📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm in a Discord gaming group that is filled with faggots and trannies. One of the trannies had a minor crashout about not ever being certain that he'd ever truly pass or feel comfortable in his own skin as a "woman." The cause of this crash out?

He saw a pretty woman.

He didn't post for days, and I legit thought he killed himself.
If that's all it took he'll probably neck himself soon.
 
I haven't swung that direction since high school, but I can say with confidence that I don't think even the most desperate of straight guys would sink to pooner snatch.
This thread is full of straight men pretending to be lesbians because they think it will get them pussy, and then fucking other straight men pretending to be lesbians. In comparison, pretending to be gay is a cinch and has a much better chance of snagging them actual pussy, albeit dry, leathery and personality-disordered. Sure, most men have some standards, but for the ones who don't, there really is no bottom.
 
This thread is full of straight men pretending to be lesbians because they think it will get them pussy, and then fucking other straight men pretending to be lesbians. In comparison, pretending to be gay is a cinch and has a much better chance of snagging them actual pussy, albeit dry, leathery and personality-disordered. Sure, most men have some standards, but for the ones who don't, there really is no bottom.
They'd know it would give them less pussy if they bothered to research the percentage of women that are lesbian in the first place. They go from the 99% of women to the 1% of women and somehow expect to have more options. But really they are getting under that 1% option because barely anyone wants to date them. Incels have a better chance of getting a partner than a troon.
 
They'd know it would give them less pussy if they bothered to research the percentage of women that are lesbian in the first place. They go from the 99% of women to the 1% of women and somehow expect to have more options. But really they are getting under that 1% option because barely anyone wants to date them. Incels have a better chance of getting a partner than a troon.
Also, troons are rapists (or aspiring rapists). The only people troons don't want to fuck are the ones who want to fuck them, aka the evil problematic chasers who are almost as reviled as TERFs in troonworld. No one wants to fuck troons less than lesbians, therefore lesbians are at the top of their list. T4T "relationships" are just two rapists simultaneously making believe they're each raping a real lesbian, instead of having a crusty swordfight with another unwashed rapist.
 
f therapists actually cared about these people and had an ounce of intelligence, then they'd know to tell these people that they would never pass and that transitioning and being seen as a fucked-up mutilated freak is far worse than whatever they're dealing with now.

That will get you fired, your licence revoked and your career destroyed.

Any sane therapist just outright won't deal with troons if they're not apathetic or on board, because you're legally only allowed to 'affirm'.

They want to believe it matters way more than it does to a huge percentage of men.

BECAUSE THEY'RE WOMEN! And their views on sex is according!

If anything I think people would be more likely to look for troons than pooners on shitholes like Grindr. They're that undesirable.

Any man who downloads grindr is just plain not straight and they're in denial about it. These dudes will always seek troons, or twinks they'll try to feminize because they feel less gay that way. It's fucking muslim mentality.

And a huge portion of femboys and MtF have their origin on gay men trying to appeal to such men, because they fetishize straight guys. And the Kiwi Farms is about the only place left where you can state the unstatable.

Anybody who's been around these circles long enough and have eyes put to use will quickly notice this.

Now, some particularly degenerate straight men would go the route @Sandshrew suggested, but the usual thing is a Totally straight, trust me bro dude seeking transvestites to sodomize.
 
This man literally has the gigachad jawline. He could cut diamonds with that. Real dainty and ladylike.
Also, troons are rapists (or aspiring rapists). The only people troons don't want to fuck are the ones who want to fuck them, aka the evil problematic chasers who are almost as reviled as TERFs in troonworld. No one wants to fuck troons less than lesbians, therefore lesbians are at the top of their list. T4T "relationships" are just two rapists simultaneously making believe they're each raping a real lesbian, instead of having a crusty swordfight with another unwashed rapist.
The thing is, troons realize that lesbians want pussy, not rotting stinkditches. They're narcissists and sex pests who want ultimate power over women, and what could be more powerful than forcing a man-hating lesbian to suck your girldick? Why else do you think they post about raping TERFs?
 
I would think a good therapist would challenge your delusional thought processes instead of patting your head and saying that it’s every one else’s problem. But welcome to clown world. Your feelings are everyone else’s responsibility.
I think pre 2015 (or so) a decent number of therapists used to do this. But then therapists who actually critically think and do their jobs just quietly stopped treating this population because anything but full affirmation turned into being reported to the licensing board for “conversion therapy” gc therapist Stephanie winn talks about this I think.

I'm in a Discord gaming group that is filled with faggots and trannies. One of the trannies had a minor crashout about not ever being certain that he'd ever truly pass or feel comfortable in his own skin as a "woman." The cause of this crash out?

He saw a pretty woman.

He didn't post for days, and I legit thought he killed himself.
This is why people should never try to appease them even 1%. There’s no making them happy. Sightings of attractive, confident members of their target sex just existing in their bodies make them seethe for days like you said. Have also seen them complain about “my friend group/coworkers do everything right with using my name and pronouns and being nice to me but I can JUST TELL DEEP DOWN that they don’t actually see me as a real woman!!!”

Imagine the collective screeching if an actual man says "who cares about women's safety?". Even MRA extremists like Andrew Tate don't s
Yeah honestly. Socially awkward men on Reddit complain constantly about how women find them “creepy” etc but I’ve never heard a man straight up say he doesn’t care if women feel afraid of him. Pooners trying to hench and seem extra cool and masculine and just end up sounding like aliens. What else is new I guess.

But here’s the question:
Who’s worse at pretending to be the opposite sex: pooners or hons???
 
Last edited:
Whose worse at pretending to be the opposite sex: pooners or hons???
Pooners without question. Now, aesthetically it's always obvious it's a guy, at least in person. But as far as how they act and such, there are some flamboyant fruit cakes that can put on a certain female stereotype that does sort of track. But pooners are just so lame and lack the virility and physicality that so usually marks men. Their socialization is just so profoundly off too.

All the women that have masculine interests actually tend to not be pooners. Being vaguely into cars and going to the gym don't count, for any lil dood bros reading this.
 
Pooners without question. Now, aesthetically it's always obvious it's a guy, at least in person. But as far as how they act and such, there are some flamboyant fruit cakes that can put on a certain female stereotype that does sort of track. But pooners are just so lame and lack the virility and physicality that so usually marks men. Their socialization is just so profoundly off too.

All the women that have masculine interests actually tend to not be pooners. Being vaguely into cars and going to the gym don't count, for any lil dood bros reading this.

I disagree with you. Gender socialization is overstated and kinda gender ideology gobbledygook. Hormones are where it's at.

Men have testosterone, which makes you assertive, aggressive and confident (i.e. male attributes) and women have estrogen, which makes them agreeable, dependable and 'motherly' (i.e. female attributes). Which means necessarily that men and women's brains are different.

Furthermore, Men also produce estrogen and women also produce testosterone. It's a very delicate balance.

Men who have naturally high estrogen will get fat. Fat accumulates estrogen, which in turns lead to more fat, which leads to more estrogen. This happens to obese and old, unfit guys. That's why women have higher body fat %.

Women with naturally high testosterone face reproductive health problems.

There can be individual differences that makes men more 'feminine' (liking poetry, knitting, being agreeable) or women more 'masculine' (liking cars, the gym, being more assertive) that are not necessarily tied to hormones, though.

Now, chemical hormones are an entirely different beast. It's observed in bodybuilders that testosterone makes men gay and women lesbian (see my post on the bodybuilding thread for more on this). When you inject estrogen on rats, male rats will get on their fours to be fucked by other male rats. Now, this, as an explanation for homosexuality, is overly reductionist, but this does exist.

To what matters in regards to troons, MtF will always be too aggressive (rather more than assertive) to properly, psychologically, pass as a female, and FtM will always be too submissive (rather more than agreeable) to properly pass as a man. Both will be overly neurotic and paranoid, which is always a side effect of exogenous sexual hormones in any gender.

And this is, essentially, the ever relevant consequence of playing God. Especially with things that we don't fully understand o comprehend, as are the endochrine system AND neuropsychology.
 
There can be individual differences that makes men more 'feminine' (liking poetry, knitting, being agreeable) or women more 'masculine' (liking cars, the gym, being more assertive) that are not necessarily tied to hormones, though.
You're not wrong but I wasn't talking about what's going on with the biological level. But their vibe, how they can hold a conversation, and present themselves. You know, how well they can try to pretend or how they come across. And on that level I still stand by my statement.

With the socialization comment I just meant that pooners do not seem able to pick up on how guys act and interact with others on any level whatsoever and they're just complete awkward, frumpy little gnome like things. They're so completely bad at pretending to get what experiences, feelings, and interests a guy might have that speaking with them feels constantly like entertaining a child.

Neither of the two camps are convincing in their attempts at disguise, of course. But I do believe on the balance, some of the guys are better at it.
 
With the socialization comment I just meant that pooners do not seem able to pick up on how guys act and interact with others on any level whatsoever and they're just complete awkward, frumpy little gnome like things. They're so completely bad at pretending to get what experiences, feelings, and interests a guy might have that speaking with them feels constantly like entertaining a child.
The truth is, their imitation of manhood is all for nought. I do not doubt that there are pooners who, on aspects of personality, might be actually quite heterosexual dudebro. But there is literally only one prerequisite for manhood, and it's to be an adult human male, and pooners cannot fulfill that prerequisite.

And troons cannot escape it.
 
And this is, essentially, the ever relevant consequence of playing God. Especially with things that we don't fully understand o comprehend, as are the endochrine system AND neuropsychology.
Your explanation is overly simplistic, but you are not wrong that the systems at play are incredibly complex in ways we don't fully understand, and that there are innate behavioral differences that are more fundamental than socialization. This started out as an effort post disagreeing with you but as I was writing it turned into more of an explanation as to why you are basically right, but ehh I'm still gonna post it after my 30+ minutes of typing:

Hormones do not directly encode behaviors. They bias and tune motivational and salience networks through extremely complex feedback loops. Both androgens and estrogens affect neuronal potentiation in ways that make certain kinds of thoughts, emotions, or impulses more likely to occur, but it's highly dependent on context and environment, and the general homeostatic state of the body. The differences between men and women are very real, but they follow a broad statistical distribution and are highly plastic. You can think of sex hormones as biasing priors within a feedback loop system: developmental pathways shape hormones, hormones shape neural tuning, and experience shapes both hormones and neurons, in a feedback loop. The stable patterns that emerge out of this dynamic are similar enough across individuals to form recognizable averages, but a high degree of variance exists. Socialization does matter, it can have enormous effect in reinforcing and normalizing tendencies towards behaviors, but those tendencies have innate, undeniably strong biological biases in their distributions that is part of what makes humans what we are. No amount of socialization can undo that.

Both sexes produce both hormones, though in very different ratios obviously. But despite what troons and pooners think when it comes to talking about their "levels", the amount circulating in your blood is not what determines their effects on your body. While sex hormones do have some direct receptor activity (with testosterone binding to androgen receptors that influence energy, focus, and reward sensitivity, and estrogen binding to estrogen receptors that modulate mood, cognition, and stress regulation), the effect of changing them attenuates quickly as the body adapts to a new homeostasis. That’s why both andropause and menopause are associated with irritability. It has less to do with the absolute hormone level and more with the relative change from the body’s previous equilibrium. However, the other mechanism by which hormones influence behavior, that is much more pronounced, is genomic and developmental effects, and how these mechanisms actually work demonstrates the irrationality of HRT as modifying behavior.

Hormones are locally converted by enzymes within tissues, and those conversions vary depending on the tissue type. The locally converted forms then bind to receptors and exert specific biological effects. For example (and ironically), in many parts of the brain, testosterone is converted into estradiol, which is the active form that binds to receptors involved in synaptic plasticity, learning, and emotional regulation. In other regions, such as the hypothalamus and amygdala, testosterone is converted instead into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a more potent androgen that activates genes related to aggression, sexual behavior, and metabolic drive, reinforcing classically masculine traits like increased motivation, vigilance, and competitiveness. These effects are not immediate, instead they reflect longer-term changes in neuronal potentiation and gene expression. In practice, men’s testosterone levels fluctuate substantially throughout the day without directly correlating to momentary shifts in mood, energy, or aggression. This long term genomic effect is particularly important during prenatal development, when estradiol derived from testosterone helps masculinize neural circuits via DNA methylation, in ways that relate to motivation and reward. These effects build tendencies into the brain early on that can persist even in the absence of continued hormonal influence, especially as they become behaviorally reinforced over time. Having low testosterone, for example, does not necessarily make someone less aggressive or docile, because behavioral expression also depends on developmental structures and Hebbian learning.

Important to realize though, is that there isn't really a process like feminization as the equivalent opposite to masculinization. Female brains simply develop along a "default" pathway of human neural development that occurs in the absence of high levels of testosterone. This is why you can see things like androgen insensitivity producing outcomes that are behaviorally more statistically in line with females than with males. The effects that high levels of estrogens have on female brains is also somewhat different to the process in men, with effects being more pronounced in puberty than prenatally, and acting primarily as organizing and activating signals, promoting dendritic branching, synaptic density, and neuroplasticity in regions such as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, which are strongly linked to socially connected, emotionally responsive, and flexible motivation patterns, but crucially, this happen only in the absence of masculinization. This is important, because this means that estrogen in adult male brains does not magically undo the masculinization that has occurred in them. Pooners do begin masculinizing their brains a little bit, though only in a limited degree, by affecting gene expression in the brain (you can see a similar effect with PCOS), but troons taking estrogen does not "feminize" the brain in any way, because there is no mechanism that does that.

In a social sense, women and men do have an obvious yin-yang complementary patterning to their behaviors, but at a biochemical level that is not how we operate. As I'm sure everyone in this thread already knows, men are basically a template "female" human that is modified through specific chemical activation patterns that emerge from our genetics, but the causal mechanisms at play are not like a switch between two states.
 
Last edited:
But here’s the question:
Who’s worse at pretending to be the opposite sex: pooners or hons???
When it comes to opposite-sex LARPing, pooners try and fail spectacularly, while troons don't even try. Troons just expect that they can tardrage and bully everyone around them into playing along, in fact, that's most of the fun of trooning. Of course, pooners will try to bully us into playing along, too, but almost no one feels "bullied" by a little fat girl with a mustache running away in tears.
Pooners do have the advantage that testosterone seems to change their appearance a lot more than estrogen changes troons' appearance. Plus, there are more actual soyboylets than there are actual gigantic women with cinderblock heads, which helps pooners blend in with the crowd more easily than troons (but no troon is trying to blend in with the crowd, they're trying to rape the crowd, loudly). So I'll say that pooners pass better than troons, but that's like saying moldy mattress foam is a "better" dinner than dog shit with broken glass in it: technically true, but 99% of us will just skip dinner if those are the options.
 
When it comes to opposite-sex LARPing, pooners try and fail spectacularly, while troons don't even try. Troons just expect that they can tardrage and bully everyone around them into playing along, in fact, that's most of the fun of trooning. Of course, pooners will try to bully us into playing along, too, but almost no one feels "bullied" by a little fat girl with a mustache running away in tears.
Pooners do have the advantage that testosterone seems to change their appearance a lot more than estrogen changes troons' appearance. Plus, there are more actual soyboylets than there are actual gigantic women with cinderblock heads, which helps pooners blend in with the crowd more easily than troons (but no troon is trying to blend in with the crowd, they're trying to rape the crowd, loudly). So I'll say that pooners pass better than troons, but that's like saying moldy mattress foam is a "better" dinner than dog shit with broken glass in it: technically true, but 99% of us will just skip dinner if those are the options.
Perfectly said, and the only correct answer. Troons revel in their invasiveness and dare you to call them out, pooners creep in on little mice feet and skitter away at the first sign of trouble. They are both gross and unconvincing in their own special way.
 
Perfectly said, and the only correct answer. Troons revel in their invasiveness and dare you to call them out, pooners creep in on little mice feet and skitter away at the first sign of trouble. They are both gross and unconvincing in their own special way.
>MtFs are overly aggressive and domineering
>FtMs are overly submissive and non-confrontational


Hmm, what an odd coincidence.
 
Last edited:
The thing is, troons realize that lesbians want pussy, not rotting stinkditches. They're narcissists and sex pests who want ultimate power over women, and what could be more powerful than forcing a man-hating lesbian to suck your girldick? Why else do you think they post about raping TERFs?

More than a few also love to flex about what superior lesbians they are for having an “organic strap” or “permanent strap on,” which betrays the type of porn that overcooked their brain with. They believe that they will “break the cotton ceiling” (i.e. get into a lesbian’s underwear) by forcing them to take the girldick. They’re not just entitled, violent creeps, but proud of it.
 
having an “organic strap” or “permanent strap on,”

Yeah, one that is rendered dysfunctional by estrogen.

Also, I don't know much about lesbians, but I don't think all of them are necessarily into being fucked?

Again, their sex betrays them. Lesbians are women, they have other priorities in sex than holes getting filled.
 
More than a few also love to flex about what superior lesbians they are for having an “organic strap” or “permanent strap on,” which betrays the type of porn that overcooked their brain with.
The fucking ego some of these people get is genuinely beyond me.

I am curious what the domestic abuse rates of lesbians compared to ""lesbians"" is, though. That sounds like it'd be a fun statistic.
 
The fucking ego some of these people get is genuinely beyond me.

I am curious what the domestic abuse rates of lesbians compared to ""lesbians"" is, though. That sounds like it'd be a fun statistic.
A “”lesbian”” in America got charged recently for murdering the other “”lesbian”” he was in a relationship with (although the MSM would have you think they’re true and honest wahmen)


Can’t tell you the last time I heard of an actual woman hurting/killing another woman in a relationship setting though…strange, that 🤔 almost like trannies retain their male-pattern violence???
 
Back
Top Bottom