Debate SSJ ness if a 13 year old girl, a pedophiles victim, should be called a slut or not . - SSJ NESS HAS HIS MIDLIFE CRISIS DEBATE THREAD , please be patient with him he is childless womanless haggot

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I did it because it's the Thunderdome and it's funny.
We all know child marriage should be illegal.
I'm just making fun of how this argument is still going, I understand you're projecting your 85 iq but this is just embarrassing.
> I did it because it's funny
> I'm just making fun of your argument
> You're projecting

Don't drop your balldo on your way out
 
I don't even know why you brought up Trump at the very start of this thread. That's the third post in this thread and it's trash and pointless. Why do 85 IQ faggot always need to bring up their political shit in unrelated conversation?

Child marriage is unethical and should be outlawed in every single states. If you're a democrat, there are currently two states that allow this: California and New Mexico. If you're a republican there are ALSO two states that allow this: Mississippi and Oklahoma.
You want to do something about it and write to your congressman or you're going to be a faggot here instead?

Nobody is debating the ethic of child marriage. Everybody knows it's wrong.
This thread was always doomed to become the hugbox thread of the Trump Enslavement Syndrome thread regulars
 
No I'm not
"I'm not advocating for child marriage, I'm just discussing the, "nuances," of it while disregarding the modern day standards in most, if not all, civilized western countries. You're the bad guy if you make assumptions about what I believe based on this."
 
Can you fags stop sperging because somebody had the audacity to mention orange man and make fun of the brown man sperging about child marriage?
This is @Jade Philosophies a fucking middle aged nonce hoping for his child bride . I hope they feed you in the woodchipper
Goddamn it he STILL hasn't given me that trashcan I asked for!
 
Before the advent of modern medicine, the average lifespan was considerably shorter than it is now. Plus, people were less concerned with education or career advancement and wanted to start their adult lives ASAP. Hence, people got married younger back in the day.
thats true, however you must remember a spergy but important point, that the average life-span was low in large part due because due to high infant mortality, the median is another matter

even still, as you say, it does not matter.

we simply are not the humans which lived before, thus we cannot truly understand or redeem their actions, nor do we need to

not saying we need to hate everybody who was simply subject to the world previously, rather that we ultimately cannot fully rationalize the choices people made, and to blindly mimic them such as the sussy guy here suggests is madness
 
Just because people here are technically more "conservative" than their contemporaries doesn't mean they want a perennial snapshot of the 1800s. I don't want slavery, I don't want company towns, I probably wouldn't like the Rockefellers, and I'm glad for presidents like Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt for breaking up those institutions, and I'd hope for more presidents like that to break up modern institutions that ruin American citizens' lives. And I wouldn't like child marriage. I don't care about some timeframe of people I'll never be able to argue with, they are basically a different country. No one wants us dragged into whatever feudalist nightmare of the past because it's fuckin TRAD, besides probably a brown jeet retard jealous that they are still living in that nightmare.

No one in A&N is living in reality anymore. You must have the most deranged and extreme possible positions for the most minor of things, lest you're a dang liberal who needs to be shot. I would definitely not subscribe to whatever ideology these people believe in or came up with in their own heads. And I didn't think that you were able to A-Log pedophilia, but I guess you could, only you could only be a pedophile in hiding yourself.
 
everytime i see this users name, it's one scandal or another.
 
Just because people here are technically more "conservative" than their contemporaries doesn't mean they want a perennial snapshot of the 1800s. I don't want slavery, I don't want company towns, I probably wouldn't like the Rockefellers, and I'm glad for presidents like Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt for breaking up those institutions, and I'd hope for more presidents like that to break up modern institutions that ruin American citizens' lives. And I wouldn't like child marriage. I don't care about some timeframe of people I'll never be able to argue with, they are basically a different country. No one wants us dragged into whatever feudalist nightmare of the past because it's fuckin TRAD, besides probably a brown jeet retard jealous that they are still living in that nightmare.

No one in A&N is living in reality anymore. You must have the most deranged and extreme possible positions for the most minor of things, lest you're a dang liberal who needs to be shot. I would definitely not subscribe to whatever ideology these people believe in or came up with in their own heads. And I didn't think that you were able to A-Log pedophilia, but I guess you could, only you could only be a pedophile in hiding yourself.
used to be that it was not so polarized here

what i desperately hope we can avoid is a /pol/-ification of kf, and as you aptly describe A&N is the spearhead of :politisperg:-ing
 
There's obviously a big difference between marrying a child and cherishing her throughout her adult life, as happened before the modern age quite commonly, and simply using a child for sexual gratification like leftist pedophle demons do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70AArSfwTLw&t=1s
In this video the philosopher Derrick Jensen explains how leftwing philosophy's desire to dissolve social rules and boundaries which they see as inherently oppressive leads to them also wanting to dissolve the boundaries between adults and children and sex and fornication and quotes leading leftwing authors to show how this is ingrained into the founding documents of the leftwing field of "queer theory".
Nicholas J. Fuentes believes this BTW.

I think some of you owe me an apology for calling me brown.
You’re right, you’re not brown, you’re a groyper (brown).
 
Can someone summarize why he got banned? He said a guy who fucked a 13 year old deserved to get shot

Ive seen this happen before, why do bams happen when dudes advocate killing pedos?
 
Back
Top Bottom