💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 168 24.2%
  • Total voters
    693
Not Who You Think said:
For anyone thinking that Drexel is simply principled and caring for Nick's kids, consider that Drexel and his daughter would either visit or stay over at the Rekieta's home. A home where there was likely a safe filled with cocaine and other drugs on the premises (unless you believe that Nick just started keeping drugs in his home on October 2023). Now consider Drexel's fear of police/government and criminal charges and also what would happen if his baby-momma caught wind of where Drexel had been taking their daughter.
Click to expand...
It should also be noted:

Drexel used to publicly go to bat for Nick against all the allegations the Farms were making back in 2023. Drexel defended Nick from allegations that Nick was using substances, was swinging, was going Hedonism II, and so on. Drexel wasn't like Camelot and claimed that it was reasonable for Nick to do this, his defense of Nick was more along the lines of "Nick wouldn't do this." Of course, we now know that Nick was swinging, he was using substances for years, and he did go to Hedo. Nick allowed Drexel to believe this and publicly defend him, when it wasn't true. I imagine Drex felt betrayed and manipulated.
 
John Andrews Stan said:
Bingo.

Nevermind that it never happened. Depp admitted to giving his daughter cannabis when she was 13, with some bullshit about how he wanted to make sure she didn’t get bad shit and would do it in a safe environment at home. That’s fucked up. But it’s not what Nick has claimed, that Depp did drugs around his kids.

Coincidentally, Lily-Rose Depp’s birthday is today. She is 26 years old.
Click to expand...
I think he knows that when the bodycam footage comes out and reveals that there's coke everywhere while his kids are home it'll be undeniable. He's trying to do an appeal to authority because the wine mom sycophants love johnny depp and got introduced to Nick through the depp trial.

Analyzing the Nick Janus speech and trying to find the truth in the technicalities I noticed:

-Saying "nobody gives a shit 99% of the time, especially when the kids are ok... My kids are fine" in regards to doing drugs in front of them is essentially an admission in my book

-He claims there wasn't an "exposure" and that his daughter wasn't "sitting around doing cocaine". This to me is him saying that the daughter wasn't exposed accidentally, and wasn't doing lines like he was... But he isn't denying that he gave it to her as a fucked up form of medicine

-"The county had no thought that my kids ingested drugs" just says to me that Nick tricked the state. It isn't the same as "i didn't give my kids drugs"

-"my decisions didn't make things worse for my kids" Kill yourself, Nick
 
BathTubShine said:
Hey stupid limpdick faggot, YOU decided to make your PRIVATE life part of your PUBLIC IMAGE bit-by-bit by drip feeding your audience pubicly parts of it.
Must be because of your exhibitionist fetish, anyways I digress:
YOU CHOSE TO MAKE YOUR PRIVATE LIFE PUBLIC AS AN ALREADY PUBLIC FIGURE.

Cheers!
🥃 :really:
Take a bump of cocaina and a glass of whiskey(dare you, pussy).
You allowed your own daughter to metabolize cocaine in her system 10x the cutoff in one way or another.
Rot in Piss Junkie cuck.
Click to expand...

Nick once again obfuscating.

The fact that they took the kids FOR TWO MONTHS for a simple drug bust is what screams WTF IS GOING ON HERE?!

Show me just one CPS case wheee a simple drug bust results in the kids being taken for two months, Nick.

As Nick himself said: The initial presumption during the arrest was that the kids would stay with the parents for a day or two. Now why didn’t that actually happen? Gee, I suppose it may have something to do with a little girl testing positive for cocaine at levels ten times the cut off?

CLEARLY they suspected that Nick either gave her cocaine or that she in some other way got a hold of it, and removed the kids for a long time whike they investigated. They ultimately couldn’t prove anything because kids don’t like to snitch on their parents. And even if they had proof, kids are only permanently taken away as a matter of last resort.
 
Fapcop said:
CLEARLY they suspected that Nick either gave her cocaine or that she in some other way got a hold of it, and removed the kids for a long time whike they investigated. They ultimately couldn’t prove anything because kids don’t like to snitch on their parents. And even if they had proof, kids are only permanently taken away as a matter of last resort.
Click to expand...

Nick also admitted in that clip that the CPS process itself went for the full six months. Six months being about as long as the process can go before the state has to initiate the process of taking the kids away. I still doubt that Nick got full custody back after two months. I suspect that after two months what Nick got was limited home visits with this kids.
 
1748378854619.webp
A short Rekieta Report because I got other shit going on
Down 12.79% on Peak Concurrent Viewers from last Tuesday (05/20/2025 / 05/27/2025)
Down 11.46% on Avg. Concurrent Viewers from last Tuesday (05/20/2025 / 05/27/2025)
1748379180058.webp
Down 16.88% on Superchats Amount, Down 30.30% on number of superchats from last Tuesday

k thx bye!!
 
Heckler1 said:
This will never happen, but as a sort of thought exercise, do any of you think there are ay steps Nick Crackeita could take to leave the shame vortex and become unironically popular again? I actually think his biggest barrier isn't the drugs or booze, but his catty need to always be right. I think it prevents him from ever actually making any meaningful change because his booze hole brain never sees the things he does as wrong.
Click to expand...
When it comes out you gave your 8 year old cocaine.
There isn't a lot you can do to ever come back.

Irrational Exuberance said:
He would need to have a literal "Come to Jesus" moment, where he just breaks down and realizes the heights from which he's fallen. It's certainly possible, but he has to be willing to at least slow down and PULL UP.
Click to expand...
Pulling up has to be done before you hit the ground.
We're halfway through the Earth to China at this point

Sneed on Cloud 9 said:
hat my clips are too big. Null said to re-sc
Click to expand...
He's trying to prep the balldowashers for what they're about to see LOL
Those niggers are the only people more insufferable than nick. The retards that blindly believe him.


Mordecai 3 Finger Brown said:
I didn't hear any acknowledgment that he knew he was being recorded.
Click to expand...
Coomalot is a rat so no surprises there.
And of course it was him saying something crass / assholeish. He did that shit with Phase and other groups.
All I can say is he gets what he deserves. And the fact he leaked this shit probably will get him blacklisted further from other events, along with not making himself look any better.
Because now its clear he pissed off a large chunk of their audience.
 
Irrational Exuberance said:
He would need to have a literal "Come to Jesus" moment, where he just breaks down and realizes the heights from which he's fallen. It's certainly possible, but he has to be willing to at least slow down and PULL UP.
Click to expand...
Even if that were possible there's absolutely no indication that Nick has any interest in redemption. It's still everyone else's fault, drugs are still cool and fun to do, its fine to have a list if enemies that you go over regularly, it's totally not galaxy gas, everyone who disagrees is a nerd, and why do you care so much anyway? So sure, if he got his act together and fucked off the internet he could probably just live a comfortable life, but I have never seen someone so opposed to that idea in my life.
 
Chazzed Up said:
There's hardly a lack of legal commentary content at this point anyway. Why listen to a nonpracticing lawyer make basic ass observations when there are dozens of better options.
Click to expand...
Nick caught the zeitgeist and then blew it. There's no returning. It's like asking how Alien Ant Farm could become a number 1 selling band in 2025. No matter what he does it won't work.
 
PixarsTedKennedy said:
It's like asking how Alien Ant Farm could become a number 1 selling band in 2025. No matter what he does it won't work.
Click to expand...
This kind of reminds me of how Limp Bizkit recently had a very successful tour through South America, the crowd utterly loved them, and a lot of the crowd was younger. Then again, Fred Durst is a marketing genius who did not give his daughter cocaine, and Wes Borland is actually an amazing guitarist, he just dresses and acts ridiculous, but not as ridiculous as Nick (he also did not give his daughter cocaine).
 
Null said:
Steve Quest retained Matthew Hardin to replace his attorney in the defamation lawsuit. It's on the docket.
Click to expand...
I wonder why the change. Did the old lawyer get tired for the pro bono work and the duration it was running? Does Monty Think he can do better with someone else? Did Monty grate on the nerves of the old lawyer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom