The lynchings weren't done by lone yahoos, and the Oklahoma City bombing was almost undoubtedly not a solo job, and Kirk was killed by a lone yahoo anyway, so you're not discussing in good faith. This is ridiculous.
Again with the lynchings. If your biggest argument is something that was in fashion a century ago, you don't have much of an argument. Chinese women were still binding their fucking feet back when pretty much every American denounced lynchings, so just stop with that.
I just looked it up and the last known racial lynching in America was 1981. Before that they were almost completely eradicated after world war II. So the crux of your argument is something that hasn't happened for nearly 45 years, and that was an isolated incident. So maybe let the lynchings go because they haven't happened since our grandmothers were getting laid casually and none of us were even born yet.
And I know the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a solo job I told you he had a friend that was helping him. If you believe that more than Timothy and McVeigh and Terry Nichols were involved, prove it. Because just like the lynchings that are a century old, I'm not letting you get away with bringing a fucking CONSPIRACY THEORY to the table as fact. That's just making a sloppy dishonest argument on your part.
And as far as Kirk being killed by a lone yahoo, reckon you should put a pin in that until later. Say like, I don't know... When the actual fucking INVESTIGATION is closed?
So to summarize what we have so far, here's what you've brought to the table:
Acts of violence that the last one happened 5 decades ago, and fell out of favor 85 years ago.
Unproven conspiracy theories.
Trying to control the narrative on an ongoing police investigation that is barely a week old.
Something tells me you were NOT on the debate team in high school lol.