Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ilhan Omar said:
"... the hate that he spewed every single day."
That last quip she had at the end is the very heart of the liberal mindset. What hate? Where is it? They always say this and that will lead to hate because they have some amazing GOTCHA line of logic fed to them by their local algorithm-induced echo chamber(s) that would make a devoted Qanon schizo blush. And the problem is that literally fucking everything you say is merely one step removed from hate.

"Oh, yeah, I don't like dogs, I don't wanna talk about it." Look at this dog genocider! He's gonna take away our friends and family! What a hate-filled monster! He hates dogs the same way Hitler hated Jews! It can't possibly because he was bit by a dog as a child and has an irrational fear of them! No, he's just a dangerous psychopath ready to gun down the next dog he sees! Let's never dig any deeper into this issue because it can't possibly be multi-faceted in any way possible!

"Yeah the second amendment does mean that there will be gun deaths." Can't believe he wants everyone on the planet to be gunned down by evil fascist republican death squads! Charlie Kirk lived and died by the sword!

What this country needs is people asking, "Why does X opinion lead to hate?" followed by some Socrates shit to snap them out of it. Maybe then some of them will realize they've been acting completely insane. Bring back that hilarious bit where you replace "white" with "nigger" and watch as every MSM news article and opinion piece magically turns into a Stormfront rant.

Then again, given that we've seen all these people throw logic and decency into the dustbin of history, maybe what this country needs is woodchippers specifically for these exact types of liberals.
 
It's going to be funny when they have to fight the Zoomers.
I've already heard bitter complaints from millenials about Zoomers being too crass, being too racist, not taking their jobs seriously, and on it goes. They're not wrong in some cases but I don't blame the Zoom-zooms for hating work or dealing with people now. I think its inevitable that people from different periods of time won't mesh perfectly.
 
This is how you know the person saying this is a Marxist or shares similar ideologies; these people believe that History (to properly express it) is this continual shift in a particular direction, leading to one inevitable conclusion. It's where you get people talking about "the right side of History" and so on; for those on the "wrong" side, their viewpoints and opinions will inevitably be proven irrelevant and wrong., which is why you should feel free to discount them, you enlightened woke progressive, you.

She needs to be driven out, because her ideology does not allow for peaceful co-existence.
 
The lynchings weren't done by lone yahoos, and the Oklahoma City bombing was almost undoubtedly not a solo job, and Kirk was killed by a lone yahoo anyway, so you're not discussing in good faith. This is ridiculous.
Again with the lynchings. If your biggest argument is something that was in fashion a century ago, you don't have much of an argument. Chinese women were still binding their fucking feet back when pretty much every American denounced lynchings, so just stop with that.
I just looked it up and the last known racial lynching in America was 1981. Before that they were almost completely eradicated after world war II. So the crux of your argument is something that hasn't happened for nearly 45 years, and that was an isolated incident. So maybe let the lynchings go because they haven't happened since our grandmothers were getting laid casually and none of us were even born yet.
And I know the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a solo job I told you he had a friend that was helping him. If you believe that more than Timothy and McVeigh and Terry Nichols were involved, prove it. Because just like the lynchings that are a century old, I'm not letting you get away with bringing a fucking CONSPIRACY THEORY to the table as fact. That's just making a sloppy dishonest argument on your part.
And as far as Kirk being killed by a lone yahoo, reckon you should put a pin in that until later. Say like, I don't know... When the actual fucking INVESTIGATION is closed?
So to summarize what we have so far, here's what you've brought to the table:
Acts of violence that the last one happened 5 decades ago, and fell out of favor 85 years ago.
Unproven conspiracy theories.
Trying to control the narrative on an ongoing police investigation that is barely a week old.
Something tells me you were NOT on the debate team in high school lol.
 
That last quip she had at the end is the very heart of the liberal mindset. What hate? Where is it? They always say this and that will lead to hate because they have some amazing GOTCHA line of logic fed to them by their local algorithm-induced echo chamber(s) that would make a devoted Qanon schizo blush. And the problem is that literally fucking everything you say is merely one step removed from hate.

"Oh, yeah, I don't like dogs, I don't wanna talk about it." Look at this dog genocider! He's gonna take away our friends and family! What a hate-filled monster! He hates dogs the same way Hitler hated Jews! It can't possibly because he was bit by a dog as a child and has an irrational fear of them! No, he's just a dangerous psychopath ready to gun down the next dog he sees! Let's never dig any deeper into this issue because it can't possibly be multi-faceted in any way possible!

"Yeah the second amendment does mean that there will be gun deaths." Can't believe he wants everyone on the planet to be gunned down by evil fascist republican death squads! Charlie Kirk lived and died by the sword!

What this country needs is people asking, "Why does X opinion lead to hate?" followed by some Socrates shit to snap them out of it. Maybe then some of them will realize they've been acting completely insane. Bring back that hilarious bit where you replace "white" with "nigger" and watch as every MSM news article and opinion piece magically turns into a Stormfront rant.

Then again, given that we've seen all these people throw logic and decency into the dustbin of history, maybe what this country needs is woodchippers specifically for these exact types of liberals.
That's precisely it, They will define anything that challenges them as hate. They go with the most polarizing word. Hate is a strong word, yet Charlie has never gone on a podium and spoke anything of hate. By claiming someone is hateful, it paints them as irrational and unable to be reasoned with. The modern day leftist sees hate as their capital sin.

But yet they paint any bit of resistance as hate. You're a homophobe if you disagree with gay marriage. you're a islamaphobe if you denounce the religion's overt violent history, you are fearful and hateful in their eyes. So they see you as a villain, the enemy. It further paints their ideological opponents as enemies, not civil opponents.
 
Only instead of "look how far we would have been without Christianity" the past couple of decades have proven to me how degenerate we would have been without it acting as a tempering, moral guideline.
Allowing an opposing force to surrender and keep their their arms and heraldry with the promise of safe passage might have happened before Christianity, my historical knowledge fails me there, but it certainly happened a lot in western european history.
 
View attachment 7942099View attachment 7942101
(Charlie Kirk would actually love this, because in one of his debates, one woman talked about what will his fursona be, he sayed he would like to be a beaver) anyways this actually violates the constitution, because how can you not post art supporting him, but only hate photos? Isnt that weird?

World's gayest "pot calling the kettle black" post I've ever seen.

"Practiced hatred, hostility or violence towards anyone different from their own viewpoints."

HAVE YOU NOT WATCHED A SINGLE CHARLIE KIRK DEBATE VIDEO??????????????????????????? ACTUALLY. HAVE YOU NOT LOOKED AT YOUR OWN COMMUNITY AND IDEOLOGY AS A WHOLE???????? WHAT IS THIS?????

I bet their only source of information about Charlie Kirk are from people who have never watched Charlie Kirk, I swear, man.
 
yes, and the blunt forrce trauma was caused by her 500 pound ass falling onto the pavement. there was an angle of video that showed the car did not touch her, she got knocked down by other people and hit the curb
Please actually show me, because this all happened when I didn't actually give many shits about politics, so I assumed that your narrative was true.
 
The lynchings of the early 20th Century were committed by Democrats, retard.
It's no use you're either arguing with someone who's not arguing in good faith, or you're arguing with an idiot. Either way you aren't going to be able to change his stance.
For what it's worth I don't think he's an idiot. I think he's being misleading on purpose.
 
If you feel strongly about the trans issue the FTC is currently looking for comments from the public on the transitioning of children. If this is an issue you care about a lot this is one of the best ways you can do something about it. It's been flooded by troons so far, and even a short comment could make a big difference. There is only a week left to leave comments, lets finish strong! Don't forget to share it with your friends who feel the same. Thank you for your attention to this matter

Do you have to be an American citizen to leave a comment?
 
1758411508542.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom