💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Nick's average and peak concurrent numbers seem weirdly close. It may just be a playboard quirk- Kurt's stream number ratios are similar, outside of Kurt's huge streams over the last 10 days.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

He "works" from 11pm-7am during the COVID thing and had to scam the American people out of $20890. He literally is a nigger.

He even did the nigger thing too and wasted it all on booze and drugs. Not sure he also took his family out to further decimate Alaskan crab population during that era like many blacks did but then again we do know his kids were stinky and hungry.

Free 20k? Yeah that’d be amazing. Toss it into my investment funds. Way better than snorting it up my nose.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Kurt continues to decimate Nick

 

[FuhrerShredder]

People who are capable of working shouldn't be going to the government for handouts.

*Especially* not trust fund kids. What the hell is that kind of begging? It's pathetic. The money should go to people who actually need it. He objectively didn't. Probably got spent on cocaine after all.

Dude, we're arranging chairs on the Titanic. The government is hostile and you should be taking every penny you can from it.

 

[Vibralldo]

Kurt continues to decimate Nick
View attachment 7532314

Nick's probably seething

This should prove to Nick that people only care about the trial and his "personality" is second, but he'll never learn anything

 

[lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll]

Nick's average and peak concurrent numbers seem weirdly close. It may just be a playboard quirk- Kurt's stream number ratios are similar, outside of Kurt's huge streams over the last 10 days.

Someone might have already mentioned, but he's also handpicking positive comments to approve and yesterday he was spinning more lies on the bodycam footage and dissing Kurt for his most recent video then privated the video hours later after too many of the comments were snarky and hits to his ego. He's definitely using his full gremlin brain to "save the channel" right now.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I do believe that this may be part of Nicks nebulously formed defence strategy in the defamation lawsuit brought by Montagraph.

Nick is leaning into the "insult comedian" and "shock jock" persona to bolster the idea that "it's just jokes, mang". The fact that he is in actuality a thoroughly unpleasant and angry person is just a happy accident.

I hope to still be around to witness the court case when it finally comes to trial in a few decades.

He leaned so hard into the bit it snapped and he's fallen flat on his face. I don't get his idea of a shock jock. Howard Stern never had an open pedophile on his show for "laughs". Even O&A, degen cesspit that it was, never had the likes of Melton on when they were on air (yes I know the sordid history...but they were not rubbing peoples faces in it).
I just want the bodycam to come out, because when it does (not if) Josh, Kino Casino, Sean, everyone can close the book in this duck and we won't have to hear about him until he dies.

I mostly agree with this, but his seething rage at Keanu has me doubting that it’s all an act or grab for attention. I think that as the nitrous or adderall leaves his system, he comes down, realizes how awful he sounded, and copes with “haha I’m a shock jock.” The reality is somewhere in the middle, I’m sure.

Up until 6 months ago, I would have maybe proposed some similar theory of mind for Nick's actions. As time has gone on, however, Nick has become so much worse that I struggle to give him any benefit of the doubt--and I was one of the slowest to become critical of him.

Nick lacks the long-term planning ability to plan this type of scheme.

Nick is a small, petty, and mean person at heart.

Nick did not suddenly or gradually change personality. He was always this way and just hid it.

Nick has consistently doubled down on disgusting and horrific lines of argument and belief. When he tells you who he is over and over, you have to believe him.

 

[Captain Manning]

i see i missed some more trevor fibraio/dollycule discourse overnight, glad others find it as obvious as i do. i have two theories to present in opposition to the idea the account is genuine in its presentation

the first theory being: it's one of you. maybe you praised the account for being such a masterfully done troll as a brag to yourself, or maybe you're overtly invested in the idea that "it's totally a real person guys" simply because you don't want your fun ruined if nick knows

the second theory: it's one of nick's associates, or maybe nick himself. this would i think best explain why nick would willingly interact with an account that has all those flags beyond it just agreeing with him. the account also made a post about fucking infants this morning and frankly, that's both something nick or his new friends would do but also not exactly pooner behavior (interesting that one of you was really sure trevor is a pooner huh?) which again reinforces the idea it's not real. but this one also makes it harder to explain the orbiting of other cows

i'm like 60/30/10 but in the end it doesn't really matter

I doubt very much it's Nick because that account has been going for years, and it's attached itself to Movie Bob and Patrick Tomlinson. I don't think Nick ever GAF about either one. That account has been known to KF outside of this thread for a while.

I suppose it could be a troll that attaches itself to high profile lolcows for attention, but it's always difficult for me to tell because trannies are insane in general, so I wouldn't outright dismiss the idea it's genuine. Very little surprises me anymore.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick lacks the long-term planning ability to plan this type of scheme.

Nick is just a walking id at this point, he moronically does anything that comes into his vile, nasty little head like the retarded hate-goblin he is. There is no consideration for the future, just pure id, that is to say, he is an id-iot.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

I pray that unlike 'the worst day ever' we eventually learn whats causing Nick to crash out particularly hard.

