💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
How enforceable would that be, anyway?
NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting crimes/illegal activity. If Chaney or April had seen crimes/illegal activity and signed an NDA, and Nick is relying on their ignorance of this fact to prevent them from saying something, he's fucked.
He's clearly trying to damage her financially, he's mentioned going after her current job
He claims to have messaged an employer of hers to tell him about alleged criminal activity. I'm pretty sure there's laws against employers doing something like this to former employees.

I fucking hope she can find a way to legally dropkick him into the fucking Marianas trench. How hard is it for this stupid asshole to not commit crimes?
 
NDAs are disfavored at law and generally have to be handled in a very specific way to be valid. What are the odds Nick could draft one that wouldn't be tossed out of court like a Barneswalker motion for a Franks hearing? A lot of NDAs are basically just to intimidate the person forced into signing them and are nearly worthless.

Where you often see them upheld is in employment termination settlements involving severance pay, where you might sign a non-disparagement clause and non-disclosure as to trade secrets and other proprietary information and, while this is generally the law anyway, such agreements will include something like a liquidated damages clause agreeing that, for instance, every violation is $5,000 without having to litigate the exact value.

An NDA that you agree to help a criminal conceal his crimes is probably pretty worthless.
Not really anymore even for corporate cucks. See Board in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (Feb. 21, 2023)
 
I'm with the folks that think he's setting up the Nanny to blame for the state of his home when the bodycam comes out.
The timing is very obvious. Let's pretend he's telling the truth and he only "found out" about these claims a couple weeks ago. He still spent weeks of the trial stream mainly not commenting on the trial but complaining about Kurt for days but suddenly as soon as he's guesting on that podcast he starts bringing up his nanny, and on the same podcast he changes his tune about the likelihood of the footage being released. Now he's talking even more about the nanny.

It will be really funny for Nick to try to explain to the average person after the body cam footage comes out why a nanny who left in February is somehow responsible for the state of the house she's not in up to three months after she'd already left (in May, when he was arrested). This is the exact kind of argument that I'd expect a fucking retard with no self-awareness to make.
By talking about how they begged the nanny to stay until the end of the school year, that her leaving made things impossible, he seems to be setting himself up to say that the situation in the footage looks bad but as soon as the school year ended everything would have magically resolved itself.

He already said this with respect to the piles of clothes all around the living areas of the house. This had something to do with the end of the school year, apparently.

Note also that at the time of the body cam footage, April was supposed to already be the new nanny.

- He was paying her over "well north of " $50K/yr
- Extra "expenses" were $30K. He later clarifies that these were GROCERIES AND FOOD FOR THE KIDS.
30k probably also includes other things than just food and snacks. Like clothes, school supplies and so on. Does Nick or Kayla look like parents that do that sort of shopping every single time? 5 growing children go through surprising amount of clothes. And then if you add up even more discretionary spending like toys... I can really see that total hits 30k knowing the spending habits of Nick at least...
The nanny worked full-time or close to full time hours and also did a lot of the driving.

He previously claimed that the so-called "snack budget" is in excess of $2,000/month, which is already 80% of the annual expenses. That leaves $6k for other expenses like driving.
 
Rekieta is headed for disaster because he has the mind of a spoiled child. And it's too late for him to ever change.
If it's a man's fate to drown, he'll drown, even in a spoonful of water.
 
- Quotes the email that she would "never ever" do this
- Aaron was contacted via email today. He was asked to give a statement. Someone from the County wants to talk to Aaron.
- Aaron would "kick in" if Chaney needs to raise money for a case
- Laughs that it's another lawyer and tells Nick to "tread lightly" because there are a lot of people in "that town" who want a "piece of his ass"
Why is he going after his former nanny now? Are the holes in his brain rewriting history? His pickle brain is once again going to get his boney nonexistent ass into trouble again. Is it because the body cam footage might be released so he’s trying to pin the mess of his crackhouse all on her leaving?

“Guys look I was soooo stressed out from streaming and driving my kids around with a safe full of cocaine that I couldn’t possibly find time to pick up stinky clothes off the ground. That bitch of a nanny left after I made a pass on her to join the qover and made life impossible!”

🥃:really:
 
But that being said; the one thing I can give Nick is was able to steal April with a lifeless dick. Don't get me wrong, I get she's low IQ; but imagine a dude having to pop pills that may not always work and deciding you're gonna be his side piece. Good job Nick, it's actually kinda impressive.
Cocaine addicts will fuck people who give them free cocaine.
Not really that impressive.
 
Aaron has addressed the Chaney issue:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2MJxsGMGjJw
- Calls it a narcissistic cope from Nick
- Says Nick admitted to the bullet of coke on the sofa
- Chaney was "the best parent they ever had"
- The "parasocial broads" are "cloud boblins" who should never have platformed Nick
- She never gave a kid alcohol
- She "just couldn't take it anymore", that was told to him by someone else
- Chaney is a "really good person" who "kept the house together" and "she knew [about the drugs]." Aaron told Nick that she knew.

And the James Roberts email issue:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=x4HcD9Z-gT4
- Quotes the email that she would "never ever" do this
- Aaron was contacted via email today. He was asked to give a statement. Someone from the County wants to talk to Aaron.
- Aaron would "kick in" if Chaney needs to raise money for a case
- Laughs that it's another lawyer and tells Nick to "tread lightly" because there are a lot of people in "that town" who want a "piece of his ass"
Say what you want about Aaron. I will believe him over Nick every single time.
 
