Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Iron Hamster]

Files this before providing alleged restraining order. lol

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

I really thought this was all AI until I got to page 4 and found his awkward assertion of his honesty. I was hoping for a "sincerely" but "truthfully" will do.


"Ya Honah, there was no way for me to know my chief witness was dead. We had a falling out. Now let me list some specific examples of why I thought he was still alive that I could've only known if I was in contact with him."

Benny and his staff deserve every last bit of derision and loss of faith in them and the system. Enjoy this sexual deviant, word slurring, retarded albatross.

 

[Dyn]

At what point is a writ of mandamus warranted for violating your rights when the judges have been bending so far backwards to appease this retard where in any other circumstance this case would have been thrown out 100 times already?

Mandamus is only supposed to be for things you can't appeal. Judges ruling in ways you don't like are appealable. The only way a mandamus is going to be appropriate is if the case goes a year or two with no rulings whatsoever.

 

[AnOminous]

lol, welcome to litigation

If you have never been in a case since before you were born, woken up into it, found out about it in your adolescence, and then fought it until your 30s, despite not even knowing what it's about, and you're now retirement age and still in it, you have never done the Jarndyce dance.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

"Ya Honah, there was no way for me to know my chief witness was dead. We had a falling out. Now let me list some specific examples of why I thought he was still alive that I could've only known if I was in contact with him."

"his health was improving" countered by "he's been dead for years" is peak Russtard.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Why is ECF 1 even sealed?

Each state has different rules on whether or not motion to proceed IFP is sealed (in whole or in part). Utah automatically seals them. Georgia, West Virginia, Cali, for example, do not.

And why can't Null the defendant even see it, isn't that some kind of unconstitutional violation of due process that a named party to an action isn't even allowed to see the original motion that started it?

It is not a constitutional violation. Null is allowed to see the important thing, mainly the complaint.

 

[Myrtle the Turtle]

I don't expect AI to be helpful in Greers case, there are so many contradictions and instances where he lied, its impossible for it to produce a coherent response considering all the bs that has been going on back and forth for years now. It can only hallucinate and fill in the blanks. GPT doesn't understand how this case even got here in the first place since logically, this case should have never gotten this far. I think using it actually hurts him since it keeps introducing things that contradict his previous statements.

The documents cap for chatGPT premium is roughly around 100-150, but IME it shits out around 20-40 before it starts hallucinating and missing important info.

Alas, were almost done with October, soon with November, the holidays and Christmas, it will be 2026 before you know it.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 372

 

[Man In A Dress]

I can feel the seethe through my screen.

 

[Catgirls are Love]

Schrödinger's restraining order, except Greee decided what state it is without actually observing it.

 

[obsdj]

Apart from the typo in the very first line (hire a proofreader dammit, I say not for the first nor likely for the last time), this is all pretty awesome. The emails are baiting Greer, but in such a way that Greer continues to refuse to acknowledge that the court REPEATEDLY ORDERED HIM to produce the document, and the fact that its relevance or lack thereof was already dismissed as an argument many long months ago.

I realize Hardin couldn't resist the temptation to comment on Greer's knowledge of Dead Steve's biological features in a footnote, but it's probably okay. He kept the filing short and sweet. Great stuff.

 

[.iota.]

this is the high-quality snark that i so enjoy in mr. hardin's filings.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

but in such a way that Greer continues to refuse to acknowledge that the court REPEATEDLY ORDERED HIM to produce the document,

I disagree. The beauty of this filing is that it shows Greer expressly acknowledging his duty and in no uncertain terms saying that he has chosen to abandon it.

 

[DavidS877]

372 Images+PDF

Spoiler: 9, 9 pages, ah ha ha

I want my CPU credits back for processing those last TWO blank pages.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Alas, were almost done with October, soon with November, the holidays and Christmas, it will be 2026 before you know it.

Null's prophecy will be fulfilled

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

My December 2024 message wasn't a sworn statement but an informal effort to cooperate with discovery.

This is some sovcit level chicanery.
"I said it in an email, therefore I can backpedal on it at any time".

upon review, I realised it had no material connection

I was in the process of getting the document in May until I saw the $80 fee

So it's nothing to do with relevance and everything to do with the fact that you're a broke, shitlipped bitch?

Masterful gambit, sir.

 

[obsdj]

I disagree. The beauty of this filing is that it shows Greer expressly acknowledging his duty and in no uncertain terms saying that he has chosen to abandon it.

Nah, he insisted that the judge hadn't ruled on his motion to reconsider (October 14). Hardin then baited him for a couple of days about relevance, and Greer then admitted to the May order but again refers to his motion to reconsider without acknowledging that it had been denied (by that point, October 17, he had seen the denial and begged, too late, for time to respond to it). He doesn't mention the repeated orders following his repeated attempts to weasel out of it, even as he continues to this day to try and weasel out of it.

 

[RodgerDodger]

The most important and compelling thing in this nice brief filing is Hardin once again putting Greers communications in front of the Judge in which he is displaying his ongoing recalcitrance and Bad Faith in his conduct of his lawsuit.

If we lived in a sane and just world having a Judicial system that actually followed its own laws, then this case would be dismissed with prejudice. Sadly we live in Clown World where politics and feelings rules instead of law. And Null is viewed as a "Bad Person" by our mysterious overlords. So here we are. No amounts of Bad faith, recalitrance, malfeasance, lies, or outright criminal fraud and abuse of the judicial system will ever be held against the retard.

Greeee's latest filing is him outright declaring that monetary sanctions have no impact on him and will not cure the bad behavior. Dropping another 4 or 5 grand on him will just trigger another year of disobedience, recalcitrance, Bad faith, and ignored court orders. How much time effort and expense did the defendant and the courts incur from the efforts to collect on that first $1000 sanction?

O would love to add some biting and sarcastic conclusion. But its reached the point where its not even funny. As someone said he's full on SovCit seeking to impose his retarded will on others.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Defendants respectfully submit that the proposed response is legally futile

This should be a paste macro on Hardin's keyboard, it is so generally applicable.

The emails are baiting Greer, but in such a way that Greer continues to refuse to acknowledge that the court REPEATEDLY ORDERED HIM to produce the document,

If I was coming into this case fresh (like a judge who purges all knowledge of his docket for 3 months at a time), I would mostly see the two of them bickering over relevance. I see Hardin baiting, but I don't think facetiously indulging Greer's opinion on relevance is helpful or illustrative here. I'd rather see him send a copy of the court order every other day so Greer trashtalks the order instead.

The beauty of this filing is that it shows Greer expressly acknowledging his duty and in no uncertain terms saying that he has chosen to abandon it.

Does it? All Hardin is nailing down is the exact date when Greer decided to fill multiple stupid motions. "I saw the $80 fee and that's when I filed that motion for reconsideration" is not breaking news, shitlips said it on the record already.

 

[obsdj]

If I was coming into this case fresh (like a judge who purges all knowledge of his docket for 3 months at a time)

Speaking of which, I note with sadness that two weeks have elapsed since Greer's idiotic objection to the District Judge on the other matter, and Hardin has apparently opted not to submit a response on the record. Yes, I know, I know, you don't need to remind me that it's not required per the rules, but sing it with me if you know the words, these judges need reminding of the facts. Le sigh.