obviously just sour grapes and not stemming from any genuine disagreements, so I will not be reading or listening to any of his retarded ramblings. Do his remaining paypigs really not see a problem with him metamorphosing from an unequivocal ballwasher for 6+ years to an ardent hater after some stupid interpersonal bullshit? They're both irony-poisoned, both self-described right-wing extremists despite being complete degenerates, and both want to lower the age of consent to the early teens, so I still don't see much difference between the two; Anglin also sucks ass at writing.
 
My interpretation of this clip is Nick after finally getting some positive mainstream attention is slowly realizing the groypers are a ball and chain around his ankle and that he has to distance himself from them to finally get the fame he's always craved.

"We've reached a stage in the adoption of antisemitism where now it might be time to start to refine. Now it's attracting a lot of idiots, and I will not be held hostage by idiots that don't know what they're talking about."

EmzLlDo-IWldi5k6.mp4
It's funny to hear him keep whining about the culture he helped build now that it’s finally turned on him. Maybe next time you shouldn't easily resort to "You're Jewish" or "You're paid Zionist shill" when you get into a disagreement with people.

But are we absolutely 100% sure about that? IOW, is there undeniable proof that Nick is a pillow biter or is the claim based simply on random guesses and poorly supported hunches?
Bitch please
1761567583897.jpeg

I don't even remember why Anglin (midget, pedophile, objective failure at life) broke up with Nick a few years ago
It was because of Fuentes talked to Dickie Spencer
 
I don't even remember why Anglin (midget, pedophile, objective failure at life) broke up with Nick a few years ago, but any continued assault from him nowadays is obviously just sour grapes and not stemming from any genuine disagreements, so I will not be reading or listening to any of his retarded ramblings. Do his remaining paypigs really not see a problem with him metamorphosing from an unequivocal ballwasher for 6+ years to an ardent hater after some stupid interpersonal bullshit? They're both irony-poisoned, both self-described right-wing extremists despite being complete degenerates, and both want to lower the age of consent to the early teens, so I still don't see much difference between the two; Anglin also sucks ass at writing.
Anglin probably does have sour grapes towards Nick especially since Nick became successful and famous while meanwhile he fell into total obscurity. I mean the guy was basically living in Nick's shadow for a very long time and now he can't even claim to be living in Nick's shadow anymore because he's completely irrelevant. But still, it's possible to have sour grapes towards someone and also have genuine disagreement with them at the same time. I think he really doesn't like or respect Nick anymore and for deeper reasons than just hating that Nick is more popular than him
 
I don't even remember why Anglin (midget, pedophile, objective failure at life) broke up with Nick a few years ago, but any continued assault from him nowadays is obviously just sour grapes and not stemming from any genuine disagreements, so I will not be reading or listening to any of his retarded ramblings. Do his remaining paypigs really not see a problem with him metamorphosing from an unequivocal ballwasher for 6+ years to an ardent hater after some stupid interpersonal bullshit? They're both irony-poisoned, both self-described right-wing extremists despite being complete degenerates, and both want to lower the age of consent to the early teens, so I still don't see much difference between the two; Anglin also sucks ass at writing.
Anglin being a degenerate is one thing but that article is well made becaue it highlights nick's association with known fed informants
 
Fuentes spent years ankle biting Tucker Carlson and calling him a CIA asset, even as recently as last year if I’m not mistaken (correct me if I’m wrong, he probably even anklebit Tucker this year as well).

One thing that makes me skeptical about the Fuentes rehabilitation arc (which is what his series of events are, an attempt at mainstreaming him, especially with Charlie out of the picture now). What possible use does Fuentes have to the feds? Why the sudden softening of him and his movement which has a verifiable list of controversies ranging from school shooters to pedophiles?
 
Fuentes spent years ankle biting Tucker Carlson and calling him a CIA asset, even as recently as last year if I’m not mistaken (correct me if I’m wrong, he probably even anklebit Tucker this year as well).

One thing that makes me skeptical about the Fuentes rehabilitation arc (which is what his series of events are, an attempt at mainstreaming him, especially with Charlie out of the picture now). What possible use does Fuentes have to the feds? Why the sudden softening of him and his movement which has a verifiable list of controversies ranging from school shooters to pedophiles?
It’s all on Charlie.

Putting aside perfectly reasonable tinfoil, it’s a knee jerk reaction against the left.

When a political side gets transgressed against severely enough, they care less about decorum or optics. Leftists did the same thing when antifa started have more retard rallies and ‘get togethers’ after Trump was elected in 2016.

Biden of all people tried to defend them in 2020 in a Presidential Debate by saying “look they’re just against fascism”.

These political pundits and operators all know exactly what they’re doing, they just don’t give a shit.
 
Any questions about Ali Akbar and his grooming of underage boys who were fans of Nick?
Any questions about Nick's involvement with an FBI informant?
Any questions about why Nick was in a tranny group chat called "The Dollhouse"
"We must storm the Capitol"?
Selling out his fans' information after J6th?
Nope, just a fed giving another fed a softball interview. This glows from outerspace
 
Skipping the origin story to get to the part where he's talking about Joe Kent: Nick isn't able to keep his faggy narcissism fully bottled in this segment. He's really terrible at putting a professional suit over what is clearly a capricious personal slight.
EDIT: Getting to the MTG question. Tucker obviously can't stand his guts.
 
Both of these men spent the better part of this year doing a gay kayfabe fight in the podcast arena over being gay faggots in basements or CIA assets. And now they're doing a softball interview together, the culmination of an even gayer rehabilitation tour to legitimize Nick? What a joke. Anyone who continues to fall for this complete alt-media charade is goycattle. I'll watch this now, but I'm sure my feelings here will be the summary by the end.
 
Back
Top Bottom