💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.4%
  • Total voters
    694
I wonder.
If Aaron finally TROs that whore OUR WIFE Kayla, like he should, will Mama Swinger Rekieta The Trust Fund Bish pay for her attorney too? Or only put up a token amount for Kayla, but fight to the death for junkie---pointless but...

Wanna bet those swinger douchebag rekieta parents would pay for junkie attorney BUT NOT so much for whore wife? Ever know any in-laws that loved their own adult kid more than the married spouse much less maybe not even as much as the grandbabies... We already know Melton cannot afford lawyers.

Just sayin
 
I'm probably late on this:
Did Monty drop the case because he wanted Nick to stop calling him a pedophile? Think about it, if Nick goes back to calling him a pedo, then he could hypothetically sue him again for defamation. If Nick gets sued, that would get him into serious trouble with his probation? I could be wrong: is it possible that because Monty dropped the suit, he's not allowed to sue again? I don't know, that's why I'm asking.
 
john marston said:
I'm probably late on this:
Did Monty drop the case because he wanted Nick to stop calling him a pedophile? Think about it, if Nick goes back to calling him a pedo, then he could hypothetically sue him again for defamation. If Nick gets sued, that would get him into serious trouble with his probation? I could be wrong: is it possible that because Monty dropped the suit, he's not allowed to sue again? I don't know, that's why I'm asking.
Click to expand...
It was probably down to purchasing power. Unfortunately good will and charity can only go so far against petrofac trust funds and an unscrupulous, unethical lawyer already punished by the bar.
1752269298811.webp
Sadly, in the real world, oftentimes the bad guys win by default because they're better equipped.
Randazza is worse than any opposing counsel Nick has ever faced.
He was suspended by the Nevada Bar for conflict of interest and self-dealing, blurred ethical lines when representing extremist clients and is a philosophical hypocrite, both promoting and attacking Anti-SLAPP whenever convenient.
 
Last edited:
I can foresee Aaron bring in the ex-wife as a witness to testify that she has asked Melton to stop before. I would not be shocked if she also files one at the same time.

The fags are saying that Nick's hearing has been moved to the 23rd as well and he and the pedo are using the same lawyer.
 
Edward Teach said:
I can foresee Aaron bring in the ex-wife as a witness to testify that she has asked Melton to stop before. I would not be shocked if she also files one at the same time.
Click to expand...
This would be wise. Aaron should 100% use the attacks on his daughter to make sure Melton hurts for a year.
WATP Karl's excuse for Melton's behaviour is that "Aaron paraded her around to own Nick after his arrest".

So fucking what? You attack a child for her father's behaviour? Make gross comments about her weight, face, sexual organs? How does that make her fair game?

Edward Teach said:
The fags are saying that Nick's hearing has been moved to the 23rd as well and he and the pedo are using the same lawyer.
Click to expand...
That means its Francis White aka "Barneswalker".

Melton legit is just taking marching orders from Nick hahaha, this is the same lawyer that failed to challenge probable cause in the Omnibus hearing. This is the same lawyer that Nick resents because he wouldn't let Nick do what he wanted and attempted a real (if failed) legal strategy.

Oh god I hope they both fuck it up, they're gonna be so mad at eachother and Melton is going to be furious that his sacred cashcow has him in a bind for a year, entirely because of Rekieta's fucking retard lawyer.
 
Illuminati Order Official said:
The rule always was "If you know about illegal
activity, report it to the authorities, not to Kiwi Farms, we can't do anything about it". Nothing gayopy happened here and Aaron is not bound by our rules.
Click to expand...
More specifically, the rule has always if you are gonna report anything to the authorities concerning lolcows, keep your damn mouth shut about it here.

john marston said:
I'm probably late on this:
Did Monty drop the case because he wanted Nick to stop calling him a pedophile?
Click to expand...
No. I am pretty sure he dropped it for the reasons he said he did. He simply couldn't put together the scratch to take it all the way.

john marston said:
Think about it, if Nick goes back to calling him a pedo, then he could hypothetically sue him again for defamation. If Nick gets sued, that would get him into serious trouble with his probation? I could be wrong: is it possible that because Monty dropped the suit, he's not allowed to sue again? I don't know, that's why I'm asking.
Click to expand...
He can hypothetically sue again, as it's not dismissed with prejudice. The issue here is he might have a harder go of it if he tried now, because Minnesota has implemented an anti-SLAPP law after Monty sued. One that, despite Randazza's claims to the contrary, would not have applied to his soon to be dismissed case. He probably would be able to clear the new anti-SLAAP, but having one just makes things more difficult for a plaintiff.

The bitch of is, Monty had a good path forward here legally. Just not financially.
 
The HRO Aaron took out on Melton is being shared on NLO, here's what's been up so far (these are screengrabs, so apologies for the imperfections):
1752270173717.webp 1752270252674.webp 1752270407064.webp 1752270451514.webp 1752270524688.webp
It's not as impressive as Nick's, so I'm wondering if Karl from Rochester and Moody the Gay Iraqi Kiwi are holding sections back. Obviously, it was enough for the judge to grant it.

Edit: they brought it back up, so far 7 pages of 28? Will add more if they show it.
Edit to add: completed last page above, and more:
1752271227157.webp 1752271351130.webp 1752272362157.webp 1752273289506.webp 1752273484965.webp 1752273700154.webp
I'm skipping over blank pages and those with no info.
1752274054124.webp 1752274194388.webp 1752274452411.webp 1752274760454.webp 1752274950718.webp 1752275212456.webp 1752275321924.webp 1752275520185.webp 1752275717386.webp
This seems to be all they had for this stream.
 
Last edited:
john marston said:
Did Monty drop the case because he wanted Nick to stop calling him a pedophile?
Click to expand...
He started the lawsuit because he wanted Nick to not call him a pedophile with no evidence. He dropped the suit because he couldn't continue to afford it. Discovery is the most expensive part of the lawsuit, and Nick and Randazza were running up the bill with stupid motions.

There's a reason people/companies with more resources do that to people without them: because it works.
john marston said:
Think about it, if Nick goes back to calling him a pedo, then he could hypothetically sue him again for defamation. If Nick gets sued, that would get him into serious trouble with his probation?
Click to expand...
No, as far as I could tell, it'd be a civil issue, not a criminal issue.
john marston said:
I could be wrong: is it possible that because Monty dropped the suit, he's not allowed to sue again? I don't know, that's why I'm asking.
Click to expand...
If he wants to drop a lawsuit, he can. If he wants to bring a new lawsuit, he could do that too. It'd be under Minnesota's new anti-SLAPP laws that didn't apply to his previous lawsuit (but Nick/his attorney pretended applied to it).
Vibralldo said:
If Nick robs Melton of his golden cow and I was melton I'd be pissed. Melton would have to make Nick the new focus of NLO.
Click to expand...
If Nick's faggotry gets Melton to lose Aaron, it could get really funny, really fast. I bet they know things about each other that would make it really bad really fast, and only one of the two is currently on probation. You think Nick manages to get a W when the lawsuit gets dismissed against him, only for his former tolerator (who has dirt on him) to go after him instead.

It'd be the most heartwarming scenario: the worst faggots you know are all suffering.
DiabeticSydePhil said:
'Do not harass or have direct/indirect contact' = 'let me talk about it on my show right after Aaron got in trouble for indirect violations by doing a show'
Click to expand...
If your show can't survive without a-logging Aaron, you don't deserve to have a show. Also should probably kill yourself if you rely on making fun of Aaron to pay your bills. Yikes.
 
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
The HRO Aaron took out on Melton is being shared on NLO, here's what's been up so far (these are screengrabs, so apologies for the imperfections):
View attachment 7631548 View attachment 7631552 View attachment 7631562 View attachment 7631564 View attachment 7631570 View attachment 7631584
It's not as impressive as Nick's, so I'm wondering if Karl from Rochester and Moody the Gay Iraqi Kiwi are holding sections back. Obviously, it was enough for the judge to grant it.

Edit: they brought it back up, so far 7 pages of 28? Will add more if they show it.
Click to expand...
There's no way he didn't mention the cupholder and daughter ai voices

That's the only way I could see them granting restraining orders against Melton for Aaron's kid but not granting protective orders against Nick
 
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
The HRO Aaron took out on Melton is being shared on NLO, here's what's been up so far (these are screengrabs, so apologies for the imperfections):
View attachment 7631548 View attachment 7631552 View attachment 7631562 View attachment 7631564 View attachment 7631570 View attachment 7631584
It's not as impressive as Nick's, so I'm wondering if Karl from Rochester and Moody the Gay Iraqi Kiwi are holding sections back. Obviously, it was enough for the judge to grant it.

Edit: they brought it back up, so far 7 pages of 28? Will add more if they show it.
Click to expand...
1752270799269.webp
That is very interesting, the time period Aaron petitioned for sharing of private sexual images is the dates that Hackamania occured.
Also this looks incredibly incomplete. Aaron couldn't have been successfully awarded this TRO without giving context to these dates.
I hope we get to see the granted ex parte motion sometime soon from a source, because this looks nothing like Aaron's successful application against Nick.
 
Last edited:
I guess petrofac trust fund money is more powerful than the sonichu medallion... You only lose a house and hundreds of thousands of dollars instead of getting your life ruined.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom