💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.3%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.6%
  • Total voters
    685
AnOminous said:
I don't know his motivation but yes, he did that. He put it in a legal filing that Nick is committing crimes.
Click to expand...
>Charges obscene amounts of money to bankrupt Nick
>Ditches Nick on a trial day
>Puts that Nick is committing a crime in a legal filing
Is Marc a kiwi?
 
1750463577861.webp
Runkle of the Bailey landed the first interview of part of Karen Read's defense team (before the networks or even Court TV). 30k watching him and the chat is running like a machinegun.

3 years ago, this would have been Nick
 
Potentially Criminal said:
View attachment 7533851
Runkle of the Bailey landed the first interview of part of Karen Read's defense team (before the networks or even Court TV). 30k watching him and the chat is running like a machinegun.

3 years ago, this would have been Nick
Click to expand...
It coulda been Nick now if he apologized after jail and got back on the grind

Speaking of which, Nick hasn't tweeted in 6 hours. Does he sleep during the day now?
 
Biggus McDickus said:
Nick knows deep down that he'll fail to keep the bodycam footage private upon the case going to the court of appeal. As has been noted, the videos WERE entered into evidence. I do not believe that he is merely afraid of the World seeing his drug den and the squalid conditions. I think it's more. He also knows that the entire footage will be analyzed to an autistic degree. It's what we do.

We're going to find something in that footage. Something he's aware that's there. It's not a moment in the clips, it's an area of the house. Something that's going to explain things in more detail. Offering some clarity on something we have been debating for a long time. If I was to guess I think it's something that it's so bad that it makes even current day Nick look like a merely grumpy guy on the Internet.

I think it's going to reveal the manner in which his daughter was being dosed. And it's not going to be good... We are going to find things that the police themselves even overlooked. Just my opinion of course. I do not claim to know this as fact.

You're going to hate him much more than you do. (In my opinion). Soon.
Click to expand...
There might be some dark secret, and The Farms will find it, given the chance.

However, I think Nick's built of house of lies around not just the footage but his arrest and conviction, and having the footage displayed and analyzed, as you suggest, will break him. His lies across the year+ will come to light, and some of the dumber followers will break ranks. It may also be he's promised to April or maybe even Kayla it won't come out, and this could be the last straw for either or both of them with Nick.

What lies? The state of the house and the obvious fake photos. The state of the family. How hap-hazard they were with leaving drugs and probably other unsafe items around, like the gun under the bed. The state of the bathroom and the dog. The mess, just everywhere. The uncut grass. Nick's account of what happened between the police and him, versus the official record. Nick's fantasy of himself can't deal with us having that info, those recordings.

Nick cares most about himself and somehow he's tied himself to this battle. I'm not so confident it will come out, but I'll be here for it if/(hopefully) when it does.
 
Potentially Criminal said:
View attachment 7533851
Runkle of the Bailey landed the first interview of part of Karen Read's defense team (before the networks or even Court TV). 30k watching him and the chat is running like a machinegun.

3 years ago, this would have been Nick
Click to expand...
I’m not sure how to translate “lawyer” into Quenya - “axanatar”? But a hearty toast to Lawgolas for forsaking the Straight Road and becoming a lawtuber of excellence instead.

If only Nick had cast his Balldo ring into the fire.
 
Potentially Criminal said:
View attachment 7533851
Runkle of the Bailey landed the first interview of part of Karen Read's defense team (before the networks or even Court TV). 30k watching him and the chat is running like a machinegun.

3 years ago, this would have been Nick
Click to expand...
Ian asked about how social media impacted the trial. David mentioned they had the team looking at stuff and took ideas from it. Bob gave call outs to having watched Ian, Andrea, and several others that he was watching to see unique perspectives. (Sorry Sean, no direct call-out for you.)

Somehow Rekieta "law" was not included. Maybe if there is litigation in the future on casseroles, Nick might get a +1.
 
Considering all those typos in tweets this morning I assume he finally hit the wall where drugs couldn't keep him going and passed out.

He'll be back at some point promising more streams that don't happen.

Radio silence from Nick surely means trouble in paradise.
 
Alessi just called out the Ham Sandwich meme! Sean vindicated!!!

No balldo references, Nick still blown out like his asshole.
(Edit to add: it could have been about the ARCA ham sandwich, but I think in the context it was Sean.)
 
SigmaBalls said:
I imagine there's also some legal niggerdry in not being able to publicly disclose that Nick is a BROKE ASS GOBLIN BODIED NIGGA that can't afford $1k/hr anymore. Would like to hear from a practicing attorney though;

@Potentially Criminal Could you clue us in? Is Randazza not allowed to publicly say that the Law Pope is legally BROKE(DICK)?
Click to expand...
You can do a read between the lines thing with your motions if you ever see:

"the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled"

That's typically what is called a "Rule 1"* violation when you may speak off the record with the court. The old timer judges love that joke as much as "Mr. Green is unavailable"


*Rule 1 is: get paid

Dixieland Buckaroo said:
Ian asked about how social media impacted the trial. David mentioned they had the team looking at stuff and took ideas from it. Bob gave call outs to having watched Ian, Andrea, and several others that he was watching to see unique perspectives. (Sorry Sean, no direct call-out for you.)
Click to expand...
Calling Hank Brennan a "faggot" to his face is something they already thought about before they listened to me. I like to think I provide insight, but I doubt those guys could glean much from a 105iq attorney
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom