💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I was really disappointed in this interview. Tuckers pushback against Fuentes was basically restricted to the Joe Kent situation, and they didn't touch on any of the real problems with Fuentes. I had hoped for, at a minimum, discussion about J6 since Tucker has made that a huge part of his brand. Barely a word about it, which is such a waste. That said, anyone who expected this to be a bloodsports match is retarded. The best anyone could have hoped for was something similar in tone to the Ted Cruz interview, but what we got had the exact same feel as the friendly interviews Tucker has.
 
Nick Fuentes states that Jews are specially protected by God and his best friend is Jewish



Nick Fuentes admits he is a fan and admirer of Joseph Stalin.



Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson discuss how they believed each other were feds, dating back to Joe Kent's 2022 congressional run

"I thought you were a fed..."

"And I thought YOU were a fed!"

 
I thought it was funny that Tucker said men were simple and women were difficult or hard to understand, and Fuentes countering that he thought men were difficult or hard to understand.

I guess we always find it hard to understand the people of the gender that we desire.
 
Straight men don’t say “yeah with women the juice isn’t worth the squeeze 🤷”

Obviously incels say things like that but there’s anger behind it, not an indifferent shrug.
 
If you were considering watching this, don't bother. I watched it on 3x so you don't have to.

Tucker didn't press Nick on anything such as J6 or him employing a faggot muzzie rapist. Basically just used Nick as a mouthpiece for similar shit he wants to talk about and allowed him to use his oppressed """history""" to help buff it.

Anything Nick says has already been said or is being said by others without the groyper faggotry. Everyone who cares already knows about AIPAC and Israel being manipulators of the US. Null has already talked about de-banking and other shit.

Want to spend a few hours watching youtube? Go watch Michael Sugrue


Edit: the only worthwhile portion that might be worth clipping is Nick trying to talk about how women are easier to understand than men. Cringekino, but only occurs at the very end so it's a 3 hour (1 hour on 3x) slop to get to the lamest of cringekino.
 
Watching Nick Fuentes talk about how women aren't complex and wives need to be subservient was funny as fuck though.

I'm watching it like "How the fuck would you know about women, faggot?"

Like...he admitted to Tucker he's never even lived with one and Tucker didn't press him on it.
Pretty simple question to ask: "Then why are you basing everything you know about women off the internet?"
Nope

Disappointing!

The part where Nick was like "I like you" and Tucker "I don't care"
LMAOOOO 🤣
 
Listening to him on Tucker right now, holy FUCK his breathing is annoying, reminds of how Jake Shields makes his podcast unlistenable with breathing alone.

What IS IT with modern podcasters having no idea how to speak into a microphone? Borzoi on TRS is unlistenable, DK on TRS is unlistenable, Jake shields is unlistenable, Nick is increasingly unlistenable, Eric Striker is too autistic not to constantly interrupt his cohosts... GIVE ME A BREAK!!
 
Catch The Rainbow said:
Nick Fuentes states that Jews are specially protected by God and his best friend is Jewish
Click to expand...
Said "special protection" was to let them do their rituals since those were a foreshadowing of christianity, arguing that sometimes allowing a bit of evil is necesary for the greater good.
"Thus from the fact that the Jews observe their rites, which, of old, foreshadowed the truth of the faith which we hold, there follows this good---that our very enemies bear witness to our faith..." (Summa Theologica, second part of the second part, Question 10 "Of Unbelief In General", Article 11 "Whether the rites of unbelievers ought to be tolerated?")
Aquinas also said that the jews are "perpetual slaves" and should always wear something to differentiate them from normal people. (said in De regimine Judaeorum)
 
Last edited:
After getting passed the annoying breathing, I'm finding this interview genuinely fascinating as it rolls on. The overall feel I seem to be getting is this:

ZOG is trying to rehabilitate Nick Fuentes, promoting him to a mainstream position, because almost all of the establishment figures have lost their credibility with young people, and they need someone who can pass as a nazi to funnel all actual nazi sentiment into a cult of personality (not unlike what they did with Trump.)

Tucker is a very skilled actor, who's pretending to be a moderate conservative Christian dude, but whose real job is to just try to convince people not to blame the jews for the corruption of America. He was given permission to bring Nick on, and told to give him a softball interview that makes both of them look as credible as possible, while trying to coax Nick into stating a more moderate position on key issues.

Nick, being too much of a self-centered zoomerbrain egotist to craft the right message, went off significantly harder than he was supposed to on the Jews, which was continually annoying Tucker and putting him on the defensive, when this is really supposed to be a cooperative softball interview. Tucker was completely correct to call Nick out for acting like a woman obsessed with petty personal conflicts with key figures.

I suspect that this is kind of a critical flaw in the way the powers that be handle their puppet talking heads. I don't think they're giving Nick a proper script, they just thought he was smart enough to follow the unwritten rules on his own, which he mostly did but he also routinely veered from the unwritten script. I bet there's some very powerful and rich people who are nervous, not having any credible young talking heads, and being unsure of whether to promote Nick, knowing he only really cares about his own clout, and doesn't have the kind of discipline that Tucker or Charlie Kirk had, where they never ever deviate from their script.

Is there even any charismatic young nazi passing right wing political commentators who could stand in for Nick if Nick fucks up his job and gets fired?
 
its funny seeing nick have this big push into the mainstream over the past month or so when you remember it was only a couple of years ago he was gunt guarding for the ralpha male rape pig
 
I'm convinced that Nick just wants to say whatever the edgiest going-against-the-grain take is, in order to be special and get views.

First, he promotes Gavin Newsom over JD Vance just because he isn't married to a jeeta. Then, he denies that there's anything suspicious about the Kirk shooting, just to "own Candace Owens" because Candace thinks Israel is involved. And now he's saying that the dude who dressed up as a Nazi for Halloween is "cringe", despite the fact he was sucking Kanye's dick when Kanye became a wehraboo. And that's not even discussing his tradcath-larping and pretending like he's not an obvious homosexual.

I watched him a little bit months ago, and I still do find clips of his entertaining. But he himself is completely retarded. I hate Jews, but I also hate Nick. I'm very surprised he managed to land an interview with Tucker Carlson though. That just goes to show that he's becoming more mainstream. I started watching it, but I haven't finished it. I do give Nick credit though for making questioning Israel more popular. But I also think he makes other antisemites look bad, and he's potentially even controlled opposition.
 
Last edited:
Targeted Individual said:
Said "special protection" was to let them do their rituals since those were a foreshadowing of christianity, arguing that sometimes allowing a bit of evil is necesary for the greater good.
"Thus from the fact that the Jews observe their rites, which, of old, foreshadowed the truth of the faith which we hold, there follows this good---that our very enemies bear witness to our faith..." (Summa Theologica, second part of the second part, Question 10 "Of Unbelief In General", Article 11 "Whether the rites of unbelievers ought to be tolerated?")
Aquinas also said that the jews are "perpetual slaves" and should always wear something to differentiate them from normal people. (said in De regimine Judaeorum)
Click to expand...
Bold of you to assume he’s even read Aquinas. He only cited this because he probably overheard this at church or recalled someone on Catholic Twitter saying this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom