💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.4%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.3%

  • Total voters
    696
Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit.
That would check out if they found only a few metabolites. IIRC the amount of metabolites found corresponds to actual usage.
In perhaps the most shocking revelation, mere hours before Nick's planned triumphant return stream on Youtube and Rumble, documents were leaked to the Farms via a burner account reveling that hair follicle drug testing had indicated that one of the youngest children in the Rekieta household had tested postiive for cocaine metabolites at 10x the false positive threshold.
WTH (1).webp
500mg is the cutoff, ARR tested at a level of over 5000mg.

Why is considering alternative explanations an issue?
They think you're sweeping because 1. they do not know you're a 4chan refugee trying to integrate with forum culture (otherwise your account creation date would be suspect), 2. this topic has already been discussed months ago and 3. it's covered in the OP with sources, so they think you got the idea from Nick, as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody else does either. It's an absolutely bizarre Nick thing. Nick somehow thinks DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDZ around is some huge burden. Nobody else on the face of the planet even understands this.

And it isn't even just normal shit. This faggot, every time he gets pulled over for speeding, immediately starts ranting and raving about DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS around. This is just for normal speeding ticket type things. You can read them in MCRO. He literally starts gibbering and foaming at the mouth about HE KEEEEEDZ every time he gets pulled over to the point it shows up in the trafffic cop's report.

Absolute mental case.
rekieta-bus.webp

No friends, no hobbies and his biggest investment in time is driving his kids.
To paraphrase PWR's motto:
- No life
- No wife
- Hoe wife
- No friends
- No hope...
 
I dunno if other homeschooling parents are credible personal references, their whole thing is that they are doing stuff with kids that they don't want others looking into, but I take your point.
Just saying that this guy showed the signs of being an outlier in a group of outliers. Then the outliers here got mad that I called them that. If you wanna police it, go ahead.
It's just that every now and then I get reports of severely off-topic discussions. Sometimes even I can't help it but join in.
Okay, then, let's focus the homeschooling topic on Nick.
  • Homeschooled kids are more isolated. That's largely the point. Evangelical Christian-based homeschooling (Nick's) literal agenda is to control the curriculum, usually for, say, creationism and originalism wrt the Constitution (Nick taught it at the co-op and espoused his views on his channel). Both are fine arguments, but they should be taught in the context of opposing views (Darwinism & a "living Constitution"). If not, no kid will be properly educated on modern discourse.

  • Nick has a habit of isolating people to control them, as documented by Kayla, April, many fans, Null, etc., whom he instructs to call/email him so he can bully/manipulate them into his worldview.

  • Willmar/Spicer is a solidly red district of MN. In all my fairly exhaustive review of local stories, I've not seen a single serious issue related blue-haired teachers on a trans/non-binary agenda, or porn-filled books in the school libraries. (I recall one male teacher in a town an hour away who was diddling some young kids; he was convicted for a lengthy stay in prison.)

  • Nick's local school district is fairly well ranked in MN, which scores in the top 30% of US states overall.

  • There is a local K-12 Christian private school easily accessible to the Rekietas. Odd that the Rekieta kids aren't given that option until they're teenagers, despite all his whining about driving. I wonder why. (Sarcasm)

  • Nick has a habit of being an outlier, but not in a good way for kids: coke, foreclosure, polycule, swinging resorts, ad hoc Rx self-dosing for supposed sleep disorders, etc, etc, etc.

  • Mandatory reporters are scary for the guilty. For every HORRIBLE story (many) that makes headlines about teachers, I'm willing to bet there are another 100 in which they've acted as righteous mandatory reporters wrt parental abuse (privately handled by the courts so we don't see them). LO! Guess who reported concerns about Nick's kids? A mandatory reporter from the church and teacher, and it was later discovered that one of his kids tested positive for coke.
My point is obvious.

I have a lot of sympathy for parents who choose to homeschool, particularly in blue areas in which school systems are woke-driven (plenty). I see no evidence of that issue in Spicer. That leaves the question of why Nick would choose to homeschool his kids. It's obvious that he wants to control all those around him and has plenty of skeletons to hide.

Edit: Clarity
 
Last edited:
The other posters actually bullied me into reading the OP and it's an absolute treasure trove. Thanks for taking the time to explain and correct me without immediately jumping into an "us vs them" mindset and immediately assuming I'm some kind of "Nick shill".
as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave ARR cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Debate has raged in the thread (spurred by experts, internet experts, and Balldo himself) as to the exact meaning of this result, the effect on the results based upon immature physiology, the type of test, the error associated with the test, and other factors, but what is known is that having even one child out of five test positive is definitely not a good look.
...not that this matters too much; it's just confusing.