Not really anymore even for corporate cucks. See Board in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (Feb. 21, 2023)
That's an administrative agency decision and not really binding on any court (or even the agency itself). It can change as soon as Trump gets to replace the 5 year members of the Board.

That said it's a reasonable explanation of the general legal concepts. Such agreements must be drafted carefully and narrowly or they risk being outright invalidated. It's very often even an NDA written by counsel experienced in doing it is not enforced for reasons of public policy.

The odds of Cuckieta ever doing it correctly are near nil.
 
The nanny worked full-time or close to full time hours and also did a lot of the driving.

He previously claimed that the so-called "snack budget" is in excess of $2,000/month, which is already 80% of the annual expenses. That leaves $6k for other expenses like driving.
But none of that has anything whatsoever to do with the nanny. Those are kid expenses. That is not money to her, for her, or otherwise relevant at all. In fact, he should have given her a credit card to use for all of it, not had her charge it then be at his mercy while he decides what looks right and when to reimburse. I can only imagine the inquisition.

And btw, he said that when she left it was so terrible because it required three drivers to cart kids. How many cars do the Rekietas have? How many of them operate in the winter?
 
The timing is very obvious. Let's pretend he's telling the truth and he only "found out" about these claims a couple weeks ago. He still spent weeks of the trial stream mainly not commenting on the trial but complaining about Kurt for days but suddenly as soon as he's guesting on that podcast he starts bringing up his nanny, and on the same podcast he changes his tune about the likelihood of the footage being released. Now he's talking even more about the nanny.
Now watch this faggot say:

Well, I was gonna leave the nanny alone, but that stupid cartoon dog is probably gonna get the body cam, so I have no choice but to talk about this now. This is the fault of Kiwi Farms.
:really:


Never mind the fact the nanny was gone by February.
 
Nick is still talking about Aaron:

View attachment 7389243

L | A
Keep talking tough, you girly bitch! balldo.gif ToeW.webp
 
Things Nick actually knows the cost of:
  • Booze
  • Cocaine
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Balldos & assorted sex toys
  • Industrial strength boner pills
  • Jamaican abortions
Did I miss anything?
Nick can look at a meaty cock and immediately calculate how much money he'd accept to suck it to completion.

The answer: Zero. He'd do it for free. Because he's a fucking faggot.
I'm less sympathetic to someone like Monty who actively engages with shit flingers online (still hopes he wins of course).
Monty made a meme image of Nick and effectively called him a retard. Nick responded by accusing him of serious criminal activity, bragged about how he'd raise money to pay for an attorney to defend him, and has doubled down at every opportunity to reaffirm pedophile allegations against Monty. That is not a proportionate response. Nick is well beyond being a mere "shitflinger", he's fucking malicious. And he's shown his malice towards everyone who he has felt has slighted him, to the point he's mostly gone on from Aaron and has switched to Kurt and his former fucking employee.
No need to be so rude about it 🥺
It’s a busy thread and people asking for information they could find out for themselves is annoying.
As JAS said, this is a busy thread. There's a thread specifically for the lawsuit with Monty and Nick that answers almost any question you could possibly have.
But none of that has anything whatsoever to do with the nanny. Those are kid expenses. That is not money to her, for her, or otherwise relevant at all. In fact, he should have given her a credit card to use for all of it, not had her charge it then be at his mercy while he decides what looks right and when to reimburse. I can only imagine the inquisition.
Yes, it would make sense that if you're in the position of Nick to hire a caretaker for your children, you could give a nanny a card that she could use to pay for things like (fast) food, groceries, gas, etc. that you would need to purchase while performing your job. But also remember that Nick is a fucking retard, and the only thing he knows how to do is neglect his keedz, punch his head, karaoke, be gay, eat single Dorito chip, & lie. If there's a simple and obvious solution to his problem, he wouldn't have thought about it, because he's too busy thinking about the next dick to suck for cock.
 
Things Nick actually knows the cost of:
  • Booze
  • Cocaine
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Balldos & assorted sex toys
  • Industrial strength boner pills
  • Jamaican abortions
Did I miss anything?
I would not be surprised if they overcharged him on booze and cocaine too.

NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting crimes/illegal activity. If Chaney or April had seen crimes/illegal activity and signed an NDA, and Nick is relying on their ignorance of this fact to prevent them from saying something, he's fucked.
I would imagine that if someone you have an NDA with is accusing you of crimes too, you have a right to defend yourself.

Nick can look at a meaty cock and immediately calculate how much money he'd accept pay to suck it to completion.
Fixed that for you.


So one thing I want to bring up.
CPS took the kids when the arrest went down.
You'd think when they talked to the kids about did they get any drugs, drinking, see anything unsorted. They'd be able to suss out that the nanny did these things to them.
"The nanny gave me 75 bucks to chug a monster."
Is he expecting the state to ignore that?
 
Why is he going after his former nanny now?
Someone has to take the rap for the disgusting state of the house we're about to see, and it sure as heck isn't going to be Nick. Plus if he can blame her for doping the kid too that wraps everything up in a neat little bow.
 
Back
Top Bottom