Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Interesting take, but he's using a problem to push his shitlib leaf socialism without addressing how his system solves any of this. Homes aren't affordable because you imported millions of jeets, and let chinks buy up all your land while your veterans got MAID'd. You can't blame corporate greed and scarcity economics when you doubled the denominator.
can you pinpoint the moment he proposes this solution? because i may have missed it, but i don't see him suggesting neither socialism nor importing immigrants en masse
in fact i can't see any proposition
 
can you pinpoint the moment he proposes this solution? because i may have missed it, but i don't see him suggesting neither socialism nor importing immigrants en masse
in fact i can't see any proposition
He doesn’t in this video, but every other video in his feed. The video itself is standalone interesting, but I believe he made it to promote his feed/ideology he pushed in the main channel. In the linked video he talks about artificial scarcity with beanies and other fad items but fails to connect it to the increase in costs of homes. The way to connect it is to either talk about zoning restrictions which also artificially decrease supply by preventing construction, or by talking about increased demand and how that caused the jump in prices. As both are sore spots for leaf lefties, he just fails to connect and instead does a plea to emotions on how gen z has to cope with luxury as they’ll never have real wealth. As opposed to identifying why real wealth is harder to generate compared to the past.
 
He doesn’t in this video, but every other video in his feed. The video itself is standalone interesting, but I believe he made it to promote his feed/ideology he pushed in the main channel. In the linked video he talks about artificial scarcity with beanies and other fad items but fails to connect it to the increase in costs of homes. The way to connect it is to either talk about zoning restrictions which also artificially decrease supply by preventing construction, or by talking about increased demand and how that caused the jump in prices. As both are sore spots for leaf lefties, he just fails to connect and instead does a plea to emotions on how gen z has to cope with luxury as they’ll never have real wealth. As opposed to identifying why real wealth is harder to generate compared to the past.
i'd like you to actually link to a video where he proposes his actual ideology, scrolling through his feed it all seems to be this type of cultural analysis but i don't see any implication that he believes in socialism
 
i'd like you to actually link to a video where he proposes his actual ideology, scrolling through his feed it all seems to be this type of cultural analysis but i don't see any implication that he believes in socialism
Hey i appreciate the reply, but I went to his feed, I got things mixed up. He looks just like another guy with a similar video I saw recently, and got them confused. So I got confused on why there was such a different tone in content compared to his usual stuff. I noticed I hadn't watched any of his previous videos, watched a couple and skipped portions and realized this is someone else. Apologies for the confusion, I swear he looks/sounds just like some other guy that gets pushed in my feed but that's on my for the mixup. I see he actually addresses my concerns in
. I saw he fixates on the concept of rent which is only a part of the generational crisis, but if that's his angle then it's something I agree with.
 
Since I posted something I thought was cool, now I will post some things I find most UNCOOL.



 
ok the last one is most definitely a skit

but what the hell is going on I JUST heard about these things how are they already this big of a cultural phenomena

Viral marketing + Chink factor, this crap is for the type of Asians who buy high fashion brands as status symbols instead of out of some sort of appreciation for fashion. This shit was meant to appeal to insect brains.
 
Decent video but I fucking hate this intentionally quirky editing shit. You're not artsy or cool because you pointed your camera down 60* and cranked up the saturation. Also I fucking hate idles and anyone who uses their dogshit 'music' as anything other than mockery. Ok I admit, I said that halfway through. I take it back. It's just more fucking youtuber essayist slop. 20 minutes to say thing bad instead of just saying thing bad. Just like all the products here, just a void of time, meaningless shit pumped out to fill a niche with nothing further.
Since I posted something I thought was cool, now I will post some things I find most UNCOOL.
This reminded me of a video that I found in the fucking depths of my harddrive a couple months ago. Absolute fucking fire and brimstone is the only acceptable response to this creature. As an englishman we do not claim him, he must be one of the immigrants here probably from France judging by how gay and obnoxious he is.


It's like if you wanted to record a video but your only recording options were vine and it limited you to 7 seconds so you had to stitch 10 7 second clips together. Absolutely disgusting video.
 
Last edited:
Interesting take, but he's using a problem to push his shitlib leaf socialism without addressing how his system solves any of this. Homes aren't affordable because you imported millions of jeets, and let chinks buy up all your land while your veterans got MAID'd. You can't blame corporate greed and scarcity economics when you doubled the denominator.
He is a shitlib, but not due to focusing on immigration. When Europeans first came to settle the United States, there was literally zero housing, outside of indian tents, most of it was complete wild wasteland. People were coming in from Europe by the millions, but housing prices weren't an issue at all, because everybody just built their own houses. Even today, if you look at amish communities, it is normal for families to have 3-5 or more children, but very few of those kids stay with their family past 30, they get married and move in into their new freshly built homes.


Excuse me if I feel a little frustrated when I see people saying that we don't have enough housing for everyone while I can clearly see that the amish are able to build an entire barn in a SINGLE DAY, that could potentially house 50-100 people in bunk beds. We are getting btfo'd by people stuck living in 18th century, we have zero excuse.

The real issue, which is something these leftist shitlibs will never address is that housing is increasingly subject to stricter and stricter government regulations. Back in the 50-60s housing was super cheap, but it also possessed various toxic materials like lead, asbestos, PCBs, Polystyrene, arsenic, etc. People wish to get in a time machine and buy a house at that time period, but chances are, they'd doom one of their family members to die from preventable cancer or a stroke from living in such environment. Excluding things that I don't think anybody would argue was bad to remove, other things that became standard in recent decades were design reviews, community consultations, energy codes, environmental restrictions, regular inspections, etc. All of which costs money and is even worse in Europe, the land these shitlibs admire so much. Past a certain point, the private sector starts seeing building affordable housing as unprofitable and crank up the prices massively for tiny living spaces, particularly for urban areas, or resort to only building McMansions (which is it's own consoomerism rabbit hole with how kitsch they look).

To add insult to injury to all of this, in Gadafi's Libya housing was instituted as a human right. Everybody, regardless of their social standing had access to their own home. Granted, that was achievable in part due to all the insane oil money the country was sleeping on, but western countries even back in the 2000s were much richer than Libya. So we're getting not only btfo'd by the amish, we're getting btfo'd by a dead African dictator. Calling the state of modern housing a tragedy is an understatement - it's a comedy.
 
As much as I joke about the Beanie Baby mania from the 90's and how people were being stupid back then, at least there was variety. These things, Labubus, look all the same to me, and they're ugly as sin.
 
As much as I joke about the Beanie Baby mania from the 90's and how people were being stupid back then, at least there was variety. These things, Labubus, look all the same to me, and they're ugly as sin.
The video I posted above talks about the Beanie Baby thing for a bit. The part I found most interesting, though, was how he highlighted the fact that the Beanie Babies were shilled to people with disposable income as a speculative investment.
The whole thing started the same way other collectable "rare" things do, with a limited run of a specific toy:
1755016398950.webp

People got into it because they wanted to be able to buy something and have it "moon" like people do with shitcoins these days, but at least at the start, the elephant was like misprinted toys in the 80s in that it was a truly-limited run, not an artificial one. Now the companies will restrict certain things to make them artificially rare, and companies like Funko would rather throw away $30 million toys than continue to pay for the warehouse space to hold them. Thing is, who even is paying for this shit? The "Willy Wonka and Oompa Loompa Golden Ticket 2 pack" might be valued at $100,000, but who the fuck are these people actually buying it?

1755016667617.webp

To make it a bit more personal to the site, eBay had some Chris-coin listings for like $500 but they aren't there anymore; nor do I see them in the "sold" listings, either. Far as I can tell, either eBay had the sellers take it down, or they weren't getting any buyers at the price they wanted so they removed the listing.

Meanwhile, on eBalubu, the highest-priced confirmed sales I could find were for this Vans collab:
1755017103994.webp

But after that all sales drop into the 4-digits, max.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, on eBalubu, the highest-priced confirmed sales I could find were for this Vans collab:
I'd like to know who bought these

I personally hold that when something like this gets sold in this way it's pretty much never a person buying it as a person would, it's always a company, some elite with a plan for it, being sold to oneself or a friend to inflate prices, or money just being moved around
it hardly ever done by some joe who actually wants this in a collection
 
I hate to say it but women are responsible for almost all of this shit. They are hyper consoomers and must be part of every trend and fag. Pretty much every time you see a man on this its being a grifting social media clout chasing faggot, not an actual end consoomer.

While men certainly piss away money on dumb shit, its usually limited to 1 or 2 hobbies 90% of the time. Its usually just cars, or guns, or shoes, or power tools one specific thing.
Interesting take, but he's using a problem to push his shitlib leaf socialism without addressing how his system solves any of this. Homes aren't affordable because you imported millions of jeets, and let chinks buy up all your land while your veterans got MAID'd. You can't blame corporate greed and scarcity economics when you doubled the denominator.

Edit: Ignore my take on shitlib leafs, i got him confused with another similar looking creator.
While very true, people today spend a lot of money on retarded shit people 20-30 years didnt. For example doggy fucking daycare. Asked a woman at work how much she spends a day to take her dog to doggy daycare. $20. Thats $100 a week, $400 a month.
 
I'd like to know who bought these

I personally hold that when something like this gets sold in this way it's pretty much never a person buying it as a person would, it's always a company, some elite with a plan for it, being sold to oneself or a friend to inflate prices, or money just being moved around
Much like with how things go in the art world i refuse to believe it's anything else besides money laundering/tax shenanigans. There's no way this shit will appreciate in value (no one will even remember Labubu by next year) and anyone who has $200.000 at hand to drop on a Funkopop will know that, too. It's all borderline, if not full-blown, white collar crime.
 
Oh, anybody can tell me what the big deal about dubai chocolate is? I noticed that whenever consoomer products are brought up, this brand of chocolate gets frequently referenced. I don't know why though, I mean... It's chocolate. Maybe it has something similar akin to the "prime" drink or mr. beast edibles, where it becomes popular as a fad and quickly disappears from store shelves? But I don't think it's associated with any e-celeb. The most I can guess is that it's supposed to market travel to Dubai, but like... what kind of idiot would travel to such an exotic place over chocolate?
 
But I don't think it's associated with any e-celeb. The most I can guess is that it's supposed to market travel to Dubai, but like... what kind of idiot would travel to such an exotic place over chocolate?
One theory I've seen is that the major push of Dubai Chocolate is from the Indians themselves to cover up the times when Instagram whores would be paid by wealthy Indian men to travel to Dubai with expensive shopping trips and the like so they could shit and piss on the women for sexual pleasure. Before the influx of this shit, searching up Dubai chocolate would apparently show stuff like that, but now it's being covered up.
 
reportedly the actual Dubai Chocolate is made by only a single company in Dubai, and they've had legal trouble with all these other brands imitating it and calling it the same thing
 
Back
Top Bottom