Its free. Most of America only sees foot traffic from broken down cars. You are completely safe because people won't intentionally drive on a shoulder except in emergencies, yet will drive on a sidewalk in exponentially more cases.
Lmao.
I don't think you'll have to worry about it in your bedroom in your parents house.
I already made one you absolute retard cuck.
I think the misunderstanding here is the road that the Hohol was complaining about was in the middle of nowhere:
Which is what @Bonesjones was referring to when he said:
Not surprising. Remember when Pete Buttplug made a big deal about cycling to his office, after being dropped off maybe a few blocks away by his big security detail?
Not surprised.
Just like how Al Gore was pro-climate change until it benefitted him. Nothing really changes.
They probably just complain why they won't let them ride in with their bikes and have to sit outside on a lawnchair if they do. Actually I could imagine one of them taking a photo of them sitting on a lawn chair at a drive in posting it to r/fuckcars to make a point how "you don't really need a car".
Its the quintissential reddit-ism of smugging over a very easy to support or logical concept so much it start to sounds retarded, irrational and unfeasible, simply because they want to use it as a vehicle for further faggotry or just the simple fact that they're really fucking annoying about it
It's hilarious how these urbanists and redditors think Elon Musk's visionary ideas like the tunnel or hyperloop are ridiculous (not agreeing or disagreeing), but are OK with this Ponzi scheme of a project that endlessly consumed time and resources and has gone no where.
They can't even draw the obvious conclusions from fucking SNCF withdrawing from the project. Or is that the car/oil companies' fault?
Yeah well the SNCF is a French company. France is in Europe. You know what else is in Europe? That's right, Russia, chud.
Hey so not fully related, but I don't know anyone remembers one time I mentioned the idea of armored vehicles becoming an optional extra you can order at the dealer after Tesla is the trend setter. Well Volvo just came out with this.
Pretty sure they had some ultimatum to CAHSR, basically "tell us how you intend to finish this thing and/or why you haven't done much at all" and that's what led to it getting defunded.Trump making urbanists seethe:
Well armored cars are typically sold by custom coach companies usually for diplomats and other high priority targets, but still it's just the society we seem to live in.
Does no one remember the BMW commercials from the 90s that were like short films?
This is moreso a marketing stunt than a serious attempt at an armored car. By their own admission it's only resistant against pistol calibers.
Yeah, that's sort of why I found it interesting it was a video put out by an official OEM. They even mentioned cases in the video like armed hijacking or kidnapping so it's like they're acknowledging the rise in prevalence of those use cases. The only thing they're missing is when a group of melonated gang of "cyclists" tries to attack you.
That does seem to be the use case for light applications like this though. They're aiming more for concealment to maintain it's look as a normal SUV over an explicit armored car. It probably isn't aimed toward an actual VIP like a politician, but instead maybe someone who's well to do, but needs extra protection. I don't think it's fully just a marketing stunt. It seems to be a real product they're trying to offer.
