- Joined
- Apr 12, 2018
That's Birdie. She fucked a ferret.
SJW Art and Extremes
- Thread starter Hummingbird
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2024
Thank you all! I checked out her thread, and I was negatively impressed both by the person and the thread itself.
If retardation could be converted into energy, then that thread could power the entirety of Tokyo.
If retardation could be converted into energy, then that thread could power the entirety of Tokyo.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
I imagined the worst thing possible, and this far surpassed it.
Tax
People will make the girliest character ever and then be mad people dont know she's a He/they/It/Xe
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2018
Puppychan, is that you?
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Oh boy, time for another update to Actual Adult Woman.
He needs higher standards. I suddenly feel way less attracted to women and I’m not even a lesbian.
Slamming X to doubt, especially after seeing that square ass she’s got. Seriously, why’d she draw herself having SpongeBob butt?
Maybe I’m just too burnt out from work, but I am struggling to see a point in this comic. Is “cartooning your way into someone’s pants” even a thing anymore, especially in real life? Or is she just making up a problem and getting mad about it? Because that bragging in the caption has me thinking “Oh yes, that totally happened. And those men were named Albert Einstein.”
Edit, forgot to mention that she updated her anti-capitalist cats comic, but this one wasn’t very SJ. Just a dumb, drawn out joke about cats loving boxes.
Maybe people who actually own cats will find it funny, but I’m just once again wondering how the hell these idiots have managed to stay in business. Especially since the Dalmatian shouting “Not again!” on another page implied that this isn’t the first time they’ve wasted food and inventory like that.
He needs higher standards. I suddenly feel way less attracted to women and I’m not even a lesbian.
Slamming X to doubt, especially after seeing that square ass she’s got. Seriously, why’d she draw herself having SpongeBob butt?
Edit, forgot to mention that she updated her anti-capitalist cats comic, but this one wasn’t very SJ. Just a dumb, drawn out joke about cats loving boxes.
Maybe people who actually own cats will find it funny, but I’m just once again wondering how the hell these idiots have managed to stay in business. Especially since the Dalmatian shouting “Not again!” on another page implied that this isn’t the first time they’ve wasted food and inventory like that.
Last edited:
RazorBackBacon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
Sort of, but you need to actually show proof of skill before the art hoes come crawling out of the woodwork. While it's funny to imagine a variation on the Titanic scene but where Jack can't draw, the girl usually wants you to sketch her with her clothes *on* first.
Remember, while terminally online grass-dodgers like us may be awash in cartoon artistry just by clicking on the Twitter app, most normies aren't. And even if they are, there's a difference between seeing art on your timeline from your favorite faceless artist and Tony from down the street who loves volleyball and draws funny doodles that he lets you look at.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2025
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
My guess: “Men are bad and stupid horndogs and I’m not like other girls because I embrace being an ugly asshole to spite men and wrongthinking women alike. Laugh now!”
hotpocalypse
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2025
If it looks like a girl, talks like a girl, walks like a girl. Is it not a girl?
Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
So what makes the person a man? If a man can have breasts, dress feminine, and pass as a woman by identifying as a man, why do TIFs need to transition then? These people man, they argue that TIFs need to chop their breasts off because their body needs to match their gender identity but some "trans men" gender identity tells them they don't need to chop their breasts off because some "trans men" 's gender identity tells them that men can have breasts. Make it make sense
People will make the girliest character ever and then be mad people dont know she's a He/they/It/Xe
Last edited:
Anyone here remember Zootopia?
I was looking at old fanart that depicted the characters from that movie as humans. And then I looked at some of the comments of these fanarts. Some of the people were complaining that the artists made Nick and Judy white and by making them that way, they were missing the entire point of the movie.
I’ve seen people say that the predators were a stand-in for minorities in America and the prey animals were supposed to represent white people. I’ve also heard people suggest that it’s the other way around. I’ve seen people suggest that Nick is clearly “PoC-Coded” because he is a Fox, a species that is seen as shifty and untrustworthy. They argue that since Blacks and Hispanics are seen this way IRL, then Nick must be portrayed as such.
I personally see some characters in that movie as having a certain ethnicity regardless of what prejudice they face (or what biases they have towards other animals). For me, prejudice isn’t relevant as to what race the characters would be as humans.
For example, Chief Bogo is a Cape buffalo, a species of bovine that is endemic to Sub-Saharan Africa. His name also originates from the Swahili word for “Buffalo”. It’s really weird for me to see him as white. I get that he discriminates against other animals, but I still see him as an African person. The same rules apply for characters like Nangi (The elephant at that nudist club) and Manchas (The jaguar that went savage). To me, Nangi reads as Indian and Manchas as Hispanic. One of them is a part of a majority (Nangi = Prey) and one is a part of a minority (Manchas = Predator), but they still seem like non-white people.
Nick and Judy always seemed white to me. Yes, I know they’re of different species and trophic levels and that they both discriminate one another, but that doesn’t mean that they have to be the same race as humans.
Of course, I don’t expect everyone to have the same interpretations as me, and that’s fine. I think people can depict the characters as whatever race they want at the end of the day.
What do you all think?
I was looking at old fanart that depicted the characters from that movie as humans. And then I looked at some of the comments of these fanarts. Some of the people were complaining that the artists made Nick and Judy white and by making them that way, they were missing the entire point of the movie.
I’ve seen people say that the predators were a stand-in for minorities in America and the prey animals were supposed to represent white people. I’ve also heard people suggest that it’s the other way around. I’ve seen people suggest that Nick is clearly “PoC-Coded” because he is a Fox, a species that is seen as shifty and untrustworthy. They argue that since Blacks and Hispanics are seen this way IRL, then Nick must be portrayed as such.
I personally see some characters in that movie as having a certain ethnicity regardless of what prejudice they face (or what biases they have towards other animals). For me, prejudice isn’t relevant as to what race the characters would be as humans.
For example, Chief Bogo is a Cape buffalo, a species of bovine that is endemic to Sub-Saharan Africa. His name also originates from the Swahili word for “Buffalo”. It’s really weird for me to see him as white. I get that he discriminates against other animals, but I still see him as an African person. The same rules apply for characters like Nangi (The elephant at that nudist club) and Manchas (The jaguar that went savage). To me, Nangi reads as Indian and Manchas as Hispanic. One of them is a part of a majority (Nangi = Prey) and one is a part of a minority (Manchas = Predator), but they still seem like non-white people.
Nick and Judy always seemed white to me. Yes, I know they’re of different species and trophic levels and that they both discriminate one another, but that doesn’t mean that they have to be the same race as humans.
Of course, I don’t expect everyone to have the same interpretations as me, and that’s fine. I think people can depict the characters as whatever race they want at the end of the day.
What do you all think?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
Its just all politically correct racial profiling.
You know their mantra: "It's Ok when WE do it"
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2024
For the thousandth time,
Why be trans?
For the thousandth time,
Why be desperate to be the opposite gender when you still want to look indistinguishably female?
Isn't... the whole point of trans is being the opposite presenting gender?
A "feminine presenting trans man" is a woman/tomboy.
A "masculine presenting trans woman" is a man/femboy.
No one's allowed to "conform to your ideals and interpretations". Who made you the CEO of decision making? No one.
God, this is what happens when your entire ideology is based around accepting anything and everything without question. Allowing anyone to say contradictory and completely nonsensical stuff and you can't say anything about it or be pressured into accepting it.
Such free thinkers, such intellectuals.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
I believe that it is possible to be TOO accepting of things.
Don't remember from where I heard it but I remember this phrase: Being so Open minded your brain just falls off.
DeeDee Megadoodoo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
This is one my favorite things they do. When they outright state what they actually think, but with a little "this is what our mean old society says" as cover. When they say things like, "we're subverting expectations by making the genius a black woman", they're saying black women are obviously retarded in reality.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2024
Trannies flooding the IHNMAIMS community is due to TADC popularizing the short story.
Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
Isn't the argument they make that "Gender expression is different from gender identity!"? Even if that were the case then this just calls into question what I said above. What exactly are the traits associated with being a man then? You can't just fucking say "Its about identifying as a man" because there has to be traits that all men share in common that isn't just identity in order for that to work. If one trans man claims that having breasts gives them dysphoria and not having them matches their gender identity but another trans man (like above) said "Having breasts doesn't take away anything about me being a man" then why do most of them even bother transitioning then? Are you dysphoric from having breasts due to other reasons or is it because your brain is telling you that those don't belong there because you're a man? This is the one thing that really gives me a headache about this community. A man, woman, non binary, etc is boiled down to how the person sees themselves and nobody is allowed to question it. Why is nobody in the psychology field questioning this whole thing?
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2025
The Amazing Digital Circus. It's based on I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
Oh right. Yeah, I know the creator was inspired by it and gets some of the basic concept down. Granted I've only seen the first episode but [insert massive sperging here about IHNMAIMS and my obsession with it and how TADC is "inspired" and not necessarily "based" on it]
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2025
Sorry, I tend to get those words mixed up