Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Even Alan Rickman criticized Emma on her acting as she got older. I can't fathom how a girl like that who did so good in the first movie fell off at the later sequels. Was it her looks? Her voice?
Because there's a higher standard for acting as you get older, as it becomes harder to convincingly fake an emotional response that you would genuinely have as a melodramatic teenager.
 
Even Alan Rickman criticized Emma on her acting as she got older. I can't fathom how a girl like that who did so good in the first movie fell off at the later sequels. Was it her looks? Her voice?
I think it was to her advantage to play an adult-like character as a kid. It's cute to see this little girl play this bossy, sassy know-it-all. More like a caricature. But those kids quickly grew into teenagers and that loses its charm. Plus the emotional stakes got higher and she came across as wooden.
 
Well in Emma Watson's case it was being vegan which ages you like shit because your body needs meat.
But Evanna Lynch is ALSO a vegan. Personally, though, I have my own thoughts...

My personal theory is that being a handmaiden for the trans brigade - having to actively lie, day in, day out, even when you yourself know you're lying - prematurely ages you.

1145a230-a60b-11ec-928c-79c2605d160c_1200_630.webp
 
If you go to the scene where she punches Malfoy in (I think it's the fifth) the 5th movie that's the exact face.

It's obvious that she had to do that scene repetitiously and she was very pissed at the crew.

She's so mad she even stumbles walking up to him and that's the take that they used.
This or that one (after)
1759228267304.webp

1759228244322.webp

1759228340429.webp


But Evanna Lynch is ALSO a vegan. Personally, though, I have my own thoughts...
The right one can't be Emma ???
What the fuck happened
 
this is completely wrong and i have no idea why people are thoughtlessly agreeing. "change of tact" is not a set phrase. it's a mistaken, ungrammatical bastardization of "change of tack", which is the correct, common set phrase and indeed has nautical, metaphorical origins. "change of tack" is a nice turn of phrase but it's utterly unremarkable. nobody says "change of tact" to refer to a "change of tactics" unless they're dumb. they would just say "change of tactics" or "tactical change". "tact" means "skill or sensitivity in dealing with others".
Yeah change of tack is a naval term that refers to tacking the sail down in a different position in order to change course
 
Back to the topic of the thread, Himdia and Euan are reacting:
View attachment 7978646View attachment 7978647View attachment 7978648View attachment 7978649

I can't believe they keep using the yacht picture like this when it's rad as hell
It's so funny that they are convinced she is on Twitter all the time. She just published the 8th book in a detective series, all of which from #3 onwards are phonebook-sized and she also exec-produces the TV adaptation. She's written + produced the three Fantastic Beasts films, overseen a smash hit video game, launched a new charity and still supervises her previous one. Oh and she went on a cruise apparently. The rocks they feel she is hurling at them are the crumbs of her attention.

Meanwhile 50% of this thread is now chuds crying "why can't she be raciiiiiist! I want her to be racist!"
 
Hard to believe considering Hermione will be brown and Snape will be a nigger.
I thought the nigger is out, or not 100% confirmed yet

Either way, I think they couldn't find a good replacement for Alan Rickman, so they all said "fuck it, let's cast a black man, so at least it will be remembered for that"

And considering what happened to Snape in the story, maybe Rowlings hates niggers too
 
Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.
I would. The suppression of uncomfortable but undeniably verified truths in the aftermath of the skeptic war has shown that principles mean nothing and everything is a matter of might makes right. Even if you support other people keeping their jobs when they say things you disagree with, they won't do the same for you, quite the opposite.
So I'd be fully in favor of people losing their careers for supporting tranny ideology. Fire them, ban them, blacklist them. Because they're doing the same to you for disagreeing with them every chance they get.

Hell, ban endorsing trannies even in the lawbooks, slap the death penalty on that shit.
 
Because there's a higher standard for acting as you get older,
I’m actually surprised how utterly disappointing the “younger cast” careers turned out with Robert Pattinson being the only success.

One would expect them to eclipse the older actors but the likes of Ralph Fiennes, Kenneth Branagh and Helena Carter just keep excelling at their craft.
 
I’m actually surprised how utterly disappointing the “younger cast” careers turned out with Robert Pattinson being the only success.

One would expect them to eclipse the older actors but the likes of Ralph Fiennes, Kenneth Branagh and Helena Carter just keep excelling at their craft.
Well Pattinson was nearing adulthood by the time the movie he was in came out, so he was obviously cast for his acting ability
 
Back
Top Bottom