💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.4%

  • Total voters
    694
I had to go back and watch some more Keanu vids for background on her and it's actually astonishing to me that this mediocre nontent streamer with a sub-100 IQ just sat down and easily won a intellectual sparring session with the greatest pedophile minds of the dabbleverse and reduced a very smart special boy into a bright red ragetwig.
 
Yes, but I’d rather Null watermark it so the farms gets credit than have EWU and over other YouTube channel profiting off of the fruits of our collective labor and our collective crowdfunding.
I propose:
Transparent “The Kiwi Farms” text center
News hamster bottom left
Kiwi logo top left
Ceiling cat top right
Candy Yoshi bottom right ((R) Midnight Energy Drink)

IMG_0551.webp
 
With the news of the Qover October Quandry, this Facebook comment by pious and based Father-in-Law Dan Sletta proves quite interesting.
1748271138498.webp
On October 21st, He explicitly wishes for someone in her life to "...save you [Kayla] from perversion(verbal/physical molesation)..."

He then edits this post minutes later to retract the molestation. Luckily, a wise Kiwifarmer checked the edit history.
Did he actively encourage Kayla to leave Nick to his hedonistic squalor? Maybe Nick's abuse was too much for the sanctity of marriage to bear?
And the specificity on verbal / physical molestation...Did Nick scream at his wife like he did to Keanu? Did he domestically abuse her? Physical assault?
 
Thank you. It seems I underestimated Meme Copium.
Meme has demonstrated good video editing skills.

Though I think @Third World Aristocrat and @Shush have delivered the best thus far.

No. He had a rant about how 'not lucky' he was because he didn't have one. It was archived by Elissa in later 2023, I believe, or early 2024.
Correct. They don't have one. And that's why I think Nick hasn't filed for divorce himself. Not even to be with April.

He has much to lose in such a divorce. She would probably rape him.
 
I think the most interesting thing about that debate - the most revealing thing is that of all people, Attention whore April was the one who just said "fuck it, I'm done. leave it in the past," and just dropped it. Now she only really comes up incidentally. There's no real news on her and we don't care either.

Meanwhile Nick is out here non-stop seething like a googly-eyed monster on 80% playback speed. The difference is night and day. Nick SHOULD just drop this nasty chapter of his life but he won't, and it's entirely his fault.

I think Keanu was too nice. The second that guy said "Well my friend doesn't share nudes" My instant thought was... "yeah he just shares creepshots of some dudes 6 year old and sings about jerking it off to kids." The "You have a wife you weirdo" was perfect though. I also love how the pedophile when challenged about anything resorts to redditor speak "muh ad hominem" Like this is some structured academic debate as Nick calls her a Dumb bitch every 2 seconds to assert his flaccid small-peen dominance over the womenfolk. Redditors are just fucking pedos aren't they?
 
For the sake of this woman not going on a killing spree with her bow and firearms
You know what, there's one positive thing we can say about April in comparison to skelly. She can actually hunt animals fairly and give them a dignified end. Nick only knows how to torture trapped critters to a slow and humiliating death. Justice for the fart squirrels and Scrombles the raccoon.
 
>Fucking women not your wife is wrong
:really: what if I fucked yours?
>Yes that's wrong
:really: let me let me

This whole 'You'd be scared to introduce me to your wife because she'd want to fuck me instead of you' line is utterly ridiculous.

Dude, I don't have ANY women in my life who'd be impressed by a man in his forties who can't support himself. Who has a wife and five kids and is still living off his parents money.

I certainly wouldn't be marrying such a woman.

Sure, I know there are skanks on the internet who flock to celebrity and cocaine like flies around shit. Perhaps some of them would even bang you -- shit, if KingCobra can get laid ANY online character can find someone who'll have sex with you.

Normal, grown-up women though? None of the women I've ever known would have anything to do with you. Even the kind of women who are into casual one off hookups wouldn't find Rekieta appealing. His body is pathetic, he isn't funny, his face looks like a ferret, he's not an intellectual powerhouse -- he's really got nothing going for him at all, that I can see.

Perhaps I'm wrong? Because I was never a fan, I just don't see any appeal in him at all. Kiwi women? Does Rekieta have any attractive characteristics? Even if you don't find him attractive, do you have friends who would fall for his charms? What is it that the wine moms find so attractive? I always assumed it was the idea that they could flirt with what they thought was a successful, happily married man, but once that's all revealed to be a facade, is there anything left?
 
KNU origin story:

Geno and Keanu describe the pic of Kayla posing for Aaron (From STMS today)

OK I get it, everyone knows Nick's a lying liar who lies and all, but usually he at least tries to stay in a comfort zone of lies that are wrapped around some bare kernel of truth or that can be wiggled out of with "I never said that" pilpul, so why does he repeatedly double down on this one particular lie about the photo being originally taken without consent when every bit of available evidence proves the opposite and everyone knows it?