I see now that there's no point speculating about the coke test because the news dropped a year ago and everyone here had their fill of discussing it. I apologize for butting in.

That said, a big steamy fart in the face of anyone who thinks they are important enough for someone to come and shill for Nick on KF. Like holy shit, please get over yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Well, yes and no.

Leading theories are 1. Nick gave it to her as a misguided attempt to treat her ADHD (there were murmurings he was saying you could use the drug that way) 2. she copied her parents and did it herself or 3. she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)

However, it is clear that the drug got into her system via direct ingestion.

Also, always read the OP, our users put a lot of effort into those (usually).
 
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave ARR cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.
The alternative would be that someone gave it to the daughter intentionally, which is only supported by conjecture based on Nick/Kayla talking about drugs in a very libertarian manner and Nick at some point discussed the medicinal properties of cocaine. There is no solid evidence that supports the child was given the cocaine intentionally.


To hide his neglect/abuse, to reduce the chance of the kids blabbing, or a mandatory reporter noticing something funny.
The kids went to a school-coop, which is where people saw the neglect and reported it. "Home Schooling" =/= "Home Schooling"
They do not attend a public school, but rather the local self-organized church school thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.
...
There is no solid evidence that supports the child was given the cocaine intentionally.​
OK, now I'm on the same page with you because initially I thought the only theory you were willing to entertain is Nick intentionally drugging his daughter. I discounted that theory because coke-heads aren't known to be generous, but after reading the long list of degeneracy documented in the OP I now realize that nothing should be ruled out completely.

Personally, I don't really care what happens to Nick and, like many others, feel more concern for the kids. Hopefully their mom gets some support from family or the state because she's going to struggle caring for them even if she manages to stay clean. I'll come back to see the discussion when Nick's verdict is announced.

she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)
I always thought coke bullets were just dosage dispensers like picrel that were repurposed from snuff tobacco as opposed to an edible?
Not that it undermines the argument...
sno-4-aluminum-snuff-bullets-copy.webp



While searching to confirm my recollection I stumbled across this 1987 study: "Marijuana and cocaine interactions in humans: cardiovascular consequences"
...a one gram marijuana cigarette (0-2.7% delta 9-THC w/w) was smoked. Cocaine hydrochloride (0-32 mg) was administered intravenously 13 minutes after the start of marijuana smoking...
Born too early to explore the universe; born too late to volunteer for free cocaine/marijuana interaction studies...
 
Well, yes and no.

Leading theories are 1. Nick gave it to her as a misguided attempt to treat her ADHD (there were murmurings he was saying you could use the drug that way) 2. she copied her parents and did it herself or 3. she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)

However, it is clear that the drug got into her system via direct ingestion.

Also, always read the OP, our users put a lot of effort into those (usually).
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
 
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
Her test results exceeded the scale of the test. Trace amounts would not cause that, she either took one very large dose in the timeframe it would remain detectable in her hair, or frequently used cocaine over a longer timeframe.

I think the one large accidental event is more likely, and would coincide with an event where Nick had to skip two streams because of a "family medical emergency" (or something along those lines, I do not remember the exact phrasing) where he had to take care of someone. He must have literally sat at home hoping she would make it, because a trip to an ER would have resulted in immediately CPS involvement and police called.
 
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
Also note that this was only kid out of 5. I would expect one or two others also show somewhat elevated levels if there was that much cross-contamination.
 
Been playing loud music outside the judges house all night to ensure he’s good and cranky this morning. :)
I would have thought you'd be outside the Rekieta compound holding the boombox above your head until Kayla fled into your arms.
Pleading to a charge so that m'ladies go free is surprisingly honorable (?) of Nick to do.
Nothing Nick does is honorable. If he bargained for Kayla and April to get charges dropped as part of his plea it was because he knew they had enough dirt to bury him six feet deep.
The other posters actually bullied me into reading the OP and it's an absolute treasure trove.
Not reading the OP before posting in a thread to ask questions that have already been settled months ago makes you a faggot of the highest order.
 
10 am is sentencing. I hope that @Fapcop bought refundable tickets.
Thank you; I had heard it was tomorrow but I wasn't sure what time. So that'll be 11:00 a.m. EST and and 8:00 a.m. out on the west coast. Got it and thanks again.
If he does get jail time can you imagine how annoying he is going to be for everybody with all his I'm a Lawyer don't you know shit.
If Rekieta gets jail time (and I hope he does) then the attorneys for every inmate who have to serve time in jail with Rekieta should file motions for sentence reduction for each of their clients. The argument could be that having so spend a minute in a jail with Nick Rekieta, unable to escape his whining and complaining and bloviating, should count as three minutes or more. The lawyers can come up with a number referred to as "The Rekieta Annoyance Factor" (such as the 3 minutes of time served for every 1 minute spent with Rekieta) and then make the arguments to the court that each client's sentence should be reduced.
It's only fair.
 
