Debate SSJ ness if a 13 year old girl, a pedophiles victim, should be called a slut or not . - SSJ NESS HAS HIS MIDLIFE CRISIS DEBATE THREAD , please be patient with him he is childless womanless haggot

[DickMain]

SSJ_Ness also said that Trump released the Epstein files (spoiler: Trump did the opposite) and that Trump admitting to stuff with Epstein wouldn't be a deal breaker for his support of him. This shouldn't be a shock to anyone

Ness's choice to distinguish between 'child' and 'teen' as if teens themselves are not children should be telling. He thinks they're fairer game.

 

[babyDunk]

most of us will remember early teenage girls (13 / 14) that would date & sleep with older guys (late teens / early 20's) in exchange for drugs or alcohol
no matter if they can not legally consent, and no matter that the older guy is using his drugs as a carrot to entice her is acting immoral himself, the girls still had agency and agreed to open their legs for booze out of free will, and that makes them sluts, no matter how old they are, no matter if they where raised by a whore mother etc.

rape is obviously an entirely different thing tho

>inb4 50 replies by angry roasties that opend their legs when they where 13 to get some booze

WTF , how many pedophiles use this site?
Thank you jannies for nuking these bastards

Can someone summarize why he got banned? He said a guy who fucked a 13 year old deserved to get shot

Ive seen this happen before, why do bams happen when dudes advocate killing pedos?

Read nigga REAAAAD

But a loving, life-long marriage between an adult and a minor , as happened some of the time in all parts of the world before the last century, is ok.

There is no fucking.

 

[skykiii]

I'm glad this thread got @Smoltine Kiminal banned. He's always been a retard saying retarded shit everytime I saw him. Thank god he finally got done in.

Totally agree. I usually don't ignore posters when I get a response notification but I got to a point where any time I saw Smoltine's name, I would just scroll past.

And yeah, he's a retard--not "internet" retard, but "I think he has legitimate brain damage" retard.

........

These threads also just make me wonder, what IS it with people needing to broadcast all their skeevy beliefs and personality aspects? You would think these people would've learned to hide that shit. Especially on a forum that is known for uncovering people's dark secrets. I almost wonder if pedos outing themselves is some sort of cry for help?

 

[Gregis]

He's been banned for a couple days now, why the fuck do I still see this thread being bumped constantly?

 

[ANF]

These threads also just make me wonder, what IS it with people needing to broadcast all their skeevy beliefs and personality aspects? You would think these people would've learned to hide that shit. Especially on a forum that is known for uncovering people's dark secrets. I almost wonder if pedos outing themselves is some sort of cry for help?

They likely feel the need to justify their attraction since they don't have the strength to admit to themselves that they have evil impulses.

He's been banned for a couple days now, why the fuck do I still see this thread being bumped constantly?

Two more fags decided to drop their hot takes about children's promiscuity and got banned in the meantime

 

[pollution jim]

He's been banned for a couple days now, why the fuck do I still see this thread being bumped constantly?

freaks asking to be banned

I don't know that it's even all browns anymore, it could be Eurocucks defending that their age of consent is as low as 14.

 

[skykiii]

He's been banned for a couple days now, why the fuck do I still see this thread being bumped constantly?

This thread has become flypaper for freaks.

There's a few more I'm hoping get outed, but I won't name names.

 

[Drip Torch]

roasties

Holy shibboleth, goyman!

 

[Neurotypical Mantis]

This thread has become flypaper for freaks.

There's a few more I'm hoping get outed, but I won't name names.

cuntspiracy man

 

[Drip Torch]

because I'm white.

So are methheads that prey on underage girls. When I was 18, several white 12yo underage girls tried to get me to have sex with them. More than once. Why? Because of being abused by their white druggie pedophile relatives.
You better believe I got myself away from those situations as quick as I could.

Whiteness is no guarantee against degenerate behavior.

 

[Not 6 Foot]

Went to sleep and woke up to a third? Is it my birthday?

 

[Kiwisee]

This thread is officially gonna be used for pest control with the way it’s going.

 

[skykiii]

I have a new name for this topic:

"ITT: Reveal that you think SSJ_Ness was right."

(We want to leave off the "...and get banned" part, they don't need to know they're walking into a trap.)

 

[AMHOLIO]

I have a new name for this topic:

"ITT: Reveal that you think SSJ_Ness was right."

(We want to leave off the "...and get banned" part, they don't need to know they're walking into a trap.)

You've been more pink triangley lately but this is a great take.

Edit: A bait thread that will never be made: debate how we should handle sexually promiscuous minors. The bans would just roll in every 5th poster.

 

[Perfectly Innocent]

What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.

 

[crazedaze]

What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.

It's really quite simple, some people's knee-jerk reaction to everything involving women is to sperg and rage out and they add nothing but gender sperg to every thread about women ever a child getting statutoried by an old man, because she is legally incapable of consent, is to call her a slut, and that means they are a pedophile. Hope that helps.

 

[Tablet County]

What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

You know you might look a lot less weird if you didn't burst into the thread with this passive-aggressive cuntery.

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.

Personally I think that using the Internet Peanut Gallery as a symposium to dicuss the nature of teenage sexuality or indeed any sort of societal or philosophical whatzit is extremely faggy and pretentious at best and suspect at worst.
And in the case of smoltine kiminul, I can't really think of a wholesome reason why someone would quibble over consent laws while also bloviating about all the whores they knew in middle school.

 

[Kiwisee]

What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

I’m sorry, I didn’t know that shaming a 13 year old rape victim makes someone “self righteous” rather than a fucking normal human being.

Edit: lmao @Mound Dweller you wanna explain your giving me a top hat, passive aggressive faggot?

 

[babyDunk]

What is the actual debate question this thread is based on? Or is this just going to be a circlejerk of self-righteousness?

For example: “Is it appropriate to call someone underage engaging in what they consider to be consensual sexual intercourse with many different people a slut for doing so?” is a very different question to “Is it appropriate to call an underage rape victim a slut?”

Only one of those hypothetical example debate questions has scope for a useful discussion involving statistics of certain happenings, as well as changes to make certain happenings less consequential while accepting that yes, teenagers can and do sleep around but that they do it a lot less today because… well experts are still debating that too!

On the other hand, unconditionally refusing to willingly consent to having sex with someone is the very opposite of slutty behaviour, and therefore, being raped is quite possibly the unsluttiest thing which can happen to anyone, irrespective of their age, common sense says there’s not a lot of useful debate to be had there.

Seems like we have another quasi-pedo here.You guys can not help outing yourself can you?

I’m sorry, I didn’t know that shaming a 13 year old rape victim makes someone “self righteous” rather than a fucking normal human being.

This is it. Aptly put.If this confounds you @Perfectly Innocent , you can go ahead and kill yourself

 

[Gog & Magog]

This reminds me of the time @Blasterman drunkenly DM'd me confessing to his bizarro incest beliefs. All I had done was ask him why he supports incest. @Muttley said he attempted to dox the guy but only learned he was a fursuiter who roleplayed IRL at a park somewhere in like Bosnia, somewhere in the Balkans. Blasterman did not deny the claim. Muttley never got around to handing me the evidence, but considering Blasterman dropped shit like this,

Polygyny was genuinely accepted in early, original orthodox Christianity and monogyny was imposed by (((them))) to curtail the rapid increase in numbers. As for incest, I see no reason why a brother shouldn't knock up his sister if both want it, and I consider this a private issue. Your house, your problems.

I can believe Muttley's assertions. This isn't the only time I've met political-extremists who've defended sexual abuse on the Farms either. Think I've met 5 or so.