Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Those of you commenting on Emma's lack of acting talent might enjoy her totally and 100% completely genuine reaction to Paris Lees asking if it would be OK with her if he used the women's toilet.

 
@Tasty Tatty I couldn't reply directly but I remember seeing her as the blonde girl in a decent mock 80s comedy called take me home tonight.
Robert Patterson however turned out to be pretty great actor despite the bad start with Twilight. The Batman is good, good time and the lighthouse were good movies.
I also HIGHLY recommend The Rover, but that's because I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for post-apocalyptic movies set in the outback.
She looks like 60 year old Brooke Shields. Damn.
Imagine 2025 Brooke Shields being more fuckable than 2025 Emma Watson.
 
"I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous."

GODDAMN
If Null had a baby with Jane Austen and that baby grew up and had to tell someone faggot to fuck themselves in the most blunt way possible, this is how they’d do it.
 
They're not mad about the rape gangs, they're mad about the kill-steal/spawn camping being done by the rape gangs. Those girls were supposed to be their property one they turned 14, not some WOP's.

Eh, I think the usual suspects are simply mad at Rowling for being a woman. If a man had said and done the exact same things as her, they would have supported him. Conversely, if Rowling had come out strongly against immigration, they would have found something else to be mad at her about. It really is quite pathetic.
 
"I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous."

GODDAMN
JK paraphrasing Pulp's "Common People".

https://youtube.com/watch?v=yuTMWgOduFM
You'll never live like common people.
This is why when you're an out of touch, woke, dumb fucking actress, you should really stop and rethink talking trash to an award winning billionaire author who gave so much of her money to charity that she wasn't a billionaire anymore, and then became a billionaire again this year.
These fucking actors forget that they're only as clever as the script they're reading says they are.
 
I agree, but lol at the last part when she couldn't help to make it about her experience.

Thing is, Emma is only aprox ten years younger than me, which is odd. I think there is some true in how we keep seeing her as a child or as a young women, when she's already on the road to 40. Dan and Rupert already formed families. A lot of the potter actors did too. It's not Jos fault that Emma only has her activism and neither family or career.

@Tasty Tatty I couldn't reply directly but I remember seeing her as the blonde girl in a decent mock 80s comedy called take me home tonight.
Robert Patterson however turned out to be pretty great actor despite the bad start with Twilight. The Batman is good, good time and the lighthouse were good movies.
I also HIGHLY recommend The Rover, but that's because I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for post-apocalyptic movies set in the outback.

Imagine 2025 Brooke Shields being more fuckable than 2025 Emma Watson.
Pattinson Is in fact a good actor and he's quite grounded for such a celebrity. I think he mentioned in some interview that he still is friends with the guys he was friends with before he was a celebrity and I believe that he might. He, like Dan (who is a good actor, we shouldn't be petty) have learned to choose diverse roles now that they can afford to play characters that challenge them and amuse them. Batman is a role I would have never imagine him to take, but maybe he just likes Batman.

Emma, OTOH, has no range and she's not that good. Her last chance to be big was Little Women and it was a mess. I remember a podcast made by feminists that absolutely hated it because the movie had injected modern feminist takes that didn't fit the actual characters. The production was also poor and cheap. The 1994 version was more careful with portraying their world as it was and had a better cast overall (Trinni Alvarado, Wynona Ryder, Claire Danes, and Kirsten Dunst).
 
Just like every time they adapt Sherlock Holmes for the screen.
The Robert Downey Jr Sherlock did Watson quite well, I thought. It was a lot closer to the characterisation of the books, with Holmes as a coke-addled dandy and Watson as a proper military man.
 
Last edited:
The Robert Downey Jr Sherlock did Watson quite well, I thought. It was a lot closer to the characterisation of the books, with Holmes as a coke-addled dandy and Watson as a proper military man.
Man if this movie doesn't live up to your characterization I swear to god I'm going to fly to Hollywood and wave a spec script right in the face of everyone whose office I manage to break into.
But if it wasn’t just for that single issue people wouldn’t be simping at her so hard. She was part of the woke mob. Like all other woke celebs, She gleefully made performative hollow woke acts like making characters black and gay out nowhere for good girl good points. And she also loved to cancel people with the mob too.
Maybe nothing ever happens because you never fucking do anything in life
 
Last edited:
That's it, I'm done, everyone's getting an eye-gouged horse in their DMs
Screenshot 2025-09-30 202811.png
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/groups?category=anger-management
 
The Robert Downey Jr Sherlock did Watson quite well, I thought. It was a lot closer to the characterisation of the books, with Holmes as a coke-addled dandy and Watson as a proper military man.
Yeah but the movie still committed the mortal sin that Doyle did after the end of the final problem: they brought Sherlock back. He was supposed to die with Moriarty, and I'll die on that hill.
Or more accurately, I'll die over those falls.
 
Thing is, Emma is only aprox ten years younger than me, which is odd. I think there is some true in how we keep seeing her as a child or as a young women,

To be fair, this issue isn’t limited to Emma.We all understand that, at the end of the day, they were just British kids who, at the time, a casting director thought matched the profiles of the characters in the books.

However, deep down, many people who grew up with these movies see the actors as their characters. That’s why people care so much about what these one-hit-wonder British actors think.

It’s not just Emma saying “trans rights”; it’s Hermione herself. It doesn’t help that Emma tried to present herself as “just like Hermione” in real life.

Ultimately, they’re just actors. They lie for a living. Their opinions just reflect the current zeitgeist out of convenience. If people want role models, they should look to individuals that aren't slaves to PR. If anything the actors that did stood for JK were incredibly brave as they did so at the time it was career suicide to question this insanity.
 
I hope this helps, but you sort of sound like you may be beyond help.
I am aware you are a green redditor post 2020 so everyone you slightly disagree with must be a pedophile, but never in this retarded subforum have I seen such a black gorilla nigger such as yourself, so your profile pic of a gorilla does fit. If anyone needs help is you, bud.

Hard to believe considering Hermione will be brown and Snape will be a nigger.
I particularly don't understand why retcon the characters like this when making defining choices such as "Alan Rickman was snape incarnate".
 
Back
Top Bottom