I always thought coke bullets were just dosage dispensers like picrel that were repurposed from snuff tobacco as opposed to an edible?
Not all of them are repurposed snuff bullets. I have been around cocaine addicts, and I saw those little plastic capsules all the time. Kid thinks it's hard candy (especially if it's colored plastic), puts it in her mouth and chews, or just swallows it, it gets released into her system by the plastic breaking open. Maybe she opened it up and just ate the content, thinking it was fizzy powder or something.

I believe this because of the incident that made Aaron reconsider his association with Nick - he had him over at his house and walked in on his kid playing with a cocaine bullet that fell out of Nick's pocket. Since Nick is a stupid fucking retard, I can see him learning NOTHING from this event, not taking any safety precautions, the same situation happening again with his own child, and it finally going wrong.
 
Guy has like five kids all in a church based homeschooling co-op and zero people wrote a letter in support. That's what his local community thinks of him.

It's why the Megan Fox letter comes across as less than helpful to me. Nick ropes in some slapper off the internet to write a letter of support. Another woman who isn't his wife talking about how awesome the swinger/adulterer is. Sure. Fine. But how well can she actually KNOW him? How much time has she spent in his actual presence? I'd be astonished if it's more than two or three days.

On the other hand, you've got all those people who DO know him. People that he worked with when he was a practicing lawyer. Members of his church. Neighbours. People involved in local community projects. People from his homeschool co-op. etc.

Those people are all notable by their silence.

Sure, his wife and his dad are going to say 'Don't send Nick down.' That's what family does, But when it comes to letters in support of his plea in mitigation, the one's that Nick has offered up were as close to worthless as I can imagine.

It's no wonder the guy failed as a lawyer. Poor sap hasn't got a jar of glue.
 
It's why the Megan Fox letter comes across as less than helpful to me. Nick ropes in some slapper off the internet to write a letter of support. Another woman who isn't his wife talking about how awesome the swinger/adulterer is. Sure. Fine. But how well can she actually KNOW him? How much time has she spent in his actual presence? I'd be astonished if it's more than two or three days.

On the other hand, you've got all those people who DO know him. People that he worked with when he was a practicing lawyer. Members of his church. Neighbours. People involved in local community projects. People from his homeschool co-op. etc.

Those people are all notable by their silence.

Sure, his wife and his dad are going to say 'Don't send Nick down.' That's what family does, But when it comes to letters in support of his plea in mitigation, the one's that Nick has offered up were as close to worthless as I can imagine.

It's no wonder the guy failed as a lawyer. Poor sap hasn't got a jar of glue.
As Potentially Criminal / Sean / Subway Boy pointed out onstream, Nick’s dad’s letter is absolute trash.
There’s barely half a sentence admitting Nick did anything wrong, and the rest is just, “muh grandkids, don’t hurt muh grandkids!”
He hardly acknowledges that a crime even took place, let alone shows any genuine remorse on Nick’s behalf (spoiler: there is none). Its stinks worse than dogshit.
 
Last edited:
Yup. And his alternative education tactics of his children are fair game provided that we don't go off-roading into a separate discussion of whether of not that is something worthy to be made fun of to my eyes. But every time this comes up people get REALLY mad. Then it isn't fun anymore. So they get an automatic win just by making things not fun. Not whether other people find it funny which is pretty subjective and most of this site would be shut down if it operated on that basis alone. So here we are.
Anyways, good talk. Stay safe. Keep your hands and feet inside the ride until it comes to a complete stop. Do not consume with alcohol. Don't feed the wildlife.
If you don't like it just start your own Rekieta thread at home.
 
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave Audreyrose cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
So you're advocating Himedall commit defamation without smoking gun evidence?
We know from the test results that Nick allowed his daughter to be exposed to large quantities of cocaine. We don't know the specifics of how that happened.
Contrary to what you might have read about the forum it's not really the culture here to make extreme assumptions without evidence just because we don't like someone.
For example based on your recent post evidence it's clear you're a faggot who should post less and lurk more. However I don't know the specifics of what your favorite technique of sucking dick for cock is. That's a small but important limitation to what I know about you.
 
Back
Top Bottom