He can't plead ignorance because even assuming for argument's sake that he doesn't keep an eye on his thread enough to see that the actual video footage of the photo being taken has been here for over six weeks, at the very least he would have seen the actual video footage of the photo being taken having been on Stallyn19's channel for over six weeks given that he routinely comments on Stallyn19 clips generally. He had to have seen that footage by now, he had to have heard the countless descriptions from Keanu and Geno over the past year about the obviously camera-facing tits-forward photo that could only ever have been posed for, and now Geno's clip today couldn't have made that more clear by even re-enacting the exact pose for all to see, and yet Nick will still continue trying to spread the pure delusion that this was a creepshot taken entirely without Kayla's knowledge. Who the FUCK does he think he's even trying to fool other than himself?

At this point his continuing to cling to this fiction is getting too delusional to easily chalk it up to a mere attempt to make Aaron look worse and/or Nick being in denial about the notion that Kayla may have simply lied to him, and one has to wonder if maybe there's some other motivation, like if he perhaps had Kayla unequivocally commit to the creepshot story in her police report because, as Nick reiterated again on Friday, he believes that the creepshot itself would be an independent felony all its own irrespective of the later dissemination that led to the RP charge. If that is the case, then he would now have to stick to the creepshot story come hell or high water, for fear of Kayla facing actual legal exposure for a false statement in a police report. There would be no other sane reason for him to not simply take the L on this relatively minor point.
 
Last edited:
Probably because acknowledging that Kayla willingly partook in the photoshoot but did not approve of its release, is implicit and undeniable proof that his wife is a slatternly whore who poses naked for other men for her own sexual gratification that is not derived from Nick's direction or consent.
 
I had to go back and watch some more Keanu vids for background on her and it's actually astonishing to me that this mediocre nontent streamer with a sub-100 IQ just sat down and easily won a intellectual sparring session with the greatest pedophile minds of the dabbleverse and reduced a very smart special boy into a bright red ragetwig.
This
Keanu is an ugly retarded bitch and we shouldn’t promote her content in this thread.
 
I had to go back and watch some more Keanu vids for background on her and it's actually astonishing to me that this mediocre nontent streamer with a sub-100 IQ just sat down and easily won a intellectual sparring session with the greatest pedophile minds of the dabbleverse and reduced a very smart special boy into a bright red ragetwig.
Keanu occupies a certain 'dumb/smart' role with a long history. I've always thought she'd be better in pre-produced fictional content. For your consideration:
  • Fran Drescher - The Nanny
  • Brittany Pierce - Glee
  • Rose Nyland - The Golden Girls
  • Joey Tribbiani - Friends
  • Gretchen Weiners - Mean Girls
There would be no other sane reason for him to not simply take the L on this relatively minor point.
I'm still pausing on the fact that Geno revealed that Kayla has "NICK" tattooed under her left breast. Thanks, Geno. I could have gone to my grave without that information.
....

Btw, on STMS, Keanu has asked anyone from Kiwi Farms to send her the evidence (tweets) about when Nick lied about missing a drug test. Anyone have the patience to teach this girl basic searching on The Farms or Ghostarchive? (I don't think she's officially a cow yet. I assume that's within the rules. I wouldn't know.)
 
I don't think she's officially a cow yet. I assume that's within the rules. I wouldn't know.
I think the general rule is "do whatever you want, but don't bring it back here."
We observe, whether you want to get involved is your problem, but if you brag about it or make yourself identifiable, your getting dragged.
 
Remember that Nick still has the Montegraph case in November. Nick will likely get hollowed out then and there and lose his mind.

There is so much more milk to come.
 
Probably because acknowledging that Kayla willingly partook in the photoshoot but did not approve of its release, is implicit and undeniable proof that his wife is a slatternly whore who poses naked for other men for her own sexual gratification that is not derived from Nick's direction or consent.

Why not simply claim (whether true or not) that each and every aspect of her Toe-fucking up to and including the photo shoot were all done with Nick's knowledge and consent, then? That would at least stay well within his idiosyncratic definition of "monogamous" since she wouldn't have gone behind his back, and it would also fall well outside his idiosyncratic definition of "cuck" since it would not go so far as to admit to ever being turned on by his wife getting boned, as distinguished from how he maintains that Aaron's texts and the hand-holding story would make Aaron the only person fitting Nick's extraordinarily narrow definition of a cuck. All of this would be internally consistent in Nick's view and he should have absolutely no problem with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom