Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Surfin Terf said:
I don’t hold lawyers in especially high regard, but is this Gomez figure even a lawyer?
Click to expand...
He appears to be. He's the founder of the Latino Rile Association, though he's one of those "latinx"-pushers everywhere else, from what I can see. Probably graduated from law school and immediately ran off to do advocacy work.
 
Shotgun Badger said:
View attachment 7753788
Oh boy, we got the chair thing again.
Click to expand...
redaction.webp
Not going to bother posting all the quote tweets, but the troons think they got her because they are going "TERFs are so stupid they don't realize this is a reference to Diogenes." It doesn't seem to occur to them that people understood the reference, but still thought it was stupid. It says a lot that their idea of intelligence is superficial displays of knowledge that add nothing to the conversation. One person pointed out that by JK's definition underage girls are women because the definition doesn't specify that you need to be an adult. But to even know that you would need to know what the correct definition is. Which is the real point of the "Behold a Man" anecdote, everyone knows what a man is. Even if they don't have a 100% definition at hand they can still recognize when you provide them an incorrect definition. Because they know.
LimeRikki said:
This is what the trannies have been doing to her since 2020, when she first opened up about her very in the middle-of-the-road (at the time) thoughts on troons.

2020 JKR: "Dress how you want, live your life as you please, sleep with whatever consenting adult will have you, just don't intrude on Women's rights or Women's spaces"

Trannies ever since" DIE ROWLING I HOPE YOU GET [insert the type of male brained threats of violence that are common among trans "women", because they are men, here]

By going after her, they brought far more attention to the issue, and far more sympathy to gender critical views than if they had just ignored her.

Every step of the way the trans community has been shooting itself in the foot for the past few years, and its finally caught up to them in a way that they cannot ignore, and they cannot undo, and they cannot whine and piss and moan and complain their way out of.

Good.
Click to expand...
Their complete inability to respond to things in a proportional way is so dumb. They can't help but start sending people death threats and rape threats over the most minor of thoughtcrimes. It's a great way to turn lukewarm allies into die hard enemies. I don't remember gays in the 2000s being like this, and they were successful, at least until they ended up in a shotgun marriage with the TQ+, a little message discipline goes a long way. Troons could learn from this but they will not.
 
Henri Barbusse said:
My personal favorite British children's author born in the 1800s is Arthur Ransome
Click to expand...
Ah, the delights of inter-war British parenting. "Better drowned than duffers. If not duffers won't drown." What would the modern equivalent be? "Better dead than a tranny. If not a tranny won't die." Or for Mermaids, "Better castrated than gay. If not gay will not castrate." I'm somehow missing the wit of the original.
 
Surfin Terf said:
Public defenders doing their job and defending even the indefensible is a good thing, but this guy’s meme indicates that he thinks that rapists getting light sentences is a good thing in and of itself because it’s “rehabilitative justice”.

I don’t hold lawyers in especially high regard, but is this Gomez figure even a lawyer? The argument he’s describing as “basically, just this meme” doesn’t actually match the meme he posted (pretty much at all) and I’d expect any lawyer to be able to parse an argument better than that.
Click to expand...
He thinks that part of the reason JKR hates trannies, is that she ideologically disagrees with grooming and "rape play" (she does, but this is known as "not being a pedo"), which he considers to be a sexual orientation. From his perspective, the meme makes sense because rape and pedophilia are normal parts of "queer" (tranny groomer) sexuality and therefore JKR and Ruben Sim are just calling for the death penalty for people with a different sexual orientation than themselves.
TruffleSpark said:
I don't remember gays in the 2000s being like this, and they were successful
Click to expand...
Gay men wanted marriage and the legal rights that come with it in part because they tend to make money and have assets. Lesbians wanted marriage and the legal rights that come with it because they tend to make less money and want to join assets. Trannies don't have jobs so all they want is special provisions to go to the consent accident party on the taxpayer's dime. They're not really people in the way homosexuals are.
 
Last edited:
Waffle Iron said:
If she's going to rake CGE over the coals, she's not going to announce it publicly. She's not an American. She'll contact her lawyers, have them explore the possibilities and results, decide what option she wants to pursue, then spring it on CGE. CGE will then be surprised and paralyzed by fear of saying anything publicly that will make it worse. They won't inform trannies what's going on. She can make CGE eat the production cost without being able to sell a single box. By the time trannies realize what is going on, CGE is already gutted.

