💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Kheapathic]

- Nick has to be careful about how he tells the story because there are 2 people that want to be 'gone' and have left the internet. Having his private life made public was traumatic. He never wanted it to come out. He does not want to do that to others. If he does tell those stories, he will plan it out in advance to protect their privacy.

Hi Drex.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

So my takeaway from the summaries posted thus far is that he's not actually arguing he's technically innocent of the possession charge, but that the evil gooberment and witnesses played dirty.

He seems to be arguing that he's only guilty by the letter of the law, but that he didn't actually do anything that bad and that the evil government and Scandinavian prudes at his church are actually the bad people for fucking with him when he had a good thing going on. Oh, and Sean because he's fat.

Notice what he hasn't said (according to the highlights)—anything about the search being unconstitutional, the warrant being bad, or anything else that came up months ago when we had the Barnes crew trying to cover for him. Weird how all of his full-throated arguments from back then have been totally dropped, huh?

Edit: Though I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to touch on them during his public stream because he's reading this thread and realizes that not bringing up any of the constitutional issues makes him look like he was just flailing back then.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

- Nick will show audio and video from his case to show how the police procedure works and all the tricks they use. Nick was treated with undue hostility by the lead investigator (Quin Pomplun)

Sounds like he wants to be first to release (edited, trimmed portions of) the bodycam footage so he can get his narrative out before the Kiwi Farms branded raw footage drops.

-Nick will show how cocaine and metabolites get into hair samples. He has studies he can show. It has not been proven that his daughter was exposed.

How many manchild-hours have already been spent debating the metabolites here? I'm sure he will bring something compelling and new to the table.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

The best thing Nick could do is show up and talk about Law like nothing happened, ignore everything else. But he's a Lolcow so that's impossible for him, he can't help but focus on his own drama, and he's a narcissist so has to try to control the narrative (even when it's impossible)

But what would be the point? He is not a legal lawyer anymore. Being a lolcow is what he is and forever be at this point.

 

[AnOminous]

Notice what he hasn't said (according to the highlights)—anything about the search being unconstitutional, the warrant being bad, or anything else that came up months ago when we had the Barnes crew trying to cover for him. Weird how all of his full-throated arguments from back then have been totally dropped, huh?

It's almost like that bullshit was total moron shit and he completely lost on it because it was retarded.

Remember how that Boss Baby looking bitch ass fucking whore Barnes insisted it was totally the best argument of all time and how anyone who was pointing out how completely fucking retarded it was was wrong?

 

[Arschersetzer]

I imagine it very likely was "uncomfortable" for the Rekieta children as sitting down at a dinner table with an entire family present without one parent being strung out on drugs and the other passed out in their bedroom on benzos would be a bizarre occurrence for them.

But not to worry they're back to dinner with their cokehead father crying about his ex-boyfriend.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

But what would be the point? He is not a legal lawyer anymore. Being a lolcow is what he is and forever be at this point.

All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

It's almost like that bullshit was total moron shit and he completely lost on it because it was retarded.

Remember how that Boss Baby looking bitch ass fucking whore Barnes insisted it was totally the best argument of all time and how anyone who was pointing out how completely fucking retarded it was was wrong?

It absolutely was retarded, as anyone who ever read and dealt with a warrant/Franks argument said at the time. But Nick can't admit it was retarded. Even if he did, it would be couched as him saying that you have to do everything possible in legal proceedings even if they have a low chance of success. Or that they were good arguments but his counsel was bad. We'll never hear Nick say "yeah, my Fourth Amendment rights weren't actually violated and the warrant was completely good." Part of his cope is that he doesn't have to take responsibility for the crime if he can contest the basis for the search and seizure.

Of course, Nick is totally free to prove me wrong and admit that he was flailing at the time. But I think everyone knows that will never happen.

 

[Kosher Dill]

All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.

And in fact, he's probably keeping that one in his back pocket (no, not that one) in case the PO tells him to get a job.
"I am getting a job, Officer, I just need to take these CLE credits in Vegas to get back in good standing!"

 

[PrestonHolt]

All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.

I'd would be really funny if he went through the trouble to get it back, and (if) the cyber crimes stuff would prove he violated attorney client privileges, got fucked over and suspended anyway.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back. He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.

Of course the question is will he?

 

[AnOminous]

I imagine it very likely was "uncomfortable" for the Rekieta children as sitting down at a dinner table with an entire family present without one parent being strung out on drugs and the other passed out in their bedroom on benzos would be a bizarre occurrence for them.

 

[JamFlowMan]

View attachment 7249398

I remember this scene from Resident Evil 7...except the house was cleaner.

 

[Kosher Dill]

View attachment 7249398

When Jake Alley's cooking starts looking like an upgrade. At least it comes with Dr. Pepper.

 

[Ollie Beach]

View attachment 7249398

My guy competing with Cobes on who makes better slop.

 

[Delany's Donkey]

So can anyone tell me what Aaron has supposedly "lied about" and what we've "gotten wrong" now that nick has admitted to literally everything everyone has been saying for 2+ year?

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

All he has to do is take some courses and he can get his license back.

And that's all he's had to do for the last 3 years and x months. And yet.

He is not a convicted felon, there are no major roadblocks that would prevent him from getting the license back.

For what purpose? I wonder.

 

[woodedbag]

So can anyone tell me what Aaron has supposedly "lied about" and what we've "gotten wrong" now that nick has admitted to literally everything everyone has been saying for 2+ year?

aaron lied about eating cum and being in a homosexual relationship with Nick where they pretended it was about banging each other's wives. that's why nick is so hurt if you want to know the truth about it.

 

[CoomerTine]

Did he take the stream down?

Nvm he did a locals stream

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

I'd would be really funny if he went through the trouble to get it back, and (if) the cyber crimes stuff would prove he violated attorney client privileges, got fucked over and suspended anyway.

I mean, I wouldn't want to hire a lawyer if he had hacked into another person's email and read their private attorney-client communications. I don't feel like that attorney would represent me well and not get into trouble while I was paying him. Seems like something a state bar association would take far more seriously than just being a drug felon. If people start thinking lawyers like that were practicing in a state with a small bar of practicing attorneys (much less practicing trial attorneys) like Minnesota, then the state bar would not be very happy. Law is a business, after all.

So it's far more likely that the state bar takes action upon complaints of violating others' attorney-client communications, especially while adverse to them legally, than for the FBI to do anything about it being a crime.