💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.8%

  • Total voters
    686
@Potentially Criminal
Is there a case for a revenge porn charge if it's a topless picture of a man shared without their consent?

Personally I would think it's silly to file charges for that but it would *also* be fucking hilarious for Nick to be charged with it.
I don't see it. If the case against Aaron was a miscarriage of the law, this would be an even bigger misuse of the of the law.

You'd also be now having to seek prosecution in Nevada and not MN
 
Always use Signal and enable auto deletion for all messages after 72 hours, that way people can't go and quote your touchy-feely messages about wanting your wife back to shame you on stage at a Las Vegas NAMBLA event.
No. Rewind the tape further.

Don't do drugs. Don't do degenerate things like swinging.

There you go. Much simpler. Obviates absolutely everything else.
 
This guy knows his kids and family members will see this shit some day and he doesn't care a bit. Gotta own the Steel Toe, no matter how grimy they come off from the texts alone

It just stays being amazing how vindictive Nick is toward someone who did nothing specifically directed at him. Sure, his wife fell in love (ish) with Aaron (duh, that's the whole danger of swinging/ swapping); and Aaron eventually said y'all crazy, I'm out, but otherwise what did Aaron do to him? Nick is a grown man, made his choices, and fafo.

OK, Aaron has also spilled tea, but glass houses, stones, etc. And he spilled as much about himself as about Nick.

Oh, yeah, Aaron likely spoke/ did speak to LEO when asked, right? But Nick has been much more scathing about all the prudes and church and family members who reported him, so if that happened, it didn't seem to originate with Aaron.

Nick, on the other hand, has made it a mission to ruin Aaron's show and reputation (whatever you think of either of those, he's still trying to worsen both). Nick very eagerly pushed criminal charges against Aaron (fair, though his offering 3, 4, 5, 6 different nudies of Kayla to LEO/ the prosecutor trying to make it happen is hilariously desperate and revealing, npi); he has shown up to harass Aaron during his streams, and he is "special guesting" at a fucking convention of Aaron-haters offering up selected cuts of Aaron's romantic musings. He's obsessed and deranged, all because someone just walked away from him.
I know Nick had a stiffy while talking about Aaron's goo lapping, but I bet at least 50% of the sad fat men in the audience did too.

No doubt about it. This was ERP. And what is funnier (and weird) is that she was telling Nick a story that she knew would get him hot. So, we now know that Nick gets off on having men, and Aaron specifically, taste his semen. GAAAAAAY

Especially his girl children.
This is how he treats the women he purports to love. He exposes Aprils intimate texts, and he exposes his wife Kayla to the whole world knowing that she got off on fucking Aaron Imholte of all people.

It is statistically predictable what his daughters adult relationships will look like. Grim.
Men like Nick should never have children, especially not girls. And yes, 100%, girls growing up with a narc dad who does not respect women are absolutely set up for personal and relationship struggles.

As one therapist I once heard explain it, when girls are neglected by their fathers, they are vulnerable to having a higher propensity to seek out their father in other men once they are in/after adolescence - which means higher potential for very dysfunctional and codependent situations, and over-preoccupation with romantic relationships, but with a deficit in the sense of self required to find a healthy mate/ relationship.
 
I can't get over the fact that this fat fuck is named Patty Melt.

Imagine going into Hackamania blind thinking it's a hacker con and it's just these losers.
 
Fatrick Melton and Nick were trying to hype up Aaron eating Nick's cum and their big bombshell was just sexting between Nick and April? I would chalk it up to April trying to emasculate Aaron in front of Nick in order to please her "boyfriend".
 
It just stays being amazing how vindictive Nick is toward someone who did nothing specifically directed at him. Sure, his wife fell in love (ish) with Aaron (duh, that's the whole danger of swinging/ swapping); and Aaron eventually said y'all crazy, I'm out, but otherwise what did Aaron do to him? Nick is a grown man, made his choices, and fafo.

You say it yourself, but Aaron hurt his ego, and that may never be forgiven.

What is more incredible to me is that Nick managed to hide this facet of his character so well for so long. It truly is a testament to the dangers of partisanship for those who liked Nick and the causes he used to support. I have taken the warning well to police the allowances made for people in questionable situations.

Agreed....this is honestly the kind of shit that gets printed out and included in a Christmas card to all of April and Nicks friends and family member.

I had a humourous thought of a 'Missing You' greeting card with a pile of cocaine on the front of it...

Maybe I'm going crazy, but initially didn't Nick say that Aaron ate his cum out of April's pussy? (I hate that I had to write that sentence)

Now April is saying it was on her chest?

The only aspect of this fabricated tale that Nick finds important to keep consistent is 'Aaron is a LOOOOOOSER!'.
 
The first time I ever actually watched a stream with Aaron was on the day of the arrest. He was on the podcast with Brennan and I think Zumcock. I went back in the stream for some context about who these guys were and what the fuck was going on as this was my first exposure to the Dabbleverse.

I remember they were arguing about how taking sponsorships on a podcasts was for losers who couldn't get advertisers like in radio or something insanely retarded along those lines. It was bizarro world. Here were a group of 40-50 year old losers arguing about how a dead medium, talk show radio, was on some noble ivory tower compared to podcast shilling.

Now shilling mansape trimmers and raycon headphones is gay as fuck, but who fucking cares about radio? I knew I had touched on some supremely stupid. Thankfully I didn't know how deep it went or I might not have followed this saga as I'd gotten sick of Rekieta during Weeb Wars and had stopped paying attention to him before he ever hit it big with trial streaming.

It's just a bunch of aged boomers who think Howard Stern and O&A were the pinnacle of media, based their entire existence and personalities around these two things, all while talking about it like they're still relevant in this day or age. Gossiping about literal whos.
 
@Potentially Criminal
Is there a case for a revenge porn charge if it's a topless picture of a man shared without their consent?

Personally I would think it's silly to file charges for that but it would *also* be fucking hilarious for Nick to be charged with it.
I don't see it. If the case against Aaron was a miscarriage of the law, this would be an even bigger misuse of the of the law.

You'd also be now having to seek prosecution in Nevada and not MN

Nevada includes only women's (not men's) nipples as a body part for an intimate image for revenge porn purposes.

"Intimate image":

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, includes, without limitation, a photograph, film, videotape or other recorded image which depicts:

(a) The fully exposed nipple of the female breast of another person, including through transparent clothing; or

(b) One or more persons engaged in sexual conduct.

2. Does not include an image which would otherwise constitute an intimate image pursuant to subsection 1, but in which the person depicted in the image:

(a) Is not clearly identifiable;

(b) Voluntarily exposed himself or herself in a public or commercial setting; or

(c) Is a public figure.

(Added to NRS by 2015, 2233)
NRS 200.770.

As an aside, naked men are covered by the sexual conduct definition, if the exhibition is "lewd":
3. "Sexual conduct" means sexual intercourse, lewd exhibition of the genitals, fellatio, cunnilingus, bestiality, anal intercourse, excretion, sado-masochistic abuse, masturbation, or the penetration of any part of a person’s body or of any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal opening of the body of another.
NRS 200.700. I would hope that "lewd" is interpreted broadly but did not research.

The statute itself (NRS 200.780) is not a strict liability crime, unlike the misdemeanor crime in MN. In NV, it appears only* as a felony level and requires an intent to harass, harm, etc.:

2024 Nevada Revised Statutes​

Universal Citation:
NV Rev Stat § 200.780 (2024)
Learn moreThis media-neutral citation is based on the American Association of Law Libraries Universal Citation Guide and is not necessarily the official citation.
PreviousNext


1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a person commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image when, with the intent to harass, harm or terrorize another person, the person electronically disseminates or sells an intimate image which depicts the other person and the other person:

(a) Did not give prior consent to the electronic dissemination or the sale of the intimate image;

(b) Had a reasonable expectation that the intimate image would be kept private and would not be made visible to the public; and

(c) Was at least 18 years of age when the intimate image was created.

2. A person who commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

3. The provisions of this section do not apply to the electronic dissemination of an intimate image for the purpose of:

(a) A legitimate public interest;

(b) Reporting unlawful conduct;

(c) Any lawful law enforcement or correctional activity;

(d) Investigation or prosecution of a violation of this section; or

(e) Preparation for or use in any legal proceeding.

4. A person who commits the crime of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image is not considered a sex offender and is not subject to registration or community notification as a sex offender pursuant to NRS 179D.010 to 179D.550, inclusive.

(Added to NRS by 2015, 2234)
*as far as my quick research found. I didn't go looking beyond this specific crime.

Related to nothing specific to Aaron's photos, but a topic of general discussion in various threads, there's also a bill as of 2/25 to expand criminal liability to include AI/generated images.
 
Nevada includes only women's (not men's) nipples as a body part for an intimate image for revenge porn purposes.
The activity was directed at Minnesota and both parties are Minnesota residents. I don't see why long-arm wouldn't apply. Not that it really matters. This isn't a crime by itself under either state's law, in all likelihood.
 
Nick is coping over his showing at the event and still talking about goo...

1746898876364.webp

L | A
 
You say it yourself, but Aaron hurt his ego, and that may never be forgiven.
Well, yeah, I was just kind of pulling it apart (and forgot to give a conclusion sentence :lol: ). It's clear that Nick wholly puts himself as the central point around which the world orbits. Or, in narc terms, no one else is really human or really matters: even if these types can be sentimental, it's always truly all about themselves; they worry (sometimes) about others because of the impact on them. He wasn't standing up for his wife's honor with the RP effort; he was exacting old and new revenge for wounds to himself.

I have taken the warning well to police the allowances made for people in questionable situations.
It's a valuable lesson to learn.
Finally, Nick serves a purpose.

The activity was directed at Minnesota and both parties are Minnesota residents. I don't see why long-arm wouldn't apply. Not that it really matters. This isn't a crime by itself under either state's law, in all likelihood.
Procedure, schmocedure. :biggrin:

Maybe this was all a master plan by Nick to have his daughter date a coke dealer in the future so he won't have to drive so far to get it.
The sad thing is that this is only a slightly hyperbolic ( :optimistic:) concept.


Nick is coping over his showing at the event and still talking about goo...

View attachment 7344785

L | A
He's so stupid.
 
I'm still mad that they haven't been taken as wards of the state.
It would be a much better life than being stuck in this miserable den of perverts, but with the barely-a-slap-on-the-wrist Nick ultimately, received, they still somehow have custody. They are young enough they'd be adopted by prospective parents, but even with risks of living in the orphanages, it can't be much worse than this.
They dont need to be wards of the state as much as they need nick to grow the fuck up and be a good father figure to them in this turbulent shit where their family is now a freakshow and everyone has access to their parents’ nudes and/or mugshot. I think the last thing they want or need is for their father to continue to make a spectacle out of them.
 
The activity was directed at Minnesota and both parties are Minnesota residents. I don't see why long-arm wouldn't apply. Not that it really matters. This isn't a crime by itself under either state's law, in all likelihood.
Displaying the pictures without consent in a commercial setting, which an event that sold tickets is, certainly opens Melton up for civil liability.

Forget some silly RP case, Aaron should request compensation for the unauthorized use and charge the statute minimum of 750$ per picture.
 
Look, I know it's already been discussed here about how these messages are erotic RP and fantasy talk, but I really can't get over the top message in the center column:

"I can't wait to talk to you about his need to hear about my big cock" - Nicholas Robert Rekieta

Who the FUCK sexts like this? Why is he turned on by this? Why is SHE turned on by this? If your sexual fantasies involve other men, they are homosexual (or bisexual at best). Getting aroused at the idea of another man asking about your dick or licking up your goo is fuckin gay. Before these texts, all the "Aaron and Nick were gay together haha" jokes were just funny jokes, but now Nick's straight up confirmed them as true. He actually WAS gay for Aaron and fantasized about it with April.

1746898705716.webp

And ofc this ebidance of goo eating being in the form of a romance novel penned by April means it's not ebdiance at all. It's just dirty talk fantasy. So Nick set out to prove that Aaron was gay but all he proved was that he himself is gay and April gets off to Nick being gay.

Great job, Balldo.
 
Look, I know it's already been discussed here about how these messages are erotic RP and fantasy talk, but I really can't get over the top message in the center column:

"I can't wait to talk to you about his need to hear about my big cock" - Nicholas Robert Rekieta

Who the FUCK sexts like this? Why is he turned on by this? Why is SHE turned on by this? If your sexual fantasies involve other men, they are homosexual (or bisexual at best). Getting aroused at the idea of another man asking about your dick or licking up your goo is fuckin gay. Before these texts, all the "Aaron and Nick were gay together haha" jokes were just funny jokes, but now Nick's straight up confirmed them as true. He actually WAS gay for Aaron and fantasized about it with April.

View attachment 7344775

And ofc this ebidance of goo eating being in the form of a romance novel penned by April means it's not ebdiance at all. It's just dirty talk fantasy. So Nick set out to prove that Aaron was gay but all he proved was that he himself is gay and April gets off to Nick being gay.

Great job, Balldo.
And this is 100% curated by Nick. This was what Nick thought would make him look as good as possible. And they make him look super fucking gay and cucked. "Tell me more about your husband, even while we have sex" What a thunder-faggot.
Now just imagine the texts Nick is hiding that he thinks make him look worse...
 
View attachment 7342876
Nick shouldn't be making fun of his physique with the way he looks. Melton's fatass too. People are actually watching this panel with interest?
it really is funny that the "joke" they can denigrate imholte for is being a little tubby. You know, a father of several kids and several-times divorcee? Yet patrick melton and vaedophile are literal circus freak level fat, no assistance needed. Glass houses and all that.
 
I know Nick had a stiffy while talking about Aaron's goo lapping, but I bet at least 50% of the sad fat men in the audience did too.

No doubt about it. This was ERP. And what is funnier (and weird) is that she was telling Nick a story that she knew would get him hot. So, we now know that Nick gets off on having men, and Aaron specifically, taste his semen. GAAAAAAY

Especially his girl children.
This is how he treats the women he purports to love. He exposes Aprils intimate texts, and he exposes his wife Kayla to the whole world knowing that she got off on fucking Aaron Imholte of all people.

It is statistically predictable what his daughters adult relationships will look like. Grim.

Look, I know it's already been discussed here about how these messages are erotic RP and fantasy talk, but I really can't get over the top message in the center column:

"I can't wait to talk to you about his need to hear about my big cock" - Nicholas Robert Rekieta

Who the FUCK sexts like this? Why is he turned on by this? Why is SHE turned on by this? If your sexual fantasies involve other men, they are homosexual (or bisexual at best). Getting aroused at the idea of another man asking about your dick or licking up your goo is fuckin gay. Before these texts, all the "Aaron and Nick were gay together haha" jokes were just funny jokes, but now Nick's straight up confirmed them as true. He actually WAS gay for Aaron and fantasized about it with April.

View attachment 7344775

And ofc this ebidance of goo eating being in the form of a romance novel penned by April means it's not ebdiance at all. It's just dirty talk fantasy. So Nick set out to prove that Aaron was gay but all he proved was that he himself is gay and April gets off to Nick being gay.

Great job, Balldo.
I watched this cringe "reveal" and was scratching my head the entire time because of how embarrassingly gay and desperate this was proving Nick to be as well as how insulting this was all towards Kayla because the man they’re all laughing at and making fun of, was balls deep on the daily in the mother of Nick's 5 children. How was this an own? Every insult that is flung at Aaron, is a testament to Kayla's actions and choices during the polycule saga as Nick endorsed it. Nick really does despise his wife. I also do not believe that April wrote that text message calling her own tits pretty. Those were Nick's words, 100% He fabricated that message. It didn't have her name on it or a time stamp.
 
Back
Top Bottom