UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs

7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.

 

[Kofi Drinka]

Does anyone know precisely why they want to map the genome of people. If anyone believes it's to stop bad health then they're weapons grade retarded.

DNA database for the police. They already use the public ones and pretend they don't.

Money. Selling the DNA of every person born is a good way to make some cash.

Farage is officially a race traitor. No mention of the future of Great Britain or our interest.

View attachment 7539867
Link Archive

Tice falling in line with the jews
View attachment 7539934
Link Archive

Haven't Farage's past groups all been funded by and had internal Israeli handlers? The Friends of Israel groups are influencing British politics from behind the scenes and no one investigates them. They leech onto every party and twist it to be pro-Israel. Bringing them to light would be helpful to identifying who is a bought asset.

Hitler winning wouldn't have improved anything we're experiencing,and would arguably have made things worse, by giving Germany control over Britain's Imperial possessions and making us subservient to a foreign power, run by a man from a culture known for several centuries for its perverse sexual desires and an obsession with shit.

You're describing Starmer. He has more loyalty to Judaism than Britain. Perverse sexual desires and an obsession with shit is as Jewish as they come.

 

[anklyscr]

Because sluts like this have thin skin, they want you to provide your driving license and passport so that your hurty words can be punished

Fuck off retard.
The reason why these “people” are so unhappy with these tattle sites and other social media is because the plebs can finally talk back to them. It used be a one way system they told the plebs what to think and how to think about them. They managed their entire public persona. It was a perfect facade hiding all the skeletons behind.

Now with twitter et al the public can leak anything and post their opinions anonymously and the “celebs” don’t like it.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Fuck off retard.
The reason why these “people” are so unhappy with these tattle sites and other social media is because the plebs can finally talk back to them. It used be a one way system they told the plebs what to think and how to think about them. They managed their entire public persona. It was a perfect facade hiding all the skeletons behind.

Now with twitter et al the public can leak anything and post their opinions anonymously and the “celebs” don’t like it.

Are you calling me a retard, or the celebrities a retard?

 

[Zoot]

arguably have made things worse,

Hitler was right. Those that fought him were wrong and brought on the genocide of the European peoples through Jewish control.

 

[Otterly]

In the same way, yes Lucy did commit a crime

She may have committed a crime, bit she did nothing wrong. When you can do something that’s not wrong, and it’s a crime, then you’ve got a problem with your laws. What she said was something like ‘they could burn them (asylum hotels) down for all i care.’
Arson is a crime. Saying you don’t particularly care if every asylum hotel gets lit up is an opinion. There is no way with her reach that anyone would read what she said and go burn down an asylum hotel.
They are not equivalent. I could, for example, say that it’d be a kind of cosmic justice if after being released she became guy Fawkes 2.0, because the only thing worth preserving in Westminster is the architecture. That’s hyperbole, and a sort of joke. If I’m caught in an under cellar with a truckload of c4, I’m in commission of a crime.
The current government is letting bad people DO bad things and locking up people for SAYING angry opinions. We have a problem.

Does anyone know precisely why they want to map the genome of people. If anyone believes it's to stop bad health then they're weapons grade retarded.

How tin foil hat d’you want it?
From least to most;
Benefits health of nation (as if.)
Can be used to supplement police database
Can be sold to megacorps for megabucks
Can be part of the social credit/control grid
Can be used to create ethnically targeted weapons

 

[teriyakiburns]

Matt Lucas and David Walliams

Matt Lucas is weird looking, but I don't know whether or not I'd classify him as perverted just based on his looks (it's everything else he does that sets off the alarms). David Walliams I can absolutely believe is as rapey cunt. Just look at him:



He exudes a constant aura of smug rapery. You can tell he's constantly ogling small boys in his mind's eye just by the expression on his face.

 

[Tom Nook's Gloryhole]

If Starmer gets involved in this Jews vs Iran shit, will that kill of the rest of labour dwindling voter base?

Might fuck reform as well as the Jew side will be the fake right positon and the Jews have probably already bribed the party anyway.

I don't give a shit about Iran but I'll be happy to take to the streets in protest over joining the war if it's the thing that kills off Starmer. Sure I'll be walking side by side with the cunts that I want shot deported, but it's a risk I'm willing to take.

 

[Tragon Dirtle]

Matt Lucas is weird looking, but I don't know whether or not I'd classify him as perverted just based on his looks (it's everything else he does that sets off the alarms). David Walliams I can absolutely believe is as rapey cunt. Just look at him:

View attachment 7540453

He exudes a constant aura of smug rapery. You can tell he's constantly ogling small boys in his mind's eye just by the expression on his face.

If you watch the video, Matt Lucas is the one that sexually assaulted him, not David.

 

[Tom Nook's Gloryhole]

I remember ages back, like 2004ish when a comedian made a joke about Matt Lucas not only being not the only gay in the village, but not the only gay in the duo. David Walliams was absolutely fucking furious at the time, but somehow hasn't ever been seen publicly with a woman.

Pretty sure that was a subtle way of exposing him that was shut down.

 

[teriyakiburns]

If you watch the video, Matt Lucas is the one that sexually assaulted him, not David.

I did. Wasn't my point.

 

[Tragon Dirtle]

I remember ages back, like 2004ish when a comedian made a joke about Matt Lucas not only being not the only gay in the village, but not the only gay in the duo. David Walliams was absolutely fucking furious at the time, but somehow hasn't ever been seen publicly with a woman.

Pretty sure that was a subtle way of exposing him that was shut down.

Walliams was married to and had kids with model Lara Stone for like 10 years. I also mentioned that he's been accused of inappropriateness towards young women - men just always focus on men preying on boys and conceptualising it as gay (only happening to boys) because they don't care about it happening to girls. It's like the priest scandals also involved many girl victims, but you never hear about it, because men don't care and want to make it a male on male homosexuals only problem.

I did. Wasn't my point.

Okay. People itt usually don't read beyond the headlines or what's actually being discussed, so I assumed you hadn't either.

 

[Zoot]

The protest party in Britain is completely captured by ZOG

Link Archive

 

[>IMPLYING]

Hitler was right. Those that fought him were wrong and brought on the genocide of the European peoples through Jewish control.

Jews were a problem in Germany (and Russia, to a lesser extent) due to high number of them and their disproportionate presence relative to the native population in education, finance and press. The same thing happened (is currently happening) to America in some regard, but in the UK our Jews were relatively well turned out. Even the Rothschilds were remarkably loyal (funded Wellington, bought the Suez right out from under the French), but even back in the 1910s the influence/number of Jews entrenched within high and influential positions in the USA was known, even to the UK. The infamous "Balfour Declaration" was another cynical attempt to draw America into the first world war, because it had Zionists lean on American politicians to have them enter it because if the UK won, it meant we could give them the land they thought themselves entitled to — only for us to drag our feet and then ultimately decide to give it to the Arabs instead (very funny) until WW2 happened. (Look up "The White Paper" and conclusions drawn from the "Peel Commission")

I think the danger of idolising Hitler too much is you'll put what is less of a problem in the UK (Jews) over a more pressing one (Muslims). It's why you'll occasionally see the occasional "Muslims are based!" remark from some American wignat because they haven't experienced widespread problems as a result of their presence in America compared to the overt ones caused by Jews (AIPAC). Jewish dominance over American politics is scattered but after Israel was established the true Zionists mostly abided by their ideology, and went to Israel. It's why in 1956 America ultimately acted against Israel in the Suez Crisis, and it would take until the Yon Kippur war for Israel to look threatened enough for AIPAC to get millions of dollars (mostly from Jews, many of whom never even went to Israel) and thus actual sway over the American government. In the 80s Gerald Ford came very close to demoting Israel's importance until congress (which was now being leant on by AIPAC) advised him otherwise. So the only country has a Jewish problem in present is America (and it's mostly a problem embedded in the past 60 years), and because the West by and large is downwind from America (as loathe as some would admit), it makes them an indirect problem to us also — but all we need to do on our end is assert our own identity and not imitate the American right-wing socially, economically, or politically.

To make Jews a problem in the UK, you tend to have to make some contrivances and loose tethers of connection between groups, ideas and individuals in order for it to work, which isn't as convincing as pointing to the Muslim who is in a position of power and is pro-immigration. You can create a flow chart of how they became a problem: Immigrants act 1971 -> British Nationality Act 1981 -> Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2002 -> Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 -> Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009. The most recent 3 are the most damaging. 2002 is responsible for stateless peoples being allowed to stay here, and made it so that the secretary of state can only deprive someone of their British citizenship if they're a dual citizen, which is probably the most annoying obstacle for getting rid of anyone, especially if we can't determine where the person is a citizen of.

By giving too much credit to the Jews, you make them too powerful, and take much of the responsibility out of the hands of the traitors and selfish cunts who did all this to begin with. Labour not only traded rapes for votes, they did the same for a lot of young people's futures when they opened up the borders (and so did the Tories, when they kept their foot in place to keep it from closing).



P.S.
Hitler acknowledged his economical goals (conquering everything to the East) would only work with a British alliance as to protect their West flank, but he made no real attempt to attain said alliance or if he did, it was ultimately sabotaged by the retard Ribbentrop.
Furthermore, Hitler was a figure meant to address German problems via a uniquely German solution.
What you really need is a figure meant to address British problems via a uniquely British solution.

 

[Kofi Drinka]

men just always focus on men preying on boys and conceptualising it as gay (only happening to boys) because they don't care about it happening to girls. It's like the priest scandals also involved many girl victims, but you never hear about it, because men don't care and want to make it a male on male homosexuals only problem.

Could you stop? The grooming gangs also target young boys and use them the same way they do girls. No one talks about that either.

Child sexual abuse is wrong. Bias reporting of it doesn't help any one and trying to play the victim over it not mentioning one sex or another is political theater to virtue signal. Men are the ones talking about little girls being abused by pakis and ignoring the little boys being raped and tortured the same way. It doesn't mean they don't care about either group, it means that's the narrative of the story and if you stop the sexual abuse it stops it for boys and girls.

To make Jews a problem in the UK, you tend to have to make some contrivances and loose tethers of connection between groups, ideas and individuals in order for it to work, which isn't as convincing as pointing to the Muslim who is in a position of power and is pro-immigration

You could look up the people pushing mass immigration and see their ethnicity. It's not a loose tether of connections.

 

[BongoMongo]

Matt Lucas is weird looking, but I don't know whether or not I'd classify him as perverted just based on his looks (it's everything else he does that sets off the alarms). David Walliams I can absolutely believe is as rapey cunt. Just look at him:

View attachment 7540453

He exudes a constant aura of smug rapery. You can tell he's constantly ogling small boys in his mind's eye just by the expression on his face.

Lucas looks weird cos he has alopecia. Poor bastard can't help it.

Walliams looks weird cos you absolutely know he's fucked kids at some point.

 

[DreinMeinVein]

You aren't responsible for what idiots on social media do. Your free speech limits shouldn't be "Maybe Abdulah will hurt someone because of this post." We have to stop building culture around Twitter

Welcome to the farms, fren.

I agree with you that we shouldn't build culture around sites like Xitter. I'm with you on that. As a general rule I like freedom of expression too, so I worded my post carefully.
I do believe that some people (not you, not me) have some responsibility over what they post; big accounts with lots of easily led followers. Rogue Imams, for example, who use social media to extend their reach and call for more random stabbings should probably face the wall.

Or, let's pretend Peter Tatchell addresses his 100k following of super-poofs:
he tells them all to @ their friends and engage in a Million Man Wankoff outside a primary school... and then it happens. Mess everywhere.
I would argue that Peter Tatchell would be responsible for that happening, if he pushed for it.

My disagreement would not be "building a culture around Twitter",
nor would it be a hypothetical outside the realms of possibility. Tatchell is fucking disgusting.
Get me?

I also agree that Made In Wales does a nice digest of the news and normal people should be free to drop a spicy tweet; that's a TOS issue rather than a legal issue.
Stay cool. I think we're expecting a storm here tonight.

 

[Tony Martin's Force Ghost]

Goddamn it, at least we have Chris Lilley by technicality. The shit he made in the 2000s could not be done nowadays.

 

[Zoot]

What you really need is a figure meant to address British problems via a uniquely British solution.

Personally, I think we need someone who can make the European people see it is our problem.

Edit: Oswald Mosley

 

[Phalanges Mycologist]

Illustrator Aljoscha Quooss has made several tiktoks alleging that Matt Lucas sexually assaulted him, and that Matt Lucas and David Walliams have been working together to sexually assault many young men in the creative industries over the last 20 years.

There has been credible accusation thrown around about him for years like people working on projects with him telling younger men "Don't be caught alone with Walliams", he was a BBC darling for a while so they did the circle the waggons thing they do to all nonces with the right connections to burry the story an dropped him when he was getting too open about it, the BBC hasn't changed one iota since Savil and won't as a institution it's corrupt to it's very core and needs removing as a whole.

They have been working overtime protecting someone quite famous out of the old guard for some time now and when that blows up an it will in the next 12 months it will all come down, the person in question is renound internationally so they will not want to admit it till it all comes out, an when it does bye bye BBC.

 

[teriyakiburns]

the person in question is renound internationally so they will not want to admit it till it all comes out, an when it does bye bye BBC.

The way you put it, I'm thinking either Attenborough (institutional weight), or god willing David Tenant, who had a media blitz about his "controversial secrets" last year, designed to bury any attempt to search up on him behind pages of "David Tenant has an extra toe!" Granted, Tenant is not old guard as such, but I nevertheless cannot wait to see his smug mug ground into the dirt for a bunch of reasons. Even though I thought he was great in Good Omens, he's still a smarmy cunt.