Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I don't think you can lump women all together. Look at Sydney Watson on Youtube. She was getting emotional over Kirk but never met him. She has similar views to me.

my dudette, rationality requires acknowledging group differences. women and men as groups are profoundly psychologically different from each other. the existence of outliers does not change this.
 
Kansas City blacks are crazy, but I think Saint Louis blacks are the craziest in the state. Terrible drivers.
Try East St. Louis (although technically it is across the river in Illinois).
my dudette, rationality requires acknowledging group differences. women and men as groups are profoundly psychologically different from each other. the existence of outliers does not change this.
It's not that profound. (Okay, well, profound enough to make us completely incomprehensible to each other from time to time.)
I can see where Rossman is coming from. This is absolutely setting an example throughout the world of broadcast. Whether or not Kimmel broke the rules (he fucking did, for 9 years straight) it's still impossible for me to see a world where the FCC shouldn't be keeping watchful eyes on both Fox News and all the leftoid news slop.
The FCC is shit and basically should not exist in its current form. Its only business should be ensuring that licensees don't stop on each other's frequencies and that unlicensed people aren't constantly pulling Captain Midnight tricks.

Kimmel was definitely in violation of regulations that shouldn't exist, since they require subjective evaluation of the truthfulness of things, when whoever is in power decides what's true. Sort of like Hunter Biden's laptop officially didn't exist so it was "disinformation" even to talk about it. They're very selective of when they enforce these regulations, though.

I don't feel a bit of sympathy for him, though. He deliberately put his employer in a shitty position and they already didn't like him.
 
Last edited:
Not gonna lie, i am getting sick of her shit
1758322302317.webp
>Her
I keep forgetting that bitch isn’t Jaden smith.
 
Kansas City blacks are crazy, but I think Saint Louis blacks are the craziest in the state. Terrible drivers.

Also I had a feeling you were from Australia, still have some vocab differences that peek through occasionally. "Gone on walkabout" is a good one but what really solidified it was referring to "birds" lol hope the US has been kind to you :)
Yeah and it's funny because I was born in America but I have the silly accent. Mom took me back as a baby and I lived there until I was older.
 
Everything with the left is a matter of, in the end, being able to say they are good and right. They know deep down murder is bad. They're dancing and cheering over not having to have done the deed on their guilty consciences because someone not like them did the deed.

Judging from some stuff I've been seeing IRL, and with personal lolcows: I think a lot of normie libs, particularly boomers, also pushed the groyper theory because they were just completely brain-broken by the assassination. They are genuinely shocked and appalled by what happened, but they're so enmeshed in the good-vs-evil, right-side-of-history narrative that they just cannot accept that their side did it.

Everything they've trusted for decades, all the TV shows and experts, have told them that this is what the bad guys do, not them. They clung to the "groyper" narrative for as long as they could, because accepting the reality is like their brains dividing by zero.
 
You have leftists celebrating his death, and rightists focusing on protesting with Starbucks orders.
Yes because these things are completely equal evils. I'm thrilled to learn that you didn't find glee in the political assassination of a Christian father, but is this really how the average leftist thinks with their morality? How is requesting Starbucks name one of their drinks after Charlie Kirk a "protest"? It's just a simple request.
 
And I'm saying that in my actual life, that's not happening around me. We are seeing it shoved in our faces constantly online though. And we are seeing people that want to drum up engagement through it, and political points taking advantage of it. The same way the media, and politicians always do. It's been fear mongering, and rage bating 24/7 on any media I find.
So where's the threshold for this stuff to become unacceptable to you? Just when it affects you personally?

You obviously aren't thinking about the 2nd and 3rd order effects of doing things like allowing niggers convicted 14 times to roam the streets and kill people. Just because you don't know them or because it's only one incident among many doesn't mean it isn't indicative of policies and ideologies that will obviously prove destructive eventually, if not now.

Teaching literally every young man or woman in college that everyone of European descent is racist and there's a moral imperative to tear down any society they've ever created, by any means necessary, is going to have consequences.

Creating a two-tiered system which privileges everyone except the members of society who are actually productive is going to have consequences.

Obviously going out and engaging in violent reprisals to random members of society is impotent and ineffective at best, and I have not seen anyone here genuinely advocating for that. But some of you soft faggots have got to get over the idea that if you're nice to the people who want you dead they're just going to leave you alone.
 
Obviously going out and engaging in violent reprisals to random members of society is impotent and ineffective at best, and I have not seen anyone here genuinely advocating for that. But some of you soft faggots have got to get over the idea that if you're nice to the people who want you dead they're just going to leave you alone.
I wouldn't be saying it if I didn't see people implying it. I have.

I think people should push back. Legally, rhetorically. Don't left trannie wierdos be the ones deciding what the rest of society find acceptable. But the actual implications I've seen from people here. Are not the way to do it.

You should defend yourself if there is a threat. Which is the same thing I said before. And will always say. If defending yourself, and pushing back in a legal way isn't what some people want. What does that imply they are saying? People responding they have had enough, when I say people should be able to have a discussion with people they disagree with. what does that imply?
 
You should defend yourself if there is a threat. Which is the same thing I said before. And will always say. If defending yourself, and pushing back in a legal way isn't what some people want. What does that imply they are saying? People responding they have had enough, when I say people should be able to have a discussion with people they disagree with. what does that imply?
In this context it means that the discussion is over, because they shot the guy who did that. That doesn't mean that anyone's going to get violent, it doesn't mean anyone is going to go Years of Lead tit for tat just yet, it means they're done wasting their breath trying to have a civil discourse with people who literally say it's a moral imperative for them to die and for their children to grow up brainwashed into hating them and everything they ever valued.

We're going to do what we want, we're going to fight for the vision of the world we want to be reality, and you're either on board or you're not. If you want to do tranny nigger worship shit and chemically castrate children, you're going to do that over there and not have any say over me and mine.
 
It's a boomercon thing, a strain of "Democrats are the real racists"

For instance:

View attachment 7938726
"СНДИGЭ!" fucking obliterated my sides

And it's always funny how the legacy of Nazi Germany is like a hot potato in political discourse, everyone is trying to attribute their likeness to their opponents. Desperately arguing semantics of "socialism" and the like to make their point. Retards should stop derailing the thread though.
Did HE watch Andor? And please, don't drag the only good series Disney put out probably ever into this.
 
Last edited:
Never said they were. All I said was I don’t like either.
When you put 2 things next to each other you are implying that they have a similar weight.
This is just plain old whataboutism. "Well yeah left is literally celebrating a politically motivated murder... BUT THE RIGHT IS ASKING STARBUCKS TO CHANGE THE NAME OF A DRINK!"
The truth is that you didn't want to admit that the left is unquestionably the "bad guy" here so you felt the need to put something, anything on the other side but because the right has been acting like normal human beings instead of chimping out the best you could muster was:
rightists focusing on protesting with Starbucks orders
 
project 2025 was basically a "here's what we'd like to see in america" document made by the heritage foundation
I was relatively socially moderate until Project 2025 hit the news cycle at the exact time all the liberals I was friends with from college hit their mid-20s and became coom and game addicted soyjaks irl. Progressives interpreted it like a literal declaration of war from the armies of Satan himself, but I read it and thought "huh, this would be good for society actually", and realized that conservatives were basically right after all.
 
When you put 2 things next to each other you are implying that they have a similar weight.
Ah, my apologies then, didn’t mean to imply they did. If I can still edit my comment, I’ll add something like “to a lesser extent” next to it.

The truth is that you didn't want to admit that the left is unquestionably the "bad guy" here so you felt the need to put something, anything on the other side but because the right has been acting like normal human beings instead of chimping out the best you could muster was:
There’s been stuff I felt were significantly worse, but I didn’t really want to mention them considering how it could be misconstrued as me agreeing with the left. So I chose something that we could all agree was goofy.

I do think the left has been very bad here, yes.
 
In this context it means that the discussion is over, because they shot the guy who did that. That doesn't mean that anyone's going to get violent, it doesn't mean anyone is going to go Years of Lead tit for tat just yet, it means they're done wasting their breath trying to have a civil discourse with people who literally say it's a moral imperative for them to die and for their children to grow up brainwashed into hating them and everything they ever valued.

We're going to do what we want, we're going to fight for the vision of the world we want to be reality, and you're either on board or you're not. If you want to do tranny nigger worship shit and chemically castrate children, you're going to do that over there and not have any say over me and mine.
So yeah. It's literally saying what I thought it was saying.

Well, I'm not going to be ok with people pushing progressive, trannies ideals. Its always been disgusting. But the country hasn't had a large ideological pushback. Every time someone did. They were shut down by the traditional media, and social media. And left with their echo chambers of people telling them, "this is bad, and believing it is equal to violence".

Just because people on this site have been against it for years, doesn't mean the normies have even heard about most of this before. As messed up as it is. This is literally the best time to push back ideologically. Because things are actually changing in a way that I have never seen before.

Not only that but antifa being classified as a terrorist organization. If people let the conversation die now. And especially if some nut goes out and retaliates. It's going to stop any real progress before it can start.

Besides all of that. I do believe Christianity, and the basic idea Charlie Kirk had was correct. Even if I don't agree with everything he said.
 
I agree with you completely. Reminds of that "scientific progress" meme:
This is more about the huge fall of rome, which ruled almost everything and collapsed from faggotry and excess. Much like the Wiemar republic in someways, and major west coast cities.

Its kinda the embodiment of bad times strong men good times weak men.

This is something humanity seems to struggle with, and is really critical for true progress, reaching abundance WITHOUT depravity.
Seamus is usually on point with his satire, but he took what should've been a simple "rest in peace" and chose instead to spin Charlie's death for his own political sperging about fatherhood
Reminder that fatherless homes generate more rapists, more homeless, more trannies, more faggots, more people on public assistance, and basically everything I'd imagine you bitch about.

A bit hypocritical there. Even if you set aside ACTUAL fatherhood, the spirit of the father is important, the type of spirit that encourages young men to be BETTER.

you wanna fight against antifa, and all that shit? have fathers in homes, father figures, mentorship, ect. Because most of those antifa faggots are bitches who NEVER had a male role model and never matured past 13, and never achieved any refined masculinity. EVEN if you don't have kids, EVEN if you are single, reaching out to young men you run into and helping any capacity you are able to help them grow as young men is objectively good for the future. In some ways I'd say charlie was actually a father to FAR MORE than his own children. Its not a coincidence pastors often have the title of father, since they sometimes fill that role, with helping mentor others.

I DID know one guy who was into the antifa shit and he never grew up knowing his father as he ditched the mom immediately. It wasn't his only problem, but I think if he had ANY capacity of a father, he would of ended up better.
 
If Stephen Colbert was assassinated live on his show, shot in the neck live for all to see like Robert DeNiro in Joker (yes I know his shows are pre-recorded but still.) I would not even think about laughing. That would be very fucked up.

A piano falling on someone like in Looney Tunes is inherently funny no matter who it is.
Okay but only if he pops his head out after and his teeth make piano key noises before falling out
 
Back
Top Bottom