🍔 Quarterpounder Jeremy Hambly / The Quartering / MTGHeadquarters / Unsleeved Media / Midwestly - Buttblasted alcoholic manchild upset he was banned from a childrens' card game, Grifter, supporter of the cancel culture, cucked by a Jewish bull (Adam Sellers), pisses in basement, shits himself, FLAGGOT, stalks little girls in public, scammer, sex pest

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lolcow live chat for stream discussion and chit-chat.

How long will Jer stay off Twitter?

  • <1 day.

    Votes: 417 30.2%
  • More than 1 day but less than 3 days.

    Votes: 567 41.1%
  • Around a week.

    Votes: 237 17.2%
  • Two weeks or more.

    Votes: 23 1.7%
  • Less than a month!

    Votes: 33 2.4%
  • He's gone, forever. Enjoy oranges, stalker.

    Votes: 103 7.5%

  • Total voters
    1,380
However in classic Quartering fashion he decided to dick ride for Rumble on Twitter last week and exposed that he in fact makes $26,151 on Rumble a month BEFORE his contracted revenue kicks in.
You've triggered my autism on accident.

So this is Hambly's Rumble studio dashboard. This number includes all Rumble-related revenue, including Locals. I figure I am one of the only people in the world who can provide information on what this looks like so I might as well show you mine.

Hambly's
1761681712893.png

Mine
1761681771689.png

Both of us are showing you the 'last 30 days'. Let's do a quick comparison:
Jeremy gets approximately 48x more views but only 5.6x as much money.
Jeremy gets approximately 48x more views but only 2.75x the watch hours (!!)

What is driving me crazy is the last part. 2.75x the watch hours?

1761681950262.png

He SLAUGHTERS me. Multiple hour streams, every single day, to many times the number of viewers!

1761682000221.png

The other thing is the graph. Check out the Y Axis.

My Y Axis for the month (best single day day was $744).
1761682037112.png

Hambly's Y axis.
1761682069018.png

But the X axis is the same: 30 days. So he's got one day in particular that's so fucking big that it's shifting his entire Y axis up to $25K out of $26K for the entire month. Huh??

Notice, by the way, that on my graph that locals payments and subscriptions are billed over the entire month, depending on when they subbed. Ad rev also comes in as you earn it. So whence cometh the $25K?

Unless... Unless the Locals contract doesn't appear on mine, because I don't have one, and that comes in on one day and that one payment is $20,000 which shifts the Y axis up to $25,000 because he has additional income on that day.. Then, throughout the rest of the month, his real earned income is $6K.
 
Mind you when he goes on his anti-EBT rants lately he has to add a disclaimer that he's not talking about the "people who actually need it"
This is yet another example of why I despise him so fucking much. Ever since he started talking about 'politics', he demonstrably contributes to every problem he pretends he's interested in solving. Even in the best-faith interpretation of his character, I'm forced to conclude that he is obscenely dishonest.
 
This is yet another example of why I despise him so fucking much. Ever since he started talking about 'politics', he demonstrably contributes to every problem he pretends he's interested in solving. Even in the best-faith interpretation of his character, I'm forced to conclude that he is obscenely dishonest.
>Lazy
>glutton
>pervert
>manchild
>No manners whatsoever

Holy shit, Jeremy Hambly is Ignatius Reilly.
 
What is driving me crazy is the last part. 2.75x the watch hours?
A theoretical explanation for this would be that Rumble is responsible for the fake/inflated viewership and consciously doesn't count them towards watch hours or payment. They might do this so they can present the 'real' numbers to investors to shield themselves from fraud allegations. It'd be interesting to see if there's a pattern of this with other partnered channels, but we probably won't ever get access to this data.
 
You've triggered my autism on accident.

So this is Hambly's Rumble studio dashboard. This number includes all Rumble-related revenue, including Locals. I figure I am one of the only people in the world who can provide information on what this looks like so I might as well show you mine.

Hambly's
View attachment 8093724

Mine
View attachment 8093727

Both of us are showing you the 'last 30 days'. Let's do a quick comparison:
Jeremy gets approximately 48x more views but only 5.6x as much money.
Jeremy gets approximately 48x more views but only 2.75x the watch hours (!!)

What is driving me crazy is the last part. 2.75x the watch hours?

View attachment 8093745

He SLAUGHTERS me. Multiple hour streams, every single day, to many times the number of viewers!

View attachment 8093749

The other thing is the graph. Check out the Y Axis.

My Y Axis for the month (best single day day was $744).
View attachment 8093752

Hambly's Y axis.
View attachment 8093759

But the X axis is the same: 30 days. So he's got one day in particular that's so fucking big that it's shifting his entire Y axis up to $25K out of $26K for the entire month. Huh??

Notice, by the way, that on my graph that locals payments and subscriptions are billed over the entire month, depending on when they subbed. Ad rev also comes in as you earn it. So whence cometh the $25K?

Unless... Unless the Locals contract doesn't appear on mine, because I don't have one, and that comes in on one day and that one payment is $20,000 which shifts the Y axis up to $25,000 because he has additional income on that day.. Then, throughout the rest of the month, his real earned income is $6K.
It looks like about $2000 of your Rumble income is from superchats. So let's say you made around $2600 outside of that based on the 70k view hours. This would put his income minus superchats at around $7200 if he has similar payouts from other sources. So like you said he likely has some lump payout once a month where it probably pushes that single day into the $15-$20k range forcing the graph to scale in $5k increments topping at 25k and this would make a lot of sense.

Since Jeremy constantly lies it's just impossible to take him at face value on anything. So it's very possible he is just lying and this dashboard does include his contract revenue which would make sense that it shows up as a lump payment once a month. Of course Jeremy could clear up a lot of this speculation by not conveniently cutting off the part of the graph that shows the source of the Rumble monetization but he did that for a reason. He certainly goes above and beyond to glaze Rumble and push it as a viable alternative to Youtube and is not above lying to make it seem like his bloated revenue is something the average tuber would have access to and not mostly the result of a sweetheart contract he negotiated using his Con Inc. connections. This constant Rumble glazing is most flagrant when he constantly pretends that the view numbers for his live show are legit despite all evidence and common sense pointing to the opposite. It's very clear that Rumble massively inflates the viewer numbers of livestreams on the home page and this is definitive proof of that.

Looking at your dashboard your average watch time is around 31 minutes per view.

Looking at Jeremy's dashboard his average view time per view on Rumble is about 1:45 per view. This is exceedingly low for someone who gets 2/3rd of his monthly views on a two hour daily livestream that allegedly has a consistent 15-40k live concurrent viewers.

Back in 2022 he showed his dashboard on Youtube during a live stream on accident and he had an average view time of about 3:25 per view. This was back during a time period where he was live streaming from that channel only rarely, less than once a week average, and also in the time period where he was getting massive views off of "Youtube shorts" which would drastically reduce his average view time since those are limited to under 60 seconds. So it's clear as day to anyone with half a brain the "views" over on Rumble are fake as fuck.
1761686344400.png


If we take the roughly 4,340,000 livestream views he had in that time period, divide those by the 26 Rumble streams he had, and multiply by the average 1:45 watch time we get an average of about 292,000 minutes watched per livestream and further more about 167,000 alleged average views per stream, which seems to be pretty consistent for what Rumble was reporting in that time period. If we take all that into account he should have at best an average of 2435 viewers watching at any given moment on a 2 hour livestream and at best 3247 average viewers on a 90 minute live stream. Take into account though these are absolute best case scenarios where everyone watches exactly 1:45, so people watching long portions of the stream would significantly lower that number and very notably this doesn't account for anyone who goes back and watches the stream on replay and isn't accounted for in the live view numbers and also works under the assumption that average view time on Jeremy's standalone videos is also 1:45 when it's probably higher just based on his Youtube average. Hmmm, that certainly doesn't seem to jive with his reported live view numbers but it does seem to jive more closely with his low chat activity and the numbers reported by Rumble when he isn't on the home page which I conveniently happened to screen shot a couple weeks ago showing he had 1602 viewers on a live stream which has been going on 45 minutes.
1761689724527.png


A theoretical explanation for this would be that Rumble is responsible for the fake/inflated viewership and consciously doesn't count them towards watch hours or payment. They might do this so they can present the 'real' numbers to investors to shield themselves from fraud allegations. It'd be interesting to see if there's a pattern of this with other partnered channels, but we probably won't ever get access to this data.
My long standing theory, based on many observations, is that streams on the Rumble home page count every single hit to the homepage as a live view for the featured stream and that live views are set to a long timeout for inactivity before they are uncounted. They avoid fucking themselves over on the back end by paying out based on actual view time, which is the industry standard from my understanding. So they can point to these inflated view numbers to investors and advertisers and get better advertising rates. Then my theory is that people like Jeremy and Tim Pool are paid inflated amounts to run ads curated by Rumble that were negotiated using these highly inflated view stats on their front page streams for a cut as long as they play along and don't call out the obvious scam. It's very possible that Rumble also bots the homepage to push these numbers (and stats investors care about like total page hits) even higher.
 
Last edited:
My long standing theory, based on many observations, is that streams on the Rumble home page count every single hit to the homepage as a live view for the featured stream and that live views are set to a long timeout for inactivity before they are uncounted.
I think your explanation is more likely, but I was suggesting a different possibility, because a hit on the homepage counting as a live viewer, not view, seems less likely. I was proposing that rumble actually runs an internal system to inflate live viewer count while still segregating real data from fake data, for payout/investor meeting reasons.

At some point somewhere, an entry is going to be made into a database representing a 'viewer'. They probably further split this out into a table for authenticated (ie logged-in) viewers ('table 1') for data collection purposes, and a table for 'guest' viewers (not logged-in, 'table 2'). When they calculate the real-time viewership, they would do a "select count from table 1 join table 2 where viewed_channel = quartering". This would represent the actual number of concurrent viewers, which they can use for legitimate purposes and not get sued.

I'm suggesting that there might be another table, 'table 3', that they just pop in some number they have decided they want. Then, when they do the inconsequential calculations for what they want their viewership to look like, they do "select count from table 1 join table 2 join table 3 where viewed_channel = quartering". This way they can make up whatever number they want for whatever channel they want to project intended viewership, while still maintaining accurate records for legal purposes because they just go back to joining table 1 and table 2.
 
I liked things better when he was just a goofy fuck that would occasionally pop up on my youtube feed with something interesting I would watch for 3 minutes and 45 seconds on average.
 
How in the fucking world has poop become such an important part of his personality? This dude is straight up insane, disgusting and unwatchable.

I remember I started watching him after he switched his channel when he got banned from Magic. Probably 5+y ago. Within months, I blocked recommandation because of how tired I was of him releasing 10min ads after an another instead of just informative videos.

He was shameless then, but it's a whole different level to constantly talk about gross shit.

How this man still has an audience is beyond me.
I watched him for a very short amount of time and then coffee brand coffee brand coffee brand coffee got so utterly annoying to me that I unsubbed.
 
I think your explanation is more likely, but I was suggesting a different possibility, because a hit on the homepage counting as a live viewer, not view, seems less likely. I was proposing that rumble actually runs an internal system to inflate live viewer count while still segregating real data from fake data, for payout/investor meeting reasons.
You may be on to something. If you go into his videos or live tab and sort by view count the numbers are all over the place and not actually sorted by the displayed "views."

Here's his live videos on Rumble sorted by view count. I see no reasonable explanation for this except that something funky is going on. For what it's worth I find it likely based on the content, guests, or dates these took place (in one case he was raided by a special episode of Russel Brand with a large panel) that these are actually his streams with the most REAL views but the displayed numbers are all over the place. At first I thought maybe they were ranked by engagement but I looked into it and that is not the case. Also LOL that his second most viewed stream ever on Rumble is him running an 18 hour loop of a fireplace on Christmas day. That is so on brand for Jeremy.
1761703163755.png

So it does seem that Rumble has some sort of secret "real views" counter hiding in the background.
 
Back in 2022 he showed his dashboard on Youtube during a live stream on accident and he had an average view time of about 3:25 per view.
Short to not detract from the metric analysis but it's exceedingly hilarious that his average watch time is about how long it takes for normies with autoplay on in the background to go "What the fuck am I listening to?" and change the video. :smug:
 
Clipped today's stream. No discussion whatsoever about the stated topics, unless you want to count watching a dozen videos on X showing urban nignog monkey behavior as 'discussing the food riots' due to the upcoming SNAP stuff. This directly supports what I talked about in my last clips post about his 'X algorithm change' cope, that he's seeing more and more of this stuff, because that's what he clicks on. Shocking stuff in 2025.


The first half was extraordinarily boring, even for his channel, and I was optimistic that I wouldn't have to do much clipping, but the second half was... different. I honestly felt like Jeremy legitimately planned segments - to address his most recent criticisms. There is some stuff that is just way too on the nose to be coincidence, imo. I don't think the member's discord came up even once though, for anyone keeping track.

Jeremy claims he never had any 'extra' money until 39, which is only 3 years ago. I suspect he is also lying about his wife lying about working at Walgreen's, for the sole reason of wanting to talk about their customers (I wouldn't be surprised if someone did tell him this, but I doubt it was his wife). He talks about how a single hospital visit could have bankrupted him, despite how he talks about going to doctors constantly. He also talks about how he had to pay vet bills on credit, which supposedly took years to pay off. The only thing about this I do believe is that he put something on credit.


Jeremy lies about being forced to eat old, spoiling steak because 'times are tough'. Another entry into the 'buying meat' category that has been so frequent with him lately.


In order:
  • Jeremy makes fun of Hannah's dad
  • Jeremy bitches about Hannah's pregnancy
  • Immediately after bringing up that inappropriate topic, Jeremy lies about being extra-careful to be on his best behavior while working around women
  • Immediately after claiming to be on his best behavior, he talks more about dating Melonie's mom


Jeremy is the coming of the American Caesar. Please, please, please cross the Poopicon River, Hambly. Honestly, there's so many little things to point out in this clip, I just don't feel like summarizing everything. Just watch until the end.


Jeremy blames the lack of healthy communities that look out for each other, resulting in the problematic federal government overreach, on... people who quit going to church. Spoken by someone who never went in the first place so they could quit going, and someone who has never done a charitable thing in his life. As far as I'm aware, all of his 'charity' he donated was simply viewer-donated money that he took credit for.


Jeremy is reduced to 'attending' church through livestream. I honestly don't feel up to critiquing this right now, because I know I'd sperg the fuck out. But for those interested... food is involved.

This is actually worse than what ANISA JOMHA said about herself.


Jeremy Hambly, the born-again Christian of what I assume to be a Sola Scriptura-based denomination, can't read the Bible.


Jeremy has to phonetically sound out words aloud as he reads. He can't pay attention to audio books. His wife buys him Steven King books, which he pretends to be against because 'anti woke'. A Bible picture book is too long for him to get through.

Jeremy allegedly can't afford 'stuffed salmon'. Editor's note - I have lived in fishing towns at various points in my life, which means I've eaten a lot of seafood, and I've never heard of stuffed salmon. Is that what people do to farmed fish to make it edible, or is this a 'black' thing? Either way, it just sounds like one of the cheapest way to eat fish to me so he should be able to afford it, but maybe I'm retarded.


Jeremy pretends like his grocery bill is comparable to the average American's, because that allows him to be pretend that SNAP people spend more on food than he does so he can pretend to be outraged.


Jeremy can't afford to give Melonie a superchat that was explicitly directed to her. He needs that money. He really, really does.


Jeremy loves to talk about how he understands the struggle of growing up with limited means, but here he describes how his parents were able to afford the fancy sports memorabilia jackets. That doesn't mean his family was rich by any means, but it's a bit removed from the 'hamburger helper and spaghetti for every meal' image he's been trying to cultivate.

Here, he's talking about grok being trained on bad information from places such as reddit. He is correct about this, but I suspect anytime grok provides a response, he will assume any potential bad answer is a result of this, and any good answer is 100% valid. Schrodinger's AI, if you will.


Jeremy is bothered that he's bald and not as successful as Tim Pool.


Jeremy is bothered that the government doesn't pay for his Mountain Dew.


Jeremy is bothered that a parking lot is full of dirty diapers, but he can't play with them because people would see.


Jeremy is bothered by his chat holding him accountable for his 'weight loss journey' and bans them. It's apparently Ethan Ralph's fault, because he thinks this is a Casino fan trolling him. He also pretends as if his lunch consisted solely of some 100 calorie drink.


Jeremy is bothered by having to eat vegetables.


Jeremy is bothered because other people forgot what it feels like to be hungry. Only he remembers what it's like to suffer starvation.

  1. Jeremy is bothered by the fact that unhealthy people are ruining the healthcare system.
  2. In the second clip, he justifies this because he's paying for his own insurance, as if that matters to the insurance companies who are really only worried about having to pay out, at the end of the day, not whether someone is on a private or employer-provided plan (with the implication that employees don't have part of their salaries withheld for their medical benefits. Hint - the vast majority of American workers who have medical insurance are paying it themselves too, Jeremy, you fucking retard).


Jeremy is bothered that other people don't take care of their parents. I strongly suspect he would absolve himself of this responsibility by sticking his parents in a nursing home, had it been necessary. There's no way Jeremy would let his parents live in his McMansion with him. They'd have a firsthand look into how fucked up their son turned out.

Jeremy makes a conscious effort to retain his 'based' anti-SNAP political stance while not alienating his audience of government aid-receiving retards.


A viewer talks about his experience on food stamps, and Jeremy does his best to retain his audience while still trying to maintain the 'based limited government' appearance. At the end, he admits he would immediately go on any available form of welfare if it made financial sense for him to do so, and the only entity worthy of replacing him is a 'big-titted AI'.


More of his disabled audience chimes in to question Jeremy's position.

This one is kind of stupid and not funny, there's no reason a 40+ year old man should be an expert on children's video game characters. I just find it ridiculous that Jeremy pretends to be super into retro video games and gets every single detail about Yoshi wrong. I included it because he just lies about everything.

I wonder if it's because he thinks he's such a Chad Christian, that a woman is there to do his bidding, or because he doesn't want the staff telling her the story of when he shit all over their store.

Jeremy makes fun of shitty tattoos, in front of Melonie, lmao...


They're still going on about this weird inside joke about pear-shaped bodies, I just found this awkward


Melonie self-felts about her 'rectangle' body, Hannah self-felts about her ' Lego' body, Jeremy corrects them and says they have Tetris-shaped bodies.


Hannah is temporarily more grossed-out by Luke's obsession with the ladybugs from, was it Lindsay Graham or some other faggot politician's asshole?


Jeremy self-felts about being a retard, then insults Hannah's dad.


Hannah does not like being accused of lying about being pregnant before being hired, which Jeremy aggressively brings up again. Because he's totally over it. Then he asserts his dominance over Melonie by talking about his standards for her appearance.


Jeremy "bullied" Melonie into getting health insurance.

You may be on to something. If you go into his videos or live tab and sort by view count the numbers are all over the place and not actually sorted by the displayed "views."
I looked into the page you referenced in your post, and I see the same results. I'm not a front-end expert, but I did my best to investigate what was going on.

I will refer to the channel categories, such as "All", "Exclusive", etc., as 'tabs'.

(Ignore the bookmarks. Yeah, I like Warhammer, I visit this website, and I have to pay bills. I don't feel like censoring because I'm tired from spending the last 3 hours clipping Jeremy, and there's no actionable information)

1761720369488.png1761720395141.png1761720408101.png1761720570738.png

We can see each 'tab' routes to a different path on the domain, obviously and literally correlated with the selected tab ( https://rumble.com/c/TheQuartering/<tab> ) other than "All", which is the default path. Typical web routing. When you click the "Filters" button below the available tabs, the dialog pops up for the user to select what they want.

1761720903494.png

When you click outside the dialog, the page actually resolves to the same URL, based on whatever tab is currently selected, but it adds a query parameter to the URL. In the first image, I've screencapped the result of closing the "Filters" dialogue having selected the "Views count" option (and then reopened the "Filters"), and the second image is exactly the same, but I've highlighted the query parameter that was added for visual reference.

1761721030272.png1761721063761.png

Unfortunately, what this means is that any logic performed in generating the final HTML/CSS/etc. response to the HTTP request of the webpage (which would include the query to generate the video IDs/other data, and the comparison statement by which to sort them) is performed server-side, and is impossible for us to gain any insight into without having access to the source code. I was hoping that such a simple sort would be performed client-side (ie the user's browser actually doing the sorting), but that is not the case.

Again, I'm not a front-end expert, and I don't know what best practices are for this sort of operation. The conclusion is that from our perspective, the "Filters" button is entirely a black-box from which we can make zero inferences about. This means that although it's impossible to prove the rumble view count is fake, it's also equally impossible to rule that out, without information we're never going to get.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Again, I'm not a front-end expert, and I don't know what best practices are for this sort of operation. The conclusion is that from our perspective, the "Filters" button is entirely a black-box from which we can make zero inferences about. This means that although it's impossible to prove the rumble view count is fake, it's also equally impossible to rule that out, without information we're never going to get.
Sorting would always happen on the backend so the results can be paginated and cached (and about a million other reasons since passing every record to the front end and sorting it there would be highly retarded). Either way something very odd is happening in the rumble backend and I can't make sense of it. Funny side note I went to look at the last few pages of his results sorted by views to see what the worst ones were and his gaming streams were all there mixed in with the 10 second aborted livestreams and it reminded me that he once made a serious attempt to transition into being a video game streamer even though that's somehow more boring than watching him fumble news commentary.
 
wonder if it's because he thinks he's such a Chad Christian, that a woman is there to do his bidding, or because he doesn't want the staff telling her the story of when he shit all over their store.
Your browser is not able to display this video.
Imagine banning your wife from going to Walmart. That's just fucking Islamic. Also it doesn't seem like he's in poverty if he can afford to exclude Walmart.
 
Imagine banning your wife from going to Walmart. That's just fucking Islamic. Also it doesn't seem like he's in poverty if he can afford to exclude Walmart.
When Jeremy says he wants to keep his wife away from black men I believe him. Next thing you know there's a new sky bull taking your wife out for pizza and now you gotta buy a plane that can do loop-de-loops and tear up your RC track to put in a basketball court.
 
When Jeremy says he wants to keep his wife away from black men I believe him. Next thing you know there's a new sky bull taking your wife out for pizza and now you gotta buy a plane that can do loop-de-loops and tear up your RC track to put in a basketball court.
Jermey talks a lot about the "Basketball Americans" when he lives in a very white area, and personally I find it hilarious. He doesn't have to deal with them, but he talks about them constantly.
 
Clipped today's stream. No discussion whatsoever about the stated topics, unless you want to count watching a dozen videos on X showing urban nignog monkey behavior as 'discussing the food riots' due to the upcoming SNAP stuff. This directly supports what I talked about in my last clips post about his 'X algorithm change' cope, that he's seeing more and more of this stuff, because that's what he clicks on. Shocking stuff in 2025.
Lol, we have to start taking bets on what grade-school level Jeremy can read at. Can't say I'm surprised by this development.
 
Lol, we have to start taking bets on what grade-school level Jeremy can read at. Can't say I'm surprised by this development.
Listening to him struggle to try and read the news articles for his 'show', I can confirm it's extremely low. I always thought it was just because reading out loud can be more difficult for some people, but he really has just been this retarded the whole time. I now think he has Type II ADD (the self-inflicted kind, just like his diabetes) based on how often he checks his twitter during his show. He's attempting to project his limited intellect in multiple domains at all times, which he's really bad at, which is also why he always cuts to ad reads or membership shills so easily. That's his default. CPU shorted out? Shill the memberships. Lose train of thought? Read an ad.
 
Listening to him struggle to try and read the news articles for his 'show', I can confirm it's extremely low. I always thought it was just because reading out loud can be more difficult for some people, but he really has just been this retarded the whole time. I now think he has Type II ADD (the self-inflicted kind, just like his diabetes) based on how often he checks his twitter during his show. He's attempting to project his limited intellect in multiple domains at all times, which he's really bad at, which is also why he always cuts to ad reads or membership shills so easily. That's his default. CPU shorted out? Shill the memberships. Lose train of thought? Read an ad.
Lol, we have to start taking bets on what grade-school level Jeremy can read at. Can't say I'm surprised by this development.

I have a giant backlog of timestamps I need to go back and clip and in one of them he admits he hasn't read a full book in over 30 years, even during his Master's degree at that 4th rate podunk state college he attended. Then he goes into how he tried and failed to read parts of the Bible and can't even follow along to books on tape.

If you think his reading is bad watch him when he types. Even though we only get to see him at most blast out a 30 word tweet or a google search on stream he struggles super hard and his fail rate for typing even a short sentence on the first try is probably near 75%. This is crazy for a guy who has spent most of his life glued to a computer. I really think QuarterGrifter is right and he's deep fried his brain from decades of internet slopmaxxing and of course the pill popping and alcoholism didn't help.
 
Now that there is an influx of people to this thread I’d like to post this old Coach Red Pill (PBUH) video on Hambly. Much of what he said still holds up to this day and he totally had this fat retard clocked from the start:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=gYM66U6wdSI
(also if someone could archive this that’d be great)

I've never seen this clip before but it's the exact same thing (although put far less eloquently) that Matt Walsh said about Quarterpounder when they had a Twitter spat a couple of years ago. Jeremy tries to court controversy and drama in order to keep up his grift.

Was he actually nearing wings of redemption weight? I figure he might of been in the high 200's at most but 400 is plump pimp territory
No way Hamburger is anywhere close to the high 200's range. The guys is a fucking ogre, and is like 6'5" or something IIRC. Even at his thinnest over the past 5 years he's probably pushing at least 340# or so, and hovering near 400# at his heaviest.

I think your explanation is more likely, but I was suggesting a different possibility, because a hit on the homepage counting as a live viewer, not view, seems less likely. I was proposing that rumble actually runs an internal system to inflate live viewer count while still segregating real data from fake data, for payout/investor meeting reasons.

At some point somewhere, an entry is going to be made into a database representing a 'viewer'. They probably further split this out into a table for authenticated (ie logged-in) viewers ('table 1') for data collection purposes, and a table for 'guest' viewers (not logged-in, 'table 2'). When they calculate the real-time viewership, they would do a "select count from table 1 join table 2 where viewed_channel = quartering". This would represent the actual number of concurrent viewers, which they can use for legitimate purposes and not get sued.

I'm suggesting that there might be another table, 'table 3', that they just pop in some number they have decided they want. Then, when they do the inconsequential calculations for what they want their viewership to look like, they do "select count from table 1 join table 2 join table 3 where viewed_channel = quartering". This way they can make up whatever number they want for whatever channel they want to project intended viewership, while still maintaining accurate records for legal purposes because they just go back to joining table 1 and table 2.

I think that "table 3" is what someone above has said, in that it's probably views when featured on the home page. Or at the very least, its "table 2" when he gets views from a raid from another channel, no matter how brief it may be.
 
Back
Top Bottom