Just look at how she handled UK politics. Did she loudly proclaim she was going to run for a seat in parliament? Did she shout off the rooftops she was working with a team of lawyers around the clock to see where she can hit trannies the hardest? No, she kept quiet, then when the Cass review came out she revealed she had a hand in it.

That's the best part about Rowling. While trannies are loud and obnoxious. They rarely get anything done. Their only weapon is screaming into the aether. For Rowling, the shitposting on twitter is a hobby. Her actual effort is working quietly and efficiently to hit as hard as possible.
Click to expand...

I hope she not only goes after CGE but also Board Game Geek and tranny Marceline Leiman who have conducted a witch hunt against her..

Is there a community thread on BGG here? If not, should one be started on that site where the owner lives in a Texas mansion, the head moderator lives on a Connecticut estate and the sites begs for money from its userbase like it's PBS while they ban users who say anything that's not negative about JK?
 
Troon Meet Noose said:
If not, should one be started on that site where the owner lives in a Texas mansion, the head moderator lives on a Connecticut estate
Click to expand...
Wait, really? The site's owners are pretty annoying but not very rich. The way they run dono drives and the limited financial information they share when they do their donations I thought the profits weren't so big after the hosting costs and dev team.
 
Waffle Iron said:
Wait, really? The site's owners are pretty annoying but not very rich. The way they run dono drives and the limited financial information they share when they do their donations I thought the profits weren't so big after the hosting costs and dev team.
Click to expand...


Here's where site owner Scott "Aldie" Alden lives https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/6-Bretton-Creek-Ct-Dallas-TX-75220/120753791_zpid/

Here's where head mod Matthew "Octavian" Monin lives https://www.redfin.com/CT/Branford/7-Flax-Mill-Holw-06405/home/54114049 I might have overexaggerated on this one. Don't care. He's an asshole who gets off on banning users.
 
TruffleSpark said:
Not going to bother posting all the quote tweets, but the troons think they got her because they are going "TERFs are so stupid they don't realize this is a reference to Diogenes." It doesn't seem to occur to them that people understood the reference, but still thought it was stupid. It says a lot that their idea of intelligence is superficial displays of knowledge that add nothing to the conversation. One person pointed out that by JK's definition underage girls are women because the definition doesn't specify that you need to be an adult. But to even know that you would need to know what the correct definition is. Which is the real point of the "Behold a Man" anecdote, everyone knows what a man is. Even if they don't have a 100% definition at hand they can still recognize when you provide them an incorrect definition. Because they know.
Click to expand...
I've seen leftists go on about how conservatives use "Gotcha" arguments whenever they debate the left and yet every time I see them defend transgenderism, they do exactly that where they post a complete strawman to counter gender critical people's argument. Like when someone argues women are part of the sex that can potentially gives birth, produce ova, etc and they completely bring up something like "So you don't think infertile women are women then?" When they never said every woman can give birth because yes , something in her body can prevent her from having kids, but she still has the parts and biology that make her one. These are of course the same people who are now arguing that using a circular definition to "What is a woman" is actually a good thing because some things can be justified through circular reasoning and it doesn't make it fallacious.
 
TruffleSpark said:
Their complete inability to respond to things in a proportional way is so dumb. They can't help but start sending people death threats and rape threats over the most minor of thoughtcrimes. It's a great way to turn lukewarm allies into die hard enemies. I don't remember gays in the 2000s being like this, and they were successful, at least until they ended up in a shotgun marriage with the TQ+, a little message discipline goes a long way. Troons could learn from this but they will not.
Click to expand...

Their previous political victories and the era of woke has trained them to always escalate. Gays were exactly like this, when a miss teen USA candidate verbally barfed on the idea of gay marriage, they were all over her. Normally they would escalate by calling someone's boss or digging into their personal life but when that fails as it increasingly does they escalate to fear tactics and criminality because those are the avenues that are left.
 
Candidate No 7 said:
She is fantastically grudgeful, isn't she? As a seasoned Rowling watcher I assumed she'd put all the aggro of the Indyref campaign behind her, especially as some prominent Cybernats are now allied with her in the TERF wars, but nooooo, she was biding her time all along after all!
Click to expand...
Maybe she's just decided to never again sit back and take it when a man beats her down. Maybe she knows now that that sort of man is never going to get better, so she should never stop fighting back until she's sure he won't get back up.
 
Jacques1194 said:
I've seen leftists go on about how conservatives use "Gotcha" arguments whenever they debate the left and yet every time I see them defend transgenderism, they do exactly that where they post a complete strawman to counter gender critical people's argument. Like when someone argues women are part of the sex that can potentially gives birth, produce ova, etc and they completely bring up something like "So you don't think infertile women are women then?" When they never said every woman can give birth because yes , something in her body can prevent her from having kids, but she still has the parts and biology that make her one. These are of course the same people who are now arguing that using a circular definition to "What is a woman" is actually a good thing because some things can be justified through circular reasoning and it doesn't make it fallacious.
Click to expand...
It's very 110 IQ behavior. It's the sort of thing you do when you are intelligent enough to know that you can organize your thoughts better than your opponent, but not so intelligent that you can find actual flaws in the core thesis of what your opponent says. So instead you just nitpick and act obtuse and willfully misinterpret things that clearly mean one thing but could technically be interpreted to mean another thing if you are really literal minded. Even though your opponent knows they are correct if they are someone in the 90-100 IQ range they probably won't be able to cross their T's and dot their I's enough to be able to explain why they are correct in a way that you can't find some sort of flaw in. People like this are so frustrating because you have to explain things in autistic detail to them in order to get them to understand it, and you need to play 20 questions with them to get them to say exactly what they mean because otherwise they will be intentionally misleading. Even if you can win against them, often it's such an exhausting task so it is easier to not bother picking the fight, so they end up winning through sheer attrition.

It wouldn't bother me as much if they held themselves to the same standards that they hold others to. But the moment you point out flaws in their logic, or even just minor grammar errors or heuristic definitions that can be misinterpreted they suddenly understand exactly how fallacious that is. It really shows that they are not interested in having a dialogue or understanding their opponent's position so much as they are just interested in using words and logic as a tool to beat people into submission.
Dafuqisdis? said:
Their previous political victories and the era of woke has trained them to always escalate. Gays were exactly like this, when a miss teen USA candidate verbally barfed on the idea of gay marriage, they were all over her. Normally they would escalate by calling someone's boss or digging into their personal life but when that fails as it increasingly does they escalate to fear tactics and criminality because those are the avenues that are left.
Click to expand...
I guess I remember stuff like that toward the end. But only after they had already more or less won. And even then not to anywhere near the same extent as what the trannies do. It's the sort of tactic that makes sense when you are in a position of strength and most of society is already on your side, and you are just sieging down isolated holdouts. And while trannies might be the tip of the spear on this, I think liberals in general have made the mistake of assuming they are in much more of a position of strength than they actually are. And now they can't understand why they are losing all of a sudden.
 
Last edited:
TruffleSpark said:
It's very 110 IQ behavior. It's the sort of thing you do when you are intelligent enough to know that you can organize your thoughts better than your opponent, but not so intelligent that you can find actual flaws in the core thesis of what your opponent says. So instead you just nitpick and act obtuse and willfully misinterpret things that clearly mean one thing but could technically be interpreted to mean another thing if you are really literal minded. Even though your opponent knows they are correct if they are someone in the 90-100 IQ range they probably won't be able to cross their T's and dot their I's enough to be able to explain why they are correct in a way that you can't find some sort of flaw in. People like this are so frustrating because you have to explain things in autistic detail to them in order to get them to understand it, and you need to play 20 questions with them to get them to say exactly what they mean because otherwise they will be intentionally misleading. Even if you can win against them, often it's such an exhausting task so it is easier to not bother picking the fight, so they end up winning through sheer attrition.

It wouldn't bother me as much if they held themselves to the same standards that they hold others to. But the moment you point out flaws in their logic, or even just minor grammar errors or heuristic definitions that can be misinterpreted they suddenly understand exactly how fallacious that is. It really shows that they are not interested in having a dialogue or understanding their opponent's position so much as they are just interested in using words and logic as a tool to beat people into submission.
Click to expand...

TL;DR, otherwise intelligent people waste a ton of brainpower in order to justify being as brain-dead retarded as possible.
 
Aero the Alcoholic Bat said:
TL;DR, otherwise intelligent people waste a ton of brainpower in order to justify being as brain-dead retarded as possible.
Click to expand...
It's the reason I find myself talking like a lawyer negotiating a contract when I'm online. Because if you aren't precise in your language you are inviting some midwit to try to do an epic own of you, and suddenly you are having a really tedious conversation where you try to explain something extremely obvious to them, and they act like you are the stupid one. And you do kind of look like the stupid one, because some things are so self-evidently true that if you find yourself having to explain something that everyone knows anyway it makes you look crazy.

This is why they do it, it's not just that they are stupid. It actually is an effective debate tactic. But it's the sort of thing you only do if you care about winning arguments more than you do about telling the truth.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom