Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Guess who's gravedancing on Charlie Kirk and making it about herself as the victim? None other than Zoe Quinn.
(Archives)
View attachment 7909328View attachment 7909329
This is the person who cried for a decade about how gamers were hatemurdering her by saying her game was shit and that her gamejourno friends were promoting her shit game because they were friends and pretending it was just an AMAZING GAME they felt people had to "play"
What a shock that after years of claiming words are violence she supports actual murder
Of course, she always did, they always did, they just tried to pretend they werent the monsters they are
 
respectfully, i disagree
My new theory now:
>they had caught him almost automatically
I think they are incompetent bumbling retards (especially the FBI) who would not have caught him unless he turned himself in. They picked him up 250 miles away and had to take a photo of his roommates computer monitor with images of Discord logs (rather than seize that kid's fucking hard drives).
>they bargained with the family to tell the media they turned him in to protect their image and prevent harassment
seems way less likely than that he just went home and his family actually did turn him in.
>they feigned incompetence to get his accomplices to move physically and online
"haha, i was only pretending to be retarded" is almost never a good idea. they look like bumbling retards. there is no reason to fake it.
>the idiots who gloated about the day before have all been held in custody and are all flipping on each other
who are you talking about? you mean the gravedancers who got fired? was there any concrete evidence of foreknowledge by a group of people? if so, the feds must certainly be looking at that.
>they are tracking his actual handlers
what actual handlers? he probably posted on discord about his intentions to his internet buddies, but those could be literally anyone, likely NOT from utah, and i have no idea how they'd be tracked down unless we start seeing subpoenas for discord (which, as far as i know, hasnt happened yet)
The dead giveaway was Trumps deflection to the ballroom discussion. He usually would be brimstone and fire with impotent rage and leaning hard into anti-left rhetoric. This time he kept his mouth shut. That should worry trannies the most, but almost no one picked up on that.

Sure, he deflected there, but he is absolutely on the anti-left warpath, mentioning it explicitly in his eulogy address and repeatedly (incessantly, even) on Fox and Friends right before the press conference identifying Tyler Robinson.

i think the truth is more or less in line with what we've been told, but it's just a sketch, and some bits haven't yet been filled in, some of which should be filled in by now (e.g., his online footprint, accomplices), but may come later.
 
You're not being honest. What you're doing is transparent. This couldn't be more cut and dry. You have people who knew him intimately flat out stating he was becoming more left-wing and was angry at Charlie Kirk for spreading "hate", and you're pretending to be hung up on the ideological complexity of "nice bulge bro".
Yeah it’s weird he set his sights on Charlie Kirk of all people, maybe targeting him out of pure convenience he was nearby?
 
I would love footage of the execution. People loved sharing charlie getting shot, would love to flip the script and show them footage of a murderer being ripped apart by a dozen rifles at once
Unfortunately they do the really goofy thing, IIRC, where they load blanks into most/all but one of the rifles.
 
These people think if they repeat something enough times on twitter/social media it will become true. And to a point, it kind of does, repeat a lie enough times and people start to believe it. Major media publications and "journalist" source articles from twitter posts all the time. It doesn't matter if it's wrong, they know that at least a few people will see the headline, believe it and never look into it again. So they will use every small detail they can find to paint this as a "right wing extremist attack" to support their narratives and to be able to label even more regular people as Nazis who deserve death.

However, the FBI/the current administration have to be aware of how important it is for the truth to come out in this particular case. We already have statements saying that he believed that Charlie Kirk was "full of hate/spreading hate", which makes it painfully obvious where the freak stands. So I'm hoping against all odds that they are collecting as much information as they can and they will do their fucking jobs and report truthfully and meticulously on his motives.

The father/family/roommate who already ratted him out will probably speak out sooner or later (if nothing else greed can always motivate some people and some of them might want to distance themselves from him), so I don't think truth can be buried this time. Either way, no matter how many people claim that one YouTube playlist with the word "groyper" and Ciao Bella means 100% the freak was a groyper.
Some of them do it to obfuscate, some do it to piss you off, and some do it because they are genuinely deranged and cannot accept anything that would contradict their worldview.
Besides, if it had been a groyper they would have had Fuentes references everywhere, they are obsessed with him and would make sure the world knew that Fuentes "won"
But let's not forget the fact that the "groyper wars" ended years ago. They managed to embarrass Kirk once at an event, that was their grand victory that Fuentes was so proud of.
Charlie Kirk went on to actually have a positive impact on politics/young people and become 100x more successful than federal asset Fuentes who does nothing but say anything that will make the right look bad/the most outrageous things he can for attention (oh, and he changes his beliefs almost daily depending on what hurts the right/gets him attention).
I'm hoping that given Vance's reaction to the assassination, there will at least be one person putting pressure on the FBI to come out with the motive. Maybe I'm way off and somehow they will succeed in pushing their narrative of this being because Charlie wasn't "extreme" enough, but I honestly doubt it. I think there will be far more repercussions than people realize, and not only people waking up and seeing through the bullshit.
I don't know, either way, more people are aware of their tactics than ever, and for the first time, they are fighting back. So even if they push their usual lies, less and less people will believe them and more will start seeing them for what they are.

Matt Walsh has the right attitude (something I never thought I'd say) about "the right" (whatever that encompasses) sticking together and standing against everyone who hates us. These people want you and your family dead, they want to laugh about it, they want to enjoy the suffering of your widow and your grieving children, they want to sully your memory, lie about your legacy, because death is not enough for them, they want to destroy everything you stand for, everything you believe in, everything you cherish, and they want to label everyone who doesn't agree with them as an extremist so that they can kill them without any remorse. So no, there doesn't seem to be any common ground. How could there be when they don't even have the basic decency of respecting human life? They don't even have enough empathy to feel bad for babies who saw their father get murdered.
Maybe we should have been listening when they keep telling us that we are all Nazis and that that makes it OK to be violent. Maybe we should have taken it seriously the first time around.
 
You don't kill a guy with a bullet that says "catch this, fascist" because a guy is not extreme enough. It's illogical. I cannot genuinely believe you actually think that.

The guy is not a groyper... I don't know what to tell you
Right because a groyper, or accelerationist, or someone that hates leftie, not to mention a guy who was trying to get away with his crime - wouldn’t try to point in the opposite direction away from himself and his motive.

Everyone is taking the fascist bullet meme, at 1000% face value. I’m sure “Lol Ur gay” is a serious reflection of his political values too. If the bullets had right wing memes on them it would be nothing but posts declaring false flag and “it glows” But because the message can fit into the preferred narrative it’s unquestionably his unironic political beliefs.

Tyler had a plan to gtfo and did. His plan wasn’t to blow his brains out or death by cop. There hasn’t been any manifesto uncovered. The dude went home to watch the results online. This tells me any message he purposely left was meant to distract away from him, stir the shit, cover his tracks. He wanted to get away with it. He wanted the cops searching for danger hair lefty troons, not a clean cut Mormon guy and son of a cop.

I’ve wondered if Tyler’s dad had express disgust and anger over Kirk’s death to him. I can’t imagine how dad felt when that security footage was released.
The truth is we have been given very little information about his actual political positions. People have said he was anti-Trump and the engraved messages appear to be popular memes associated with weird online communities, but this is still 100% consistent with being a groyper. People here don't seem to realize how twisted the average groyper is...
We don’t. I think the FBI is stuck with a very messy, inconvenient narrative with Tyler. They are going to be mum and just let the current narrative and outrage keep humming along. Why mess up a good thing?

Patel was nervous and very careful about how he answered the repeated questions about the motive. The most he would say is “read the messages on the bullets” and Tyler had expressed hate towards Kirk to someone. He repeatedly dodged questions about motive and was vague as fuck.

Imagine how bad it looks that while you’ve got enraged public calling for arresting all leftists - to admit the killer was actually a right winger nihilist or accelerationist. They will never allow that to happen.

The truth really doesn’t matter when it comes to a political narrative anyway. People on this forum still insist Vance Boelter, a Trump loving, Christian prepper and pastor who preached against gays and trannies, was a progressive dem ffs. (Remember Vance also scribbled “no kings” on a piece of paper and printed off 20 in the world’s laziest attempt at planting evidence to throw cops off his trail.)

Even if a video of Tyler pledging to rape and kill for Nick Fuentes, or calling Kirk a race traitor, surfaced they’d still insist he was a progressive lefty terrorist. Any evidence that doesn’t fit the narrative is fake anyway. Have they even stopped calling Tyler a troon yet? It’s hard to keep up with this thread when it’s a drum beat instead of a discussion.
 
Yes, being white is hard.
It's good a nigger like you and understand that.
I'm 34, male, Israeli
a44cbdf4af19e2885c804f5401a89c5efc916a03e209efa324b9dacb42300b43_1.webp
 
Yeah it’s weird he set his sights on Charlie Kirk of all people, maybe targeting him out of pure convenience he was nearby?
I think Charlie was uniquely dangerous to these people, because he reaches out and had discussions with people from across the aisle. I think the greatest danger to this radicalized far-left mob isn't getting them fired, it's reaching out and casting doubt in the mind of their recruits.
 
How are none of these leftists haunted by that video of him suddenly getting shot in the fucking neck? Just a civil debate as usual and suddenly there was blood spurting out of his neck. Fucking grim

Are people really this desensitized?
I think it's a function on being detached from reality, whenever by living in walled-off community, having rich parents, living 90% of your daily life on the Internet, having attended private schools etc. that doesn't teach you hard life lessons like, if you celebrate some goober getting shot and killed because he said something mean then someone might walk up to you on the street and sucker punch your teeth off.
 
Unfortunately they do the really goofy thing, IIRC, where they load blanks into most/all but one of the rifles.
I thought it was ONE gun having a blank???

I do genuinely wonder what happenes if someone headshots during that, can't tell me its never happened, and this fucking murderer would deserve it
 
The longer the Republicans take to give full, transparent insight into his motives the worse the situation will become. The wilder the speculation will become. The most important thing right now should be laying the speculation and chaos to rest.

Everyone knows why this deranged kid killed Charlie Kirk, and we know how he got radicalized. He is a leftist extremist on Reddit and Discord, just like the 100s of thousands of cheering faggots there right now.

What I actually want from King Jeet at the FBI is a replay of the Jan 6th response. I saw gigantic digital billboards in a big city funded by the FBI asking to turn anyone we knew who took part in J6.

I want the same fucking thing. No, actually I want it ten fold. I want every single person this kid interacted with on reddit and discord investigated. I want them to live in fear that a SWAT team is going to break down their parents doors. We are at war, and I want my enemies destroyed.

I watched exactly none of Kirk's videos in my life, but my girl did, and my dad did, and some of my friends did, and these mutants would cheer for their public execution. So they are an existential threat to my people and I want them destroyed, and it has to happen immediately.
 
Well working man was for the left. And left gave working man a lot.
Identifying as "left" doesn't give you the right to ride the coat-tails of labor organizers, and calling yourself "anti-fa" doesn't give you the right to associate with the people who stormed the beaches of Normandy. I wish you people would stop thinking it does.
 
Yeah it’s weird he set his sights on Charlie Kirk of all people, maybe targeting him out of pure convenience he was nearby?
I'd agree it was partly convenience. I think to us it seems weird because Charlie is so nondescript and boring but to zoomer leftists he was a big deal. His debate-me-bro clips are all over TikTok, he was satirized on South Park which is a good metric for where smug Jon Stewart libtards are at, and he was lined up to debate Hasan Piker later this year. He's also the head of TPUSA which is an organization specifically about student outreach and college campuses. At almost every college that's the designated conservative group so college lefties consider TPUSA the local nazi club. You can see a lot of people on social media comparing Charlie to Goebbels.
 
No they cannot. Bella Ciao is communist song and only a leftists would write "Catch this fascist". The messaging it clearly left wing the only way that you could justify him being right-winger is with them being misdirection.

Bella Ciao was a song on the America First groyper playlist. Also, someone by the name of "AF Bella Ciao" gave money to Nicholas on his birthday.

So the groypers are well-versed in that meme and are happy to use it.
 
Right because a groyper,
Fuck off with your wordsalad fanfiction you desperately defensive shitlib. All you've been doing is dilating about how the psycho shitlib that murdered Kirk must be in that group you are obsessed with and that's it.

You pretending that it is a legitimate option is you being a lying faggot, it's like saying a hoofprint either belongs to a horse or a unicorn from Jupiter. Yeah, schizo, those are two equally likely alternatives aren't they?

Edit: oh yeah, Laughing Faggot is just a shitlib doing pilpul. Nice to get a confimation on that.
 
Back
Top Bottom