I'd say he has all the usual signs of a relapse, but I truly think he never stopped using.

 

[Soapmore]

@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang and any other attys, can someone clarify this relationship for me?

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-21763968

I want to understand how that relatioship works in general, and specifically if that might mean insight in Rekieta-Randazza before official paperwork drops.

 

[FuhrerShredder]

@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang and any other attys, can someone clarify this relationship for me?

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-21763968

I want to understand how that relatioship works in general, and specifically if that might mean insight in Rekieta-Randazza before official paperwork drops.

Yeah, Randazza is stuck with this loser until he can formally go through the withdrawal process for non-payment. It's why attorneys have formal engagement letters and disengage letters after work is completed so they don't get roped into stuff they are legally liable to care about due to deadbeats like Crackets.

 

[AnOminous]

@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang and any other attys, can someone clarify this relationship for me?

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-21763968

I want to understand how that relatioship works in general, and specifically if that might mean insight in Rekieta-Randazza before official paperwork drops.

Not an attorney although I have a J.D. but it's profoundly unprofessional to do a no-show and waste the time of the court even if the important witness "Mr. Green" has failed to appear. The ethically proper manner to do this is to inform the court of the reason for non-appearance, so the hearing can be rescheduled or canceled.

If the problem is expected to be recurrent, the ethically proper thing to do is file a motion to withdraw. This might not be allowed, especially with an indigent client, but even an ex-lawyer previously authorized to practice, like Nick, should be presumed to know that a lawyer doesn't have to work for you without pay. The fact he chose to snort all his money up his nose rather than pay his legal bills will get him no mercy.

This is assuming that's the case, though.

 

[AltisticRight]

(Hedo sign with energii_kang and romaine from someone I forget who)

Who else can be that autistic.

tanked so hard in one week that I can't even try to be funny.

His views dropped harder than Aaron's nutsack on him and his wife.
His views dropped harder than his penis upon realising Aaron's departure.
His views dropped harder than the mouth of the narcotics test supervisor upon seeing Rekieta's daughter's positive test.
His views dropped harder than the garments of Our Wife when Aaron Imholte minted the first KNU.

 

[Owlbear]

I can’t wait to find out all the Superberry money was despoisted into a personal instead of a business account because he was too lazy to do it correctly, and that pierces the veil.

He uses the "Rekieta Law" branding and advertises "Rekieta Law" at the beginning of every stream so it would be absurd to think that these streams are run by "Rekieta Media." The use of branding and advertising is also a factor in piercing the veil.

 

[AnOminous]

He uses the "Rekieta Law" branding and advertises "Rekieta Law" at the beginning of every stream so it would be absurd to think that these streams are run by "Rekieta Media." The use of branding and advertising is also a factor in piercing the veil.

Nick's use of LLCs has been amateurishly stupid at the best of times. As dumb as his "this was never a law channel" blatant lies have been, the lies about his cardboard cut-out "corporations" actually have legal implications he's too stupid to understand.

 

[Soapmore]

@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang , I do wonder if that's what's making Nick freak out in the last couple days. Randazza "pulling out" would be unmistakably and undeniably interpreted as Rekieta's finances--his homestead-- is off the rails. And what can he do but ... what, attack Randazza? or do what every narcissist hates more than a bullet to head: admit the truth. Shit's broken.

Couldn't happen to a nicer fella.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It is technically impermissible in the State of Minnesota for a non-lawyer own a law firm. See MRPC Rule 5.4.

However, it's less clear to me whether Nick's "involuntary restricted" status instantly gets him into trouble there, or whether he'd have to be outright disbarred.

No, he doesn't have to be disbarred. But there are a couple things in play here:

1. Rule 5.4 says a lawyer can't practice in the form of a prof corp or firm in which a non-lawyer owns a fiduciary interest. But he's not authorized to practice, and not really the point of that Rule. However:

2. As involuntarily restricted, per the Board of CLE, he MAY NOT HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN A LAW FIRM THAT IS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION:

B. Restrictions Imposed. A lawyer on restricted or involuntary restricted status shall be subject to the following provisions and restrictions:

(1) The lawyer may not engage in the practice of law or represent any person or entity in any legal matter or proceedings within the State of Minnesota other than himself or herself, except as provided in Rule 14.

(2) The name of the lawyer may not appear on law firm letterhead without a qualification that the lawyer’s Minnesota license is restricted. A law firm name may continue to include the lawyer’s name if the name was included prior to the lawyer’s placement on restricted or involuntary restricted status. The lawyer may not be listed “of counsel” or otherwise be represented to clients or others as being able to undertake legal business.

(3) The lawyer may not have a financial interest in a law firm that is a professional corporation.

A "professional corporation," aka "professional firm" per MN statute ("firm" replaced "corporation" in the general law, but the scope is the same) can be of any legal corporate structure. That includes LLCs.

Subd. 5.

"Firm" includes a corporation, limited liability company, and limited liability partnership, wherever incorporated, organized, or registered.

Subd. 14.​

"Ownership interest" means:

(1) with respect to a professional firm that is a corporation, except a nonprofit corporation, shares in the corporation;

(2) with respect to a professional firm that is a limited liability company, a membership interest in the limited liability company; and

(3) with respect to a professional firm that is a limited liability partnership, a partnership interest.

Subd. 17.​

"Professional" means a natural person who is licensed by the laws of the state of Minnesota or similar laws of another state to furnish one or more of the categories of professional services listed in subdivision 19. Professional includes a natural person who is licensed or otherwise authorized to practice law under the laws of a foreign nation.

Subd. 18.​

"Professional firm" means both Minnesota professional firms and foreign professional firms.

Subd. 19.​

"Professional services" means services of the type required or permitted to be furnished by a professional under a license, registration, or certificate issued by the state of Minnesota to practice medicine and surgery under sections 147.01 to 147.22, as a physician assistant pursuant to sections 147A.01 to 147A.27, chiropractic under sections 148.01 to 148.105, registered nursing under sections 148.171 to 148.285, optometry under sections 148.52 to 148.62, psychology under sections 148.88 to 148.98, social work under chapter 148E, marriage and family therapy under sections 148B.29 to 148B.39, professional counseling under sections 148B.50 to 148B.593, dentistry and dental hygiene under sections 150A.01 to 150A.12, pharmacy under sections 151.01 to 151.40, podiatric medicine under sections 153.01 to 153.25, veterinary medicine under sections 156.001 to 156.14, architecture, engineering, surveying, landscape architecture, geoscience, and certified interior design under sections 326.02 to 326.15, accountancy under chapter 326A, or law under sections 481.01 to 481.17, or under a license or certificate issued by another state under similar laws. Professional services includes services of the type required to be furnished by a professional pursuant to a license or other authority to practice law under the laws of a foreign nation.

Corporations for law practice must register as "professional firms."

Now, of course the LLC is terminated (2/2023), though Nick still often references "Rekieta Law LLC." Note that admin termination is NOT dissolution, and an admin term LLC can be reinstated. So, Nick is in violation of the Board of CLE rules.

("Rekieta Law," as an Assumed Name, has also expired (2/2021).)

2. A lawyer not authorized to practice may not represent or imply that they are.

Rule 5.5​

​

(b)​

A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in Minnesota shall not:

(1) except as authorized by these rules or other law, establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of Minnesota law; or

(2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice Minnesota law.

[1] A lawyer may practice law only in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is authorized to practice.

[4] Other than as authorized by law or this rule, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice generally in this jurisdiction violates paragraph (b)(1) if the lawyer establishes an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law. Presence may be systematic and continuous even if the lawyer is not physically present here. Such a lawyer must not hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. See also Rules 7.1 and 7.5(b).

[7] Paragraphs (c) and (d) apply to lawyers who are admitted to practice law in any United States jurisdiction, which includes the District of Columbia, and any state, territory, or commonwealth of the United States. The word "admitted" in paragraph (c)contemplates that the lawyer is authorized to practice in the jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and excludes a lawyer who while technically admitted is not authorized to practice because, for example, the lawyer is on inactive status.

* yes, the Comment above refers to practice from one jurisdiction vs another. However, it is clear the concept of "admitted" in a jurisdiction subsumes being authorized to practice law in that jurisdiction, and statuses other than active and in good standing are not OK to practice. That's the point.

Yet Nick constantly calls himself a Minnesota Lawyer and owner of a law firm. Both are impermissible per the above, on multiple bases. He even let his own lawyer say exactly this in the "hey, new statute!" motion in the Montagraph case earlier this month:

2.4. Defendants’ Programming

Defendant Rekieta is a Minnesota attorney. Id. at ¶ 3. He practices law under Rekieta Law, LLC. See Rekieta Law, LLC Articles of Organization, attached as Exhibit 32. It is a professional firm, providing Rekieta’s licensed services under Minn. Rev. Stat. § 319B.06, and, per the statute, it provides no other services. See Rekieta Dec. at ¶ 4.

He even provided the articles! For an administratively terminated firm that is I permissibly owned by a lawyer not authorized to practice law, for the practice of law! Haven't looked at the exhibits to that motion, but that looks like KNOWING deception, to a Court, by both of them.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Nick's use of LLCs has been amateurishly stupid at the best of times. As dumb as his "this was never a law channel" blatant lies have been, the lies about his cardboard cut-out "corporations" actually have legal implications he's too stupid to understand.

I honestly think Nick just enjoys wasting his money and other people's time. He seems to have an infinite amount of both.

 

[Lian Xing]

Yet Nick constantly calls himself a Minnesota Lawyer and owner of a law firm. Both are impermissible per the above, on multiple bases. He even let his own lawyer say exactly this in the "hey, new statute!" motion in the Montagraph case earlier this month:

Is this why he is sweating the most recent ethical investigation so much?