💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Is this why he is sweating the most recent ethical investigation so much?

I surely hope so. That and the felony admission.

And allow me to provide additional support for the seriousness of violations of Rules, etc., mentioned above - as they are enshrined in statute:

481.02 UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW.​

Subdivision 1.​

It shall be unlawful for any person or association of persons, except members of the bar of Minnesota admitted and licensed to practice as attorneys at law, to appear as attorney or counselor at law in any action or proceeding in any court in this state to maintain, conduct, or defend the same, except personally as a party thereto in other than a representative capacity, or, by word, sign, letter, or advertisement, to hold out as competent or qualified to give legal advice or counsel, or to prepare legal documents, or as being engaged in advising or counseling in law or acting as attorney or counselor at law, or in furnishing to others the services of a lawyer or lawyers, or, for a fee or any consideration, to give legal advice or counsel, perform for or furnish to another legal services, or, for or without a fee or any consideration, to prepare, directly or through another, for another person, firm, or corporation, any will or testamentary disposition or instrument of trust serving purposes similar to those of a will, or, for a fee or any consideration, to prepare for another person, firm, or corporation, any other legal document, except as provided in subdivision 3.

Subd. 2.​

No corporation, organized for pecuniary profit, except an attorney's professional firm organized under chapter 319B, by or through its officers or employees or any one else, shall maintain, conduct, or defend, except in its own behalf when a party litigant, any action or proceeding in any court in this state, or shall, by or through its officers or employees or any one else, give or assume to give legal advice or counsel or perform for or furnish to another person or corporation legal services; or shall, by word, sign, letter, or advertisement, solicit the public or any person to permit it to prepare, or cause to be prepared, any will or testamentary disposition or instrument of trust serving purposes similar to those of a will, or hold itself out as desiring or willing to prepare any such document, or to give legal advice or legal services relating thereto or to give general legal advice or counsel, or to act as attorney at law or as supplying, or being in a position to supply, the services of a lawyer or lawyers; or shall to any extent engage in, or hold itself out as being engaged in, the business of supplying services of a lawyer or lawyers; or shall cause to be prepared any person's will or testamentary disposition or instrument of trust serving purposes similar to those of a will, or any other legal document, for another person, firm, or corporation, and receive, directly or indirectly, all or a part of the charges for such preparation or any benefits therefrom; or shall itself prepare, directly or through another, any such document for another person, firm, or corporation, except as provided in subdivision 3.

Subd. 8.​

(a) Any person or corporation, or officer or employee thereof, violating any of the foregoing provisions shall be guilty of a misdemeanor; and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as by statute provided for the punishment of misdemeanors. It shall be the duty of the respective county attorneys in this state to prosecute violations of this section, and the district courts of this state shall have sole original jurisdiction of any such offense under this section.

No wonder he doesn't want to get in good standing:481.06 GENERAL DUTIES.Every attorney at law shall:

(1) observe and carry out the terms of the attorney's oath;

(2) maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers;

(3) counsel or maintain such causes only as appear to the attorney legal and just; but the attorney shall not refuse to defend any person accused of a public offense;

(4) employ, for the maintenance of causes confided to the attorney, such means only as are consistent with truth, and never seek to mislead the judges by any artifice or false statement of fact or law;

(5) keep inviolate the confidences of the attorney's client, abstain from offensive personalities, and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless the justice of the cause requires it;

(6) encourage the commencement or continuation of no action or proceeding from motives of passion or interest; nor shall the attorney, for any personal consideration, reject the cause of the defenseless or oppressed.

481.07 PENALTIES FOR DECEIT OR COLLUSION.​

An attorney who, with intent to deceive a court or a party to an action or judicial proceeding, is guilty of or consents to any deceit or collusion, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor; and, in addition to the punishment prescribed therefor, the attorney shall be liable to the party injured in treble damages.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

This made me realize if nick was on the farms he'd 100% be the kind of guy who spergs out about getting top hats.

He would be in your DM's for giving him a mark and Nulls DM's about getting autism or a hat mark.

Nick would be one of the group dm gooners sending polycule pics and porn he's jerking to

He'd be sending images of himself to all of beauty parlor flexing while wearing that Jamaican cuckbeater.

 

[Penguin Soldier]

Yeah, and I didn't even enjoy that as much as the recent "debate" with acclaimed author David Foster Wallace. That was "Tommie Tooter talks to Bob Chandler"-tier gold. Ralph still has it on occasion.

Man I haven't thought of Tommie in forever, talk about washed cows. People compare Nick to Ralph, but he's more more than likely gonna end up like Tommie.

 

[Chug Smuckle]

If Nick didn't have holes in his brain he'd realize that the Court slapping Aaron with a $50 aka 1 KNU, meant something. Mainly there sick of Nick's shit. So I'm sure there inclined to listen to Nick and his lawyer (who is presumably getting billiable hours). Again, he's just metaphorically punching himself in the face like a retard.

 

[AnOminous]

No wonder he doesn't want to get in good standing:481.06 GENERAL DUTIES.Every attorney at law shall:

I'm pretty sure that being or not being in good standing doesn't allow a former attorney who is prohibited from practicing law by court order from claiming to be practicing law in a legal filing.

Randazza claimed that on behalf of the prohibited from practicing law by court order fail lawyer Nick Rekieta. According to Randazza, despite the fact that Nick is legally prohibited, by court order, from practicing law, Nick actually is practicing law.

Defendant Rekieta is a Minnesota attorney. Id. at ¶ 3. He practices law under Rekieta Law,
LLC. See Rekieta Law, LLC Articles of Organization, attached as Exhibit 32.

Randazza even attaches an exhibit to prove that Nick illegally owns a law firm, despite not being authorized to practice law, and is practicing law, despite being prohibited by court order from practicing law.

 

[not william stenchever]

he was doing industrial level shit!

I don't think nitrous comes in full size and pressure welding style tanks, he probably got a much smaller and lower pressure tank from a party supply store. So party clown level shit.

 

[Clayton cadidlehopper]

(Kurt does actually practice, most of Lawtube seem to want to do Streaming/ trial coverage as their primary job and practicing as something they can do on the side)

Kurt hasn't worked in several years outside of youtube and even then he did patent law not criminal (still respectable)

I believe Potentially Criminal, Runkle, MLS, and Larry all still practice. Not sure who else...Law & Lumber?

 

[RotPockets]

Kurt hasn't worked in several years outside of youtube and even then he did patent law not criminal (still respectable)

I believe Potentially Criminal, Runkle, MLS, and Larry all still practice. Not sure who else...Law & Lumber?

Bald Joe from Jew (lol)gic is still out there jewing everyone he can as a slumlord debt collector.

 

[Red Dye #5]

I don't think nitrous comes in full size and pressure welding style tanks, he probably got a much smaller and lower pressure tank from a party supply store. So party clown level shit.

I think you can buy nitrous tanks for welding, so yeah he might just have a big one

Edit: typos

 

[Stiffy]

I think you can by nitrous tanks for welding, so yeah he might just have a big one

Aaron says that he a has a reloadable green device for nitrous huffing. Not sure how accurate that is. Says there is a canister and a tube.

 

[3MMA]

We do what we can with what we have. Nick has only a tiny keyboard and his blue fingers to lash out at the world. It's all he has left.

This is all Nick has left:

(partially machine generated, partially handmade.)

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm pretty sure that being or not being in good standing doesn't allow a former attorney who is prohibited from practicing law by court order from claiming to be practicing law in a legal filing.

Absolutely. But those general 481.06 duties do become even more on-point if he's actually in good standing (in the sense that "but I'm not authorized, so my general duties as an attorney are n/a" might be lamely advanced as a defense to general duty failures under 481.06 (vs the specific prohibitions in 481.02, which 100% apply to a non-authorized person, and most specifically to a lawyer not authorized to practice)).

I think they all apply to him, which is why I included both sections. But I'm fairly well versed in the Weasel Word language, and I would not put it past him to try to blunt a 481.06 charge on the basis of his dereliction.

Randazza claimed that on behalf of the prohibited from practicing law by court order fail lawyer Nick Rekieta. According to Randazza, despite the fact that Nick is legally prohibited, by court order, from practicing law, Nick actually is practicing law.

Exactly, and reading that motion this morning, along with Josh's questions around Rekieta's use of references to the law LLC vs the media LLC, are what re-inspired my interest in revisiting that drum I (and you, and others) have been banging for +/- a year or more about his holding himself out as a lawyer at all the various points at which he has not been authorized to practice. Pretty sure at some point I laid out the various places (primarily on YT) he'd still been referencing the law LLC/ being a lawyer, even though I'd seen he'd swapped in the media LLC in some places (50-50; I know I did the research and found quite a bit; possible I didn't bother posting each item).

He has multiple layers of professional rules and criminal statutes violations based even solely on his conduct and his overt and implied representations that he is a lawyer and owner of a law firm, despite not lawfully being either.

I think I may have mentioned before that a thing the MN professional responsibility has done is send a stern warning letter to people awaiting/applying for admission, after passing the Bar and already employed by a Minnesota firm, who correspond with the OLPR on their firm letterhead about their pending admission without including an explicit disclaimer that they are not yet admitted in the state (and, if applicable, where they are admitted and in good standing). In those scenarios, the prospective admittees did not say or imply they were "Minnesota lawyers" at all, in any way; they merely failed to explicitly state that they are not (yet). The OLPR do not like bullshitting over technicalities.

Randazza even attaches an exhibit to prove that Nick illegally owns a law firm, despite not being authorized to practice law, and is practicing law, despite being prohibited by court order from practicing law.

Yes, the articles of organization I mentioned? Like I said, didn't go pull the exhibits, but as the text in the motion didn't note the LLC has a status of administrative termination, I (apparently correctly) guessed he just happened not to include that.

Randazza/ his firm appear to have a low standard or diligence. OR they are just as deceptive as Nick. Everything about his status should have been independently verified and disclosed in that filing.

...and gosh, do you suppose Nick reviewed and approved that filing? Either he did and didn't disclose (see, again, 481.06 (4) and 481.07), or Randazza potentially failed his client by neither performing diligence (of fully publicly available and free information) nor confirming accuracy with his client.

 

[Stiffy]

Nick is so lucky he lives in a pussy state like Minnesota, he'd already be in prison if it was Florida or Texas.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick is so lucky he lives in a pussy state like Minnesota, he'd already be in prison if it was Florida or Texas.

He would be dangling from a lamp post in a real country.

 

[ChromaQuack]

If you get me the the Sailor goon outfit image

I'll do you one better. Behold:

 

[Vibralldo]

I'll do you one better. Behold:

rackets_horror.webm

Was that one of his daughter's outfits? Looks to be a little girl's outfit and he's posing with their toys.
He's clearly getting off to this knowing what we know now and Kayla wanted to use one of her son's Halloween costumes for a boudoir shoot.

It wouldn't surprise me if Nick was getting horny while wearing his daughter's outfit.

 

[AnOminous]

It wouldn't surprise me if Nick was getting horny while wearing his daughter's outfit.

Nick is an enormous queermo. He sucks dicks. Dicks are what he sucks. He is gay. He is a fucking homo.

 

[Sneed Force One]

So let me get this straight.
Marc Randazza, in an attempt to placate his client's ego, inadvertently stated to the court that Nick Rekieta is actively practising law, when he is in fact, barred from doing so due to his failure to study CTEs?

 

[AnOminous]

So let me get this straight.
Marc Randazza, in an attempt to placate his client's ego, inadvertently stated to the court that Nick Rekieta is actively practising law, when he is in fact, barred from doing so due to his failure to study CTEs?

I don't know his motivation but yes, he did that. He put it in a legal filing that Nick is committing crimes.

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

Nick knows deep down that he'll fail to keep the bodycam footage private upon the case going to the court of appeal. As has been noted, the videos WERE entered into evidence. I do not believe that he is merely afraid of the World seeing his drug den and the squalid conditions. I think it's more. He also knows that the entire footage will be analyzed to an autistic degree. It's what we do.

We're going to find something in that footage. Something he's aware that's there. It's not a moment in the clips, it's an area of the house. Something that's going to explain things in more detail. Offering some clarity on something we have been debating for a long time. If I was to guess I think it's something that it's so bad that it makes even current day Nick look like a merely grumpy guy on the Internet.

I think it's going to reveal the manner in which his daughter was being dosed. And it's not going to be good... We are going to find things that the police themselves even overlooked. Just my opinion of course. I do not claim to know this as fact.

You're going to hate him much more than you do. (In my opinion). Soon.